Saturday Night Turkey “Surprise” Treats

Still got leftover bird?  It's a TSA thanksiving weekend!!!  Pat Down that Turkey!!!

*

Try some of these Cajun recipes then bring them on because we know you have them!!!

Emeril’s Turkey Gumbo Recipe

Turkey Jambalaya from Epicurious

Cajun Turkey Pot Pie

Here’s some of my things to do with leftover sweet potatoes, if you got ’em!

Sweet Potato Biscuits

1 cup flour

2 tsp. baking powder

1 cup cooked, mashed sweet potatoes

1 tsp salt

1/2 cup sugar

3 tablespoons butter (soft)

1/3 cup milk

Sift the flour salt and baking powder in one bowl.  Mix the sugar and sweet potatoes in a second bowl.   Add the butter and beat the mixture until it’s smooth.  Add the dry ingredients to the sweet potato mixture and add the milk.  Blend well.

Roll out the dough on a floured board.  Cut with a biscuit cutter.  Place in a buttered baking pan.  Bake at 400 degrees for 20 minutes.  I serve this with some whipped honey butter.

Du Pain Patate (Sweet Potato Bread)

2  cups grated raw sweet potatoes

1/2 cup sugar

1/4 cup butter melted

1 tsp cloves.

1 tsp salt.

2 unbeaten eggs

1/2 cup flour

1/2 cup cane sugar syrup (yes, CANE SUGAR syrup … it’s a  Cajun thing and we make it down here)

1 tsp nutmeg

1 tsp cinnamon

1 Tbsp. orange zest.

Put the grated raw potatoes in a bowl.  Ad one egg at a time and beat it real well until it’s mixed and kind of fluffy. Add the orange rind.  Mix it some more.  Add the sugar and beat it.  Add the syrup and the melted butter.  Mix.  Then Mix the spices, salt and flour together then add that to the rest of the mixture.  And, right, mix it again.

Okay, this is the fun part.  You’re going to transfer that to a well-greased iron skillet.  Bake it at 300 to 325 for an hour.  You can tell it’s done when the bread pulls away from the sides.  Cool it about 10 minutes before you get it out of the skillet.  This is going to make a really sticky type potato bread and if you put fresh cream on top, you’ll think you just about tasted the best thing ever.  Remove it in wedges with a spatula while it’s still hot.

This one is a really old recipe from a friend’s family and I had to beg for it … enjoy!!!

* (It’s a thanksgiving turkey that’s been through a TSA scan, that’s all!!!)


“Chertoff’s naked-screening and the sinister drumbeat of fear”

So, I’m in the compare and contrast type of mood today.  Two New Yorkers have weighed in on the ongoing TSA Gate Rape.  Over at the NYT, it’s Roger Cohen from London–New Yorker by job–on ‘The Real Threat to America’.  The quote in the title is the end line from his op-ed.    Over at the NYP, it’s the proverbial nitwit, Republican (NY) Representative Peter King and his title tells all.  That would be ‘Qaeda the enemy – not TSA screeners’.

Guess which man loves our country and our Constitution?  The Britwit or the Nitwit?

Cohen has a remarkable sense of humor.  He suggests that if we ever do get Osama bin Laden that we should “Rotate him in perpetuity through this security hell, “groin checks” and all”.  If ever there was an indication that terrorists have won,  it’s that we’ve now lasted longer than the USSR in the bedouin country of Afghanistan and we’re all considered terrorist wannabes now.  Yup my 87 year old, WW2 decorated Dad and your 2 year old grandchild are threats as we now know it.

What’s next?  Pat downs at every holiday event because some Somalian teenager fell for an FBI sting operation?  Will holiday tree lighting ceremonies see the next set of installations of  “Chertoff’s naked-screening” machines?  If so, let me go buy the stock.  I want a piece of THAT action so I can go buy my own plane and dust off the old pilot’s license.  ( I used to fly in corporate jets a lot in the 80s.  It bothered me that the pilot was the only one who knew how to land the plane.)

So, let’s visit the hysterical and paranoid King’s hyperbole.  You know, the kind that gets you reelected in a solid Republican District.

As a conservative, I find it disappointing that so many on the right taking issue with the TSA sound like left-wing liberals.

It reminds me of when then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani stepped up police activity in New York City. Liberals were against it and argued that stop-and-frisks violated people’s civil rights.

But conservatives knew that it was necessary to bring law and order to New York. We were right, and it saved lives.

I have enough faith in TSA chief John Pistole — as nonpartisan a person you can find in government — that he wouldn’t be doing it if he didn’t think it right.

For all we know we could find out six months from now these machines aren’t as good as we think they are and there’s another way to do it without the pat-downs.

But for now let’s at least assume that John Pistole and the TSA are well-intentioned and they are doing the right thing based on the information available to them right now.

Excuse me while I Godwin and think that maybe this is akin to the Germans thinking they should just give the S.S. a chance to do their jobs because the government knows best about ‘perceived threats’.  That very well could include your 60 year old butcher!  Yes?

Oh, and let me put this in perspective for you.   “Peter King is a Long Island GOP congressman and soon-to- be chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.”   Doesn’t that make you feel better about the future of this country?  That would be up to and including the viability of commercial airlines in the next few years. I just hope every stock plan I’ve been forced to invest in by the State of Louisiana doesn’t hold any airline stocks.  Next time, I’m going Greyhound or Mustang.

Cohen’s op-ed–in contrast to the abrasive King–talks about the undie bomber and the shoe bomber and demonstrates how one failed plot after another has led to “another blanket layer of T.S.A checks, including dubious gropes, to the daily humiliations of travelers”.  He’s right.  None of these things were functional and that doesn’t even appear to matter.  Which brings me back to the idea of buying stock in the new KBR and Halliburton government-fund-leaching corporations hawking security measures.  Exactly how much of this involves our safety instead of their profit motives and the political donations they can offer well-positioned pols like King?  Check this Cohen tidbit out.

There are now about 400 full-body scanners, set to grow to 1,000 next year. One of the people pushing them most energetically is Michael Chertoff, the former Secretary of Homeland Security.

He’s the co-founder and managing principal of the Chertoff Group, which provides security advice. One of its clients is California-based Rapiscan Systems, part of the OSI Systems corporation, that makes many of the “whole body” scanners being installed.

Chertoff has recently been busy rubbishing Martin Broughton, the wise British Airways chairman who said many security checks were redundant — calling him “ill-informed.” Early this year Chertoff called on Congress to “fund a large-scale deployment of next-generation systems.”

Rapiscan and its adviser the Chertoff Group will certainly profit from the deployment underway (some of the machines were bought with funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act). Americans as a whole will not.

Rapiscan: Say the name slowly. It conjures up a sinister science fiction. When a government has a right to invade the bodies of its citizens, security has trumped freedom.

RapE-a-Scan or Pillage-The-Treasury?  Or both?  Your call.

Just for good measure, Cohen adds the 4th amendment to the conversation.  Good place to start this discussion.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Lest we forget what a bunch of people thought their soldiers have died fighting for–I might add–let it not be the profits of any more of these blood sucking government sponsored corporations.  Chertoff should be run out of the country; tar and feathered, on the nearest rail.  I’d like to extend that courtesy to Pete King too.  But first, let’s make sure that both of them spend plenty of time in a crotch groping session with the TSA.  Then, let’s put their nudie scans on the internet where we all can see the demi-emperors with  no clothes.


If the Turkey didn’t put you to sleep …

Economics doesn’t take holidays.  It’s probably why we economists are so grim.  Just in case you need a good nap, here’s some of my pointy head friends with bow ties discussing things economic.  I was going to try to spare you out of holiday cheer, but Mark Thoma reeled me in and now I must share.

I’ve mentioned recently how absolutely baffled I am by the number of “conservative”  (i.e. radical) Republicans who keep buying into economic fallacies that even conservative (i.e. authentically conservative) economists can’t support.  I mentioned Nobel Prize winning and father of the Monetarists Milton Friedman’s huge study on the Great Depression.  His thesis was that very poor Fed policy made the Great Depression.  In 2002, Bernake even agreed and apologized to him for the FED’s errant ways. Friedman was a consummate free marketer and wrote pop books and pop Newsweek columns during his heyday as a conservative icon. I’m sure he would not be suffering these fools were he alive today.

Thoma points to two recent columns by two former Reagan Team economists.  One article is from Martin Feldstein who is probably the closest thing remaining to Milton Friedman in terms of conservative, free market, economic thought.  The other is from Bruce Bartlett who was one of the fathers of Supply Side economics during the Reagan years but has since repented.  He’s really adapted the Friedman statement “We’re all Keynesians now”.  Both economists are intent on stopping this current batch of policy nincompoops from recreating The Great Depression.

The first Thoma thread references Feldstein who writes on the QE2 at Project Syndicate.  Feldstein was Chair of Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisors and was President of the NBER.  You  may recall that NBER dates business cycles for the country.  I want to hit his bottom line first so those of you that are using this for nap material can see that it’s ludicrous to think the QE2 is wild-eyed and out-there policy experimentation.

In short, the Fed’s policy of quantitative easing is likely to accelerate the rise of the renminbi – an outcome that is in China’s interest no less than it is in America’s. But don’t expect US officials to proclaim that goal openly, or Chinese officials to express their gratitude.

China is experiencing inflation.  We are experiencing deflation.  The reason this is good for both countries is that it will offset each of these pressures.  Feldstein explains the goal of the QE2 in terms of US policy first.  I’ll cover that quote.  You’ll need to go read the explanation for the China side of the equation too.

The United States Federal Reserve’s policy of “quantitative easing” is reducing the value of the dollar relative to other currencies that have floating exchange rates. But what does the new Fed policy mean for one of the most important exchange rates of all – that of the renminbi relative to the dollar and to other currencies?

The effect of quantitative easing on exchange rates between the dollar and the floating-rate currencies is a predictable result of the Fed’s plan to increase the supply of dollars. The rise in the volume of dollars is causing the value of each dollar to fall relative to these currencies, whose volume has remained constant or risen more slowly.

The Fed’s goal may be to stimulate domestic activity in the US and to reduce the risk of deflation. But, intended or not, the increased supply of dollars also affects the international value of the dollar. American investors who sell bonds to the Fed will want to diversify the dollars that they receive from it. One form of that diversification is to buy foreign bonds and stocks, driving up the value of those currencies.

The result of this move will be to make our exports more competitive abroad and to make every one else’s exports–including those countries that have pegged their currencies to the dollar in an unfair manner–less competitive. We are simply turning the tables on the beggar-thy-neighbor growth policy China and others have adopted. The Fed is doing this because there is no will on the part of domestic policy makers to stimulate the demand in our country for consumers or government.  There are 4 major parts of GDP.  If fiscal policy doesn’t stimulate Consumption or Government demand, then there remain Investment and Exports.  Investment is the least reliable form of demand and is rather small compared to the rest of the economy.  The Fed is trying to tackle the  aggregate demand shortage as best it can in response to the laws that compel it to act when unemployment is high.

Which brings me to the Bruce Bartlett thread.  Bartlett has a piece today up at The Fiscal Times called ‘Starve the Beast: Just Bull, not Good Economics’.  As some one who is currently suffering from a governor who has selectively adopted the policy as a path to the White House, I personally can tell you that it is very much Bull and causes a lot of undue suffering.  It is ideology chosen over fact, logic, and above all, compassion.  Bartlett goes straight to the heart of Voodoo Economics by using data to show that Dubya  Bush’s embrace of  of tax cuts in his first term as president did nothing to further economic growth and did everything to drive us in to unnecessary deficit spending.

It ought to be obvious from the experience of the George W. Bush administration that cutting taxes has no effect whatsoever even on restraining spending, let alone actually bringing it down. Just to remind people, Bush inherited a budget surplus of 1.3 percent of the gross domestic product from Bill Clinton in fiscal year 2001. The previous year, revenues had been 20.6 percent of GDP, spending had been 18.2 percent, and there had been a budget surplus of 2.4 percent.

When Bush took office in January 2001, we were already well into fiscal year 2001, which began on Oct. 1, 2000. He immediately pushed for a huge tax cut, which Congress enacted. In 2002 and 2003, Bush demanded still more tax cuts, even as the economy showed no signs of having been stimulated by his previous tax cuts. The tax cuts and the slow economy caused revenues to evaporate. By 2004, they were down to 16.1 percent of GDP. The postwar average is about 18.5 percent of GDP.

Spending did not fall in response to the STB decimation of federal revenues; in fact, spending rose from 18.2 percent of GDP in 2001 to 19.6 percent in 2004, and would continue to rise to 20.7 percent of GDP in 2008. Insofar as the Bush administration was a test of STB, the evidence clearly shows not only that the theory doesn’t work at all, but is in fact perverse.

There is nothing better than an addict who has fought their demons and comes out the other side to explain exactly why the demon should die.  Bartlett succinctly explains why the Republicans continue to support the ideology and the drivel despite evidence that everything they believe is quite false.

Nor was Bush’s budgetary profligacy limited to programs that could be justified, however loosely, on national security grounds. As I detailed last week, he and a Republican Congress created a massive new entitlement program, Medicare Part D, to buy the votes of seniors and buy themselves reelection in 2004. Among those voting for this monstrosity were many Republicans still in Congress today who are unjustly considered to be staunch fiscal conservatives, including incoming Speaker of the House John Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, and House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan.

Because of its obvious ridiculousness, one seldom hears conservatives say openly that tax cuts automatically reduce spending. But it still underpins the entire Republican budget strategy — tax cuts never have to be paid for, no meaningful spending cuts are ever put forward, earmarks and foreign aid are said to be the primary sources of budget deficits, and similar absurdities.

Both of these men have written tractable–albeit, tough–reads on policy decisions that people really need to understand.  I know there is a tendency this time of year to wallow in football games, shopping binges, and short term feel good embrace of childhood memories, but really, there is a lame duck congress in session and an incoming group of Congressional morons with a President in office who wants to play Let’s Make a Deal with them.

If you can awake from tryptophan dreams long enough to read these two articles thoroughly, please do so.  We can’t afford any more Voodoo policy mistakes.


Black Friday Reads

Good Morning!

Well, be thankful for the food in your belly!!!  Did you move a size up this morning?  According to the U.N. and the NYT the  ‘World is “Dangerously close” to a Food Crisis’.

Global grain production will tumble by 63 million metric tons this year, or 2 percent over all, mainly because of weather-related calamities like the Russian heat wave and the floods in Pakistan, the United Nations estimates in its most recent report on the world food supply. The United Nations had previously projected that grain yields would grow 1.2 percent this year.

The fall in production puts the world “dangerously close” to a new food crisis, Abdolreza Abbassian, an economist with the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, said at a news conference last week.

Rising demand and lower-than-expected yields caused stocks of some grains to fall sharply and generated high volatility in world food markets in the latter half of the year. Prices for some commodities are approaching levels not seen since 2007 and 2008, when food shortages prompted riots around the world.

Got that backyard farm started yet?

At the moment, the only prices that appear to be rising on the national level are gas prices.  The Dallas Fed breaks down inflation as measured by the PCE for you.

Apart from yet another sharp increase in the price of gasoline, inflationary pressures in October were as muted as we’ve seen in quite some time. Both the core PCE price index and the trimmed mean registered essentially zero inflation rates in October, each posting annualized rates of just 0.1 percent.

The 12-month core rate fell 0.3 percentage points to 0.9 percent, and the 12-month trimmed mean rate, which had been fairly stable around 1 percent for the past six months, ticked down to 0.8 percent.

To be sure, the headline PCE price index did increase at a 2.0 percent annualized rate in October, but about 90 percent of that gain is accounted for by the price index for gasoline, which jumped 4.7 percent from September to October (or about a 73 percent annualized rate of increase).

So, gasoline aside, are we seeing a downshift in the underlying trend in consumer price inflation? While today’s release certainly points in that direction, one never wants to make too much out of any one month’s numbers. In inflation updates over the past few months, we’ve stated our view that the underlying trend in inflation was stable, albeit at an extremely low level. That view evolved only with the accumulation of several months worth of data. Going forward, we’ll again be looking for patterns that are sustained over multiple months worth of data.

They have a list of things that “leading progressives” are thankful for over at New Deal 2.0. You just have to go look.  Really.  I mean REALLY.   I’m going to stick with Dean Baker Bill Black, and James K. Galbraith  because economists have to stick together. You can  figure out what to do with the media personalities on your own.

“I’m grateful that we won’t have Larry Summers to kick around anymore.” – James K. Galbraith, author of The Predator State and Professor of Government, University of Texas at Austin

…

“I am grateful to Social Security, which made it possible for our family to avoid economic disaster when my father died of a second heart attack when he was 41. I am grateful to a nation in which I could be a serial whistle blower, exposing the misconduct of two presidential employees, the Speaker of the House James Wright, and the ‘Keating Five’ — and survive. And I am grateful to the Ancients, who faced a vastly crueler world and recognized that the key was for each of us to try to repair it, and whose advice has led generations to make those repairs, rather than accepting cruelty, greed, exploitation, and indifference as the natural state. I am thankful for all who came before and worked to make things better.” – Bill Black, Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and white-collar criminologist

…

“I am thankful for the Web. It is an enormous potential equalizer in giving progressives without money comparable input into public debate as the right-wingers with lots of money. In this vein, the Huffington Post’s webhits are going up. The Washington Post’s circulation is going down.” – Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research

Here’s some interesting news on Net Neutrality from The Hill.

Seeking to weaken potential regulations, AT&T is actively working to complicate the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) renewed effort to broker a compromise on net neutrality.

Industry and Hill sources said that an AT&T official made public last week that the agency has quietly undertaken a new round of negotiation. The sources stressed that they had obtained this information through AT&T channels.

The delicate FCC effort is aimed at resolving one of the most fractious issues in tech policy. The hope was to quietly consult with industry and public interest stakeholders while insulating the negotiations from the noisy politicking the question stirs on both sides.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski invited industry and public interest sources to help shape a possible compromise, giving AT&T a major seat at the table. Public advocates are concerned about how much Genachowski appears to be listening to AT&T, with one saying he has practically given them “veto powers.”

Ex parte filings show that AT&T officials consulted frequently with the agency this month. Policy executive Jim Cicconi met with Genachowski’s office the day before the new net neutrality effort became public.

Politico had a story up about lesbian Air Force Major Margaret Witt who was discharged under DADT.   This is another incidence involving the Obama administration’s legal stance on DADT which appears at odds with what the President says.  The Air Force may seek stay of order to block Witt’s reinstatement.  Her case is being followed by the ACLU.

“We foresee no problem about Major Witt getting reinstated,” Doug Honig of the ACLU’s Washington state chapter said Wednesday. “Once we discuss this with the Air Force, present evidence meeting the nursing hours requirements, and Major Witt passes the physical – all of which will happen – we would be shocked if the Air Force were suddenly to seek to stay her reinstatement.”

The Obama administration’s legal stance is likely to come as a disappointment to gay rights advocates, who took the decision not to seek a stay as an indication that the administration may no longer be mounting a full-court press to uphold the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy written into law by Congress in 1993. Obama has pledged to repeal the law, but the Justice Department has continued to defend it, citing a tradition of Executive Branch defense of most Congressional enactments.

Regardless of whether a stay is sought, the Justice Department is appealing Leighton’s ruling, just as it is appealing another judge’s recent order that the “don’t ask” policy is unconstitutional on its face.

HuffPo is reporting that Elizabeth Warren convinced President Obama to stop the bill that would make foreclosures easier and enshrine robosigning into law.  Let’s hope she’s replaced Larry Summers as the economic ear of the President.

The decisive way in which she labored behind the scenes to stymie a bill that would have eased requirements for documentation in the foreclosure process underscores how her arrival has altered the administration’s relationship with major banks.

The bill, which passed both houses of Congress and awaited President Obama’s signature to become law, essentially would have compelled notaries to accept out-of-state notarizations, regardless of the rules in those states.

State officials across the country–who have been pursuing probes looking into wrongdoing within the foreclosure process– feared that those jurisdictions with lax standards could have become hotbeds for foreclosure documentation fraud. Lenders and mortgage companies could have used those states as central clearing houses to produce bogus foreclosure paperwork, and then export those documents to other states with more stringent regulations–an expedient bypass around the strictures.

South Korea has ordered troops to move to a “front line island” and the U.S. sends an air craft carrier to the Yellow Sea.

Despite warnings from North Korea that any new provocation would be met with more attacks, Washington and Seoul pushed ahead with plans for military drills starting Sunday involving a nuclear-powered U.S. aircraft carrier in waters south of this week’s skirmish.

The exercises will likely anger the North — the regime cited South Korean drills this week as the impetus behind its attack — but the president said the South could little afford to abandon such preparation now.

“We should not ease our sense of crisis in preparation for the possibility of another provocation by North Korea,” spokesman Hong Sang-pyo quoted President Lee Myung-bak as saying. “A provocation like this can recur any time.”

At an emergency meeting in Seoul, Lee ordered reinforcements for about 4,000 troops on the tense Yellow Sea islands, along with top-level weaponry and upgraded rules of engagement that would create a new category of response when civilian areas are targeted.

Great!  Yet another excuse for more military spending!

I’m still trying to recover from three plus days of not having potable water.  If you hear a scream emanating from a laundry room some where south of you, it’s undoubtedly me.   Thank goodness I decided to eat out for Turkey Day!!

What’s on your reading and blogging list today?

The Wikileaks begin: breaking news and live blogging

Some of the Wikileak documents related to U.S. diplomacy are begining to show up in Newspapers throughout the world.  I just read in the Jerusalem Post that there is evidence that Turkish citizens smuggled weapons to al-Qaida.

Wikileaks is planning to release files that show Turkey has helped al-Qaida in Iraq, according to London-based daily Al-Hayat. The newspaper also reported that the US helped the PKK, a Kurdish rebel organization.

One of the documents, a US military report, reportedly charges Turkey with failing to control its borders, because Iraqi citizens residing in Turkey provided al-Qaida with supplies to build bombs, guns and ammunition.

Minkoff Minx found this in the Ottawa Star.

Canada’s official lips were sealed tight on the matter, except to confirm dual overtures from Washington — David Jacobson, the U.S. ambassador to Ottawa, gave a head’s up to Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon, while the Canadian embassy in D.C. is “currently engaging” with the State Department.

Sources in Ottawa acknowledged on background that even after the U.S. briefings the scope of what’s coming remains unclear. “We are not privy to the full contents of documents which may be leaked,” foreign affairs spokesperson Alain Cacchione said in an email to the Star.

I’m watching tweet after tweet of status updates from Wikileaks like this one:

wikileaks WikiLeaks
Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd briefed by Hillary Clinton on Wikileaks, according to SMH
The last country mentioned is Norway. I’ve seen Canada, Denmark,  and even the NYT being briefed!!  I’m beginning to feel like the “War against Terrorism” has met its Daniel Ellsberg.