Elizabeth Edwards’ “Devastating Act of Ultimate Revenge”
Posted: June 10, 2011 Filed under: Crime, U.S. Politics | Tags: Cate Edwards, Elizabeth Edwards, John Edwards, revenge, Rielle Hunter 46 CommentsAccording to the National Enquirer, which originally broke the story of John Edwards’ affair with Rielle Hunter and that he was the father of her child now claims that Elizabeth Edwards secretly recorded a video that she believed would incriminate him.
“Elizabeth wanted to exact revenge against John for destroying their 33-year marriage and family by cheating with Rielle,” source close to the scandal told ENQUIRER.
“It was Elizabeth’s idea to secretly record a video and tell what knew of the affair and John’s horrific betrayal.”
Before her death in December 2010 at age 61, Elizabeth got newly engaged daughter Cate, 29, to agree that if anything happened to John, she would take care of the youngsters with the help of relatives and friends.
“It was then – without Cate’s knowledge – that Elizabeth turned the video camera on herself. She passed the video to a close friend and asked that it be sent to prosecutors,” said the source.
If the Enquirer hadn’t already proved itself to be accurate about this story several times in the past, I wouldn’t believe it. If this is true, it says a lot about Elizabeth’s strength of will and determination. Talk about a “steel magnolia!”
Monday Reads
Posted: June 6, 2011 Filed under: Economy, Foreign Affairs, morning reads, Yemen | Tags: jobs, John Edwards, the economy, Yemen 32 Comments
Good Morning!
The top stories on every one’s mind these days are the lousy jobs report last week and the tumbling stock markets. Democrats in the House are calling for new infrastructure spending as a way to create more jobs in the hopes that a few federal projects could provide some stimulus to the stalling recovery.
“The American people, while concerned about the deficit, place much more emphasis on job creation, and they see a role for the government,” Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) told The Hill. “A fast injection of job stimulus on the public side would help tremendously. … It [the job report] helps our argument about investment.”
Other Democrats delivered a similar message on Friday. Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) said “the answer” to the lingering jobs crisis is “investment” in the “communities and businesses who need confidence and resources to hire [people].”
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) said “investing in our communities goes hand in hand with full economic recovery.”
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) said that only in Washington is targeted new spending being demonized.
“Once you get outside the Beltway, almost everyone agrees that we should be rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure and investing in clean American energy that reduces our dependence on oil,” Blumenauer said.
Meanwhile, the major reason for home foreclosures these days isn’t the subprime loan scandal. It’s unemployment.
The Obama administration’s main program to keep distressed homeowners from falling into foreclosure has been aimed at those who took out subprime loans or other risky mortgages during the heady days of the housing boom. But these days, the primary cause of foreclosures is unemployment.
As a result, there is a mismatch between the homeowner program’s design and the country’s economic realities — and a new round of finger-pointing about how best to fix it.
The administration’s housing effort does include programs to help unemployed homeowners, but they have been plagued by delays, dubious benefits and abysmal participation. For example, a Treasury Department effort started in early 2010 allows the jobless to postpone mortgage payments for three months, but the average length of unemployment is now nine months. As of March 31, there were only 7,397 participants.
“So far, I think the public record will show that programs to help unemployed homeowners have not been very successful,” said Jeffrey C. Fuhrer, an executive vice president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
One additional question is popping up now that it appears more than certain that some entitlements will be subject to cuts, That is why aren’t Democrats defending Medicaid? Democrats have spoken out against cuts to Social Security and have defended Medicare. What about Medicaid?
…for all the Democrats’ posturing and campaigning against Republican plans for Medicare, the GOP budget actually makes more immediate and deeper cuts to Medicaid. But Democrats haven’t been blasting the GOP Medicaid plan with nearly the same fervor, even though Republicans would cut about $750 billion from the program during the next decade and end the guaranteed federal match for states.
With intense budget negotiations on the debt limit under way, health care insiders think Democrats won’t budge much on Medicare now that they have a significant campaign chip in their pockets: Kathy Hochul’s upset win in New York’s 26th Congressional District is Exhibit A of the power of Medicare.
And that makes advocates worry that Medicaid cuts are more likely to come out of budget negotiations led by Vice President Biden.
Medicaid covers more than 50 million people, including low-income children and seniors in long-term care, but it doesn’t pack the same political punch as Medicare. Some observers say that’s due to the lingering perception that Medicaid is just a program for poor people that holds a much less broad-based appeal.
That perception is definitely part of the challenge in communicating Democratic opposition to the GOP’s Medicaid plans, Rep. Robert Andrews (D-N.J.) told POLITICO.
Medicaid “doesn’t quite have the same political dynamic” as Medicare, Andrews said.
Protestors in Wisconsin have opened a ‘Walkerville’ Tent city in Madison as a reminder of the Great Depression and to protest the governor’s budget. Wisconsin is leading the way in protesting the way state budgets are being balanced on the backs of the poor and the working and middle classes.
In a move meant to evoke the infamous “Hooverville” tent cities of the Great Depression, protesters in Madison, Wisconsin opened “Walkerville” on Saturday evening, a tent city in the heart of Madison intended as a protest of Governor Scott Walker’s budget plan.
The Wisconsin Sentinel Journal calls the protest “the latest act in the 2011 political drama featuring the governor’s push to eliminate most collective bargaining rights for most public employees”.
By 9:00pm, an estimated 250 campers in up to 100 tents were arrayed throughout the designated protest area, with many campers pitching their tents on concrete sidewalks. City police, state troopers, and other law enforcement personnel were on hand, but on the whole a carnival air prevailed as families set up for the night, some intending to stay just for a night or two and others through June 20.
Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh is in Saudia Arabia recovering from injuries suffered in an attack on his palace last week. Many people are encouraging him to stay there.
The United States and Britain are pressing Saudi Arabia to persuade the Yemeni president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, to formally stand down after flying to Riyadh for treatment for injuries that were sustained in shelling in Sana’a on Friday.
Diplomats said that Washington and London were insisting that Saleh now be urged to implement a deal under which he would relinquish power in exchange for immunity from prosecution and financial guarantees about his future.
Pro-democracy protestors in Yemen were celebrating his departure after 33 years in power, but the Arab world’s poorest country still faces turmoil as well as immediate concerns over whether a truce will hold if Saleh tries to return and his relatives and supporters fight back.
The risks ahead were underlined by clashes in the southern city of Taiz, which left at least two dead and four injured. Shelling was also reported in Sana’a.
Saleh was described as recovering following emergency medical treatment in a Riyadh military; he was injured by shrapnel when his palace compound was attacked by tribal rivals.
Yemen’s ruling party, the General People’s Congress, insisted he would be back, but diplomats and analysts expressed doubt, suggesting that Saudi patience with an always fractious and often manipulative neighbour was exhausted.
It would be impossible for Saleh to return, argued Abdul Ghani Iryani, a respected Yemeni political commentator. “He is out. That is the only rational course. The exit of the president has defused some of the tensions and war is less likely today than it was yesterday.”
Evidently John Edwards is going to trial because the Feds offered him a plea deal that included prison time.
Just before John Edwards was indicted Friday, prosecutors made a final offer: They would accept his guilty plea to three misdemeanor campaign finance law violations in the $925,000 cover-up of his affair.
With the deal, the former Democratic vice-presidential nominee would avoid a felony conviction – and almost certainly keep the law license that had made him wealthy.
But there was a catch.
The government wanted to dictate a sentence that would result in up to six months of prison for Edwards, even with the plea to lesser charges.
Edwards and his lawyers were concerned. They wanted the ability to at least argue to a judge for alternatives, such as a halfway house, weekend releases, home arrest or some arrangement that would allow Edwards to be with his school-age children. He is a single parent after the death of his wife, Elizabeth, in December.
Yeah, right. My guess is he doesn’t want to be some one’s mistress.
So, that’s what I’ve dug up today. What’s on your reading and blogging list?
John Edwards to be Indicted
Posted: May 25, 2011 Filed under: Breaking News, U.S. Politics | Tags: affair, campaign finance laws, cover up, indictment, John Edwards 33 CommentsEdwards reportedly knows about the plan and is considering his options. He could make a plea arrangement or face a trial, which could be long and costly.
An indictment or a plea bargain could happen within the next two weeks, according to reports.
The Department of Justice plans to argue that two wealthy supporters donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Edwards campaign — money that went to support Rielle Hunter, a videographer Edwards’s campaign with whom Edwards had an affair. The government will claim the funds were illegal campaign contributions.
Edwards has admitted to fathering a daughter with Hunter.
The government’s case reportedly depends on former Edwards campaign aide Andrew Young who originally said that he was the father of Hunters’s daughter and later accused Edwards of engineering an effort to hide the affair from the public.
James Hill from ABC broke the story. You can watch the story at this link.
Winning the Trifecta of Poverty: Black, Older, Woman
Posted: July 2, 2008 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Esmin Green, Hillary Clinton, human development index, John Edwards, Poverty, taxes, universal health care 3 CommentsJust about the time I think civilization has hit rock bottom, I find something else disturbing. An American Woman, Esmin Green, died because of antipathy, the abhorrent state of health care in this country, and her demographics. She basically won the lottery for what it takes to be an invisible person in this country. She was black, older (49), a woman, and in need of mental health care. The folks in the room did nothing. A security guard did nothing. There is evidence that the staff fudged the details of her death.
“A shocking video shows a woman dying on the floor in the psych ward at Kings County Hospital, while people around her, including a security guard, did nothing to help.
After an hour, another mental patient finally got the attention of the indifferent hospital workers, according to the tape, obtained by the Daily News.
Worse still, the surveillance tape suggests hospital staff may have falsified medical charts to cover the utter lack of treatment provided Esmin Green before she died.”
There is no reason for these things to happen in an industrialized modern country. We are able to treat all people humanely and there are plenty of resources and wealth to make this possible. What we lack is the will. We would rather buy toys and have comfy huge cars and homes than take care of the least among us with our tax dollars or even our charity.
This is from Wikipedia:
Poverty in the United States refers to people living in poverty in the U.S. Within the U.S. the most common measure of poverty is the “poverty line” set by the U.S. government. The official poverty threshold is adjusted for inflation using the consumer price index. Poverty in the United States is cyclical in nature with roughly 12% to 15% living below the federal poverty line at any given point in time, and roughly 40% falling below the poverty line at some time within a 10 year time span. While there remains some controversy of whether or not the official poverty over or understates poverty, the United States has some of the highest absolute and relative pre and post-transfer, poverty rates in the developed world. Overall, the U.S. ranks 16th on the Human Poverty Index.
Those under the age of 18 were the most likely to be impoverished. In 2006 the poverty rate for minors in the United States was the highest in the industrialized world, with 21.9% of all minors and 30% of African American minors living below the poverty threshold. Moreover, the standard of living for those in the bottom 10% was lower in the U.S. than in any other developed nation except the United Kingdom, which had the lowest standard of living for impoverished children.
That’s right, the U.S. is not number one in anything right now when it comes to economics. However, we’re close to achieving the number one for developed nations with high levels of income disparity and poverty. We are no longer the the economy with the highest GDP (the European Union has passed us). We have not been the economy with the highest living standard or income per capita in the world for some time. We’re 9th now in GDP per capita( http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?c=cu&v=67 ) per the CIA’s World Fact Book. We’re all losing ground, but there are those in our country who never reached that ground at any point in their lives. Their numbers are growing rapidly.
We’re very low ranked on all indexes that measure how we treat the least among us for wealthy, developed nations. This is especially true when it comes to comparing the U.S. to other developed nations. Here’s the Human Development Report link for 2007/2008. The United States now ranks 17th in the world on this index. (http://hdrstats.undp.org/indicators/5.html)
How can such a rich nation with so many resources and positive gifts to human civilization rank so low on how it treats its most vulnerable citizens? The answer must lie some where within us. It lies within the people that watched this woman fall and die. It lies within the guard that did nothing. It lies within the hearts of the folks responsible for her treatment that ignored her for so long and then lied to cover their actions. It lies within a system where the big economics discussion during a presidential campaign is how can I get away with paying the least amount of money possible to move this country and its citizens forward?
Look at the roads, the schools, the electrical grids, the Levees, the hospitals and then look very closely at the state of their decay. Every time you scream don’t raise MY taxes to a politician, another crack in our infrastructure appears. Another wounded soldier sits in Walter Reed with rat feces and mildew. Another Esmin Green falls to the floor dying without help or hope.
I hope you all enjoy your plasma tvs, your big ol Toasterlike SUVs, and your summer vacations at Disneyworld because those are obviously more important than showing the world that the U.S. takes care of its own. The future requires us to save, to invest, to pay taxes to build infrastructure and to provide funds for research and technology. Our humanity requires us to provide basic services to our fellow citizens.
Now I’m not saying I want to pay for a bridge to nowhere or a museum that glorifies mules or Woodstock. I do, however, want to pay for whatever it would take to stop another person like Esmin Green from dying, to stop toxic food and toys from killing U.S. children, animals, and adults, to ensure that our returning wounded soldiers have everything they need, and to provide for adequate basic health care for all Americans.
I know Hillary Clinton shared this vision with me. I know that John Edwards shared this vision. I know many of you do. It is time we spoke up. It is also time we offer to make sacrifices to ensure that all Americans share the promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. My pursuit of happiness does not necessarily require a plasma tv, but it does require that we stop folks like Esmin Green from winning the trifecta of poverty ever again. We need the type of universal healthcare plan offered by John Edwards and Hillary Clinton. Let us commit to the sacrifice and work it takes to achieve it.









Recent Comments