Tuesday Reads: Back Home Again In Indiana

Mounds State Park, near Muncie, IN with the Great Mound in the distance.

Mounds State Park, near Muncie, IN with the Great Mound in the background.

Good Morning!!

My family moved to Indiana when I was ten years old. My Dad had been offered a job as a professor at Ball State Teachers College (soon to be Ball State Univerity) in Muncie. He bought his first house there in one of those brand new 1950s developments that were springing up all over to respond to the needs of returning WWII vets and other upwardly mobile couples with growing families–like my parents.

I went to school in Muncie from 6th grade on. I graduated from Muncie Central High School in 1965, and then attended Ball State for two years. Muncie is a very different city now then when I was growing up there. At that time, Muncie was home to many auto parts factories that supported the car makers in Detroit. Thousands of people traveled from rural areas in Kentucky and Tennesee to find good paying jobs there.

I never felt like I fit in in Muncie. My parents were liberals and our family was Catholic. Only one other person I can recall–my best friend–had a father who was a professor. Muncie was mostly Republican and only about 10 percent Catholic. There was actually quite a bit of prejudice against Catholics there, and that was troubling to me. Other kids seemed to look at me oddly when they found out what my Dad did. I wanted to get out of there, and after two years of college, I moved to Boston.

Even though I wanted out of Muncie as a young woman, I’ve never lost my attachment to the natural beauty of Indiana. It’s still a largely rural state in which the geography varies widely depending on the region. Northern Indiana is lake country, Southern Indiana is filled with rolling hills and gorgeous scenery. The central part of the state where I grew up is flat and is still filled with the corn and soy fields that many people believe are all there is to Indiana. It’s not true. That’s just where the Interstate highways are. But I think the farm country is beautiful too.

As the car industry fell on hard times, so did Muncie. Unemployment skyrocketed, and stayed high for decades, as the car parts factories disappeared. Today Muncie is a majority Democratic “college town,” and Ball State is the city’s biggest employer. I think I could be happy in Muncie now, and I’ve often thought of moving back there in my old age. For one thing it’s a much less expensive place to live than Boston. For another thing, I miss those open spaces where you can see the horizon in the distance on all sides.

I’m telling you all this so you can understand that I still love Indiana, and why I am so deeply saddened by the way the Tea Party movement has captured the state’s government. Dakinikat has been posting quite a bit about the latest outrage–an extreme, post-Hobby-Lobby-decision version of the so-called “Religious Freedom Restoration Act.” But that is just the tip of the iceberg.

Indiana has also been a leader in the right wing attacks on voting rights (strict voter ID law) and women’s reproductive rights (attacks on Planned Parenthood and attempts to pass extreme anti-abortion measures). Historically Indiana has tended to elect Republican Governors and Democratic Senators. I don’t know why that is, but it’s also true here in deep blue Massachusetts where for nearly 50 years I’ve lived under GOP rule. Indiana’s current governor is a very far right extremist, as the entire country now knows.

I thought I’d post some of the reactions to this horrible new law from inside Indiana.

This morning, the conservative Indianapolis Star–which endorsed Mike Pence in 2012–published a rare front page editorial:


Indy star fix it


Gov. Pence, fix ‘religious freedom’ law now.

We are at a critical moment in Indiana’s history.

And much is at stake.

Our image. Our reputation as a state that embraces people of diverse backgrounds and makes them feel welcome. And our efforts over many years to retool our economy, to attract talented workers and thriving businesses, and to improve the quality of life for millions of Hoosiers.

All of this is at risk because of a new law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, that no matter its original intent already has done enormous harm to our state and potentially our economic future.

The consequences will only get worse if our state leaders delay in fixing the deep mess created.

Half steps will not be enough. Half steps will not undo the damage.

Only bold action — action that sends an unmistakable message to the world that our state will not tolerate discrimination against any of its citizens — will be enough to reverse the damage.

Gov. Mike Pence and the General Assembly need to enact a state law to prohibit discrimination in employment, housing, education and public accommodations on the basis of a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.

Those protections and RFRA can co-exist. They do elsewhere.

Laws protecting sexual orientation and gender identity are not foreign to Indiana.

Indianapolis, for example, has had those legal protections in place for nearly a decade. Indy’s law applies to businesses with more than six employees, and exempts religious organizations and non-profit groups.

The city’s human rights ordinance provides strong legal protection — and peace of mind —for LGBT citizens; yet, it has not placed an undue burden on businesses.

Importantly, passage of a state human rights law would send a clear message that Indiana will not tolerate discrimination. It’s crucial for that message to be communicated widely.

That would bring Indiana in line Illinois where the “religious freedom” laws is overridden by a strict non-discrimination statute; but for the moment, Pence seems determined to stick with his bigoted stance because of his ridiculous fantasy of running for president. Before this, he had no chance in hell. Now he’s becoming a laughing stock like Bobby Jindal. But even Jindal probably has a better shot at the GOP nomination than Pence does.


Bridgeton covered bridge, Indiana

Bridgeton covered bridge, Indiana


Fox 59 Indianapolis: Indiana’s reputation taking a hit over religious freedom bill.

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (March 30, 2015)– Those who work in tourism in Indianapolis fear the economic impact and damage the religious freedom legislation could bring to the city and state’s economy. Sunday, Visit Indy said conventions had expressed questions about the controversial legislation, but none had expressed interest in leaving.

Monday, labor union AFSCME announced it would pull its women’s conference out of downtown Indianapolis. It was scheduled for October 9th through October 11th. Visit Indy said the conference was to be held at the JW Marriott downtown, with 800 expected attendees and an estimated $500,000 in economic impact.

Meanwhile, the state remained in the crosshairs online Monday, with the hashtag #boycottIndiana going strong on Twitter.

Cher criticized Governor Mike Pence over the weekend, and Apple CEO Tim Cookpenned an editorial in the Washington Post calling religious freedom laws like Indiana’s dangerous.

Visit Indy said they’re in crisis mode reassuring conventions Hoosiers are welcoming. The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis is taking a stand, too. Open for service stickers are affixed to the museum’s windows.

“We wanted to reaffirm to the community that we welcome everyone,” said Brian Statz, Vice-President of Operations and General Counsel.

Then Statz had better get busy and put serious pressure on Pence and the legislature, because this backlash has reached critical mass and it’s not going away anytime soon.

Bean Blossom covered bridge

Bean Blossom covered bridge

CBS 4 Indianapolis: City-County Council passes resolution opposing RFRA, sends loud message to state leaders.

INDIANAPOLIS (March 30, 2015)–The Indianapolis City-County Council passed a resolution Monday night opposing the new Religious Freedom Restoration law. The measure was sponsored and introduced by 16 council members on both sides of aisle. It passed in a 24-4 vote.

The resolution will now be sent to Statehouse for Gov. Mike Pence’s viewing.

Supporters of the measure say the current version of the law hurts Indiana commerce, repels young talented professionals and further tarnishes the Hoosier image.

“As the representatives of the city and the county, we feel it is our job to make sure we are doing everything to fight back and let the world know that Indianapolis is a welcoming place,” said John Barth, City-County Council vice president.

“If they need to repeal it then repeal it. If they can fix it, then fix it! But make it count and that’s really what we are saying tonight,” said Councilor Jeff Miller.

Before the meeting, those opposed to the new law rallied in-front of the City-Market. Chants and signs sent a clear message to the rest of the world: “No hate in our State.”

“Under no terms or wording is discrimination acceptable,” said Patrick Dutchess.

“The support that our community has had here in Indiana to say we don’t agree with the governor is amazing,” said Angie Alexander.


Indiana's Brown County State Park in Fall.

Indiana’s Brown County State Park in Fall.


CBS 4: Butler, Purdue and other Indiana university presidents issue statements on religious freedom bill.

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (March 29, 2015) — Presidents of universities in Indiana are speaking out after Indiana Gov. Mike Pence signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act last week.  Questions remain about what to expect in Indiana’s new religious freedom bill means and the power it holds….

The president of Butler University, James Danko, released a statement on Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act on Sunday. The statement reads:

As president of Butler University I am particularly sensitive to the importance of supporting and facilitating an environment of open dialogue and critical inquiry, where free speech and a wide range of opinion is valued and respected. Thus, it is with a certain degree of apprehension that I step into the controversy surrounding Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

However, over the past week I have heard from many Butler community members—as well as prospective students, parents, and employees—who have expressed concerns about the impact this law may have on our state and our University. As such, I feel compelled to share my perspective and to reinforce the values of Butler University.

While I have read a variety of opinions and rationale for RFRA, it strikes me as ill-conceived legislation at best, and I fear that some of those who advanced it have allowed their personal or political agendas to supersede the best interests of the State of Indiana and its people. No matter your opinion of the law, it is hard to argue with the fact it has done significant damage to our state.

Like countless other Hoosier institutions, organizations, and businesses, Butler University reaffirms our longstanding commitment to reject discrimination and create an environment that is open to everyone.

Today, more than ever, it is important that we continue to build, cultivate, and defend a culture in which all members of our community—students, alumni, faculty, staff, and the public—can learn, work, engage, and thrive. It is our sincere hope that those around the country with their ears turned toward our Hoosier state hear just one thing loud and clear—the united voice of millions who support inclusion and abhor discrimination.

Butler is an institution where all people are welcome and valued, regardless of sexual orientation, religion, gender, race, or ethnicity; a culture of acceptance and inclusivity that is as old as the University itself. Butler was the first school in Indiana and third in the United States to enroll women as students on an equal basis with men, was among the first colleges in the nation to enroll African Americans, and was the second U.S. school to name a female professor to its faculty.

I strongly encourage our state leaders to take immediate action to address the damage done by this legislation and to reaffirm the fact that Indiana is a place that welcomes, supports, respects, and values all people.

Click on the link to read statements from the presidents of Ball State University, Hanover College, and Perdue (former governor Mitch Daniels is president).

Versailles State Park, Indiana

Versailles State Park, Indiana


Where are these so-called “religious freedom” laws coming from? The Christian Science Monitor tried to find out. The obvious candidate is ALEC, but they claimed to CSM that they aren’t drafted the legislation.

Who’s pushing the religious freedom laws in states?

But when asked whether ALEC was involved in supporting the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, ALEC spokesperson Bill Meierling responds: “We do not work on firearms, marriage equality, immigration, any of those things people frequently say are ours.”

Still, North Carolina state Rep. Graig R. Meyer of (D) Durham says that ALEC is having a profound effect on how state legislators in his state are picking their targets.

“While ALEC may not be directly distributing the template legislation we’re seeing pop up all over the country, they are primarily the network for legislative exchange that is operating as a provider of educational seminars and conferences,” Mr. Meyer says in a phone interview.

One such ALEC conference was held in North Carolina. “While nobody can say for sure where the next religious freedom law bill will pop up, it’s probably a safe bet to look at where their most recent national conferences were held and where the next one will be,” says Meyer.

The last ALEC national conference was held in December in Washington, D.C. The next one coming up will be in San Diego, Calif., according to ALEC’s Meierling. He describes the organization as “an exchange of legislators and entrepreneurs who come together to discuss policy.”


A Source Watch report on the legislative authors of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) shows many are also on the ALEC Indiana membership list.  Three of the bill’s co-authors are also ALEC Task Force committee chairs, including Indiana state Sen. Carlin J. Yoder (R) of District 12, Sen. Jean Leising (R) of District 42, and Sen. Jim Buck (R) of District 21, according to Source Watch.

Other Democratic legislators say ALEC is shaping conservative legislation in their state. For example, Arizona state Sen. Steve Farley sees the non-profit group as a driver of debate on gun legislation and the recently aired idea of mandating church attendance in his state.

Mandating church attendance???!!! I certainly hope that doesn’t catch on. I don’t trust this Supreme Court to protect us.

What else is happening today? Please post your thoughts and links in the comment thread.

48 Comments on “Tuesday Reads: Back Home Again In Indiana”

  1. bostonboomer says:

    I hope everyone has a nice Tuesday.

    • Fannie says:

      Wonderful post this morning. I just watched the Bridges of Madison County, and your photos remind me of the photographer, Clint Eastwood in the movie. I use to have a coffee table book of all the covered bridges in this country.

      Had my grands kids for spring break, and was getting things together after they left, my car was hit. Took it in for repair, and woke up with ankle sore. No swelling, etc.

      I’ve been reading everybody’s post, and I am so happy that the Liberals are attacking the religious right. It’s time to stop the damage they are doing to this country, and around the world. They are the most cruel people on the face of earth. All they want is power and money, they could care less about hungry children, or poor working people without jobs, without housing. They are putting themselves above the law, and that’s not the way we do it in this country.

      I understand your fondness for Indiana, I feel the same way down in the Delta, but I could never ever live there again. All lives matter, we are all humans, and we don’t need the kind of policies being pushed by the tea party republican wingnuts.

      • bostonboomer says:

        Thanks, Fannie. How is your ankle now? Is your car OK?

        • Fannie says:

          Doin’ good, okay, and will have a rental car for awhile. It was a teenage girl, and I just held on to her, till her mother could come and get her. She cried and cried, and I sure could see myself in her, been there, done that.

  2. bostonboomer says:

    The Clown Car backs Pence.


    Jeb Bush Praises Mike Pence For ‘Religious Freedom’ Law. “The former Florida governor was not the only prospective Republican candidate to laud Indiana’s law.”

    • Fannie says:

      I saw that, and the Clown Ted Cruz thinks the can ride that homophobia, and anti-abortion train that their ancestors have been riding for 200 years. Here it is 21st Century, and the hate has amplified beyond belief.

    • ANonOMouse says:

      That’s because the T-Nuts are screaming for their potential candidates to stand up for Indiana’s RFRA. And so, they are.

  3. TheRealKim says:

    I just don’t get it! How is this happening?

  4. janicen says:

    I know everyone here is sick of my saying how much I love Terry McAuliffe but my governor jumped on the opportunity opened up by Pence and the Tea Party idiots and issued and open letter to businesses in Indiana, “Come to Virginia, we don’t discriminate!”. Love, love, love me some Terry.


    • bostonboomer says:

      I’m not sick of it. Pence has really stepped in it this time. Almost everyone in the state is against him on this. I think he’s going to have to find some way to back down. Unfortunately for him, he already said publicly that he doesn’t want to pass a nondiscrimination law for LGBT people. I’m glad to see him getting beaten up. He deserves it.

      • Fannie says:

        Yes he does, and Indiana wants to get rid of that law. If they don’t it’s going to fester like an ugly oozing wound, that gets deeper and deeper with time.

        I have tried to get Idaho to stop giving the Followers of Church Christ the right to allow children do die because they believe in prayer rather than medicine, hospitals or doctors. The cemeteries are full of kids, and this is wrong too.

    • NW Luna says:

      Never sick of hearing someone stand up to these bullying wingnuts!

  5. janicen says:

    So the party of less government wants to mandate church attendance. Makes sense. What’s next, witch trials?

  6. TheRealKim says:

    I knew the Hobby Lobby case opened the door to the looney bin. But the idea of places being able to once again hang a sign saying “No ( whatever) Allowed” takes us back fifty years.

    • bostonboomer says:

      It’s incredible. Previously, we could assume SCOTUS would find these laws unconstitutional, but now I’m not so sure. Congress needs to overturn Citizens United.

  7. Boo Radly says:

    Just watched Gov. Pence’s news conference. He denies any discriminatory results would come from the bill that 30 other states, that Pres. Bill Clinton signed in 1993, that as a Hoosier he could never ever support any such thing, it’s the media’s fault, blah blah blah. He thanks all his supports for standing with him……… over and over and over again. May be just me, but I don’t think he helped himself or his state and I do not think a re-write done this week at his request will make this go away.

    Thank you for this succinct post on this bill BB.

  8. Sweet Sue says:

    Thanks for the pictures, too. Indiana looks beautiful.
    “Every prospect pleases and only man is vile.”

    • bostonboomer says:

      I’m glad you liked them. Indiana really is a pretty state, and the scenery is so varied.

  9. ANonOMouse says:

    Thanks for the excellent post BB.

    I watched Mike Pence news conference this morning. Compared to the Mike Pence I saw on ABC This Week on Sunday, it’s obvious the shell is beginning to crack. But, the real problem remains, Mike Pence SIGNED this legislation, in private and flanked by flaming LGBT haters. He can’t un-sign that bill. He was advised by many, many LGBT groups as well as many private businesses, CEO’s, organizations, NOT TO SIGN the bill. He was even told why he shouldn’t sign the bill, but he did. Now he has to find a way out of this, which to my mind means including LGBT as a protected class in the State’s Civil Rights Law.

    No matter how hard Pence tries, he can’t put lipstick on this pig. This law was designed as a stealth weapon to use against the LGBT community when/if SCOTUS rules in favor of Marriage Equality. Gay weddings, gay receptions, gay parties IN PUBLIC. This is what scares them the most.

    • bostonboomer says:

      Exactly. Pence has made a giant mistake, and I don’t see how he can save face now.

  10. ANonOMouse says:

    NASCAR jumps in

    • bostonboomer says:

      Very cool. Pence is completely out of step. He’ll be in deep doo doo if people boycott the Indy 500.

  11. ANonOMouse says:

    And who else could be impacted by this law?

  12. ANonOMouse says:

    Arkansas Legislature just passed RFRA that is nearly a carbon copy of the Indiana Law. Gov. Hutchinson says he will sign it.

  13. babama says:

    I could hardly believe it about mandatory church, wth? I had to look for myself:


    Senator Allen also apparently believes Earth is 6000 yrs old.

    Her words remind me of what Rand Paul said recently at a private D.C. prayer breakfast: “We need a revival in the country. We need another Great Awakening with tent revivals of thousands of people saying reform or see what’s going to happen if we don’t reform.”


    Was I the only one who heard an edge of threat in his statement?

    I think it is spot on to be asking where this is coming from. The religious right is much more organized, much more global and long term strategizing than most Americans have any idea of:

    My hope is that they will overplay their victim claims. For better or worse, Americans tend to reward winners and reject whiners. Who doesn’t have more immediate problems these days?

    I think this is a critical moment to push back and push back hard. I feel for the good people in Indiana, I know how bad I felt here when Prop 8 passed. But, this law can’t be “fixed”. It is too broad, too wrong, and has to much potential to be used against women and other marginalized groups, not just lgbt. I hope to live to see the four words, “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” added to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. And, to see a renewed awareness that, always, we must be vigilant in maintaining our progress.

  14. dakinikat says:


    Letterman says “This is not the Indiana I remember as a kid”