Friday Reads
Posted: February 18, 2011 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: collective bargaining, Federal Budget, Foreign Affairs, just because, morning reads, The Media SUCKS, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics | Tags: Bahrain protests, budget, Budget Deficit, Federal Spending, Republican attacks on Employee Unions, Wisconsin protests | 26 Comments
Good Morning!!
I’m hoping that Wisconsin represents a tipping point in Republican overreach. Fourteen Democratic Senators from Wisconsin are holing up in a Best Western in Rockford Illinois while the Governor and State Senate President send out the state troopers to find them and bring them back for a vote they will lose. That’s right. A United States Governor is using police tactics on elected officials. He’s also ready to call out the national guard to deal with a lawful gathering of students, teachers, police officers, fire fighters, nurses, civil engineers, doctors, and file clerks. It’s six am. Do you know where your constitutional rights are?
Will this be the day that Republican attempts to remove collective bargaining rights from government workers ends? TPM has evidence that right wing Republican Governor Scott Walker Ginned up a Budget battle to bust state employee’s unions by passing irresponsible tax cuts the moment he hit the office.
“Walker was not forced into a budget repair bill by circumstances beyond he control,” says Jack Norman, research director at the Institute for Wisconsin Future — a public interest think tank. “He wanted a budget repair bill and forced it by pushing through tax cuts… so he could rush through these other changes.”
“The state of Wisconsin has not reached the point at which austerity measures are needed,” Norman adds.
In a Wednesday op-ed, the Capitol Times of Madison picked up on this theme.
In its Jan. 31 memo to legislators on the condition of the state’s budget, the Fiscal Bureau determined that the state will end the year with a balance of $121.4 million.
To the extent that there is an imbalance — Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit — it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January.
Meanwhile, Republicans are escalating the rhetoric on budget doom and gloom–after pushing for draconian tax cuts for billionaires in December–on the Federal level too. Boehner is talking shutting down the Government once again.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Thursday ruled out a short-term government-funding bill that maintains current levels of federal spending, escalating a standoff with Democrats and President Obama that could result in a government shutdown.
“I am not going to move any kind of short-term [funding bill] at current levels,” he told reporters at his weekly press conference.
“When we say we’re going to cut spending, read my lips, we’re going to cut spending,” Boehner added, invoking George H.W. Bush’s infamous and ultimately broken pledge on taxes during the 1988 presidential campaign.
Democratic Senate leaders refused to budge, saying a short-term bill should keep current funding levels in place. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) likened Boehner’s comment to “throwing down the gauntlet.”
Let’s hope we get the same kind of Senate leadership on the national level as Wisconsin workers are getting from their Democratic Senators. How do you build an economy when the decision makers do things that remove incomes and jobs from ordinary Americans?
Paul Krugman’s “Willie Sutton Wept” is a must read. He explains three things you need to know about the current budget debate. I think it’s an important read because I spent some time last night listening to multiple news outlets filled with chattering class idiots insisting that all economists think the deficit is the most pressing problem the country faces. I personally can’t name ONE economist that does.
There are three things you need to know about the current budget debate. First, it’s essentially fraudulent. Second, most people posing as deficit hawks are faking it. Third, while President Obama hasn’t fully avoided the fraudulence, he’s less bad than his opponents — and he deserves much more credit for fiscal responsibility than he’s getting.
About the fraudulence: Last month, Howard Gleckman of the Tax Policy Center described the president as the “anti-Willie Sutton,” after the holdup artist who reputedly said he robbed banks because that’s where the money is. Indeed, Mr. Obama has lately been going where the money isn’t, making a big deal out of a freeze on nonsecurity discretionary spending, which accounts for only 12 percent of the budget.
But that’s what everyone does. House Republicans talk big about spending cuts — but focus solely on that same small budget sliver.
And by proposing sharp spending cuts right away, Republicans aren’t just going where the money isn’t, they’re also going when the money isn’t. Slashing spending while the economy is still deeply depressed is a recipe for slower economic growth, which means lower tax receipts — so any deficit reduction from G.O.P. cuts would be at least partly offset by lower revenue.
The whole budget debate, then, is a sham. House Republicans, in particular, are literally stealing food from the mouths of babes — nutritional aid to pregnant women and very young children is one of the items on their cutting block — so they can pose, falsely, as deficit hawks.
We have a staggering rate of unemployment with underlying employment trends that are not good. Some sectors of the economy, some groups of workers, and many states are in dire straights. I would never believe that a group of people that have lived so close to the precipice that was The Great Depression can be suggesting what they are suggesting now. Either they seriously want to take the country down or they are so stupid and corrupt that they know not what they are doing and they don’t care what they are doing. Our economy is not by any real standard experiencing a good and sustained recovery from a devastating financial crisis. There is weakness in nearly every sector. The only way to grow the economy and to eventually shrink the deficit is through job and economic growth. Every decision maker that I hear these days is aiming policy in the opposite direction and taking away every single means available to make it so.
I’d just like to ask you one question. Was your future destroyed by the burden of paying for the debt and deficits that resulted from World War 2? We’re still paying that down so we should have had a really really horrible economy for the last 60 years if you follow the line of thought of these people screaming about the deficit. Would you have rather they didn’t run any deficit and just called off the entire Omaha Beach thing? Would your life had been better now for that decision? Do you think your life would be better if they’d have not ever offered student loans, or PBS, or undertaken the burden of an interstate system? Do you feel your life is burdened by paying for the Interstate system?
Some times you have to take on long term debt for the big things. We have a big country with a big GDP. We can handle the debt. What we can’t handle is sustained loss of jobs and incomes for the majority of people. They’re downsizing all of us and upsizing their billionaire friends lives. Every one of us should be willing to take to the street like the folks in Wisconsin to stop that. Every Senator and Congressman that believes in the American Middle class should be willing to shut down the workings of congress if it’s necessary to stop this assault on public goods and public servants.
Pro-democracy protesters in the small monarchy of Bharain continues to experience the full force of government oppression in their struggle for reform. American produced tear gas came into play yet again.
Armored cars are now patrolling the streets of the capital, and all further protests have been banned by the authorities. But sporadic clashes have occurred in different parts of the city.
A statement from the Ministry of Interior claimed that the authorities had attempted to negotiate a peaceful end to the demonstration.
“Security forces evacuated the area of Pearl Roundabout from protesters, after trying all opportunities for dialogue with them, in which some positively responded and left quietly,” the statement read.
However, human rights activists were quick to dismiss these reports, and Al Jazeera reported that the protesters were asleep when the police raid began and that medical staff attending the wounded were among those beaten by police.
The violence comes on the fourth consecutive day of protests since demonstrators staged a ‘Day of Rage’ on Feb. 14, with two protesters killed earlier in the week. In the aftermath of these fatalities, Bahrain’s King Hamad bin Issa issued an apology and promised an investigation into excessive police violence.
Bahrain is an interesting Gulf Nation in that it has predominately Shia Muslim but the ruling family is Sunni. Sunnis enjoy the majority of the wealth and benefits here as was the case in Iraq so there are tensions between the two sects. Most of the Gulf states are predominately Sunni. Sunnis represent the middle class here while Shia are poor. There appears to be some interesting bedfellows made as a result of the protests. Bahrain is an important US alley because of its strategic location as home for the US Navy’s fifth fleet. It has a lot of natural gas but a small and dwindling amount of petroleum, as such, it is not as wealthy as many of its neighbors. The Al Khalifah dynasty appears unwilling to compromise at this point, but time will tell.
The SEC may be getting ready take Freddie Mac officials to court.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has escalated its investigation into mortgage financer Freddie Mac’s disclosures to investors and has notified at least one former official that it intends to file civil charges against him.
Anthony “Buddy” Piszel, who was chief financial officer of Freddie Mac from 2006 until 2008 when the government placed it in conservatorship, received a “Wells notice” from the SEC, according to Corelogic, a California company where he is chief financial officer. A Wells notice is an indication that the SEC staff intends to recommend to its five-member commission that it file civil charges. Corelogic disclosed the Wells notice on February 10 and said Mr Piszel had submitted his resignation, but would stay until June.
The SEC has investigated Freddie before for possible fraudulent accounting practices and problems related to disclosure and corporate governance. Freddie Mac was formed in the 1970s to give money to mortgage lenders to be used for house loans. It’s the largest buyer and packager of house loans in the mortgage market. It is publicly held and currently bankrupt.
So, the world around us changing.
What’s on your reading and blogging list today?
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- More
This is a Democratic Adviser?
Posted: November 15, 2010 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: Surreality, Team Obama, The DNC, The Great Recession, U.S. Economy | Tags: budget, cat food commission, Peter Orzag, President Obama, Social Security, the economy | 39 Comments
I have to admit to being with Digby on this one. It’s getting more obvious to me that this Democratic Administration is going after our Social Security benefits with gusto. You may recall that Peter Orzag was the Obama Budget Director and is now one of the major economic advisers to the President. This contribution to the NYT is not the first flare to be fired, but it is a distinctly blinding one.
So, first Orzag admits that Social Security is not a federal deficit problem. You would think he’d end with that. Social Security is an off budget program and it’s self funding and managing. That’s the deal. People pay for the benefits and they expect them. It’s a third rail of politics and you’d think after Dubya’s adventures into handing the trust fund to Wall Street that would be all she wrote. But, it’s not. (Emphasis is mine on this.)
So it would be desirable to put the system on sounder financial footing. And that is precisely what the co-chairmen of President Obama’s bipartisan commission on reducing the national debt have bravely proposed to do. It’s too bad their proposal has been greeted with so much criticism, especially from progressives — who really should look at it as an opportunity to fix Social Security without privatizing it. Although the plan leans too much on future benefit reductions and not enough on revenue increases, it still offers a good starting point for reform.
…
The main flaw in the proposed Social Security plan is that it relies too little on revenue increases and too much on future benefit reductions. A reasonable objective would be a 50-50 balance between changes in benefits and changes in revenues. But the way to bring reform into better proportion is to adjust the components of this proposal, not to fundamentally remodel it.
Alrighty, so let’s first IGNORE the fact that the cat food commission had no real business sticking its nose into Social Security because it’s charter said it was to go after the Federal Deficit. And, as Orzag has stated, Social Security is NO contributor to that deficit.
So, here’s where I agree with Digby.
I can hardly believe anyone of his stature could argue this nonsense. Orszag agrees that SS does not contribute to the long term deficit and yet is trying to convince us that that the Deficit Commission draft just put it on the table anyway, apparently out of a surfeit of progressive idealism. Huh? Moreover, he also thinks it makes sense to jump right on the third rail in American politics because it would be desirable” to do something about a potential future problem — when we are in the middle of an epic economic shitstorm with stubborn 10% unemployment and a banking and housing crisis that shows no sign of abating.
Is he ignorant of the fact that most people in this country are convinced — mainly because they’re being told it every single day by every politician, talking head and gasbag — that “entitlements” are destroying the economy and the future of the United States? The idea that social security cuts could buy the administration a chance for more stimulus is delusional.
Yup, delusional. And get this closer …
The White House has been handed a highly progressive reform plan for Social Security that could attract Republican support as well.
If this is progressive, I want to be known as something completely different.
This just seems to be the start of the swansong for the program. BostonBoomer sent me this call for liberals to get on board with similar clarion calls today. It’s from USN and John Farrell.
Okay, my liberal friends. On Friday I explained why the proposals of the Simpson-Bowles commission should be welcomed, and put on the bargaining table by conservatives. Today I will argue, despite what Paul Krugman says, that there’s good stuff for liberals too.
Remember, first and foremost, that this is a starting point. You don’t have to buy into everything to keep the conversation going. And beware misinformation.
You know, this all seems to assume that we don’t have Democratic pols that make Faustian bargains with themselves before they even start dealing with the Republicans. I have to admit that I’m with Krugman on this one too.
Right at the beginning of his administration, what Mr. Obama needed to do, above all, was fight for an economic plan commensurate with the scale of the crisis. Instead, he negotiated with himself before he ever got around to negotiating with Congress, proposing a plan that was clearly, grossly inadequate — then allowed that plan to be scaled back even further without protest. And the failure to act forcefully on the economy, more than anything else, accounts for the midterm “shellacking.”
You expect any one to fight for what’s right in Social Security given recent history like Krugman identifies? I don’t. No hope or expectation of it at all. After all, a major Presidential Advisor just call Allan Simpson brave instead of being labeled the crazy old coot he is.
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- More





Recent Comments