In The Land Of The Delusional
Posted: March 2, 2012 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, Austerity, double-speak, Economy, income inequality, Mitt Romney, religious extremists, Republican presidential politics, the GOP, U.S. Economy, War on Women, Women's Healthcare 16 CommentsIn the Land of the Delusional the Koch brothers are principled citizens who merely disagree with Democratic policy stands and are aghast at the
vindictive slurs leveled against them and all other sincere, freedom-loving Republicans. In the Land of the Delusional, the hate and rage on review is a product of pink-bellied Lefties, Alinski acolytes, looking to take down American virtue and reduce the country’s might and glory. In the Land of the Delusional bankrupt ideas, economic mayhem and privateering can be obscured by attacks on woman, gays and the down and outers.
March is living up to its reputation—coming in like snarling Lion. Rush Limbaugh exposed a full Monty of misogyny, his comments on Sandra Fluke provoking even House Speaker Boehner to suggest the diatribe was ‘inappropriate.’ What inspired the outburst? Several weeks of desperate frontal attacks on women’s healthcare issues, thinly veiled and wrapped beneath ‘religious liberty’ arguments.
Let’s not kid ourselves! This is little more than shifting the conversation from discussion over economic issues, for which the Republican party has no credible position. The US Budget Watch has reported that Republican plans to slash taxes on corporations and high-income earners would explode the national debt up to $3 trillion. And for all the ballyhoo by the Norquist group the Washington Post reported [as well as many other sources] that the country’s revenue-collection has eroded to a 60-year low.
From the WP report:
Polls show that a large majority of Americans blame wasteful or unnecessary federal programs for the nation’s budget problems. But routine increases in defense and domestic spending account for only about 15 percent of the financial deterioration, according to a new analysis of CBO data.
The biggest culprit, by far, has been an erosion of tax revenue triggered largely by two recessions and multiple rounds of tax cuts. Together, the economy and the tax bills enacted under former president George W. Bush, and to a lesser extent by President Obama, wiped out $6.3 trillion in anticipated revenue. That’s nearly half of the $12.7 trillion swing from projected surpluses to real debt. Federal tax collections now stand at their lowest level as a percentage of the economy in 60 years.
But why let facts stand in the way. Paul Ryan, the Republican’s designated ‘serious thinker’ certainly doesn’t.
Ryan also complimented Romney’s economic plan. The congressman’s stamp of approval has been important for Republicans since he earned praise last year for his ambitious budget — which would dramatically change Medicare— from strong conservatives.
“Very credible. They are talking about entitlement reform. They are putting specifics on the table on Medicare and Social Security reform. The president, knowing that these are the big drivers of our debt, is ducking it,” Ryan said of Romney’s proposals.
Ah, yes. The ideologically blind leading those blinded by ambition. That certainly gives me confidence.
But as Paul Krugman suggested a mere 10 ten days ago, Mitt Romney let slip a truism in the swirl of Michigan campaigning when he said:
“If you just cut, if all you’re thinking about doing is cutting spending, as you cut spending you’ll slow down the economy.”
Over which the ideological purists set the dogs loose. The Club for Growth immediately denounced the Romney slip, insisting that it was a clear indication that Mitt was an imposter, not a ‘true’ limited government conservative [translation: not willing to drown all government in that Norquist bathtub].
What’s a candidate to do? Retreat, of course, in the same way Romney flipped on the Blunt Amendment, breaking all records, I would guess. In less than an hour, Candidate Romney twisted from ‘not going to go there’ to ‘of course, I support it.’ Enough to make your head spin. This is a political party in the death throes.
So, what’s the best way to distract?
Let’s pillory the women, start calling them sluts or suggest they film sexual exploits for the sake of some overweight, mean-spirited shock jock. Or let’s pretend that the perceived decline of the Nation rests squarely on the shoulders of the Gay Community and their screechy insistence that they too expect and deserve [can you believe the gall of these people] basic civil rights. And don’t forget the statistics on the ever-expanding numbers of Americans slipping into poverty. We tried calling them losers and moochers. How about we deny they exist, the way a North Carolina legislator recently announced. Yes sir, that’s the ticket!
In the Land of the Delusional schizophrenics rule the day, magical thinking replaces reason and bare-foot and pregnant is a very good thing. In the Land of the Delusional all things are possible.
Except the truth.
Thursday Reads: Happy Animals, Dickish Theocrats, Jurassic Fleas, and ET’s
Posted: March 1, 2012 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, 2012 primaries, morning reads, religious extremists, Reproductive Rights, Republican presidential politics, U.S. Politics, War on Women, Women's Healthcare | Tags: Darrell Issa, Davy Jones, dinosaurs, GOP convention delegates, happy animals, Jurrassic fleas, Michigan primary, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), Super Tuesday, The Monkees, theocracy 85 CommentsGood Morning!!
I thought I’d start out with something upbeat. How about some photos of happy animals? Buzzfeed has 26 of them. Here are some of my favorities:
How can you not smile at those? Check out the rest at Buzzfeed, and don’t miss the joyful anteater!
Now let’s get to the news. I thought Michigan was a winner-take-all state, but I guess not. The Santorum campaign claims the result was really a tie, because Willard and Rick the Dick will each get 15 delegates from Michigan.
While there has been no final determination of who won how many delegates in Michigan on Tuesday, current results suggest both candidates won seven of the state’s 14 congressional districts, each of which award two delegates to the winner. In addition, Santorum adviser John Brabender said the state’s two at-large delegates are likely to be split between Romney and Santorum because the vote was so close.
So I guess it’s winner-take-all by district? I don’t understand the GOP delegate system at all.
“It’s highly likely this is is going to end up being a tie, based on the data that we have,” Brabender said. “I don’t know how you look at that as anything besides this being a strong showing for Rick Santorum and anything short of a disaster for Mitt Romney.
“If we can do this well in Romney’s home state, this bodes well for Super Tuesday.”
Romney won the popular vote in the state by about 3 percentage points, according to the latest tally.
The final delegate totals haven’t been determined yet, according to the WaPo article.
According to numbers whiz Sean Trende at Real Clear Politics, Odds of a Brokered Convention Are Increasing
We’re finally close enough to Super Tuesday to get a sense of how the overall delegate count might work out in the GOP primary. The end result: Assuming that none of the four candidates drops out of the race, it looks increasingly as if no one will be able to claim a majority of the delegates. The candidate with the best chance is Mitt Romney, but he probably wouldn’t be able to wrap up the nomination until May or even June. The other candidates will probably have to hope for a brokered convention.
Trende lays out the Super Tuesday math state by state. Check it out at the above link. Can you believe Super Tuesday is less than a week away? I can’t decide if I should vote on the Dem or Repub ballot. I guess I’ll decide at the last minute. I don’t think Elizabeth Warren has any real competition, but I’ll need to find out for sure.
Ed Kilgore had an interesting post yesterday at Political Animal. Rick Santorum lost the Catholic vote to Romney in Michigan 44-37. I guess Rick has the Bishops but not the rank and file Catholics who like to plan their families. Kilgore:
Immediately there was speculation that Rick’s visceral dissing of JFK’s church-state relations speech might have contributed significantly to this result, or had perhaps cost him Michigan altogether.
That was my initial reaction, too, until I started wondering: why did we all assume Santorum had an advantage among Catholics in the first place? …. as I and others have amply documented, the idea that Catholics are more conservative than Americans generally, even on “social issues,” is pretty much a myth. But you had to figure that the kind of Catholics who choose to vote in Republican primaries are pretty significantly correlated with “traditionalists” like Rick, right?
That’s actually not so clear at all. The last contest with exit polling by the networks was Florida. There Santorum won 13% of the overall vote, but just 10% of Catholics; Mitt Romney ran a bit better among Catholics than he did overall. Now maybe you could say Florida’s heavily Latino Catholic vote is atypical. What about South Carolina? There Santorum won 17% of the overall vote, but just 15% of Catholics. Again, Romney performed a bit better among Catholics than among voters generally.
It doesn’t really surprise me. I wonder why Kilgore didn’t break down the gender numbers? I’ll bet Catholic women didn’t care for Santorum’s act.
The New Civil Rights Movement blog has more interesting details on which population groups voted for Rick the Dick and which ones preferred Willard.
Speaking of dickish theocrats, Darrell Issa may have topped Rick the Dick Tuesday at the latest War on Women hearing in the House. From the estimable Sarah Posner at Religion Dispatches:
One of the strangest moments at yesterday’s very strange hearing on whether a regulation duly promulgated under a law passed by Congress was “executive overreach” and an infringement of religious freedom was when Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Not Catholic) asked to have the papal encyclical Humanae Vitae entered into the Congressional Record.
His point, obviously, upon questioning the now-ubiquitous Bishop William Lori of the Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, was to show the authoritative (or rather, authoritarian) roots of the Catholic opposition to “artificialqui” contraception.
There it is now, part of the Congressional Record! A document few Catholics follow, and which provoked dissent from (believe it or not) American bishops when Pope Paul VI issued it in 1968.
I’m really starting to tire of bishops testifying before Congressional hearings and now we have quotes from Papal Encyclicals in the Congressional Record?! WTF?
Via Think Progress, disgusting misogynist pig Rush Limbaugh opened his bit yap yesterday and
called Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown student whom House Republicans wouldn’t let testify at a contraception hearing last week, a “slut” and a “prostitute” today, because, Limbaugh argued, she’s having “so much sex” she needs other people to pay for it:
LIMBAUGH: What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke [sic] who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex. What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.
You can hear the clip at Media Matters if you are so inclined. I decided not to listen.
Also at Think Progress, check out Alyssa Rosenberg’s Pop Culture Guide to the War on Women.
In science news, an article in Nature reveals that Dinosaurs had giant fleas–about an inch long!
Primitive fleas were built to sup on dinosaur blood in the Jurassic period, more than 150 million years ago. The potential host–parasite relationship has been uncovered thanks to a set of beautifully preserved fossils found in China.
Today, the varied group of parasitic insects known as fleas frequently infests mammals, birds and thankfully we have products like Comforits amazon to remedy those woes. But little is known about their origins. The flea fossil record consists mainly of modern-looking species from the past 65 million years, and the identity of possible fleas from the Cretaceous period (145 million to 65 million years ago) has been debated by experts. But Michael Engel, a palaeoentomologist at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, and his colleagues have now extended the history of the parasites by at least 60 million years. Their work is published online today in Nature1.
Engel and his co-authors studied nine flea specimens from two sites: the 165-million-year-old Jurassic deposits in Daohugou and the 125-million-year-old Cretaceous strata at Huangbanjigou, both in China. The insects were not quite like fleas as we now know them. Whereas modern fleas range from 1 to 10 millimetres in length, the Jurassic and Cretaceous species were between 8 and 21 millimetres. “These were hefty insects as far as fleas are concerned,” says Engel.
If you’re more interested in futuristic science, Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) is going “live on the web.”
Announced at a technology conference in Los Angeles, the site Setilive.org will stream radio frequencies that are transmitted from the Seti (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) Allen Telescope Array in Northern California.
Participants in the project, being run by Jillian Tarter of the Seti Institute’s Center for Seti Research, will be asked to search for signs of unusual activity in the hope the human brain can find things automated systems might miss.
“There are frequencies that our automated signal detection systems now ignore, because there are too many signals there,” Tartar told BBC News.
I think just about anyone can volunteer to help sort out unusual frequencies from radio and TV signals.
Finally, Davy Jones of the artificially created ’60s group The Monkees died yesterday of a heart attack at 66. From TMZ:
An official from the medical examiner’s office for Martin County, Florida confirmed with TMZ they received a call from Martin Memorial Hospital informing them that Jones had passed away.
We’re told Davy suffered the heart attack at a ranch near his Florida home, where he was visiting his horses. Davy began experiencing distress while he was sitting in his car, and that’s where a ranch hand found him.
The ranch hand told Sheriff’s detectives … the singer began to complain that he was not feeling well and was having trouble breathing. Paramedics were called and Jones was taken to a nearby hospital where he was pronounced dead. Authorities say there are no suspicious circumstances surrounding his death.
Here’s one of the group’s classic bubblegum hits. RIP Davy Jones.
That’s it for me. What are you reading and blogging about today?
Dueling Op-Eds And the Great Divide
Posted: February 26, 2012 Filed under: birth control, Congress, Elizabeth Warren Campaign, fetus fetishists, fundamentalist Christians, PLUB Pro-Life-Until-Birth, Scott Brown, The DNC, the GOP, War on Women, Women's Healthcare, Women's Rights 13 CommentsIt will be a fine fight for the Senate seat in Massachusetts and the lead up is not disappointing. The Horse Race is now turning into a duel at thirty
paces.
Elizabeth Warren offered the first volley, making her position clear on the contentious dispute over women’s access to contraception under the Healthcare Reform Act. She stated in no uncertain terms that exclusionary waivers for contraception access were outrageous. She supports President Obama’s compromise and expressed shock at Scott Brown signing onto the Blunt amendment that would allow employers deny coverage for ‘moral or religious reasons.’ Speaking to Greg Sargent last week she said:
This is an extreme attack on every one of us. It opens the door to outright discrimination. It would let insurance companies and corporations cut off pregnant women, overweight guys, older Americans, or anyone — because some executive claims it’s part of his moral code. Maybe that wouldn’t happen, but I don’t want to take the chance.
Neither do I.
But even if the language in the Blunt amendment were airtight, I’d oppose it and find the suggestion totally unacceptable. I pay taxes for wars for which I was never consulted and absolutely disagree with. That’s against my moral code. Can I get a tax refund now? I also think giving vulture oil companies subsidies is a ludicrous and immoral practice. Another refund? Oh, and those Wall Street bankers, the greed, the fraud that American taxpayers got stuck for? I want my money back, now.
We can all play this opt-out game.
So, where does Scott Brown come down on the question of women’s healthcare? Quelle surprise! He’s rubberstamping the irrational GOP position. But by doing so, he takes a 180-degree spin from his 2002 vote, when he supported a mandate on contraception, the Church be damned! Nonetheless, his answer to Warren? Through spokesman, Colin Reed:
It’s elitist for Elizabeth Warren to dictate to religious people about what they should believe and how they should act. She wants to use the power of government to force Catholics to violate the teachings of their faith. That is wrong. This issue deals with one of our most fundamental rights as a people — the freedom of religion. Like Ted Kennedy, Scott Brown supports a religious conscience exemption in health care.
Nice going, Mr. Brown. It’s wrong today but wasn’t wrong in 2002. The political winds must have been blowing differently a decade ago. And we’re conjuring up the ghost of Teddy Kennedy? Shame on you. But what I really like is the word ‘elitist,’ which is the Republican/Fox News buzzword for ‘those snooty people, who are not real Americans.’ Real Americans drive a truck like Scott Brown–back and forth to a home in Wrentham valued between $1-2.3 million.
Yup, just like average folks!
Lest we forget, there’s a reason Scott Brown was named by Forbes magazine as one of “Wall Street’s favorite senators.”
To be fair, Elizabeth Warren is no financial slouch. Both Warren and Brown have done extremely well for themselves. They’re both lawyers, educated, well-heeled professionals, standing on either side of the Great Divide we call politics. The issue of contraception has been put into play, an issue that according to all polls marks Warren’s position as the undisputed winner.
The Boston Globe ran Dueling Op-Eds on the issue. Warren’s editorial is here.
She starts with that withering image of the Republican panel that Representative Issa managed to convene—a panel of five poker-faced, middle-aged men discussing contraception and religious rights. In the optics department it was a devastating image. Out of touch much? A prime female health consideration and you fail to have women on the panel? Says everything we need to know on the Republican mindset. Elizabeth Warren then takes Scott Brown to task not only for supporting the proposed Blunt bill but fighting to get it passed.
If you are married and your employer doesn’t believe married couples should use birth control, then you could lose coverage for contraception. If you’re a pregnant woman who is single, and your employer doesn’t like it, you could be denied maternity care. This bill is about how to cut coverage for basic health care services for women.
Let’s be clear what this proposed law is not about: This is not about Catholic institutions or the rights of Catholics to follow their faith. President Obama has already made sure religious institutions will not be forced to cover contraception – at the same time that he has made sure women can get the health care they need directly from their health care insurers. Carol Keehan, the president and CEO of Catholic Health Association, said that Obama’s approach “protects the religious liberty and conscience rights of Catholic institutions.
And Scott Brown’s answer: It’s a matter of fundamental fairness. Really?
Here’s the beginning of Brown’s statement:
The new ObamaCare mandate forcing religious organizations to offer insurance coverage for practices that violate the teachings of their church gives the government control over the most personal aspects of our lives. It also erodes one of the basic protections of the Constitution – the right to practice religion without government interference.
The federal government is now saying to religious hospitals and charities, “Just do what you’re told, and leave the moral questions to us.’’ This over-reaching dictation from Washington is one reason I opposed and voted to repeal ObamaCare.
Which, of course, fails to answer the earlier question: why was a mandate A-okay in 2002, yet oh so wrong now? Possibly because then it concerned RomneyCare. The name makes all the difference in the world! Interesting, too, that according to Think Progress:
Brown also voted for a 2005 bill mandating hospitals to offer emergency contraception to rape victims, even after lawmakers defeated his amendment to allow religious hospitals to opt out of the requirement. Brown split with then-Gov. Mitt Romney on the matter and joined the legislature in overriding his veto.
And the American public? The polling numbers on the issue of contraception and subsequent WH compromise are revealing:
Obama’s compromise takes this politically charged issue off the table for mainstream Americans, most of whom side with Obama. A Fox News poll conducted last week before Obama’s Friday announcement found that 61 percent of voters believe employer health plans should be required to cover birth control for women, while 34 percent disagreed. Among women, two thirds approved of the requirement.
Rush Limbaugh may scoff at the issue. But for women? This is a very big deal. Because birth control means reaching this point in our lives:
When we’re ready.
And Mr. Brown? You’re not only a hypocrite on the issue, you’re definitely on the wrong side of history.
Apologies And Cockroaches
Posted: February 24, 2012 Filed under: abortion rights, birth control, Feminists, fetus fetishists, Girl Scouts, Planned Parenthood, PLUB Pro-Life-Until-Birth, religion, religious extremists, Reproductive Health, Reproductive Rights, Republican politics, War on Women 10 CommentsI’m always amazed when politicians/public personas do or say something truly idiotic, catch flack for it in the press and/or the court of public opinion, and then apologize in a half-ass way
This is often referred to as: Making A Bad Situation Worse!
And so here comes the utterly pathetic apology of Bob Morris, Republican State Rep from Indiana, who went on a moral crusade against the Girl Scouts of America, charging they were a secretive arm of Planned Parenthood [automatically bad in Morris’s opinion] and as such were indoctrinating our daughters in the corrosive ideas of feminism, lesbianism and yes, even communism. Morris made these accusations in a ‘letter of concern,’ which he sent to fellow Indiana legislators. How could he know that his written opinion [the result of tireless web-based research by his own admission] would go public, putting him and his ravings on review?
The world is truly an unfair place!
No doubt the publicity proved problematic for Morris because he has now offered an apology. Of sorts. He’s willing to admit that his words were: emotional, reactionary and inflammatory. He did not mean to impugn those families active in Girl Scout organizations that are run in a responsible manner, those promoting leadership, community involvement and family values.
This flies in the face of earlier comments [Tuesday of this week] to a local radio station, where Morris said:
“The Girl Scouts of America don’t stand for anything. They let those girls do what they want in their troop meetings.”
How quickly these righteous warriors fold when exposed to the daylight. Now Morris says he should not have painted the Girl Scouts with “such a broad brush.”
“Had I known this letter would have gone to a wider audience, I would have cited further evidence for my position,” Morris wrote.
Let me play a little inside betting on this one: I’ll stake you 10:1 that had Morris known the letter would have gone public, he would never have written it. It’s easy to be a bully and nincompoop when you think the team is squarely on your side. It’s an altogether different scenario when you’re exposed for what you are: a religious reactionary with an axe to grind, in this case against anything or anyone connected to Planned Parenthood. And where would a Bob Morris get the sense that smearing the Girl Scouts and Planned Parenthood was A-okay?
From the rah-rah being given to the likes of Rick Santorum, whose recent ravings have been heralded ‘as sincere, steadfast.’ I’m sure the judges in Salem were viewed with the same sanguine eye.
Morris’s full apology can be found here.
But men like Morris just cannot help themselves. Yes, they want the public attention to go away but they just cannot or will not back down. Even in apology, Morris feels the need to challenge:On March 5, 2004, the Girl Scouts of the United States of America’s CEO, Kathy Cloninger, stated in an interview on the NBC Today Show that the Girl Scouts USA partners with Planned Parenthood with regard to sex education for Girl Scouts. To my knowledge, the Girl Scouts USA have not rescinded, corrected or denied that statement.
There you go. Sex education = sexualization. Why? Because we all know that ignorance is bliss. In fact, Rick Santorum disclosed to Mania Meister Glenn Beck that higher education is a dangerous thing, that the President’s plan to extend college educations to ever more students is a dark, nefarious plot:
On the president’s efforts to boost college attendance, Santorum said, “I understand why Barack Obama wants to send every kid to college, because of their indoctrination mills, absolutely … The indoctrination that is going on at the university level is a harm to our country.”
He claimed that “62 percent of kids who go into college with a faith commitment leave without it,” but declined to cite a source for the figure. And he floated the idea of requiring that universities that receive public funds have “intellectual diversity” on campus.
Yes sir, keep those kids down on the farm ‘cause, golly shucks, you give ‘em an education how you going to convince ‘em the earth is only 6000 years old or that cavemen saddled up the dinosaurs.
Why let scientific evidence stand in the way when magical thinking is so much more soothing. And ideologically correct.
Oprah has her own list about making ‘good’ apologies but here’s Peggysue’s suggestions for future mea culpas:
If you don’t mean it, don’t say it. This is a turn on the Thumper philosophy: If you don’t have anything good to say, don’t say anything at all.
Do not come kicking and screaming to an apology, regardless of what your pollsters say. Resistance shows and just makes you look like a bigger cockroach.
Do not state an additional challenge in an apology. Example: Okay, I got caught with my pettiness and religious right-wing bona fides showing but here: PROVE THIS WRONG.
The essence of any apology is humility. If you can’t manage humility and/or your acting abilities are subpar? Just hang it up. You are a cockroach and will likely remain a cockroach.
You can avoid apologies altogether by remaining in the shadows. There’s a reason cockroaches hang together in the dark. Because the light makes them vulnerable. In the light, the rest of us get to see what a nasty piece of work a cockroach really is.
Btw, here’s a factoid about the insect world: a cockroach can survive weeks without its head.
Color me positively unsurprised!

















Recent Comments