Wael Ghonim Speaks

Al Jazeera English clip of what as far as I can tell are Wael Ghonim’s first public comments after being released today, made at his home:

Wael also gave an interview that is making waves across Egypt.

The Guardian — “Facebook campaigner Wael Ghonim strikes a chord on Egyptian television“:

Google executive’s emotional interview after his release hailed as a landmark moment in Egypt revolt

Egyptian Wael Ghonim, talks at his home in Cairo, Egypt, on Monday. Wael Ghonim at his home in Cairo on Monday. Photograph: Ahmed Ali/AP

An emotional television interview given by a young Egyptian Google executive who was arrested after playing a key role in using the internet to spark the uprising against Hosni Mubarak is being hailed as a landmark moment in the ongoing revolt after it struck a chord across Egypt and beyond.

Wael Ghonim, a marketing manager who became a hero to anti-government protestors after he went missing on 27 January, confirmed in the interview following his release that he was behind a highly influential Facebook page that helped lead to what he described as “the revolution of the youth of the internet.”

Before his appearance on Monday on a privately owned Egyptian television channel, the father-of-two was held in repute by many who believed that he was the anonymous activist behind a Facebook page named after a young Egyptian businessman whose death at the hands of police in June set off months of protests.

The page, “We are all Khaled Said“, became one of the main tools for organising the demonstrations that started the revolt in earnest on 25 January.

However, Ghonim’s stature across the country now appears destined to rise dramatically if the post-interview reaction on the internet is anything to go by. Calls are being made for him to stand as president. Others predicted that his performance, which was being acclaimed as a tour de force of calm but explosive political passion, would inevitably boost the numbers of those attending the latest mass demonstration in Cairo’s Tahrir square and elsewhere this morning.

I am not a hero. I only used the keyboard, the real heroes are the ones on the ground. Those I can’t name,” said Ghonim, who sobbed throughout the interview, which ended with him being overcome with emotion as he was shown images of some of those who died in the uprising.

This appears to be the scene at the end where Ghonim becomes overwhelmed and leaves the studio upon being shown images of people who died in the protests:

Translation of Ghonim’s words in the above clip, as provided by a comment left on the youtube:

“I’m so sorry, but I swear by God, we are not to blame. It’s the fault of those in power, who refuse to step down. I want to go.”

I see a longer clip from the interview and even a translated transcript of the full interview, but I caught this retweeted on Mona Eltahawy‘s twitter:

@RamyYaacoub is going to subtitle the Ghonim interview tonight (EST).

RamyYaacoub says the video will be coming up shortly, so I’ll add that when it becomes available.

Also Mona tweeted this about 4 hours ago, and it’s being retweeted a lot:

#Egypt revolution isn’t 1 person but mass uprising. Needs a face or else #Mubarak‘s war of attrition will wearit down. Make @Ghonim face NOW

This is an open thread to discuss the protests in Egypt and other developments in the Middle East.

UPDATES

RamyYaacoub had video editor issues, so he’s just posted his transcript here with timestamps. Also, Alive in Egypt has overlaid captions on the youtubes: Part I | Part 2 | Part 3 | Last Part

And, a memorial page: 1000memories.com — Egypt Remembers.


41 Comments on “Wael Ghonim Speaks”

  1. zaladonis says:

    Calls are being made for him to stand as president.

    A marketing manager who gathered a protest with a Facebook page has now, with a single emotional TV interview, inspired calls for him to be president.

    I’m speechless.

    • Branjor says:

      I guess that’s what happens when there’s a leadership void.

      • Outis says:

        Perhaps it is an emotional response, but when your leaders are corrupt to the core, someone who stands up with courage and nothing but the best of intentions for his country and its people is a far better choice than more elites. Is there something to be said for governing experience? Yes. But the experienced politicians in this country that I trust are in the single digits. It takes too much money and connections to rise to power, so a person that rises from the people looks pretty attactive.

      • bostonboomer says:

        I agree with Outis.

      • Sima says:

        Yes, I too agree, Outis. Isn’t that one of the things that made Mubarak attractive 30 years ago? He was a man of the people, albeit a full life military man. So he could be controlled by the military (or vice versa) but seemed to be ‘normal’ to the people.

      • zaladonis says:

        Good point, Outis, and if this goes anywhere I certainly hope Ghonim is the right person for the challenge.

        My gut response, I have to admit though, is oh geez it’s just like the U.S. All about marketing and emotion rather than substance and reason. I see the Obama social networking and graphics and the people fainting at his rallies – I knew where that was headed and here we are.

        I know it sounds stodgy but I think this would be a real good time for people to call for reason over emotion. As Sima points out, Mubarak came in this way. And experience in how government works might be useful, because IMO if the new President approaches the job as a marketing challenge, look out.

      • Fannie says:

        I would consider him for President, and I don’t even live there.

      • zaladonis says:

        Then if you end up with a President more adept at marketing than governing, you’ve no business being surprised.

    • Sima says:

      Happens all the time here too. That’s kind of how we end up with people like Palin in charge, isn’t it? There’s this mythos that anyone can be President, it takes no real training at all. When ‘anyone’ becomes President though, it’s often a disaster, like Mr. Obama.

      • That’s certainly true for here in the US, but Ghonim was held as a political prisoner for 12 days in the middle of a bloody revolt… Palin and Obama didn’t arise out of something like that. I think this is different.

      • zaladonis says:

        As revolts go it wasn’t all that bloody and 12 days is not even two weeks.

        Come on. I don’t mean to diminish the events here but must everything be Cliff Notes these days? It’s not like he’s been a freedom fighter or organizer or leader for years, he’s a marketing manager for Google who put together a protest on Facebook. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, it deserves kudos, but this “political prisoner in the middle of a bloody revolt” seems an effort to elevate him to Nelson Mandela status.

        12 days as political prisoner does not a President make.

      • I didn’t say he was Nelson Mandela. But there was actual life lost and a real grassroots protest/revolt here as opposed to the faux grassroots that Palin and Obama have going on. Nor did I say he’d make a great president, just that I think he’s different. I just think he’s a genuine figure as a rallying point for the Egyptian protesters at this time. I’m far more interested in the fact that he’s brought new life to the protests and the prediction that he’ll bring more people to Tahrir and other protest areas than the calls for him to be president.

      • zaladonis says:

        Not sure what makes Egyptians gathering in a square “real grassroots” and Americans rallying for Obama and Palin “faux grassroots.” Both groups would insist, and sincerely believe, they are real people with real concerns being addressed by real leaders.

        Ultimately we just have to see how it plays out, but I don’t think it’s insane of me to question if a Google marketing manager is the best person available to be President of Egypt based on a Facebook page and one emotional TV interview. Maybe he is; maybe drawing thousands of people to a city square is a great accomplishment; or maybe it’s what any good marketing/PR person can do.

      • Well from my vantage point, One group is protesting a 30 year dictator and fighting for the right to self-governance and democracy. The other two groups are largely fanclubs, imho. There are fair amount of genuine supporters mixed up with the bot-like supporeters, but they are all still supporters of a personality at this point, rather than much of a series of signature causes, since neither Obama nor Palin really stand for much imho, empty suit, empty skirt, and by now anyone who had grander aspirations for either of them should have ample evidence to the contrary.

        The Egyptian protesters are actually fighting for a cause bigger than one person or figure–they’re fighting for, yes, freedom–as Hillary discussed in her human rights speech at Georgetown, that’s freedom from the oppression of tyranny and freedom from the *oppression of want*.

  2. Mona Eltahawy talking about Ghonim, Wisner, and Suleiman on PBS Newshour… Michael Singh also offers his view:

    • bostonboomer says:

      She looks a lot like Janeanne Garafalo.

    • jawbone says:

      Transcript from NewsHour of above segment.

      MONA ELTAHAWY: It has started to include the military, because although during the first few days, when the military was sent to the streets, they were seen as the kind of noble, honorable figures who were acting as a buffer between the pro-democracy demonstrators and the Mubarak thugs who were sent into the street to beat them, their seeming neutrality has begun — has turned against them.

      And over the past few days, the human rights activists and journalists and bloggers who have been detained were detained by the military police. So, there’s a lot of ill will and bad feeling generally towards the armed forces amongst the pro-democracy demonstrators.

      And they also see as part — you know, the armed and Mubarak and Omar Suleiman, they see them all as one. They see them all as part of a regime. And they do not trust Mubarak and they do not trust Omar Suleiman. And they’re especially worried about the vice president, Omar Suleiman, because they see the United States administration as pushing him as an alternative to Mubarak. And they see the two as one. They do not make a distinction between Suleiman and Mubarak.

      And they are especially worried that basically a dictator is being replaced by a torturer because of Omar Suleiman’s connection to the rendition program by which terrorist suspects were sent to Egypt by the U.S. administration. And Omar Suleiman was said to have overlooked the torture for — of suspects for the United States.

      There’s more, but the interviewer from NewsHour and the other guest studiously avoid her references to Suleiman and torture and rendition. The US actions which the MCMers dare not mention anymore.

      MONA ELTAHAWY: Well, you know, I put it in this — in this sense. I think that the Egyptian regime, Mubarak, Suleiman and the circle around them, is engaged in a war of attrition of sorts with the Egyptian pro-democracy demonstrators, in that they’re digging in their heels. They’re hoping that the population at large says, oh, come on, guys, he said he’s going to leave, as we heard in Margaret’s story; you know, just go home.

      And the pro-democracy demonstrators are determined. And every day, as I said, their numbers increase. I mean, one of the — one of the young people who was instrumental in launching this uprising is a woman called Israa Abdel-Fattah.

      And after Wael Ghonim’s interview, she sent out a tweet saying, tomorrow, we want to see 10 million people all across Egypt, because remember the demonstrators have not been just in Tahrir Square. They have been all across the country. And it’s important to state that, because it’s not just focused on Tahrir Square.

      So, that perseverance and determination has not gone. And they’re really engaged in this kind of one-on-one with Mubarak now. And they want to see more pressure put on him, and cut U.S. military aid to the Mubarak regime, freeze the Mubarak regime’s assets. Mubarak is said to have up to $70 billion of assets across the world.

      And lobbyists — you know, the position of Frank Wisner is a very strange one, because he was sent to be envoy to Egypt. And yet he’s employed by a company that is employed by the Mubarak regime. So, we have got a lot of conflicts of interest going here. And we can leverage all of those things to help the pro-democracy demonstrators.

      My emphasis throughout quotes.

  3. # Via Scarce: Wael @Ghonim said wld sing this song to himself during 12-day detention, blindfolded http://bit.ly/gGOEjV #Jan25

  4. Dima_Khatib:

    1. So if “reform” government, newly appointed, is trying to impress the world with “reform” (as assigned by WHouse), well : in vain! #jan25 1 minute ago via web
    2. Last year salary raise between 10-20% so nothing extraordinary in 15% ! Just that this year: effective in April instead of June/July #jan25 4 minutes ago via web
    3. You must have heard about 15% salary raise in #Egypt. But did you know this raise is annual? And mandatory in Labour Law? #jan25 #egypt 6 minutes ago via web

  5. bostonboomer says:

    Thanks for the updates, Wonk.

  6. bostonboomer says:

    OT: Ed Rendell is breaking up with his wife. Too bad Pat lost interest in him.

    Maybe his wife was a Hillary supporter and couldn’t take his sudden flip flop to Obama.

  7. bostonboomer says:

    Also OT: Jane Harmon is quitting and there will be a special election to replace her.

    Plus, the scourge of Obots, the DLC, is going out of business.

    I guess the DLC’s work is done now that Obama is in the WH–even tho Obots still claim they didn’t support him.

    • Sima says:

      Comment from the article about the DLC:

      ‘Corporate America has spoken and is putting all their chips on the other side of the aisle.’ So true, so true.

  8. Outis says:

    This is such an interesting discussion with so many valid points. And while I agree with Zaldonis, I wouldn’t trust a “Marketing” person as far as I could throw them (I battled them like dragons in my former corporate life), I will go out on a limb and state he is just a manager, so he’s probably a guy who needed a paycheck, not a marketing genius like Axelrod.

    I guess I am truly hoping the protesters prevail and are able to take their country back. After the protests in Europe failed, I’ve been hoping so much that the people can prevail, somehow, somewhere. Because I know that deep down, I hope it is possible here too and that people will see others succeed and will stand up. I wish all the protesters in every country right now, who are showing more courage than myself or any of my neighbors, the very best. Solidarity to the highest.

    • What Outis said x 2

      • Sima says:

        x 3.

        I want the Egyptians to succeed. I want them to gain Democracy as they want it, not as we Americans define it. I suspect it’ll be closer to our ideal than it would seem at this point.

        I see the similarities between the ‘youth’ movement in Egypt and the Palin and Obama movements, but there are vast differences. No-one is dying here for Obama or Palin, and I bet no-one would. Also, Obama leads his movement, Palin hers. As we’ve discussed, no-one seems to be outright leader of the Egyptian movement. This can be bad, this can be good. I’m afraid they are doomed, I’m hopeful they succeed. I swing back and forth between hope and depression for them.

        And it feels really sort of dishonest to be evaluating, almost judging, what they are trying to do while sitting on my butt in a chair in a warm room before a computer. Maybe I need to go to the next sympathy rally in Seattle…

    • zaladonis says:

      I guess I am truly hoping the protesters prevail and are able to take their country back.

      Everybody here hopes the protesters succeed in taking their country back, I would hope that’s a given among us. I’m feeling a little like I did during the 2008 primaries and first 18 months of Obama’s presidency — like if I express reasoned concern that veers from the echo chamber, that somehow makes me against the protesters or complicit in thwarting their effort to gain Democratic elections and a prosperous economy.

      My concern for them is the same concern I have for Americans, that with power they make smart choices. I hope Wael Ghonim or whomever they choose as leader leads them well.

      Sima, you say nobody here is dying for Obama. The circumstances of Egypt today and the U.S. in 2008 are vastly different, but I went to an Obama rally and I know as well as I’m typing here now that many, if not the majority, would have eagerly put themselves in harm’s way, even died, to protect and defend him, to see their dream realized. I hope you attended one of his 2008 rallies, if not you missed an amazing event, the type that’s both exhilarating and terrifying. Exciting because a crowd of people gathered with passion over a single vision, and terrifying because it’s fueled by passion over a single man.

      Hating Mubarak is justified but Mubarak is by no means the only problem Egyptians have to deal with. And while it would be spectacular if a Google marketing manager turned out to be a hero leading Egyptians to free elections and prosperous economy and national security – wouldn’t that be something! – I stand by my observations and evaluation so far.

      • bostonboomer says:

        Zal,

        You should stand by your evaluation. It makes all the sense in the world.

        Of course we all hope, at an emotional level, that the protesters are successful. But it’s obvious to me that they missed the SOGOP moment.

        And clearly they should have met with Suleiman (if they were invited–were they?), if only to stay in the loop. Now the Muslim Brotherhood has pretty much eclipsed them in terms of the real world situation.

    • zaladonis says:

      And BTW, I’m not saying I don’t trust Wael Ghonim because he’s a marketing person. I’m saying the people choosing a 31 year old marketing manager on the slim strength of his having gathered a protest through a Facebook page and being emotional in a TV interview is worrisome because they’re being pretty much as indiscriminate as those who cheered Mubarak 30 years ago. It’s not what he knows or may have a talent for that’s troubling, it’s whether or not he has what’s needed to navigate the very complex circumstances and challenges ahead for the next President.

      • bostonboomer says:

        Or as indiscriminate as those who supported Obama despite his lack of experience because he could read a speech off a teleprompter?

      • zaladonis says:

        Yes exactly, bb.

      • jmacwa says:

        If he is chosen, it will be because the powers that be “market” him to the people. Marketing is a science (art???) that I wish had never been perfected.

      • Did you even watch the interview?

      • The reason I ask is bc in the interview he passionately stands up against being accused of being a traitor of Egypt simply for asking for their rights to self-governance and democracy. I think these are the the types of things that struck a chord with people. Not the fact that he created a facebook page. He’s a rallying point right now–Nothing more nothing less.

  9. I added Part 3 and Last Part youtube links from Alive in Egypt to the updates.

    Also, if the following is authentic, then here’s a very interesting Statement issued by The Faculty of Law at Cairo University (scroll down page to see the translation on-site):

    Statement from Cairo University- faculty of law
    Issued from the discussion forum held on 7/2/2011 around legal and constitutional solutions to meet the needs of the Peoples revolution

    On Monday the 7th of February 2011 the professors of the faculty of law at Cairo university met and after many fruitful discussions and thorough analysis of the parameters of constitutional thought and what is best for our country in order for it to correspond with the great leap & the revolution of the Youth of the Nation which has both been welcomed and backed by many communities within the nation , presented to the nation from a pure conscience and in reaction to the new developments that have affected the entire nation’s sentiments . Presented here to the great Egyptian nation are the results which the forum has reached in regards to what must be done for the good of the nation at this historical juncture in our beloved country
    The forum has reached the following conclusions:

    Firstly : To completely support and back The revolution of the 25th of January which was sparked by the pure and uncorrupted Youth of Egypt in which all the diverse communities of Egypt joined to demand freedom , democracy and the sovereignty of the law , the achievement of social justice and calling to account the corrupt and those who have hindered the fate of this nation and honoring the blood of the martyrs which was spilt in the cause of the nations freedom and upholding the dignity of the citizen.

    Secondly – Withdrawing all legitimacy from the current regime

    Thirdly – Calling upon the President of the Republic to comply with the will of the nation as expressed by the public

    Fourth – The Necessity of the instant dissolution of both Parliament and the Shura Council due to the impossibility of their meeting as a result of final sentences issued from the High Constitutional court which nullify the results of the elections in many constituencies

    Fifth- A call for the creation of a founding committee devoted to the creation of a new constitution that is in accordance with the current phase, with the condition that all political ideologies are represented in this committee as well as civil society organizations and all Egyptian communities

    Sixth – The delegation of all presidential powers to the vice president, as permitted by Articles 82 and 139 of the constitution in accordance with their correct interpretation

    Seventh – The expansion of the current structure of the government in order for it to be an interim government dedicated to the nations recovery

    Eighth- The issuance of decrees from the republic which would create laws that launch the right to create political parties and allowing citizens the rights of election and nomination for public office

    Ninth- The swift restructuring of the state authorities in accordance with the new constitution

    Tenth – The immediate termination of the enforcement of the Emergency law

    Signed on behalf of the attendees
    Dr Ahmed Awad Belal
    Dean of the Faculty of Law

  10. jawbone says:

    I looked for the rolling updates which BBC and The Guardian both had up through yesterday. Today, neither has such a feature.

    Interesting but…in any way meaningful? I really can’t know. But…could mean Suleiman is a done deal and whatever the people of Egypt do (who are not MOTU level) no longer really matters? So, best to go with the US/British line? Oh, I do feel so skeptical….

    The Telegraph has covered the WikiLeaks State Dept. cables where Israel and US agree Suleiman should be the next leader of Egypt; that was back in 2008.

    Nice touch that he has a secret hotline to Isreali government figures, said he would allow Israeli soldiers to invade Egypt to go after Hamas, and guaranteed he could prevent elections in Gaza. Obama needs guys like him.

    The Awl reports on piece by UC prof which includes allegaton Suleiman tortured one US rendered detainee himself.

    “The extraordinary rendition program landed some people in CIA black sites—and others were turned over for torture-by-proxy to other regimes. Egypt figured large as a torture destination of choice, as did Suleiman as Egypt’s torturer-in-chief. At least one person extraordinarily rendered by the CIA to Egypt — Egyptian-born Australian citizen Mamdouh Habib — was reportedly tortured by Suleiman himself … In October 2001, Habib was seized from a bus by Pakistani security forces. While detained in Pakistan, at the behest of American agents, he was suspended from a hook and electrocuted repeatedly. He was then turned over to the CIA, and in the process of transporting him to Egypt he endured the usual treatment: his clothes were cut off, a suppository was stuffed in his anus, he was put into a diaper—and ‘wrapped up like a spring roll’. In Egypt, as Habib recounts in his memoir, My Story: The Tale of a Terrorist Who Wasn’t, he was repeatedly subjected to electric shocks, immersed in water up to his nostrils and beaten. His fingers were broken and he was hung from metal hooks. At one point, his interrogator slapped him so hard that his blindfold was dislodged, revealing the identity of his tormentor: Suleiman.” (My italics and underlining)

    Sounds like our kind of strong man! Smooth as silk to the outside world; a real tyrant on the inside.

    From Al Jazeera article by Prof. Lisa Hajjar, first appearing in Jadaliyya.

    • jawbone says:

      Well, Glenn Greenwald must be feeling better, making good progress in getting over his dengue fever, as he’s on top of the two articles I noted, plus works in how the NYTimes sets forth Obama et al’s actions. And, he pulls in the background articles available. Usual fine job.

      His closing paragraph shows our MCM is in fine stenography mode, verging on hagiography of Suleiman the Torturer. (Have US publications mentioned those WikiLeaks’ cables?)

      …the fact that American policy has “changed” from imposing Mubarak on that country to imposing someone with Suleiman’s vile history and character belongs at the forefront of every discussion, especially ones purporting to examine who he is. Praising Suleiman for his “valued analysis” and commitment to fighting The Terrorists while neglecting to mention these other critical facts — as today’s NYT article does — is misleading on multiple levels.