And now for the Propaganda
Posted: February 18, 2011 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: Breaking News, Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, collective bargaining, John Birch Society in Charge, The Bonus Class | Tags: collective bargaining, NEA, unions, Wisconsin protests | 53 CommentsThe Right Wing Media and John Birch society outlets are pressing hard against the protests happening in Wisconsin and other places where government workers’ rights to collective bargaining are under assault. We’re seeing police state tactics employed by the Republicans in Wisconsin and typical hateful propaganda from the mouthpieces of the plutocracy. Here’s an excellent example of right wing hysteria worthy of a dying despot using State TV to scare people from WSJ.
A seminal showdown between public unions and taxpayers. — For Americans who don’t think the welfare state riots of France or Greece can happen here, we recommend a look at the union and Democratic Party spectacle now unfolding in Wisconsin.
That’s right, Wisconsin is having ‘welfare state’ riots like France or Greece. I’ve missed the fires, but hell, what’s a little purple prose compared to having every one sing ‘The Internationale’ eventually? Is that what they think of Fire Fighters and Teachers? Do the services we provide fall under a ‘welfare state’? Do the years we spend at school or training need to be discounted because we work for the public sector instead of the private? Look at that pejorative word ‘riots’. Isn’t every one in Wisconsin exercising their constitution-given rights to free speech and assembly? Are they really rioting? This reminds me of the characterization in Egypt by the state TV of journalists and protesters as provocateurs of foreign agents. That was the trigger pulled on a gun pointed at the head of journalists among others.
Catch what’s called a ‘modest proposal’ in the second paragraph. Unbelievable. This Op-Ed was unsigned and that in itself is telling. It’s an edict from above.
Mr. Walker’s very modest proposal would take away the ability of most government employees to collectively bargain for benefits. They could still bargain for higher wages, but future wage increases would be capped at the federal Consumer Price Index, unless otherwise specified by a voter referendum. The bill would also require union members to contribute 5.8% of salary toward their pensions and chip in 12.6% of the cost of their health insurance premiums.
How can you ‘bargain’ for higher wages when you’re currently under a salary freeze? How is it ‘bargaining’ when they start your position with wage increases capped at the CPI? What happens if there’s a shortage of something like Civil Engineers and the going wage for Civil Engineers doubles? Does that mean you have no right to ask that your salary be brought up to the market level so that your only choice is to leave your job and go else where? What is the basic purpose of having the right to collective bargain but to be able to sit down and negotiate from a position of strength to a reasonable, mutually agreed position? What does it say when the state wants to handicap you from the get go and start you from the minimally acceptable position to begin with? How does this do anything but decimate the collective bargaining process?
I need to make a disclosure here. I’ve been a member of the NEA and I worked with the negotiating team at my college in Nebraska. This is something I sorely miss down here in Louisiana because I haven’t had a decent working situation since then. My livelihood was subjected to the capricious whims of both Deans and politicians many times. None of this would have happened if I had a strong bargaining unit. I would have had a vehicle for redress and I imagine they may not have even tried what they’ve gotten away with under different circumstances. An example would be that my last position offered me a job and salary–taking me off the job market–then 10 days before school started, they changed both my salary and job grade to a much lower position when I had no options at that point. I’d have never taken that offer had it been made when I was in a position to do something else. This last teaching job never paid me any of the salaries they offered me for either of the two academic years I worked there. I received two contracts after school had started that were distinctly different from the terms they gave me mid summer. That’s just one example of abuse too. Also, what few benefits we had in the Louisiana public university systems are the result of the collective bargaining power of the clerical and janitor’s unions. That goes for administrators too. If they hadn’t achieved a minimal threshold, the rest of us would never have gotten similar deals. The only employees that have control over the terms of their jobs are the very top administrators and the sports coaches.
But then, I speak now as the new enemy of the people. Just read right wing media sources. Oh, and watch CNN and NPTV. I learned exactly how horrible people like me are on State of the Union and The Nightly News Report last night. I’m the new face of communism and the caliphate. I switched to MSNBC last night because I simply couldn’t take the public bashing of my profession and my colleagues any more. This bashing came via Journalists and Politicians which– last time I checked–were the two least respected professionals in the country.
I won’t even show you some of the more egregious right wing bloggers who basically portray all teachers, policemen, firefighters, janitors, prison guards, and other civil servants as greedy bastards who sit around all day doing nothing and collecting outrageous salaries that they’d never be able to achieve in the private sector. This is all based on bogus assumptions. One blog calls the protests in Wisconsin ‘hate rallies’. This farcical stereotype is being tooted by Republican pols who have premier pension plans and insurance programs immediately and have access to discounted and free services. How many of you have a barber shop or a gym you don’t pay for? I didn’t even have that at either of my University jobs and universities have some pretty nice gym facilities. Faculty and staff have to pay to join. How hypocritical is that?
How far have we sunk when so many elected officials and media figures are trying to make enemies of the very people that are here to serve us? What has a park ranger at a state park done to deserve this kind of vituperative treatment? Why do they so hate the middle class and the very groups of unions that set the tone for wages and benefits in many places? What type of plantation mentality does it take to eagerly seek to force workers into such a hapless position? Better yet, why are so many people duped by these voices of the plutocracy?
Perhaps every one recognizes that we may be crossing the Rubicon. This maybe the threshold of our final chance to stop the Republican and Chamber of Commerce led plot to put us all back on plantations with a debt form of indentured servitude that we can never escape.
What’s happening in Wisconsin is more threatening to unions because it’s not just giving back money–something that’s become a mainstay in the auto industry for years. It’s giving back hard-won rights. By going after collective-bargaining rules, Walker has taken on public-employee unions in a way that’s more fundamental, profound, and threatening to unions than New Jersey’s Republican Gov. Chris Christie’s wielding of the budget axe. Christie has become the darling of the GOP circles because of his administration’s fiscal austerity.
By taking aim at the ability of public employees to strike, Walker has found a tool that may well cut the state’s budget deficit. In doing so, however, he has lit a fire under Democrats and a chastened labor movement that has gotten used to givebacks.
Collective bargaining is the infrastructure–the essential core of labor’s rights and power–and so attacks on that right go to the heart of the union movement. That is why the president weighed in on what is at first glance a local issue. If the battle of Madison spreads beyond Columbus and Des Moines to the rest of the country, we’ll be hearing a lot more on this topic from the president.
It isn’t far fetched to say that the fascist elements in this country are using police state tactics to squelch dissent. The plutocracy that funds the so-called tea party is deep in the trenches on this one. Here’s one such group of little fascists in training bragging they chased the 14 Democratic senators out of Rockford, Illinois. How many of these idiots realize that their being used by folks like the trust fund baby Koch brothers to suppress people who they have a lot more in common with than difference? Why are they being used to attack others fighting for the few scraps left to those outside the bonus and inherited wealth class?
The NYT has also put a no-name editorial up signifying the force of the board of editors.
Like many governors, he wants to cut the benefits of state workers. But he also decided a budget crisis was a good time to advance an ideological goal dear to his fellow Republicans: eliminating most collective bargaining rights for public employees.
Not surprisingly, thousands of workers descended on the Capitol building, pounding on windows and blocking doors, yelling “shut it down.” So many teachers called in sick that public schools in Madison and more than a dozen other districts had to be closed. On Thursday, the Democrats in the State Senate refused to show up, vowing to prevent any action until the governor drops his plan. The state police were sent to find them.
Mr. Walker has decried the chaos, but it was entirely self-inflicted. His plan to undermine the unions, which would have no direct impact on the budget, would take away nearly all of their rights to negotiate.
They would be barred from bargaining about anything except wages, and any pay increase they win would be limited by the consumer price index. Contracts would be limited to a year, and union dues could no longer be deducted from paychecks. As President Obama correctly put it on Wednesday, that “seems like an assault on unions.” (The archbishop of Milwaukee and players for the Green Bay Packers have also come out in support of the workers.)
I personally hope this is the moment of plutocratic overreach that puts people in the streets to protest. We have public goods for many reasons. Some times, it is the only way a good–like public transportation–will be provided. Some times it’s the only way that a good–like education–will be provided to any one but the rich. Other times, public provision is necessary because the social costs of private provision are huge. Examples of these are processes that cause security risks and crime, pollution, or other public health risks.
Bringing Public workers down is not a way to lift every one else up. Traditionally, unions have provided the benchmark for every right we have including five day work weeks, overtime pay, holidays, child labor laws, worker safety initiatives, and benefits. Much like public plans for insurance, they provide an anchor of the minimally acceptable contract in markets that are so lop-sided. In other words, its a way to fight off monopoly on the other side of the market. If you’re a teacher or you want to go into law enforcement or fire fighting or civil engineering, then you’re going to have to work for a municipality or state. They are the sole employers. They are monopolies.
Collective bargaining is necessary when the other side of the equation in a market is a monopoly. It is the only offset to the overwhelming power of the monopoly. It is frequently why you still see unions in private markets where the company is also either a monopoly or oligopoly like the steel industry or the automobile industry. Monopolies take advantage of customers and they take advantage of the factors they use in their production process if they can. Collective bargaining is an important offset to this power. Without out, all of us would be much worse off.
So, you can want your MTV and Super Bowl and tacky Chinese made jeans. Give me my union.
update: Green Bay Packers join the Protests. National Guard representatives balk at being used as tools.
“The NFL Players Association will always support efforts protecting a worker’s right to join a union and collectively bargain. Today, the NFLPA stands in solidarity with its organized labor brothers and sisters in Wisconsin.”
The support of the Packers players hasn’t been lost on those marching in the streets. Aisha Robertson, a public school teacher from Madison, told me, “It’s great to see Packers join the fight against Walker. Their statement of support shows they stand with us. It gives us inspiration and courage to go and fight peacefully for our most basic rights.”
and from the same source:
Yes, in advance of any debate over his proposal, Governor Walker put the National Guard on alert by saying that the guard is “prepared” for “whatever the governor, their commander-in-chief, might call for.” Considering that the state of Wisconsin hasn’t called in the National Guard since 1886, these bizarre threats did more than raise eyebrows. They provoked rage.
Robin Eckstein, a former Wisconsin National Guard member, told the Huffington Post, “Maybe the new governor doesn’t understand yet—but the National Guard is not his own personal intimidation force to be mobilized to quash political dissent. The Guard is to be used in case of true emergencies and disasters, to help the people of Wisconsin, not to bully political opponents.”
Already this week, as many as 100,000 people have marched at various protests around the state with signs that reflect the current moment like “If Egypt Can Have Democracy, Why Can’t Wisconsin?” “We Want Governors Not Dictators,” and the pithy “Hosni Walker.”
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- More
Friday Reads
Posted: February 18, 2011 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: collective bargaining, Federal Budget, Foreign Affairs, just because, morning reads, The Media SUCKS, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics | Tags: Bahrain protests, budget, Budget Deficit, Federal Spending, Republican attacks on Employee Unions, Wisconsin protests | 26 Comments
Good Morning!!
I’m hoping that Wisconsin represents a tipping point in Republican overreach. Fourteen Democratic Senators from Wisconsin are holing up in a Best Western in Rockford Illinois while the Governor and State Senate President send out the state troopers to find them and bring them back for a vote they will lose. That’s right. A United States Governor is using police tactics on elected officials. He’s also ready to call out the national guard to deal with a lawful gathering of students, teachers, police officers, fire fighters, nurses, civil engineers, doctors, and file clerks. It’s six am. Do you know where your constitutional rights are?
Will this be the day that Republican attempts to remove collective bargaining rights from government workers ends? TPM has evidence that right wing Republican Governor Scott Walker Ginned up a Budget battle to bust state employee’s unions by passing irresponsible tax cuts the moment he hit the office.
“Walker was not forced into a budget repair bill by circumstances beyond he control,” says Jack Norman, research director at the Institute for Wisconsin Future — a public interest think tank. “He wanted a budget repair bill and forced it by pushing through tax cuts… so he could rush through these other changes.”
“The state of Wisconsin has not reached the point at which austerity measures are needed,” Norman adds.
In a Wednesday op-ed, the Capitol Times of Madison picked up on this theme.
In its Jan. 31 memo to legislators on the condition of the state’s budget, the Fiscal Bureau determined that the state will end the year with a balance of $121.4 million.
To the extent that there is an imbalance — Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit — it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January.
Meanwhile, Republicans are escalating the rhetoric on budget doom and gloom–after pushing for draconian tax cuts for billionaires in December–on the Federal level too. Boehner is talking shutting down the Government once again.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Thursday ruled out a short-term government-funding bill that maintains current levels of federal spending, escalating a standoff with Democrats and President Obama that could result in a government shutdown.
“I am not going to move any kind of short-term [funding bill] at current levels,” he told reporters at his weekly press conference.
“When we say we’re going to cut spending, read my lips, we’re going to cut spending,” Boehner added, invoking George H.W. Bush’s infamous and ultimately broken pledge on taxes during the 1988 presidential campaign.
Democratic Senate leaders refused to budge, saying a short-term bill should keep current funding levels in place. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) likened Boehner’s comment to “throwing down the gauntlet.”
Let’s hope we get the same kind of Senate leadership on the national level as Wisconsin workers are getting from their Democratic Senators. How do you build an economy when the decision makers do things that remove incomes and jobs from ordinary Americans?
Paul Krugman’s “Willie Sutton Wept” is a must read. He explains three things you need to know about the current budget debate. I think it’s an important read because I spent some time last night listening to multiple news outlets filled with chattering class idiots insisting that all economists think the deficit is the most pressing problem the country faces. I personally can’t name ONE economist that does.
There are three things you need to know about the current budget debate. First, it’s essentially fraudulent. Second, most people posing as deficit hawks are faking it. Third, while President Obama hasn’t fully avoided the fraudulence, he’s less bad than his opponents — and he deserves much more credit for fiscal responsibility than he’s getting.
About the fraudulence: Last month, Howard Gleckman of the Tax Policy Center described the president as the “anti-Willie Sutton,” after the holdup artist who reputedly said he robbed banks because that’s where the money is. Indeed, Mr. Obama has lately been going where the money isn’t, making a big deal out of a freeze on nonsecurity discretionary spending, which accounts for only 12 percent of the budget.
But that’s what everyone does. House Republicans talk big about spending cuts — but focus solely on that same small budget sliver.
And by proposing sharp spending cuts right away, Republicans aren’t just going where the money isn’t, they’re also going when the money isn’t. Slashing spending while the economy is still deeply depressed is a recipe for slower economic growth, which means lower tax receipts — so any deficit reduction from G.O.P. cuts would be at least partly offset by lower revenue.
The whole budget debate, then, is a sham. House Republicans, in particular, are literally stealing food from the mouths of babes — nutritional aid to pregnant women and very young children is one of the items on their cutting block — so they can pose, falsely, as deficit hawks.
We have a staggering rate of unemployment with underlying employment trends that are not good. Some sectors of the economy, some groups of workers, and many states are in dire straights. I would never believe that a group of people that have lived so close to the precipice that was The Great Depression can be suggesting what they are suggesting now. Either they seriously want to take the country down or they are so stupid and corrupt that they know not what they are doing and they don’t care what they are doing. Our economy is not by any real standard experiencing a good and sustained recovery from a devastating financial crisis. There is weakness in nearly every sector. The only way to grow the economy and to eventually shrink the deficit is through job and economic growth. Every decision maker that I hear these days is aiming policy in the opposite direction and taking away every single means available to make it so.
I’d just like to ask you one question. Was your future destroyed by the burden of paying for the debt and deficits that resulted from World War 2? We’re still paying that down so we should have had a really really horrible economy for the last 60 years if you follow the line of thought of these people screaming about the deficit. Would you have rather they didn’t run any deficit and just called off the entire Omaha Beach thing? Would your life had been better now for that decision? Do you think your life would be better if they’d have not ever offered student loans, or PBS, or undertaken the burden of an interstate system? Do you feel your life is burdened by paying for the Interstate system?
Some times you have to take on long term debt for the big things. We have a big country with a big GDP. We can handle the debt. What we can’t handle is sustained loss of jobs and incomes for the majority of people. They’re downsizing all of us and upsizing their billionaire friends lives. Every one of us should be willing to take to the street like the folks in Wisconsin to stop that. Every Senator and Congressman that believes in the American Middle class should be willing to shut down the workings of congress if it’s necessary to stop this assault on public goods and public servants.
Pro-democracy protesters in the small monarchy of Bharain continues to experience the full force of government oppression in their struggle for reform. American produced tear gas came into play yet again.
Armored cars are now patrolling the streets of the capital, and all further protests have been banned by the authorities. But sporadic clashes have occurred in different parts of the city.
A statement from the Ministry of Interior claimed that the authorities had attempted to negotiate a peaceful end to the demonstration.
“Security forces evacuated the area of Pearl Roundabout from protesters, after trying all opportunities for dialogue with them, in which some positively responded and left quietly,” the statement read.
However, human rights activists were quick to dismiss these reports, and Al Jazeera reported that the protesters were asleep when the police raid began and that medical staff attending the wounded were among those beaten by police.
The violence comes on the fourth consecutive day of protests since demonstrators staged a ‘Day of Rage’ on Feb. 14, with two protesters killed earlier in the week. In the aftermath of these fatalities, Bahrain’s King Hamad bin Issa issued an apology and promised an investigation into excessive police violence.
Bahrain is an interesting Gulf Nation in that it has predominately Shia Muslim but the ruling family is Sunni. Sunnis enjoy the majority of the wealth and benefits here as was the case in Iraq so there are tensions between the two sects. Most of the Gulf states are predominately Sunni. Sunnis represent the middle class here while Shia are poor. There appears to be some interesting bedfellows made as a result of the protests. Bahrain is an important US alley because of its strategic location as home for the US Navy’s fifth fleet. It has a lot of natural gas but a small and dwindling amount of petroleum, as such, it is not as wealthy as many of its neighbors. The Al Khalifah dynasty appears unwilling to compromise at this point, but time will tell.
The SEC may be getting ready take Freddie Mac officials to court.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has escalated its investigation into mortgage financer Freddie Mac’s disclosures to investors and has notified at least one former official that it intends to file civil charges against him.
Anthony “Buddy” Piszel, who was chief financial officer of Freddie Mac from 2006 until 2008 when the government placed it in conservatorship, received a “Wells notice” from the SEC, according to Corelogic, a California company where he is chief financial officer. A Wells notice is an indication that the SEC staff intends to recommend to its five-member commission that it file civil charges. Corelogic disclosed the Wells notice on February 10 and said Mr Piszel had submitted his resignation, but would stay until June.
The SEC has investigated Freddie before for possible fraudulent accounting practices and problems related to disclosure and corporate governance. Freddie Mac was formed in the 1970s to give money to mortgage lenders to be used for house loans. It’s the largest buyer and packager of house loans in the mortgage market. It is publicly held and currently bankrupt.
So, the world around us changing.
What’s on your reading and blogging list today?
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- More






Recent Comments