Hurricane Irony: Lame Press Coverage

I’m hoping that all of you on the East Coast had an uneventful Hurricane Irene visit.  It’s always a pain to lose electricity and some tree branches, but hey, as I’ve been hearing all day today, it could’ve been worse.   I seriously can’t believe the coverage this weekend.  You’d have thought the martians had landed.  I think the corporate media out did itself.  So, I’m putting up any open thread so you can share your stories and I’m also putting up what I considered some of the most offensive press moments of the week.

My number one choice for stupid press tricks was who ever thought to call Ray Nagin on to the media circuit as a preparedness guru.  Remember, Ray Ray,  he was the mayor of New Orleans that basically put all the city buses right in the most flood prone sections of the city and hid in the penthouse of the Sheraton Hotel until the President showed up to offer him a shower about 5 days after landfall.  It gave all of us at Rising Tide 6 a source of endless jokes.

No, this wasn’t meant to be a joke. Although many believe the 2005 response to Hurricane Katrina was a colossal failure at every level of government, former New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin appeared on MSNBC on Friday to offer preparedness advice for those in Hurricane Irene’s path.

Speaking with Martin Bashir, Nagin gave government agencies and their leaders high marks for their preparations. But he said only time will tell if the public follows their instructions.

“[I] think they’re doing an excellent job of alerting the public, which is one of the main things you need to do. One of the problems they’re having on the East Coast is that they have not experienced a storm like this in so long, so there are going to be many people who may not heed the warnings, or may move too late to try and evacuate. And that is when the drama will unfold.”

Nagin didn’t deny that he made some errors with Katrina in 2005. But he put much of the blame on New Orleanians themselves:

“Well, I would tell you this, Martin: It was a historic, catastrophic event … “[N]ow that I have had a chance to really go back and take a look, there are a number of things that I think that I could have done better. But in an evacuation situation where a catastrophic storm is approaching, the leader has one responsibility, but also the citizen has a responsibility to heed the warnings and act appropriately.”

My second lame press trick of the Hurricane coverage was how Geraldo Rivera couldn’t suppress his disappointment that there wasn’t more mayhem and death.  Every time I tried to find something on TV other than hurricane coverage, I would eventually see Geraldo.  The look on his face said “Damn! It’s empty again!!” every time I saw him.

Number three is up there on the Youtube.  That’s the Sea Foam covered Tucker Barnes in Ocean City telling us how he smells while reporting because he’s taking a sea foam shower.  If it doesn’t smell great and it’s coming in during flooding, chances are you don’t really want to be covered in it.
Number four is Howard Kurtz’s pronouncements that are just lame by definition:  “Cable news was utterly swept away by the notion that Irene would turn out to be Armageddon”.  No Howard, they were utterly swept away because it’s always all about them and this was doubly so.

The fact that New York, home to the nation’s top news outlets, was directly in the storm’s path clearly fed this story-on-steroids. Does anyone seriously believe the hurricane would have drawn the same level of coverage if it had been bearing down on, say, Ft. Lauderdale?

The symbiotic relationship between television and local officials played a huge role. Chris Christie, the New Jersey governor who was all over television on Sunday morning, had drawn saturation coverage with his blunt warnings to “get the hell off the beach.” New York’s mayor, Michael Bloomberg, who ordered evacuations of low-lying areas, has been a constant presence. President Obama and FEMA officials made sure to generate their share of news as well.

These officials have a responsibility to plan for worst-case scenarios, of course, but something more blatantly political is at work. Mayors and governors need to be seen as on top of the crisis, which means being visible on the tube. No one wants to be the next Ray Nagin or Heckuva Job Brownie, looking disorganized after Katrina. A badly handled snowstorm has contributed to more than one mayor’s defeat.

The blizzard of press conferences, in turn, enable the networks to keep their “Breaking News” banners up and furnished a sense of drama for a story that otherwise consisted of reporters on streets where the hurricane was expected to strike and weather experts with their maps in climate-controlled studios.

All I can say is that we’re lucky there is better stuff on the internet these days.  Otherwise, no one on the east coast would’ve probably gotten some real information at all.

This is an open thread, so have at it!!!


9 Comments on “Hurricane Irony: Lame Press Coverage”

  1. Nabil says:

    The only thing worse than media coverage is damn Yankees now proud that they’ve survived both an earthquake and a hurricane.

    • dakinikat says:

      I’ve decided that newsrooms must give out merit badges like the scouts.

    • bostonboomer says:

      We’ve had far worse hurricanes up here than that thing, but if they didn’t affect NYC, you probably never heard about them. Trust me, we’ve had tons of blizzards in the Boston area worse than Irene that killed and flooded out more people. But we don’t get that kind of 24/7 media coverage of our extreme weather events. Even MSNBO canceled their prison break shows and stayed on all night interviewing weather channel people.

      My pick for most bizarre was when a weatherman on MSNBO tried to make 50-mph winds sound dangerous. “The wind could pick up something on the street like a stick or piece of trash and turn it into a lethal projectile.” LOL! If that happened, there would be frequent deaths and injuries from “lethal projectiles” in Boston and Cambridge almost year round.

  2. Minkoff Minx says:

    Aside from the guy who went and flashed the weather channel live shot, I have to say the one that got me disgusted was the reporter who was on the Jersey Shore and he interviewed 3 young women, one of which was named Irene. I don’t know, but it looked like the reporter was working hard to “pick up” the chick named Irene, the flirting was so damn obvious…I felt like I was watching Singled Out or Love Connection…

    Yes the media coverage was over the top…but look at all the stuff it kept from being reported on…the BP leak, no jobs, crappy economy…etc.
    And hey, Obama got to look all in charge at the hurricane center, yup…I bet the administration is pleased with this weekends news coverage.

    Aside from all the hype, there has been a lot of damage and people lost their lives. CNN is reporting 20 deaths due to Irene, and in Philadelphia, seven buildings collapsed. I would rather be evacuated and deal with less disaster…but that is just me.

    • bostonboomer says:

      I have no objection to the preparations and evacuations, although I just heard on NPR that people in NY are complaining about Bloomberg’s overkill of forcing 300,000+ people out of their homes.

      My objection was to the 24/7 coverage of the storm just because it affected Washington and NYC. We in New England don’t get that kind of coverage for far worse storms and neither does any other part of the country except perhaps CA. There certainly wasn’t that kind of coverage of the approach of Hurricane Katrina. But now we really know for sure–everything is all about the media a political elites all the time.

  3. Branjor says:

    News coverage was hyped and over the top, as has happened in the past. My friends and I were discussing it while watching News12 New Jersey Saturday night while nothing much beyond rain and some wind gusts were happening outside. We were also getting frequent tornado warnings but nothing ever hit (thank heavens). Had to put it off after a while, as it got to be too much. OTOH, if it had been bad and they hadn’t warned us, people would have wanted their heads on a platter too. Anyway, I think it was good that we got substantial coverage of it locally, but the rest of the country could have been spared the news saturation. I would rather see that type of coverage for something like Hurricane Katrina. Anyway, we had a good time and are very grateful to have been spared a major disaster.

    • bostonboomer says:

      I’m very glad that it wasn’t a major disaster. From what I’ve seen on TV though, the NJ shore had some bad flooding. If Wolf Blitzer lived there, it would have gotten some coverage.