Iowa Caucus Monday Reads

Let the Games Begin!!!

Waverly_iowaToday are the Iowa Caucuses that will likely make or break a lot of the more iffy candidates hanging on to the slim hope that somebody takes them seriously.  Iowa first is a long tradition with some interesting twists. Some of the things that I learned so far in the 2016 silly season include the idea of a “kiddie table” debate and that pundits take Uber and that all those Iowa Uber drivers seem to be the source of anecdotal evidence on voting patterns.

This Iowa Caucus is not the Iowa Caucus of my parents. My father was the Ford Dealer in Council Bluffs, Iowa for over 25 years.  They voted in the same elementary school where I practiced “duck and cover” during the Cuban Missile Crisis and saw my second grade teacher Miss Irma Long cry as she announced we’d be sent home because our President, Mr. Kennedy, had been shot in Texas.  Most of the candidates of the ilk we have today would’ve been a really odd sight on the stump back then.

I can only imagine what my parents and their friends would say if this crazy looking man from Northern Louisiana showed up looking as he does–which is like someone who’s been lost on an island for years ranting crazily from too much sun–to rally for a candidate. But, the same group of Baptists that harassed one of my father’s clerks for doing laundry on Sunday because they saw the steam coming out of the dryer vent is probably uber excited about Ted Cruz and the duckstasy of religious fever.  They want to holy roll all gay marriage supporters off the planet, I guess.

While stumping in Iowa for Ted Cruz on Sunday, “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson declared that gay marriage is a sign of growing “depravity” and “perversion” in America.

Robertson, notorious for his racist and anti-gay remarks, said of marriage equality: “It is evil, it’s wicked, it’s sinful and they want us to swallow it.”

“We have to run this bunch out of Washington D.C.,” Robertson said. “We have to rid the earth of them. Get them out of there.”

Cruz followed Robertson on stage, calling the reality TV star “a joyful, cheerful, unapologetic voice of truth.”

Cruz is in hot water for a number of things.  First, there are many they are still not convinced he meets the “natural born” qualification stated in the Constitution and Donald Trump mentions it every chance he can.  Additionally, Cruz has used a push piece that has come under criticism by the Iowa Attorney General. The Strump is making a lot out of Cruz’s possibly illegal mailer.2_0.685694001389844425_osage_iowa

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump condemned mailers sent by Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) presidential campaign over the weekend, which implied Iowa voters had violated election law.

The mailer, which uses social pressure to urge potential voters to the polls, “grades” Iowa voters on their voting history — a practice not done by the state.

“I think it’s one of the most disgraceful things I have seen in politics,” Trump told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews on Sunday’s “Hardball.” “When you say violation, and then they’re giving you F’s for your voting records and they’re saying immediately come and vote. I think it’s one of the most horrible things that I have seen in politics.”

You can follow the link to TPM to see an example of the mailer.  Meanwhile, every time Trump uses music, another musician tells him to cut it out.  This time it’s Adele.

The Republican presidential candidate, whose slogan is “Make America great again”, has recently been playing Adele’s hit Rolling In The Deep as his “warm-up” music.

“Adele has not given permission for her music to be used for any political campaigning,” her spokesman confirmed.

It is not the first time Trump has been criticised for appropriating pop songs.

Lawyers for Aerosmith star Steven Tyler sent Trump’s campaign a cease-and-desist letter last year, after the politician played the band’s hit single Dream On at numerous rallies around the US.

The letter said Trump’s use of the song gave “a false impression” he endorsed Mr Trump’s presidential bid.

Trump responded on Twitter, saying he had the legal right to use the song, but had found “a better one to take its place”.

“Steven Tyler got more publicity on his song request than he’s gotten in 10 years. Good for him!” he added.

Blizzard conditions will be heading tonight to my childhood home in Council Bluffs which basically means there will be no fair weather turnout in a good deal of Eastern Iowa.  It also means that youngest daughter will be digging out on Tuesday since she’s out there in the Omaha Boonie Suburbs.

My continued fascination with the parallels between Bernie and the Strump has me thinking on how the both of them seemed to have made the Super Pac and the billionaire donor class appear irrelevant. Trump is self-financing his campaign. Sanders has just passed a record for collecting money from small donors. It’s amazing to watch Jeb Bush struggle for attention while swimming in all that money. 

With billionaire Donald Trump sitting firmly atop the Republican field, the willingness of big establishment donors to underwrite his competitors’ war chests has fizzled.

About 17 donors gave $1 million or more to groups backing Republican presidential candidates in the last six months of 2015, 60 percent fewer than the number who gave that much in the first half of the year, according to Federal Election Commission filings. And outside groups that can accept unlimited contributions accounted for about 27 percent of Republican fundraising in the second half, down from 78 percent.

Many donors contributed large sums early to create the perception that their candidate was financially viable to go the distance. Now, with the first-in-the-nation caucuses taking place today in Iowa and several other primaries happening in the coming weeks, much of that money isn’t being replenished as candidates enter a grueling and expensive phase of the campaign.

“Part of this is the Trump effect,” said Tony Corrado, a government professor at Colby College. “Some major establishment Republican donors are undoubtedly waiting to see which candidate will emerge as the best alternative to Trump.”

For some, that’s already begun. Marco Rubio, who has emerged as the leading establishment candidate in recent months, won the backing of two major conservative hedge fund donors — Paul Singer and Ken Griffin — each of whom gave $2.5 million in late 2015 to a super-PAC supporting Rubio, Conservative Solutions PAC.

Rubio’s also winning over some big money that previously backed Bush, who, as a frequent target of Trump’s jibes, has struggled to get traction with voters. After raising a record $103 million in the first half of the year, the super-PAC supporting Bush, Right to Rise USA, pulled in only $15 million over the next six months, the bulk of it from one donor.

iowa-grantsRubio joins Clinton and Sanders as the top fund raisers.

The former secretary of state brought in over $37 million in the final three months of 2015 and started the year with $38 million in the bank. At the same time, the campaign spent $35 million in those three months. She continues to benefit from millions of dollars raised by her super PACs, including Priorities USA, which said Friday it has raised $50 million through this month. Two other groups supporting Clinton, American Bridge and Correct the Record, brought in an additional $6 million total.

And while Sanders has sworn off super PACs and criticizes Clinton’s largesse, a group run by National Nurses United is backing the Vermont senator regardless and has raised $2.3 million, with about half of that remaining, the group reported.

Clinton’s haul also meant a windfall for the Democratic National Committee and state Democratic parties across the country, who worked with Clinton’s campaign to raise money for the Hillary Victory Fund. In total, Clinton’s campaign raised $18 million for the DNC and state parties.

“We’re heading into the first caucuses and primaries with an organization second to none thanks to the support of hundreds of thousands of people across the country,” said Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager. “We will have the resources necessary to wage a successful campaign in the early states and beyond.”

Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver touted the number of individual contributions — 3.25 million — the campaign has received. “As Secretary Clinton holds high-dollar fundraisers with the nation’s financial elite, our supporters have stepped up in a way that allows Bernie to spend the critical days before the caucuses talking to Iowans about his plans to fix a rigged economy and end a corrupt system of campaign finance,” Weaver said in a statement.

It looks like Hillary and the Strump are the expected winners tonight.  Sanders, Cruz and Rubio all appear poised to close with some delegates since Iowa is not a winner take all state.roseman-covered-bridge

It would be entirely reasonable to presume that Bernie Sanders has momentum in Iowa. He’s gained on Hillary Clinton in national polls. Hekeeps pulling further ahead of Clinton in New Hampshire. And he’s made substantial gains in Iowa relative to his position late last year. December polls of Iowa showed Sanders behind by an average of 16 percentage points; the race is much closer now.

There’s just one problem: Sanders’s momentum may have stalled right when it counts the most.

The Des Moines Register’s Iowa poll released Saturday, for example, had Clinton leading Sanders by 3 percentage points. That means Iowa is close and winnable for Sanders; polling errors of 5 or even 10 percentage points are not uncommon in the caucuses. But it also means that Sanders hasn’t gained on Clinton. The previous Des Moines Register poll, released earlier in January, showed Clinton up by 2 percentage points instead.

The same story holds for other polling companies that have surveyed Iowa twice in January. A couple of these pollsters — American Research Group and Quinnipiac University — show Sanders leading. But they don’t show him gaining; Sanders also led in the previous edition of the ARG and Quinnipiac surveys.

Location_Des_Moines_IowaClinton and Cruz are relying on a substantive ground game and good commit to caucus plans for GOTV activities.  Sanders and Trump are hoping for a large turnout and the ability to overwhelm the caucuses where they do have a base. Cruz appears to be the one Republican with a substantive ground game.  Cruz has a natural base with evangelicals that Trump has somewhat eroded.  Cruz goes after the right wing religious voters.

It’s little more than 24 hours before the pivotal Iowa caucuses begin, and the presidential campaigns are still going strong. Especially for Ted Cruz, who TIME reporter Alex Altman says digs deep to his religious roots to connect with his conservative voters on the trail.

“Ted, the voice of sanity, in this time of calamity!” a voter exclaims at a campaign stop in a public library in northwest Iowa.

Cruz has been touring several towns in Iowa, and is one of the few candidates who planned to stop in all of the state’s 99 counties.

“This is part of Cruz’s strategy to win it the old fashioned way,” Altman said, “which is to go hand-to-hand in small towns, visit people, and tell them why he wants their vote.”

Iowa is primarily a rural state although there are vast differences between the east and western sections of the state.  It is home to several really good universities and to the Amish. There are still plenty of farmers there including the grandfather of my future son-in-law who used to buy his F150s from my dad.   Iowa folks are also very fond of their agriculture and ethanol subsidies.  It’s going to be interesting to see how they weigh in tonight. I’m seeing lots of pictures and shots from places I recognize that don’t seem to have changed much in my 60 years on the planet. Parts of the state do not have reliable wifi still.  There is also a large contingent of immigrants that work the slaughterhouses.   It’s a state that looks like Mayberry in many ways.  We’ll just have to see.

We will be posting a live blog with the returns later tonight.  Caucus doors lock down around 8:30 cst.  The weather will be important as will the intensity of the supporters.  Who do you think is going to win tonight?

Advertisements

51 Comments on “Iowa Caucus Monday Reads”

  1. mablue2 says:

    OMG!!! I just tuned into MessNBC. Chris Matthews doesn’t know David Dinkins? He asked if that was “the-rent-is-too-damn-high” guy.

  2. Riverbird says:

    Thanks for your post about Iowa. It reminds me of North Dakota, where I grew up.

    I’m trying not to get stressed out about this primary. I hope Hillary wins and I don’t care who gets the most Republican votes.

  3. mablue2 says:

    Seriously, why do IA and NH have to go first and get all this importance? These 2 states bear no resemblance to the make up of the Democratic Party. Maybe the GOP could start there and give these 2 states all that weight, but not the Dems.
    By the way these whole caucasing this is ridiculous and it excludes people who live oversees. This is not how we vote.

  4. William says:

    I am concerned about what the O’Malley supporters will do. I am no expert on Iowa caucus procedures, but I imagine that if their candidate does not reach the threshhold on the first counts, they get to choose someone else. It would not surprise me if O’Malley instructs them to go for Sanders, for whatever ostensible or real reason. This is what happened in ’08 in this caucus. Too much room for jiggering the results. I hope for a small Hillary win, although I am certain that the media spin on whatever happens will be favorable to Sanders. Even so, any kind of win for Hillary would be quite helpful. The nature of this caucus makes a small Sanders win a possibility, because it may come down to districts, not voters as a whole. Best guess: a somewhat ambiguous result, for a caucus procedure which is given vastly more import by the media than it should deserve.

    • Riverbird says:

      I agree about what O’Malley might do.

    • janicen says:

      O’Malley supporters must comprise a minimum of 15% of a particular precinct’s caucus voters in order to remain viable. If they don’t hit 15%, they have to join another team. Clinton’s people speculate that they are more likely to go to Sanders so they have an app along with rapid response people in place to shore up O’Malley voters in any precincts where they number under 15%. Obama used this tactic in the ’08 caucuses. I actually saw it first hand in Washington State but it backfired in the case of my precinct.

    • bostonboomer says:

      O’Malley has instructed his voters to stay with him and not go to other candidates.

    • Ron4Hills says:

      Pure Cynicism but i hope that O’Malley is thinking VP and tries to suck up to Hills.

      • janicen says:

        I’m becoming convinced that he’s staying in to help Hillz. He won’t be veep, but he’ll get something in return.

      • bostonboomer says:

        I think it’s too late for that after the horrible things he said to her in the debates.

  5. Fannie says:

    Thanks Dak, the numbers are for Hillary. Am glad to see comments on O’Malley’s voters. Right now he’s only getting, 3, 4 or 5%. I’d be happy to see a 50/50 split, and see him endorse Hillary.

  6. bostonboomer says:

    Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ campaign chairman admits he doesn’t know the caucus rules.

    Yahoo: Sanders campaign cites ‘alarming’ signs Clinton plans to pack the caucuses

    Weaver’s concern is based on what he described as an “alarming” letter received by a voter named Dennis Clifford in Hawarden, Iowa. Although Clifford is a Sanders supporter, the letter, from a Clinton campaign office in Sioux City, urged him to caucus for Clinton and identified a non-resident as his local precinct captain. That would not actually be prohibited, but Weaver, who admitted he wasn’t familiar with the rules, claimed it indicated the Clinton campaign is “infiltrating the caucuses with out-of-state paid staffers.”

    How is Bernie going to win if his campaign manager doesn’t even know the rules?! WTF?

    Luther’s letter is not actually evidence the Clinton campaign broke any rules. Precinct captain is a title campaigns have created as part of their organizational efforts to get voters to caucus. It is not an official position. While people who are not residents are not allowed to participate and be counted in a precinct’s caucus, anyone is allowed to attend and watch. In fact, the Clinton campaign claims to have a 17-year-old volunteer — too young to participate — serving as a captain in one precinct.

    • William says:

      I love this gloss by the writer: “Is not actually evidence.” This implies that, well, maybe they did break rules, but this is not actually evidence that they did. Actually, it is not actual evidence of anything, except that the Clinton campaign has a lot of people supporting it.

      I certainly hope you are right about the results tonight, BB.

  7. bostonboomer says:

    Good funny read from Shakesville: You can’t mansplain away the Berniebros.

    One of the latest mansplainers is Glenn Greenwald. LOL!

    • janicen says:

      It’s all a myth, eh? Well then some mythical creature called my daughter a “dumb c%nt” today when she dared to disagree with one of them. She responded by saying, “If you’re going to insult me, I’d appreciate it if you spell my name correctly…”

  8. Ron4Hills says:

    I am disgusted with all of the major media outlets that have totally ignored the abuse and bullying being done by Bern-ers over social media.

    George Stephanopoulos and Donna Brazile ought to be ashamed because I know they know how this stuff works.

    Of all the pundits Katrina Vandenhouvel was actually the most generous toward Hills on “This Week” and considering how in-the-tank she has been for Bernie that is a shame.

    I did not expect her to say anything about the BernieBros but I foolishly thought George or Donna would at think mention it as an interesting wrinkle if nothing else.

    • janicen says:

      An article appeared on FB today, pro-Bernie, talking about Hill’z ties to Monsanto. There were about 40 comments. I went on and commented that Tad Devine, one of Bernie’s campaign advisers worked for a firm that lobbied for Monsanto. Guess what? The next time I looked at it, the comments were all gone and you couldn’t comment on it anymore. In a matter of two minutes.

    • bostonboomer says:

      There have been a number of stories about the Berniebro abuse–including at the BBC, Mashable, and The Atlantic. It’s getting quite a bit of attention right now. Even Bernie’s campaign is trying to control it. I have post links to these stories over the past few days.

  9. bostonboomer says:

    Al Giordano, whose past predictions have been very accurate is predicting that Hillary will do much better than expected in Iowa.

    He predicts Hillary: 54% Bernie: 36% Marty: 10%

    He says there are indications that Bernie’s on-the-ground organization is weak. See Yahoo story I posted above, his campaign mgr. knows little about the caucus system apparently.

    Sanders’ support is concentrated in three counties that are home to universities. In Iowa you have to win delegates in every district; you can’t just win big in 2 or 3 and come in first. Hillary has people on the ground in every district.

    If college students live in Iowa they have to return to their home districts to caucus. That may be difficult because they have classes today and there is a blizzard on the way.

    More problems for Bernie. The turnout is not expected to be huge–it will be “normal” about like 2004. He has been trying to damp down expectations for days, so I think he knows he’s not going to win.

    I got most of this info from Giordano’s Facebook page. I joined his group there. He’s also on Twitter.

    • janicen says:

      I agree with your earlier comment. I think she will do better than expected.

      • bostonboomer says:

        If she does, there’s a good chance she could win or come in a close second in NH. next week. Don’t forget there’s a debate on Wednesday night.

  10. Fannie says:

    I don’t know how in the world these pundits thinks Sanders is pulling it off like Obama. He’s not Obama, and never was, and never will be. He’s not proud of our President, not like our Hillary Clinton.

  11. Fannie says:

    Help me out….let’s back track to NH in 2008. Hillary won there because of Dartmouth (Hanover) NH, came in to vote……..isn’t that right?

    Iowa has 45 votes
    NH has 24 votes

    Here’s what I am thinking, it’s not going to sink a row boat, much less a battleship if Hillary loses.
    I’d love to see her teach these ashols that she can go on and win the whole damn thing, and maybe they’ll learn a lesson. Okay, so after Iowa and NH, there is 68 delegates, 2300 needed, and not all is going to one person. Isn’t that right?

    Say Hillary wins 60% of vote, 26 in Iowa, and Bernie gets 18 in Iowa

    Say Bernie gets 60% of votes, 14, NH, and Hillary gets 10 in NH……..If this happens at that point Hillary leads…………Geronimo!

  12. bostonboomer says:

    I put up a new thread to discuss the caucus news and results.

  13. bostonboomer says:

    //platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  14. bostonboomer says:

    Oh hell, I put those on the wrong thread.