As this depressingly stupid but important presidential election drones on, I have to say I’m more inclined to opt out by the day. There are simple truths that both campaigns are avoiding. Perhaps it is true that common sense is a most uncommon trait. Let’s look at just a few things my mother taught me that I thought was pretty much common sense. I wasn’t sure if she got them all from Dear Abby or if they were under the collection of old wives’ tales, but damned some body in these campaigns needs their mom to tape some old copies of Dear Abby to their bedroom mirrors. Just like my mom did for me so that I would develop some common sense.
First, I was taught that People in Glass Houses shouldn’t thrown stones. That means if every one supporting Senator Barack Obama is going to criticize Sarah Palin for lack of experience, they better take a good long, hard look at the top of the ticket. Which is worse? An inexperienced Presidential candidate with a Washington Hack at the second position or an inexperienced Vice Presidential candidate with a Washington Hack at the top of the ticket? You decide.
Second, I was taught to not open my mouth when I don’t have a clue what I’m talking about. Neither McCain or Obama seem to know enough about the economy that either of them can answer questions without sounding clueless. Maybe I’m being hypercritical here since I am a financial economist, and what’s going on is right up my area of expertise, but PulEEZE tell me that one of these candidates had your basic macroeconomics and microeconomics courses somewhere on their college transcripts? Oh, right, we have NO idea about that because Obama won’t release his … and McCain was busy crashing planes and trying not to be absolutely dead last in his class. I’m not expecting a Rhodes Scholar for President, but … wait, we did have a Rhodes Scholar, as I recall, and things went pretty well then … maybe we SHOULD start asking for candidates that did their homework for a change.
Third, I was taught not to talk out both sides of my mouth. McCain has evolved into a Teddy Roosevelt Republican who likes government oversight seemingly overnight. None of his primary stump speeches would’ve lead any one to that conclusion. Obama has taken so many sides on one position, I feel like that little green possessed girl in The Exorcist every time I hear another speech. I mean, really, how many sides to a single issue can there possibly be? Obama seems to find a new one with every new audience.
Fourth, i was taught if you keep on lying it increases your chances of being caught and that people really NEVER trust anything a liar says. I don’t even know where to begin here. The first thing thing that comes to mind though is the Obama interview with O’Reilly. He just keeps brushing off those specious friends of his. They just folks he knows in his neighborhood. That was it, these are the people in his neighborhood, in his nieghborhood, in his neighborhood … yes these are the people in his neighborhood, they’re the people that you meet each day. I mean, right, we all have thousands of folks we know, and each of know at least one person who tried to blow up the pentagon and was sorry they didn’t blow up more buildings, another person who is in jail for corruption and fraud, yet another person who says Goddamn America and blames the country for 9-11 … sheesh, I know I’m highly odd, that I don’t have any friends like this? and I mean… you do, don’t you? Then there’s this week’s McCain thing: the fundamentals of the American Economy are strong and what I meant was the American workers are the most productive in the world. Yeah, right, that’s not a non sequitur there.
Fifth, I was taught Birds of a Feather flock together. Neither of these candidates can say they are outsiders looking in on the current financial crisis. Senator Obama with his limited amount of time in Washington is the number two Senator to get funds from both Fannie and Freddie. Penny Priztker is the mother of the subprime mortgage meltdown as well as his finance chair. Half of his finance committee has major connections to most of the big players in the current housing bubble and investment banking blow up. John McCain relies on Phil Gramm for advice. Puhleeze! You think we don’t know if you weren’t part of the problem you at least turned a blind eye to it? Or were so busy on the campaign trail you wouldn’t even have known what was going on even if you read the news?
This has to be the worst set of candidates I have ever seen or heard of in U.S. History. Why can’t we just have some folks that show a little decency, wisdom, and common sense? If we don’t get some primary election reform soon, I’m going to expatriate to some place that appreciates democracy pretty soon. It’s a lost art form here.
I just spent a good week with nothing but a radio. It was also broadcasting nothing but Gustav news 24-7. So, i’m back reading the MSM and trying to catch up with the blogosphere. I feel like I’ve emerged from a cacoon to find the oxygen sucked out of the presidential campaign by Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin. While I was concerned with Hurricane Gustav, Hurricane Sarah was the story every where else.
It appears the press has spent the majority of that week vetting Palin. I wonder where all that hyper-vetting was when we needed that done with Senator Barrack Obama. Will they ever get around to checking out his relationship with all those Chicago thugs? How about figuring out if he still holds citizenship in Indonesia?
Yesterday was a treat for those of us starved for some one who really did look presidential. Hillary gave a great speech in Florida. Too bad she was having to ride to the rescue of the hapless DNC candidate. The Obama campaign is now begging her to offset the huge momentum coming from the McCain campaign after the suprise vp pick. Hillary has even taken on the white knite mantle in such low low places as Daily Kampf and Huffington Poop. Ah, what could have been …
Obama looked positively starved for oxygen and tired on George’s ABC morning talk show to the point he said he was having to take hits for his “muslim faith”. He was so completely unaware of his gaffe, George had to remind him he was a christian. Meanwhile, Biden showed he may be part of the Washington problem, but at least he understands the issues by discussing the current bail out plans of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Biden is the ultimate Washington insider and there is absolutely no way the Obama campaign is going to successful repackage this canned ham.
McCain is just smiling and basking in the Palin glow as he enjoys a much bigger post-convention bounce than Obama. He’s decided team campaigning sells well, and the power duo have been going from city to city while attracting crowds evoking the rock star label again. It also looks like McCain has pre-empted the change mantra and is successfully riding the maverick pony with his new wild west sidekick. Ah, the American Western, what a completely wild, wild image.Meanwhile, the NY Times says Obama’s fundraising is suffering from the same anemia shown by the candidate. It appears there’s a max to Obamamania and it was reached a long time ago.
Even Pumas have changed the conversation. Overexposure abounds!Obama is so yesterday! The focus in the PUMA movement has gone three ways now. First, there are those intent on reforming the current democratic party and the process that keeps giving us losers. The Denver Group has gone that direction. I’m not sure if an outsider movement can overcome the most insider of problems, but more power to them. We need to get rid of caucuses and reform the primary system for both parties. This is an ambitious, long term goal. A second group is focused on Hillary and pressuring the senate to recognize her as senate majority leader. This is again an outsider movement focused on an insider problem. I think we can all say that the democratic congressional leadership is a big disappointment. It’s only real accomplishment has been earning congress a lower approval rating than President Bush. What exactly does it say when you’re more unpopular than the worst president in history? The third group has jumped on the McCain wagon train and will ride it until Hillary comes back into play again in 2012. I’m not there with McCain and his dependence on fundie fanatics. I think he can handle the presidency but I just can’t support irresponsible tax cuts and anyone who hangs with folks that take the bible literally. I didn’t spend so much of my life sitting in university classrooms and studying science to turn my brain off in the voting booth. I just can’t hold my nose and vote for someone beholden to the religious right.
Personally, I think it’s important we start to focus downticket and ensure a reasonable group of senators and representatives will hit Washington to ensure that McCain’s Maverick side will be rewarded while his pandering to the social right side goes completely punished. Meanwhile, as Hurricane Ike becomes less relevant to Louisiana and I return my focus to research and the blood sport of politics, I’m taking bets on how long the Palin momentum will continue and if the Obama campaign can get a jumpstart again.
One thing that hasn’t changed is the misogyny that is deeply embedded in US culture. We’ve seen the re-ignition of the mommy wars which is unwinnable as was the cold war. I’ve also seen perfectly good progressives tell jokes like ‘well, at least she has TWO things going for her’. I may just return to my old feminist roots and burn a few bras. One thing hasn’t changed for me though, I’m not voting for Obama.
I didn’t watch the values forum last night despite all the hype. I had a lot of reasons for this. One, I really get tired of watching Obama continually invent himself and his life story. Two, I really didn’t want to watch McCain in high pander mode speaking to the craziest part of the Republican base. Three, I have to say that I avoid this country’s original koolaid drinker’s–the hyper religious–because I have a low threshold for ignorance and intolerance. If you have issues with atheists, you better stop reading now, because I’m going into full attack mode on what continues to be used by the powerful to control the weak: religion.
Why don’t we have big media events surrounding the candidates discussing their commitment to science and reasoned thought? We could have conversations on constitutional issues or approaches to foreign relations and trade. Instead, we get conversations on personal screw ups and what role ignorance plays in your life. Since Sunday morning new shows are part of weekly ritual, I’m currently enduring clips and analysis about Obama’s high school drug use (yawn) and McCain’s first marriage (bigger yawn). Obama was once again his light weight best. (This seemed to me a repeat of an Oprah interview). McCain just pulled the list of cliches every Republican uses when dealing with the likes of Dr. Dobson and Pat Robertson. Yes, a fertilized egg = a walking, talking breathing, thinking human being. Yes, marriage = some sort’ve club that somebody’s imaginary friend only lets one woman and one man into. Yes, I have an imaginary friend that I speak to even though that kind of behavior is usually associated with mental illness but is considered mandatory when you call the imaginary friend “god”. They both had to cite their carefully worded confirmation lessons for the benefit of the Pharisees.
I can’t imagine Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, or James Madison doing this sort of thing or going any where near the likes of Warren and his sheeple. Warren and his ability to make a group of people pay him tons of money so they can feel better about themselves is only equal these days to Obama’s ability to do the same. These guys are snake oil salesmen, pure and simple.
If you read the letters between Adams and Jefferson, they actually spend a huge amount of ink making fun of the hyperreligious and trying to figure out ways to stop them from ruining the USA. Thomas Paine was an ardent atheist. The major framers of the Declaration were deists at best and were probably just quiet atheists. Jefferson actually rewrote a bible for the Unitarian Universalist church taking out everything he considered to be based on fantasy. This means his version is a very small pamphlet. He considered Jesus a fictional character– along the lines of King Arthur–possibly a real person but so steeped in stories by now, the real person has been long lost. Most of the founding fathers found religion to be a base on which to build moral frameworks and something not to be taken literally. Can you imagine what last night’s group of kool aid drinkers would’ve have done to these three or four men and first presidents that many consider most responsible for the founding of this country?
None of the major founders of the country considered themselves Christian at all because they were all learned men who were born during the Age of Reason. They had read exactly what and how the religion was invented in the 3rd century. The Nicean Council was charged with setting up some thing that would be a tool to manage slaves, children and women, and spread Romanism throughout the conquered lands. Most Christians aren’t even aware they celebrate their ‘sabbath’ on Sunday because Constantine, the Roman Emperor responsible for inventing Christianity as we know it, was a committed high priest of the Sun God for his entire life. Each Sunday, Christians gather to celebrate Constantine’s snark.
We’re now in the 21st century, it’s time we stop badgering candidates to adopt Iron Age superstitions to be considered acceptable presidents. Let’s ask them to be reasoned, intellectually honest, and true to the spirit of this country’s commitment to freedoms instead. Pastor Rick Warren and his ilk should be left to the realm of the National Enquirer and not the nation’s business. This is especially true in a country where the fastest growing belief systems are Buddhism and Islam. Every day, we become more religiously diverse. There are also a huge number of atheists out there –besides Buddhist who are atheistic by doctrine. The Presidency should be an office for the intellectually gifted, not the reason-impaired. Religion needs to be kept out of politics as was the original intent of the founders of the nation.
Some examples on the Founding Father’s Belief System
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and State.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Danbury Baptist Association, CT., Jan. 1, 1802
Indeed, Mr. Jefferson, what could be invented to debase the ancient Christianism which Greeks, Romans, Hebrews and Christian factions, above all the Catholics, have not fraudulently imposed upon the public? Miracles after miracles have rolled down in torrents.
— John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, December 3, 1813, quoted from James A Haught, ed, 2000 Years of Disbelief
John McCain seems to be gaining traction on Barack Obama in a large part due to the energy crisis. Senator Obama stumbled by suggesting that we could save the amount of fuel generated by new off-cost drilling simply by maintaining the correct tire pressure for our cars. I remember this energy saving tip was provided as a public service announcement by Mario Andretti back in the day. For some one who is running to solve some of our country’s biggest problems, it simply didn’t seem too, well presidential. It seems more like a topic for Hints from Heloise.
The Obama campaign must have gotten the message that these household hints during speeches aren’t a substitute for specifics on national energy policy when the McCamp camp started handing out tire gauges with ‘Obama’s energy plan’ emblazoned on the sides. Obama immediately responded with both an ad and a very long speech. The few specifics layed out by the plan aren’t very earthshattering. I already attacked one of his suggestions as simply bad economics in my blog yesterday. Any tax placed on the sellers of a price-sensitive product will be passed on immediately to the buyers. So, the suggestion of a $1000 tax rebate to the taxpayers based on windfall profits will just eventually come from higher prices at the pump. So, you get a rebate with one hand and you get higher gas prices with the other hand. Since we’ve never seen an Obama transcript, I’ll just have to speculate that he never took Economics 101 or 102. I should know because I’m a professor of economics and I teach those classes.
I reviewed Obama’s ad yesterday and found one attack on McCain. This was the charge that McCain is simply supporting the Bush-Cheney Energy plan. I checked into the voting records for the 2005 Bush Cheney Energy plan and found something astounding. McCain voted against it. Obama voted for it. It didn’t take long for McCain to pick up on this. i heard a McCain speach today in Lima, Ohio pointing out that Obama voted FOR the Bush-Cheney Energy plan while he voted against it. The Bush-Cheney Energy plan was generally seen at the time as a series of huge handouts to petroleum interests. So, how is it that Obama voted for it and McCain voted against it?
McCain policy advisor Dough Holtz-Eaken had this to say in a press release reprinted by the Chicago Sun-Times.
While distorting John McCain’s vision for energy independence, Barack Obama is also misleading the American people when he says John McCain supported the Bush-Cheney energy policy. Let there be no mistake: the only candidate who voted to give tax breaks to Big Oil is Barack Obama when he supported the 2005 Bush-Cheney energy bill that gave $2.8 billion in subsidies to the oil companies. John McCain voted against this bill for the very reason that he opposed these tax breaks to oil companies and as president he will ensure their repeal. While he may decry them on the campaign trail, Barack Obama had no problem standing side-by-side with the oil companies while in the United States Senate.
I’ve seen the ad playing on CNN. This has to be a misstep by the Obama campaign. Why would you actually bring attention to such an obviously questionable charge? A quick check of campaign contributors also shows that Obama has also taken a lot of money from Big Oil as has the McCain campaign. Why would you charge your opponent with being in the pocket of big oil with such an obvious elephant in your own room? (And this could be that Obama, at the time, voted more Republican than McCain) Senator Obama must think the press will cover for him by not pointing out the obvious about the contradictions in his behavior and campaign rhetoric.
Taking on high oil prices is going to play much better in Peoria and Omaha than giving speeches in front of German Victory monuments shouting out with “I am a citizen of the world”. I can really see a McCain ad coming with this contrast set out for those of us living in the big fly over.
Once again, we see the Audacity of Hype.
The McCain Ad:
and the Obama response:
Again, linking McCain to the Bush-Cheney Energy plan when McCain voted against it and Obama voted for it, seems an odd tactic. I think this will back fire big time if there’s actually some discussion of the facts-on-the ground. I’m sure the RNC is just waiting for the DNC convention to nominate this clearly in-over-his head candidate before the attack ads start in full.
Please, delegates, run away from an Obama nomination as quickly as possible.
So which of these guys has the correct answer? Well, on the one hand there’s this guy trying to get elected president, so what else is he going to say? Then on the other hand, we’re really not technically in a recession yet so Phil has a point. They are both right and they are both wrong which is something only an economist could say and I couldn’t resist living up to the old joke. Okay, I’ll break it down into a few more stylized facts.
Our growth rates is somewhere between 0 and 1, our unemployment rate is pretty much where it should be, and most of the economic indicators are mixed, at best. We’re in a very slugglish growth period, but there still some major economic indicators that are showing neutral or positive. That doesn’t mean that all of us are living the same reality, however. The real answer to the question depends on WHO you are and WHERE you live. The economy is stagnant at the moment, and we’re in for a period of time where Americans are going to have to get use to making some tough choices and not seeing forward momentum. We’re basically all working and staying pretty much in the same place. Our clothing is costing us a lot less. We’ve got electronic gadgets galore and they are all really cheap. Have you priced computers, dvd players, or stereos recently? They’re all pretty cheap and just about any one can get to them. However, health care, driving, and eating are going from cheap to pricey.
The question of high energy prices and the segments of America that aren’t doing so well come mostly from globalization of the world economy that brings both good developments and bad. This is not going to reverse. As the economy adjusts, all buyers will win from global trade but those whose jobs go abroad will loose, and some will loose big time. We buy cheap stuff from the Chinese, they turn around and buy cars and they want gas. This increased demand for gas means higher gas prices. The Chinese also take jobs away from the manufacturing sector because Chinese labor comes extremely cheap and doesn’t require a pension or health plan. Those folks working for those companies that are outsourcing to other countries are miserable. While the USA has a relatively low unemployment rate of around 5%, places like Michigan and Pennsylvania have 10% unemployment rates. They are suffering. So, if you’re in the medical sector, you’re going to be happy as a clam. If you’re in manufacturing, prepare for a new career. Also, the government has grants out there to retrain folks loosing jobs from NAFTA. If you can prove it’s from NAFTA, go get it now!
438,000 jobs have been lost bringing unemployment to 5.5 percent. This is not a bad situation now, but if it continues, chances are we will be looking more like recession. Economists consider this rate to be close to the rate that represents what it should be if we are operating at capacity. The big question is: WILL IT GO UP?
So what about the financial crisis? How widespread is the mortgage problem? The housing crunch is wrecking the construction industry in places like Miami, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles. However, down here in New Orleans, the construction industry can’t find enough workers and is booming like never before. So Housing Foreclosures are a major problem in places like California, Nevada, and Florida. Many of these foreclosures are for house flippers. These folks are speculators and can whine all they want but that’s business and that’s what you get when the market moves against you. However, folks that were suckered into bad loans by mortgage brokers are a different matter. These folks are loosing their homes for banks that were looking for high fee income and basically put people into mortgages they couldn’t handle. Government regulation and help is required here. We’re not likely to get that as long as Dubya is in office. He’s threatening to veto the current bill. (All of the sudden our prez (the BIG spender) goes fiscally responsible on us!) I’m waiting for both McCain or Obama to come up with specific plans here. Hillary Clinton was the only one who spoke to this situation and her answer was a moratorium on rates. I think we’re going to need some federal bonds to fund some of these folks. It’s something similiar to what we did during the Great Depression to keep families in their homes and off the street.
So there are several markets that are a huge mess. The automobile industry and some sectors of manufacturing and the financial industry which has spilled into the housing industry, But again, most of the impact from these sectors is hitting some states hard and other states not so much at all.
Unfortunately, a lot of the higher prices are due to those high food and gas prices which are not a function of a bad U.S. economy, they are a function of problems in the global economy. There is also a continuing pattern since the 1980s that has left the rich getting richer and the poor and middle class getting poorer. The income inequality problem is worsening in this country and it looks as though it will continue. This is why it is essential that everyone has access to quality education at all levels. We should consider allowing more students attend university on the taxpayer’s dollar. Aid should definitely be mean income tested. It is much cheaper to send a teenager to school than it is to house him in a jail for the rest of his life.
These are some steps we can take to solve some of these things. First, as long as U.S. business has to pick up the tab for worker’s health insurance, the U.S. worker will not be competitive. We need universal health care paid for by individuals/taxpayers on an ability-to-pay basis. Second, all agriculture price supports, set aside programs, and subsidies, especially to ethanol, should be halted. Third, we all need to conserve energy and switch to other fuels sources (with the exception of ethanol made from things that are food). If we are making biofuels, then we need to use garbage or chicken fat or some byproduct, not food itself.
So, which of the candidates are up to the challenge? I don’t think either of them are, but I’m waiting.
Have you notice the quality of discourse on issues has gone decidedly downhill since the candidates given ‘get home free passes’ by the media during the primary are what we now seem stuck with? As an economist, I’m still waiting for one of them to actually say something about economic policy other than the usual discourse on taxes and spending. As a citizen, I’m thinking about building a bomb shelter in my backyard.
I can only second this sentiment by the International Herald Tribune on what small details the two have offered up to date.
“McCain is placating economic conservatives in the Republican party by promising tax cuts that would lead to a fiscal nightmare. Obama is pandering to labor with protectionist threats that would endanger relations with important trading partners.”
The one thing I will point to is this telling Obama candidate-of-change sidebar:
“Obama is backtracking somewhat on Nafta, and if he wins, don’t be surprised if he gives a green light to Democratic congressional leaders to pass the Colombia trade pact in a lame-duck session.”
I’m completely buying this one since the FISA sell-out. Remember we already had the wink, wink, nudge, nudge moment with Goolsbee and the Canadian ambassador as a preview.
I’m just waiting to get my hands on the new issue of Forbes which supposedly has a side-by-side comparison. I’ve gleaned both of their sites, and believe me, they both supposedly have economic advisors. Now, if they’d just put forth coherent economic policies I could actually WRITE about.
I was hoping for a little more on the international side, given our foreign policy is in a deplorable state and this is McCain’s supposed forte. Both seem inadequate although there is a change in direction against Obama coming from, of all places, Europe. The WaPo, here to date a good member in standing of the Obama pep club has recently started this discussion:
“European officials are increasingly concerned that Sen. Barack Obama‘s campaign pledge to begin direct talks with Iran on its nuclear program without preconditions could potentially rupture U.S. relations with key European allies early in a potential Obama administration.”
Oh, great job guys!! Beat up on Senator Clinton for her pant suits and emasculating use of a microphone, THEN tell us that the hopie changie guy could potentially threaten our relations with allies. Way to go!
Meanwhile, Senator Obama has managed to be endorsed by every tinpot dictator remaining on the planet while garnering heavy criticism from even the European press for undermining the ongoing diplomacy on Iran and its nuclear weapons development. I have several things I want to share with you on this front. The first is an appalling Gaddafi video discussing the importance of an Obama presidency. Savage politics has an excellent blog providing a great analysis on this development. (http://savagepolitics.com/?p=797) so I’ll point you in that direction for more on him.
At last count, Fidel Castro, Kim Jon Il, Obama’s Kenyan cousin, Hamas, and Muammar al-Gaddafi are all giddy on Obama. Maybe they all have the same koolaid supplier as Obamba or maybe they see that some one so incredibly in over their head has to give them some kind of advantage. Castro did have one small bone to pick with Obama saying “When he was a candidate, he of course committed the error of yearning for “a democratic Cuba.” Well, I guess Wright, Ayers, Farahkhan, and Pflegle didn’t completely capture Obama’s attention for 20 years. Maybe he can take a few pointers from cousin Odingo who appears completely ready to embrace his cousin. This nugget is from the BBC.
“Barack Obama’s cousin Raila Odingo (a radical Muslim African Arab) planned and executed the ‘ethnic cleansing’ of Kenya’s Rift Valley.”
Which leads me to a sidebar question: If Obama is supposedly a Black American, why is Odingo, his cousin doing ethnic cleansing on native Africans? This only makes sense if Odingo is ethnically an Arab which would implies that Obama isn’t actually a Black American but an Arab American. I frankly don’t care what his ethnicity actually is because I’ve had it with identity politics, but it brings up a larger question of why Obama would pose as an African American if he’s an Arab American?
Now, we have Bomb Bomb Iran McCain’s advisors doing the 9-11 re-shuffle. Charlie Black plays the wow, what if we get attacked again card and comes up with McCain wins. This is our war-hero candidate who is supposed THE ONE with foreign policy creds and shouldn’t need surrogates dropping 9-11 references. This happens after the we had found out that McCain’s strategest Peter Madigan was a lobbiest for, of all places, IRAN. McCain is using Bush’s play book a little too much for comfort.
“In an interview with the Atlantic in late May, McCain said that “Iran is hell-bent on the destruction of Israel, they’re hell-bent on driving us out of Iraq, they’re hell-bent on supporting terrorist organizations, and as serious as anything to American families, they’re sending explosive devices into Iraq that are killing American soldiers.” In a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee this month, McCain again mocked Obama’s willingness to enter into dialogue with the Iranians, saying, “The idea that they now seek nuclear weapons because we refused to engage in presidential-level talks is a serious misreading of history.”
Again, if sanctions and saber-rattling were working so well, we’d have settled this issue already. McCain needs to voice some real options here or be defined as the third Bush term.
Can we find some kind of policy that doesn’t include threatening all out war or suggesting it’s okay for a President to talk to ANY of these jerks without preconditions? Is there any one in either of these campaigns that can get these guys a really quick lesson on diplomacy and international relations? Both of them seem to be clueless and we can’t seem to get the press to go after either of them at the same time on this.
Is this really the best leadership we can offer the world? Haven’t we done enough damage with 8 years of a president completely in over his head? Do we need four more years of cluelessness?