Send in the Clowns! OOPS! I mean the Anchors from those so-called major News Networks!
Posted: July 17, 2008 Filed under: No Obama | Tags: Afghanistan, iran, IRAQ, MSM echo chamber, MSM fullfers for Obama, Obama 2 CommentsNo one can question the role of the MSM as fluffers for Obama any more. Senator John McCain spent the last leg of the primary season tromping around the middle east with Senators Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman in tow. I recall there was media present because Lieberman had to correct McCain several times about the difference between Al Quaeda and Shite insurgents supported by Iran. However, I do not recall that the trailers included ALL THREE Anchors of each of the non cable networks. This is the same group that I used to rely on for truth about Vietnam, Nixon, and Watergate. Wither art thou Walter Cronkite?
This is an even bigger shocker! I heard this from Greta Van Susteren on FOX. Oh, the SHAME! I’m admitting to watching FOX now in public! I first learned that the three amigos will be trotting around the globe with the anointed one from Greta on Fox after I got home from teaching a freshman seminar on Monetary Policy. I did not read it first from my subscription to the NY Times. I didn’t even hear it from my ol’ ninth ward slummin’, Vaughn’s visitin’, Ketel one drinkin’ friend Anderson Cooper or his producer Jamie! I’m still trying to find my bearings right now because I can’t BELIEVE I heard this from GRETA (http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/07/17/oh-oh-how-does-the-media-yes-the-media-explain-this-one/) before I heard it from Anderson Cooper or read it in the TIMES but I also have to say, I think the world is upside down at the moment. I think the gravitational pull of the earth has been disrupted somehow.
I’ll quote from the NY TImes out of habit and the fact I pay damn good money for my subscription.
Media Stars Will Accompany Obama Overseas
But when Senator Barack Obama heads for Iraq and other places overseas this summer, Mr. Williams is planning to catch up with him in person, as are the other two network evening news anchors, Charles Gibson of ABC and Katie Couric of CBS, who, like Mr. Williams, are far along in discussions to interview Mr. Obama on successive nights.
And while the anchors are jockeying for interviews with Mr. Obama at stops along his route, the regulars on the Obama campaign plane will have new seatmates: star political reporters from the major newspapers and magazines who are flocking to catch Mr. Obama’s first overseas trip since becoming the presumptive Democratic nominee. A “Meet the Press” interview is also being planned.
The extraordinary coverage planned for Mr. Obama’s trip, though in part solicited by aides, reflects how the candidate remains an object of fascination in the news media, a built-in feature of being the first black presidential nominee for a major political party and a relative newcomer to the national stage.
But the coverage also feeds into concerns in Mr. McCain’s campaign, and among Republicans in general, that the news media are imbalanced in their coverage of the candidates, just as aides to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton felt during the primary season.
Well, we know it’s an oddity when Obama takes a trip over seas to learn something, let alone something remotely related to working. We know that his senatorial duties overseeing the NATO commitment to Afghanistan have been scarce to nonexistent. We know now that Obama missed many of the higher level meetings on Iraq and when he did attend 1 out of 3 meetings, he asked about something other than Afghanistan. He never held a meeting for the sub-committee for which he holds the chairmanship. While trying to back Obama up, Joe Biden actually lets slip how badly Obama’s carried out any senatorial duties at all. But what do you expect from some one who has gotten more than full time pay for holding down part time jobs? Did we mention these were part time jobs he can’t even show up for?
This from ABC’s Jack Trapper today. ( source: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/)
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and his allies have been hitting Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, for not holding any hearings to examine the role of NATO in Afghanistan in his perch as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs.
“He’s never had a hearing,” McCain said Tuesday, “so I am not surprised that all he has done is said, ‘Well, we need more troops.'”
In a letter to Obama earlier this week, McCain-backing Sen. Jim DeMint R- SC, wrote, “With oversight of NATO relations and its role in Afghanistan, I believe it is time for us to focus closely on these issues,” DeMint wrote, suggesting a meeting of the subcommittee upon Obama’s return from a much anticipated trip abroad.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joe Biden, D-Del., had previously told Meet the Press that “the reason Obama didn’t hold a hearing on NATO, I chair the committee. Every one of those committee hearings are held at full committee.”
But today Biden decided to take his defense of Obama one step further, writing to DeMint that there have been plenty of hearings on European Affairs, they’ve just been held at the “full committee level.”
“On the particular issue of NATO’s mission in Afghanistan,” Biden wrote, “We have held three Full Committee hearings in the last 22 months: one under Senator Lugar’s chairmanship (September 21, 2006: “From Coalition to ISAF Command in Afghanistan: The Purpose and Impact of the Transition”), and two undermine (March 8, 2007: “Afghanistan: Time for a New Strategy?” and January 21, 2008: “Afghanistan: A Plan to Turn the Tide?”). At all three of these hearings, we were fortunate enough to have the expert testimony—in addition to other witnesses, both in and out of government— of former NATO commander and Supreme Allied Commander-Europe, Gen. James R. Jones (USMC, ret.).”
But Biden’s letter brought attention to the fact that Obama did not attend two of those three hearings — and for the third, on March 8, 2007, Obama only asked one question, one unrelated to Afghanistan.
So we have the least knowledgable person on earth about the status of Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan whose knowledge basically comes from what he reads from teleprompters leading three other folks with limited knowledge that basically comes from what they read from teleprompters on a tour of the world. I now know completely where that old phrase ‘the blind leading the blind’ originates.
Come some one please wake me from this extremely bad dream. Especially the one where I flip the channel to AC and watch him announce how Bill Clinton is fully behind the Obamanation from Illionois. Hell must’ve frozen over. I’m watching Fox and Bill Clinton is saying polite things on tv about Barack Obama and oh, did I mention crude oil has gone below $130 a barrel?
And now awaiting your approval: Dumb and Dumber
Posted: June 24, 2008 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: foreign policy, gaddifi, kim jong il, mccain, Obama 7 CommentsHave you notice the quality of discourse on issues has gone decidedly downhill since the candidates given ‘get home free passes’ by the media during the primary are what we now seem stuck with? As an economist, I’m still waiting for one of them to actually say something about economic policy other than the usual discourse on taxes and spending. As a citizen, I’m thinking about building a bomb shelter in my backyard.
I can only second this sentiment by the International Herald Tribune on what small details the two have offered up to date.
“McCain is placating economic conservatives in the Republican party by promising tax cuts that would lead to a fiscal nightmare. Obama is pandering to labor with protectionist threats that would endanger relations with important trading partners.”
The one thing I will point to is this telling Obama candidate-of-change sidebar:
“Obama is backtracking somewhat on Nafta, and if he wins, don’t be surprised if he gives a green light to Democratic congressional leaders to pass the Colombia trade pact in a lame-duck session.”
source:http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/22/america/letter.php
I’m completely buying this one since the FISA sell-out. Remember we already had the wink, wink, nudge, nudge moment with Goolsbee and the Canadian ambassador as a preview.
I’m just waiting to get my hands on the new issue of Forbes which supposedly has a side-by-side comparison. I’ve gleaned both of their sites, and believe me, they both supposedly have economic advisors. Now, if they’d just put forth coherent economic policies I could actually WRITE about.
I was hoping for a little more on the international side, given our foreign policy is in a deplorable state and this is McCain’s supposed forte. Both seem inadequate although there is a change in direction against Obama coming from, of all places, Europe. The WaPo, here to date a good member in standing of the Obama pep club has recently started this discussion:
“European officials are increasingly concerned that Sen. Barack Obama‘s campaign pledge to begin direct talks with Iran on its nuclear program without preconditions could potentially rupture U.S. relations with key European allies early in a potential Obama administration.”
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/21/AR2008062101658.html
Oh, great job guys!! Beat up on Senator Clinton for her pant suits and emasculating use of a microphone, THEN tell us that the hopie changie guy could potentially threaten our relations with allies. Way to go!
Meanwhile, Senator Obama has managed to be endorsed by every tinpot dictator remaining on the planet while garnering heavy criticism from even the European press for undermining the ongoing diplomacy on Iran and its nuclear weapons development. I have several things I want to share with you on this front. The first is an appalling Gaddafi video discussing the importance of an Obama presidency. Savage politics has an excellent blog providing a great analysis on this development. (http://savagepolitics.com/?p=797) so I’ll point you in that direction for more on him.
At last count, Fidel Castro, Kim Jon Il, Obama’s Kenyan cousin, Hamas, and Muammar al-Gaddafi are all giddy on Obama. Maybe they all have the same koolaid supplier as Obamba or maybe they see that some one so incredibly in over their head has to give them some kind of advantage. Castro did have one small bone to pick with Obama saying “When he was a candidate, he of course committed the error of yearning for “a democratic Cuba.” Well, I guess Wright, Ayers, Farahkhan, and Pflegle didn’t completely capture Obama’s attention for 20 years. Maybe he can take a few pointers from cousin Odingo who appears completely ready to embrace his cousin. This nugget is from the BBC.
“Barack Obama’s cousin Raila Odingo (a radical Muslim African Arab) planned and executed the ‘ethnic cleansing’ of Kenya’s Rift Valley.”
Which leads me to a sidebar question: If Obama is supposedly a Black American, why is Odingo, his cousin doing ethnic cleansing on native Africans? This only makes sense if Odingo is ethnically an Arab which would implies that Obama isn’t actually a Black American but an Arab American. I frankly don’t care what his ethnicity actually is because I’ve had it with identity politics, but it brings up a larger question of why Obama would pose as an African American if he’s an Arab American?
Now, we have Bomb Bomb Iran McCain’s advisors doing the 9-11 re-shuffle. Charlie Black plays the wow, what if we get attacked again card and comes up with McCain wins. This is our war-hero candidate who is supposed THE ONE with foreign policy creds and shouldn’t need surrogates dropping 9-11 references. This happens after the we had found out that McCain’s strategest Peter Madigan was a lobbiest for, of all places, IRAN. McCain is using Bush’s play book a little too much for comfort.
“In an interview with the Atlantic in late May, McCain said that “Iran is hell-bent on the destruction of Israel, they’re hell-bent on driving us out of Iraq, they’re hell-bent on supporting terrorist organizations, and as serious as anything to American families, they’re sending explosive devices into Iraq that are killing American soldiers.” In a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee this month, McCain again mocked Obama’s willingness to enter into dialogue with the Iranians, saying, “The idea that they now seek nuclear weapons because we refused to engage in presidential-level talks is a serious misreading of history.”
source: http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/06/19/mccain_iran/index.html?source=rss
Again, if sanctions and saber-rattling were working so well, we’d have settled this issue already. McCain needs to voice some real options here or be defined as the third Bush term.
Can we find some kind of policy that doesn’t include threatening all out war or suggesting it’s okay for a President to talk to ANY of these jerks without preconditions? Is there any one in either of these campaigns that can get these guys a really quick lesson on diplomacy and international relations? Both of them seem to be clueless and we can’t seem to get the press to go after either of them at the same time on this.
Is this really the best leadership we can offer the world? Haven’t we done enough damage with 8 years of a president completely in over his head? Do we need four more years of cluelessness?
Talk about your quick change: Possum Seal = Road Kill
Posted: June 23, 2008 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: flip flops, Obama, Presidential Seal, Vero possumus 7 CommentsWELL, call me a possum’s mother!
Yes he CAN change!!! Guess no one thought the poseur presidential seal was seemly, so yes, folks … the SEAL IS NOW WITH US UNDER the BUS!!!
EXTRA EXTRA!
This just in from ADVERTISING AGE:
Obama Campaign Drops Faux
Presidential Seal
The Possum Sleeps Tonight
source: http://adage.com/campaigntrail/post?article_id=127944/
I guess the bus musta run over the Vero possumus and it’s now a VERO posthumus.
Yet another example of change we can measure in minutes… Flip Flops ANYONE?







Recent Comments