Wednesday Evening Reads: Boxer steps up for women and Romney steps back on Blunt
Posted: February 29, 2012 | Author: JJ Lopez aka Minkoff Minx | Filed under: 2012 primaries, Accommodation and Compromise, birth control, Congress, fetus fetishists, fundamentalist Christians, Health care reform, legislation, Mitt Romney, PLUB Pro-Life-Until-Birth, Psychopaths in charge, Religious Conscience, religious extremists, Reproductive Health, Reproductive Rights, SDB Evening News Reads, Senate, the GOP, Violence against women, War on Women, Women's Healthcare, Women's Rights | Tags: Barbara Boxer, Blunt Amendment, Women in News Media, Women Writers |22 CommentsGood Evening
There have been destructive storms throughout the midwest, watch out they may be heading your way.
Massive storm system claims 9 lives in Midwest, heads east – CNN.com
A powerful storm system, which left a trail of destruction and nine deaths in its wake across the Midwest, moved Wednesday evening into the Mid-Atlantic region, putting more communities at risk.
The storms first hit before dawn, with one tornado packing 170 mph winds as it smashed Harrisburg, Illinois, killing six. A smaller tornado caused significant damage in the music resort city of Branson, Missouri.
Nearly 200 people were hurt, authorities said Wednesday.
We are expecting bad weather here in Banjoland, I can hear the distant rumbling…
More activity was possible in northern Alabama, extreme northern Georgia, southern and eastern Kentucky, northern Mississippi, western North Carolina and much of Tennessee, according to CNN meteorologist Sean Morris.
So this is going to be a short post, the electricity goes out so easy here…with so many trees, if one large branch falls in the wind it can create a domino effect.
I am so disgusted with Democrats who act like republicans, Sen. Manchin will vote for Blunt amendment on contraceptive care – The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) will vote for Sen. Roy Blunt’s (R-Mo.) amendment on the Obama administration’s contraception mandate.
“While I would have preferred that both sides would have come together around a solution like we had in West Virginia, I am voting in favor of this measure to protect the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America,” Manchin said in a statement.
Manchin also notes that in his home state, West Virginia law requires contraceptive coverage but also guarantees “religious freedom for employers or institutions that object to such services.” The law requires health insurance companies to also provide contraceptive care but exempts religious institutions that object based on “religious tenets.”
He must not have listened to Boxer’s speech today:
msnbc video: Democrats attack GOP war on women
…it is pure partisan politics and we are here today to say it is not going to pass. the right wing of the republican party does not speak for most of the women in this country.
She kicked ass today on the floor…I have tried to find a video clip of her…but couldn’t.
Romney stuck his foot in it again, first he comes out against Blunt and then he is for it. Romney comes out against `Blunt-Rubio’ – The Plum Line – The Washington Post
I just got off the phone with Heath, and he graciously played me the audio. Heath asks Romney if he’s for the “Blunt-Rubio” amendment, and defines it. Romney replies:
“I’m not for the bill. But, look, the idea of presidential candidates getting into questions about contraception within a relationship between a man and a woman, husband and wife, I’m not going there.”
That’s pretty remarkable. If Romney knew what he was saying, the Senate GOP caucus, which is set to vote on this amendment tomorrow, may feel as if Romney has pulled the rug out from underneath them. And this has become an important issue for conservatives. So it’ll be interesting to see how the base reacts to this, particularly since the GOP primary is anything but over and Rick Santorum — who’s perceived as a more reliable social conservative — is likely to use this to attack Romney, who will be under continued pressure to connect with social and religious conservatives.
Then, as usual, he backtracked his comment.
UPDATE II: It’s not clear which bill Romney opposes. It was described to him as “Blunt-Rubio,” which is a term some use to refer to the Blunt amendment, because Rubio co-sponsored. But the bill was described to Romney more narrowly, in keeping with another Rubio amendment that just focuses on contraception. The question is what Romney was opposing when he said, “I’m not for the bill.”
UPDATE III: The Romney camp now says he’s for it:
“Regarding the Blunt bill, the way the question was asked was confusing,” a spokesman told TPM. “Governor Romney supports the Blunt Bill because he believes in a conscience exemption in health care for religious institutions and people of faith.”
I guess the question was a bit convoluted, as the Blunt Amendment and the Rubio version are worded a bit differently .
However, it still does not excuse the fact that Romney is an ass.
One more link for you. It is a very good piece about the number of women writing, or lack of women writing, for the news media: Do Women Count?
Here is the answer.
Apparently, not in the news media.
Yesterday, after I made some snarky comment, a friend asked me if I was Eeyore. The truth is, I’m a mash-up of Eeyore and Tigger. Tigger bounces up and down gleefully whenever I talk about gay rights. But today I’m talking about the ladies again, so get ready for Eeyore.
The online magazine VIDA just released its count of female::male bylines in influential literary and political outlets—”thought leader” magazines, as they’re called. The numbers are absolutely dismal. In The New Yorker and The Atlantic, there are nearly three male bylines to one female. In The New Republic, the byline ratio is four to one. In Harper’s, it’s five to one.
VIDA’s introduction and its press release say nice cheerful things, like, “But we at VIDA aren’t discouraged by this fact—we know that significant cultural change takes time.”
But time isn’t making significant changes. Well, okay, in 2005, the Columbia Journalism Review found that the byline ratio in The New Yorker was 3.5 to one, and in The Atlantic it was six to one, so yes, things have inched up a bit. (In The Atlantic, though, consider which women are writing. As Caryl Rivers notes in her dead-on analysis called “The Atlantic’s Woman Problem,” “The leitmotif of much of what the Atlantic publishes about women is that female gains are dangerous—to children, to families, to marriages, to themselves, and to men.” I have a great editor at The Atlantic Online who has assigned me some very interesting stories. But she’s female—and outnumbered.) But women actually make up more than 50 percent of English literature and journalism school graduates. We’re not talking about Larry Summers’ leaky science pipeline here. We’re talking about the subject at which girls are, stereotypically, supposed to be outstanding, and where they concentrate in high numbers: reading and writing.
Please…I encourage you to read the rest of this article by EJ Graff. In this anti-woman environment, her article really makes a point about the attitude women have been fighting against for years, and the lack of progress we have made…depressing but needs to be said.
Have a safe evening, and be aware of any serious weather that might be heading your way!
A few more links:
I believe Ralph mentioned this earlier today:
North Korea Agrees to Suspend Nuclear Work, U.S. Says – NYTimes.com
The GOP really is grasping at straws: RealClearPolitics – Odds of a Brokered Convention Are Increasing
And in Europe, the cold weather is causing more deaths:
Fuel poverty deaths three times higher than government estimates – Home News – UK – The Independent
One more, Obama camp hits Romney for supporting Blunt amendment | The Raw Story
Great post MM. Romney is such a fool!
I would urge anyone who has a chance to watch Rachel Maddow’s show this evening, maybe when it repeats later. Her initial segment about politics in the US and why we are where we are is just plain brilliant. The segment’s title is “They went that a way”.
Her interview when she received the Steinbeck Award this weekend was also very good and is available online. It’s very long but I thought it was well worth watching.
Joe Manchin is predicted by her hypotheses on politics in America.
Saw pieces of it & she’s exactly right. The further to the right the Repugs run, the more the Dumbs follow them. Hell, if the right (& Fox) are going to call ALL Dumbs Liberals, then let them do something really Liberal. Make the damn Repugs chase them for once. I’ve said for years that every movement needs a really radical element to get the opposition to sit down at the table & talk to those they consider reasonable. But if you start “reasonable” you will be labeled as The Radicals. It sure worked for a while with PETA as the super radicals in animal rights – it helped HSUS make some gains with establishment types. This is why Obama should have started health care with single payer on the table. The final bill would have been much better. The Dumbs play chess with the Repugs by first removing all their pawns from the board. DUMB – DUMB – DUMB.
I guess you really missed a lot of the point. She wasn’t talking about some negotiating strategy but about the difference in structure between the parties. The fact is there is a long term conservative movement while there really is not a liberal movement in the US.
As can be seen from the 2008, and earlier, elections Democrats tend to coalesce around candidates and be supportive of “their” candidate in spite of some policy differences. Republicans are 180 opposed from that. They support policies and, in the final analysis, don’t care a lot about the identity of the candidate. That’s not necessarily the case with the newer tea partiers but they’re not established Republicans and will never be in the current party.
Thanks for filling in the details. I tried to stay up to watch the repeat, but didn’t make. Hipefully it will be posted online & I’ll be able to watch it.
I posted this earlier but I don’t know if anyone read it. If not, that’s a shame because it’s one case of Obama doing the right thing for a good reason.
How Obama Ignored The NDAA’s Military Custody Provision
Yeah, it was interesting!
I want to study it further.
I’ll be interested in your opinion. It sounds good but you never know now.
The NDAA is simply wrong, American’s rights to a trial, right to be charged, and not to be locked as if in a dictatorship will lead us down the road to ruin…land of the not so free. Our media has failed us when the only person covering it is Mark Fiore.
Obama codified Legal Easy of NDAA …bye Constitution
You didn’t read the story, did you?
Franklin Graham apologizes for questioning Obama’s Christian creds: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/28/franklin-graham-apologize-obama-faith-race_n_1307758.html Black Christian leaders called him out on his racism & accused him of “bearing false witness.” When is someone going to call Mr. Sanctimonious out for the same thing?
I thought this was an interesting article from Alternet this morning: http://www.alternet.org/belief/154330/5_great_moments_in_history_that_could_teach_christian_zealots_important_lessons/
& this one too: http://www.alternet.org/news/154296/corseted_minds%3A_does_fear_of_irrelevance_send_conservative_men_fleeing_to_the_victorian_age/
Minx, I hope the storm passed you by and you’re okay.
Romney’s only principle
Gene Lyons has Willard’s Number.
U.S. District Court Judge sends racially-charged e-mail about Obama.
Naturally, he’s a GW Bush appointee.
I consider him a despicable racist and, from the comments, so do the readers of that story.
He shouldn’t be on the bench. How can he hear cases involving African Americans after this?
If he has any integrity, he’ll resign. I’m not gonna hold my breath though.
Balloon Juice: WE HAVE LIFTOFF
Sometimes John Cole cracks me up.