Today is the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire. The AFL-CIO blog has an excellent post up to commemorate this tragic anniversary. Here is a bit of it, but I suggest you read the whole thing if you can find the time.
When word got out two weeks ago that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker had ordered the windows of the state Capitol building bolted shut during the ongoing protests against his attacks on public employees, it was a chilling reminder of a similar action by the employers of the Triangle Shirtwaist factory.
Nearly 100 years ago to the day of Walker’s order—which he rescinded after public outrage—146 workers, mostly young immigrant girls, jumped to their deaths from the 10-story building, unable to escape a fire because factory foremen had locked all the doors. The owners, Isaac Harris and Max Blanck, worried the workers would steal from the company.
Hyman Meshel worked on the eighth floor. When the rescue crew found Meshel, who was still alive,
the flesh of the palms of his hands had been torn from the bones by his sliding down the steel cable in the elevator, and his knuckles and forearms were full of glass splinters from beating his way through the glass door of the elevator shaft.
Thirty dead bodies clogged the elevator shaft. All were young girls. Among the many victims, the New York Times reported the day after the disaster, were two girls:
charred beyond all hope of recognition, and found in the smoking ruins with their arms clasped around each other’s necks….
In Greenwich Village, relatives of victims marched in a procession to honor those who died so tragically–as well as those who managed to survive
Rosie Weiner, one of 146 victims of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, was only 19 when she died.
“She jumped from the ninth floor window. According to reports, she was holding her friend Tessie Wisner’s hand,” said Suzanne Pred-Bass, Weiner’s great-niece.
Pred-Bass was one of hundreds marching in a procession from Union Square to the scene of the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. Another of her great-aunts, Rosie’s 17-year-old sister Katie, somehow survived that day 100 years ago.
“She grabbed the cable, really so courageously, of the last elevator to leave the ninth floor and saved herself. It was really remarkable,” said Pred-Bass.
Annie Springsock, then 17 years old, also survived. Her granddaughter, Eileen Nevitt, came from California to pay tribute to her and the historical impact of the fire.
Today, as we watch Republicans do everything in their power to destroy unions, remove safety regulations, and cut off funding for regulators, we need to remember what happened on that awful day 100 years ago. We can’t give up the fight. We must stand together against these politicians and their war on workers.
This is an open thread.
Yes, folks, it’s going viral! Indiana House Democrats have emulated Wisconsin Democratic Senators and leave the state rather than vote on a draconian anti-union bill.
Seats on one side of the Indiana House were nearly empty today as House Democrats departed the the state rather than vote on anti-union legislation.
A source tells The Indianapolis Star that Democrats are headed to Illinois, though it was possible some also might go to Kentucky. They need to go to a state with a Democratic governor to avoid being taken into police custody and returned to Indiana.
The House came into session twice this morning, with only three of the 40 Democrats present. Those were needed to make a motion, and a seconding motion, for any procedural steps Democrats would want to take to ensure Republicans don’t do anything official without quorum.
With only 58 legislators present, there was no quorum present to do business. The House needs 67 of its members to be present.
Indiana Government Mitch Daniels, who has completely unrealistic presidential aspirations tried to laugh off the Democrats’ strategy.
downplayed the boycott and the labor protests and laughed off suggestions that he might send the state police to pick up Democrats, some of whom left the state to escape their jurisdiction.
The right-to-work bill would prohibit Hoosier companies from entering into contracts requiring employees either to join a union or pay union dues or fees.
The bill would have a dramatic impact on teachers.
I’ve worked in both the public and private sector. I’ve also worked in union and non-union shops. Additionally, I was part of the collective bargaining process for community college instructors in a right to work state some time ago so I’m familiar with the process. I’ve been a manager and economist that has done strategic budgeting and planning so I’m used to salary and benefit surveys even though I’ve no experience in HR. I also check my facts before taking any one else’s words or wishful thinking. It’s easy to look for a scapegoat for the budget woes of states. The answer lies more in the nature of governors and legislators getting to balance a budget when funds are pouring in than it does in the joy that some people appear to be getting by scapegoating public sector workers and their unions.
For some reason, there’s this idea floating around that public sector employees are raking in the bucks at every one else’s expense. Also, there’s another canard out there that it’s public employees and their generous pensions that are breaking the back of state budgets. I know that’s not really the case for several reasons. The first one is that I know how the collective bargaining process works for a public employee because I’ve done it and the resultant salaries and benefits packages usually aren’t up to private sector levels. It’s based on bringing a rubric of like institutions in like communities and like jobs to the negotiating table. You basically point to that rubric and say here’s the top, bottom, and middle salaries for people in similar jobs in similar institutions. You point to their numbers and then you point to your institutions numbers and you suggest what it would take to put your institution in line with those averages. You negotiate to averages. You can’t negotiate to the best circumstance or you’ll be taken to labor “court” by management and the judges will force you to concede to a more reasonable position. The only time I’ve seen institutions go for the top salary positions is when they’re making a concerted effort to increase their academic standards and recruiting like the Duke Business School did awhile back. That, however, was a complete outlier.
As a union negotiator, you bring the rubric of institutions that would give your membership the best deal in the first round. The institution brings the rubric of institutions that give them the best deal. That rubric has to reflect similar circumstances to your membership. You can’t compare yourself to Harvard if you’re not an Ivy league school. You can’t compare yourself to Hawaii if you’re in the Midwest. Your rubric has to be a set of best matched institutions.
If everything works according to plan you negotiate a joint rubric that represents a middle ground and that middle ground will determine the end package that will likely stand for several years. If you can’t get that done, you declare an impasse and go to the NLRB or some other government entity that decides which rubric you’re going to use and that settles the situation. This happens with both benefits and salaries. It’s repeated every time negotiation year begins. It’s not an outrageous process at all. In the end, the membership either accepts it or rejects it. In my experience, teachers are generally pretty wimpy when it comes to accepting offers. I loved negotiating at a combination technical and community college because the craft people were used to unions and negotiations and were pretty good negotiators. The lead negotiator was a scrappy heating and air conditioning instructor of Italian and Sicilian heritage. I just loved talking strategy with him. Usually, the academic faculty would roll over easily for any scraps. This is a two way negotiating street. It only works when both parties sit down and are willing to hammer out a deal.
The reason this is not working in Wisconsin right now is that one side is refusing to negotiate at all. Not only that, but one side is changing the rules in the middle of the game. If there is no offset, there is no middle ground. This is the only way to get raises in public institutions. I can tell you that since I left that situation and moved to public institutions in Louisiana where you don’t get raises unless you have a governor that’s willing to fight the legislature for an across the board raise for every one. As a faculty, you live and die by whatever salary you got at the onset or you quit. In my experience, the best and the brightest do just that. They bring their new offers and see if they’ll be matched. If not, they move on. I’ve seen the institution then go to the job market and hire much younger and less experienced professors for much bigger salaries after not being able to offer even half that much to a recently tenured one. No one wants to be the one to offer a raise because every one will then want their salary raised to market level. It’s easier to let the good ones go instead. This is especially true in the econ/finance areas and also engineering and computer science because you can easily go to Wall Street or the private sector and make major amounts of money. If you’re represented by a negotiating unit, you come out with a decent cost of living raise annually and if your particular job has had an increase in marketability, you’re salary will move closer to the market. You never approach a private sector equivalence.
I’ve never seen anything in the public sector remotely approach a salary you can get in the private sector. The benefits tend to be better but the monetary compensation is almost always worse. I’ve given you an example from the salary survey done by the AFT in 2010 in the table at the top. It reflects the national salary survey of 2010 done by the Bureau of Labor Statistics which is the government’s data collector on labor markets. That’s the same people that collect unemployment statistics and inflation statistics. They have no ‘agenda’ but to collect the data. Individual groups just use the data to learn what the going market rate is for public and private sector jobs.
Now, I want to give you examples of things from the state of Louisiana. I’m going to use two resources. First, is a search engine set up by The Times Picayune of all state employee salaries. Use it to search out only one thing. The job title clerk. Clerks in state government have a union. So, just stick clerk in the job title and submit. You’re going to see there’s quite a few “pages” of clerk names, departments, and salaries. Six lucky people on the first page make high salaries for having that clerk title. The next group on the next few pages make between about $25,000 to $35,000 annually. You’ll see that the vast majority of these folks basically make around $15,000 -19,000 annually by the time you get pass about 3- 4 pages out of a total of 14 pages of names. I would like to remind you that the poverty level for a family of four is $22,050 annually. For a family of two it is 14,570 and for one person it is $10,830. These levels are for the entire country.
There’s another graphic that you can check that shows exactly who the top paid employees are and how much they make. I can assure you that none of these folks are covered by the state employees unions and none of them have any peers who have lower or higher salaries or benefits depending on when they entered service alone. These people are mostly political appointees of the governor. In this case, they are political appointees of Bobby Jindal. I’m going to show you the graph that is relevant. (It’s down below this section.) The salary structure is top heavy. You can go back and search who has the top money. You will see that it is top university administrators and coaches. Even these salaries do not stack up to private sector CEOs or coaches. It isn’t the clerks that are making outrageous salaries and it isn’t their bargaining unit that is at fault for any of this. You’ll also see if you got that page that many state workers are attorneys, engineers, teachers, nurses and doctors. These are professional people. You cannot expect to recruit and retain the best professional, well-educated service workers if you do not offer them a competitive salary. The most mobile ones will leave eventually if you don’t offer them raises and benefits commensurate with the private sector. You can go to any of the BLS salary surveys and you will see what the AFT put in that nice graphic above year after year after year. You will not get a compensation in the public sector that is more generous than the private sector at those levels of expertise. If there is a private sector ‘competitor’ for offering the job. Believe it or not, not every one is an English teacher that might likely wind up as a waitress. Here in New Orleans, most of the English teachers at my university would make better money if they’d wait tables or pour cocktails in the French Quarter. The only difference is that English teachers get a pension and insurance and they get to do the job they love.
Okay, now I’m going to go all economist on you. When you are a teacher, a firefighter, or a public health or safety worker, you face what is called a monopsony. That means there is likely to be one source of jobs and so you face the buyer’s version of a monopoly. What this means is the chips will be stack against you coming out with a ‘competitive’ wage. For example, how many forensic scientists do you suppose work outside of the local police departments? You may face a number of municipalities that could hire you in this situation. It is not, however, illegal for municipalities to collude on setting standards for salaries and benefits. Hence, you may face the same situation in city after city.
There seems to be this mindset that public servants should be public slaves from some quarters. Why should the clerk who fills out your driver’s license form be treated differently than the clerk that fills out your bank deposit slip? Why this double standard that public employees can’t be represented by unions? Well, first, I think many people still believe that public employees served by unions some how get a better deal than the others. This generally is not the case for all things. The only items that have held together for state employees that are not as available in the private sector tends to be the pension benefits and probably the insurance. One of the reasons that the insurance tends to be not such a big deal is that many states self insure and they have huge pools of employees so they can be more generous with benefits at a lower cost. I’ve generally lived in states where the biggest employer is the state. That’s a lot of people and insurance gets cheaper as the pool grows larger.
I think one of the other reasons is that people in nonunion jobs feel helpless about their futures and they are angry that they really don’t have the same safety in numbers that you see with union shops. You can’t be bullied by an employer when there is a union in place. This does have a tendency to protect even the worst employee, but when you work for capricious bosses, and we all do, you’ll never be safer than when you have union representation. You also are more aware of when your number will be up during downsizing and you will get a recall if they start rehiring if you’re a member of a union. This type of job security is generally the most important thing to a state employee which is why they work for lower monetary compensation. But again, why begrudge others what you could have if you’d just organize your work place?
I’ve been seeing way to many sites discuss ‘greedy’ teachers who selfishly walk out of the classroom to protest their right to organize. I really don’t get this meme at all. Wouldn’t you fight for your family’s livelihood if it were threatened? Why are teachers supposed to be treated differently than any one else?
A Governor or any other publicly elected official isn’t just held to account on voting day. Democracy is a day-in-and-day out process. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was elected to handle the budget. He immediately cut $117 billion in revenues coming from businesses and created a $130 billion deficit. His answer to covering his self created deficit was to change the terms of thousands of previously negotiated commitments to public employees. He backed out of the state’s commitment. He’s also refused to remove the union busting portions of the bill in exchange for salary and benefit concessions. How is this anything but dogmatic and unfair to state employees? Who makes heroes out of people that break commitments? Each of those families made plans based on the sanctity of the promise the state of Wisconsin made to them. They were part of the agreement and they should be part of renegotiating the agreement because that’s the rules of the game there. Changing the rules of a game in the middle of play is cheating.
If Governor Walker was so interested in frugality, then he should’ve started by not passing those $117 million in tax breaks. An election victory is not a blank check in a democracy.
Within days of becoming governor, Mr. Walker — who hung a sign on the doorknob of his office that reads “Wisconsin is open for business” — began stirring things up, and drawing headlines.
He rejected $810 million in federal money that the state was getting to build a train line between Madison and Milwaukee, saying the project would ultimately cost the state too much to operate. He decided to turn the state’s Department of Commerce into a “public-private hybrid,” in which hundreds of workers would need to reapply for their jobs.
He and state lawmakers passed $117 million in tax breaks for businesses and others, a move that many of his critics point to now as a sign that Mr. Walker made the state’s budget gap worse, then claimed an emergency that requires sacrifices from unions. Technically, the tax cuts do not go into effect in this year’s budget (which Mr. Walker says includes a $137 million shortfall), but in the coming two-year budget, during which the gap is estimated at $3.6 billion.
Democrats here say Mr. Walker’s style has led to a sea change in Wisconsin’s political tradition.
“Every other Republican governor has had moderates in their caucus and histories of working with Democrats,” said Graeme Zielinski, a spokesman for the state’s Democratic Party. “But he is a hard-right partisan who does not negotiate, does not compromise. He is totally modeled after a slash-and-burn, scorched-earth approach that has never existed here before.”
There’s some very interesting polls coming out of the Wisconsin protests. Here is some poll analysis on unions and public unions from the CSM.
Asked about “when you hear of a disagreement between state or local governments and unions that represent government workers,” more Americans say their first reaction is to side with the union (44 percent) than with state or local governments (38 percent). And substantially more Americans see union contracts as ensuring that workers are “treated fairly” than as giving workers an “unfair advantage.”
Other polls have found mixed results. Here’s some coverage at Huffpo for the Pew poll cited above as well as a few others. Either way, it’s interesting to note that Walker has some pretty strong ties to the notorious Koch Brothers. These trust fund babies spend a lot of John Bircher Daddy’s money trying to bust unions. I don’t think this can be discounted either.
According to Wisconsin campaign finance filings, Walker’s gubernatorial campaign received $43,000 from the Koch Industries PAC during the 2010 election. That donation was his campaign’s second-highest, behind $43,125 in contributions from housing and realtor groups in Wisconsin. The Koch’s PAC also helped Walker via a familiar and much-used politicial maneuver designed to allow donors to skirt campaign finance limits. The PAC gave $1 million to the Republican Governors Association, which in turn spent $65,000 on independent expenditures to support Walker. The RGA also spent a whopping $3.4 million on TV ads and mailers attacking Walker’s opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. Walker ended up beating Barrett by 5 points. The Koch money, no doubt, helped greatly.
When there is big corporate money in elections, there is only one offset these days. That would be the money and free labored offered up by unions. Undoubtedly, the public sector unions are some of the last big unions standing. I can only imagine how much the Kochs and others would like to gut the fund raising and GOTV efforts of unions that are usually made available to candidates that thwart their Bircher plots. After all, there’s very little standing right now to check the power and political donations of megacorporations. This fact alone should make any one support the few unions left standing. However, the bigger question remains. Why do so many people begrudge public workers a voice in the terms of their employment?
The Right Wing Media and John Birch society outlets are pressing hard against the protests happening in Wisconsin and other places where government workers’ rights to collective bargaining are under assault. We’re seeing police state tactics employed by the Republicans in Wisconsin and typical hateful propaganda from the mouthpieces of the plutocracy. Here’s an excellent example of right wing hysteria worthy of a dying despot using State TV to scare people from WSJ.
A seminal showdown between public unions and taxpayers. — For Americans who don’t think the welfare state riots of France or Greece can happen here, we recommend a look at the union and Democratic Party spectacle now unfolding in Wisconsin.
That’s right, Wisconsin is having ‘welfare state’ riots like France or Greece. I’ve missed the fires, but hell, what’s a little purple prose compared to having every one sing ‘The Internationale’ eventually? Is that what they think of Fire Fighters and Teachers? Do the services we provide fall under a ‘welfare state’? Do the years we spend at school or training need to be discounted because we work for the public sector instead of the private? Look at that pejorative word ‘riots’. Isn’t every one in Wisconsin exercising their constitution-given rights to free speech and assembly? Are they really rioting? This reminds me of the characterization in Egypt by the state TV of journalists and protesters as provocateurs of foreign agents. That was the trigger pulled on a gun pointed at the head of journalists among others.
Catch what’s called a ‘modest proposal’ in the second paragraph. Unbelievable. This Op-Ed was unsigned and that in itself is telling. It’s an edict from above.
Mr. Walker’s very modest proposal would take away the ability of most government employees to collectively bargain for benefits. They could still bargain for higher wages, but future wage increases would be capped at the federal Consumer Price Index, unless otherwise specified by a voter referendum. The bill would also require union members to contribute 5.8% of salary toward their pensions and chip in 12.6% of the cost of their health insurance premiums.
How can you ‘bargain’ for higher wages when you’re currently under a salary freeze? How is it ‘bargaining’ when they start your position with wage increases capped at the CPI? What happens if there’s a shortage of something like Civil Engineers and the going wage for Civil Engineers doubles? Does that mean you have no right to ask that your salary be brought up to the market level so that your only choice is to leave your job and go else where? What is the basic purpose of having the right to collective bargain but to be able to sit down and negotiate from a position of strength to a reasonable, mutually agreed position? What does it say when the state wants to handicap you from the get go and start you from the minimally acceptable position to begin with? How does this do anything but decimate the collective bargaining process?
I need to make a disclosure here. I’ve been a member of the NEA and I worked with the negotiating team at my college in Nebraska. This is something I sorely miss down here in Louisiana because I haven’t had a decent working situation since then. My livelihood was subjected to the capricious whims of both Deans and politicians many times. None of this would have happened if I had a strong bargaining unit. I would have had a vehicle for redress and I imagine they may not have even tried what they’ve gotten away with under different circumstances. An example would be that my last position offered me a job and salary–taking me off the job market–then 10 days before school started, they changed both my salary and job grade to a much lower position when I had no options at that point. I’d have never taken that offer had it been made when I was in a position to do something else. This last teaching job never paid me any of the salaries they offered me for either of the two academic years I worked there. I received two contracts after school had started that were distinctly different from the terms they gave me mid summer. That’s just one example of abuse too. Also, what few benefits we had in the Louisiana public university systems are the result of the collective bargaining power of the clerical and janitor’s unions. That goes for administrators too. If they hadn’t achieved a minimal threshold, the rest of us would never have gotten similar deals. The only employees that have control over the terms of their jobs are the very top administrators and the sports coaches.
But then, I speak now as the new enemy of the people. Just read right wing media sources. Oh, and watch CNN and NPTV. I learned exactly how horrible people like me are on State of the Union and The Nightly News Report last night. I’m the new face of communism and the caliphate. I switched to MSNBC last night because I simply couldn’t take the public bashing of my profession and my colleagues any more. This bashing came via Journalists and Politicians which– last time I checked–were the two least respected professionals in the country.
I won’t even show you some of the more egregious right wing bloggers who basically portray all teachers, policemen, firefighters, janitors, prison guards, and other civil servants as greedy bastards who sit around all day doing nothing and collecting outrageous salaries that they’d never be able to achieve in the private sector. This is all based on bogus assumptions. One blog calls the protests in Wisconsin ‘hate rallies’. This farcical stereotype is being tooted by Republican pols who have premier pension plans and insurance programs immediately and have access to discounted and free services. How many of you have a barber shop or a gym you don’t pay for? I didn’t even have that at either of my University jobs and universities have some pretty nice gym facilities. Faculty and staff have to pay to join. How hypocritical is that?
How far have we sunk when so many elected officials and media figures are trying to make enemies of the very people that are here to serve us? What has a park ranger at a state park done to deserve this kind of vituperative treatment? Why do they so hate the middle class and the very groups of unions that set the tone for wages and benefits in many places? What type of plantation mentality does it take to eagerly seek to force workers into such a hapless position? Better yet, why are so many people duped by these voices of the plutocracy?
Perhaps every one recognizes that we may be crossing the Rubicon. This maybe the threshold of our final chance to stop the Republican and Chamber of Commerce led plot to put us all back on plantations with a debt form of indentured servitude that we can never escape.
What’s happening in Wisconsin is more threatening to unions because it’s not just giving back money–something that’s become a mainstay in the auto industry for years. It’s giving back hard-won rights. By going after collective-bargaining rules, Walker has taken on public-employee unions in a way that’s more fundamental, profound, and threatening to unions than New Jersey’s Republican Gov. Chris Christie’s wielding of the budget axe. Christie has become the darling of the GOP circles because of his administration’s fiscal austerity.
By taking aim at the ability of public employees to strike, Walker has found a tool that may well cut the state’s budget deficit. In doing so, however, he has lit a fire under Democrats and a chastened labor movement that has gotten used to givebacks.
Collective bargaining is the infrastructure–the essential core of labor’s rights and power–and so attacks on that right go to the heart of the union movement. That is why the president weighed in on what is at first glance a local issue. If the battle of Madison spreads beyond Columbus and Des Moines to the rest of the country, we’ll be hearing a lot more on this topic from the president.
It isn’t far fetched to say that the fascist elements in this country are using police state tactics to squelch dissent. The plutocracy that funds the so-called tea party is deep in the trenches on this one. Here’s one such group of little fascists in training bragging they chased the 14 Democratic senators out of Rockford, Illinois. How many of these idiots realize that their being used by folks like the trust fund baby Koch brothers to suppress people who they have a lot more in common with than difference? Why are they being used to attack others fighting for the few scraps left to those outside the bonus and inherited wealth class?
The NYT has also put a no-name editorial up signifying the force of the board of editors.
Like many governors, he wants to cut the benefits of state workers. But he also decided a budget crisis was a good time to advance an ideological goal dear to his fellow Republicans: eliminating most collective bargaining rights for public employees.
Not surprisingly, thousands of workers descended on the Capitol building, pounding on windows and blocking doors, yelling “shut it down.” So many teachers called in sick that public schools in Madison and more than a dozen other districts had to be closed. On Thursday, the Democrats in the State Senate refused to show up, vowing to prevent any action until the governor drops his plan. The state police were sent to find them.
Mr. Walker has decried the chaos, but it was entirely self-inflicted. His plan to undermine the unions, which would have no direct impact on the budget, would take away nearly all of their rights to negotiate.
They would be barred from bargaining about anything except wages, and any pay increase they win would be limited by the consumer price index. Contracts would be limited to a year, and union dues could no longer be deducted from paychecks. As President Obama correctly put it on Wednesday, that “seems like an assault on unions.” (The archbishop of Milwaukee and players for the Green Bay Packers have also come out in support of the workers.)
I personally hope this is the moment of plutocratic overreach that puts people in the streets to protest. We have public goods for many reasons. Some times, it is the only way a good–like public transportation–will be provided. Some times it’s the only way that a good–like education–will be provided to any one but the rich. Other times, public provision is necessary because the social costs of private provision are huge. Examples of these are processes that cause security risks and crime, pollution, or other public health risks.
Bringing Public workers down is not a way to lift every one else up. Traditionally, unions have provided the benchmark for every right we have including five day work weeks, overtime pay, holidays, child labor laws, worker safety initiatives, and benefits. Much like public plans for insurance, they provide an anchor of the minimally acceptable contract in markets that are so lop-sided. In other words, its a way to fight off monopoly on the other side of the market. If you’re a teacher or you want to go into law enforcement or fire fighting or civil engineering, then you’re going to have to work for a municipality or state. They are the sole employers. They are monopolies.
Collective bargaining is necessary when the other side of the equation in a market is a monopoly. It is the only offset to the overwhelming power of the monopoly. It is frequently why you still see unions in private markets where the company is also either a monopoly or oligopoly like the steel industry or the automobile industry. Monopolies take advantage of customers and they take advantage of the factors they use in their production process if they can. Collective bargaining is an important offset to this power. Without out, all of us would be much worse off.
So, you can want your MTV and Super Bowl and tacky Chinese made jeans. Give me my union.
“The NFL Players Association will always support efforts protecting a worker’s right to join a union and collectively bargain. Today, the NFLPA stands in solidarity with its organized labor brothers and sisters in Wisconsin.”
The support of the Packers players hasn’t been lost on those marching in the streets. Aisha Robertson, a public school teacher from Madison, told me, “It’s great to see Packers join the fight against Walker. Their statement of support shows they stand with us. It gives us inspiration and courage to go and fight peacefully for our most basic rights.”
and from the same source:
Yes, in advance of any debate over his proposal, Governor Walker put the National Guard on alert by saying that the guard is “prepared” for “whatever the governor, their commander-in-chief, might call for.” Considering that the state of Wisconsin hasn’t called in the National Guard since 1886, these bizarre threats did more than raise eyebrows. They provoked rage.
Robin Eckstein, a former Wisconsin National Guard member, told the Huffington Post, “Maybe the new governor doesn’t understand yet—but the National Guard is not his own personal intimidation force to be mobilized to quash political dissent. The Guard is to be used in case of true emergencies and disasters, to help the people of Wisconsin, not to bully political opponents.”
Already this week, as many as 100,000 people have marched at various protests around the state with signs that reflect the current moment like “If Egypt Can Have Democracy, Why Can’t Wisconsin?” “We Want Governors Not Dictators,” and the pithy “Hosni Walker.”