It seems as if mass shootings are contagious. Whenever there is a high profile case, more gun violence follows. There have been so many cases of gunmen shooting multiple people lately that the massacre of ten people in Buffalo seems to have receded into the past. But it happened only three weeks ago. It’s difficult not to feel helpless and despairing when these massacres keep happening and one political party stands in the way of the federal government doing anything to prevent them.
In the early hours after the shooting at a Tulsa medical center on Wednesday, the details were murky. Soon, it became clear that the death toll there was not going to be as nearly as high as the tolls from the recent shootings in Uvalde and Buffalo.
Four people were killed in Tulsa (in addition to the gunman), compared with 21 in Uvalde and 10 in Buffalo. But the Tulsa shooting is nonetheless horrific in its own way — not only for its victims and their families but also for what it says about gun violence in the United States.
Shootings that kill multiple people are so common in this country that they often do not even make national news. They are a regular feature of American life. Tulsa has become the latest example — yet another gun crime that seems almost ordinary here and yet would be extremely rare in any other country as wealthy as the U.S.
To give you a sense of how common these shootings are, we’re devoting the rest of the lead item of today’s newsletter to a list of every documented mass shooting in which a gunman has killed at least three people in the U.S. so far this year. (The Gun Violence Archive defines a mass shooting as any in which at least four people are shot, including survivors.)
Among the patterns we noticed: Family disputes are a common motivation, and gang disputes are another. Every identified suspect has been a man, many under 25. Baltimore and Sacramento have experienced multiple such mass shootings this year.
Read the list of incidents at the NYT link. On May 25, NPR counted 213 mass shootings in 2022.
When Vanderbilt University psychiatrist Jonathan Metzl learned that the perpetrator of the Uvalde, Tex., school massacre was a young man barely out of adolescence, it was hard not to think about the peculiarities of the maturing male brain.
Salvador Rolando Ramos had just turned 18, eerily close in age to Nikolas Cruz, who had been 19 when he shot up a school in Parkland, Fla. And to Adam Lanza, 20, when he did the same in Newtown, Conn. To Seung-Hui Cho, 23, at Virginia Tech. And to Eric Harris, 18, and Dylan Klebold, 17, in Columbine, Colo.
Teen and young adult males have long stood out from other subgroups for their impulsive behavior. They are far more reckless and prone to violence than their counterparts in other age groups, and their leading causes of death include fights, accidents, driving too fast, or, as Metzl put it, “other impulsive kinds of acts.”
“There’s a lot of research about how their brains are not fully developed in terms of regulation,” he said.
Perhaps most significantly, studies show, the prefrontal cortex, which is critical to understanding the consequences of one’s actions and controlling impulses, does not fully develop until about age 25. In that context, Metzl said, a shooting “certainly feels like another kind of performance of young masculinity.”
In coming weeks and months, investigators will dissect Ramos’s life to try to figure out what led him to that horrific moment at 11:40 a.m. Tuesday, May 24 when he opened fire on a classroom full of 9- and-10-year-olds at Robb Elementary School. Although clear answers are unlikely, the patterns that have emerged about mass shooters in the growing databases, school reports, medical notes and interview transcripts show a disturbing confluence between angry young men, easy access to weapons and reinforcement of violence by social media….
“Age is the untold story of all this stuff,” said Metzl, who is also a sociologist. “I feel very strongly we should not have people 18 to 21 with guns.”
Read the rest at the WaPo.
Summer Morning, Sleeping Cat, by Yuanchi Qiao
There’s still a lot of discussion in the media about the disastrous response of law enforcement in the Uvalde school massacre.
Ten days after a gunman slaughtered 19 students and their two teachers in their classrooms at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, there are still significant gaps in the information officials have released about law enforcement’s response.
“My point as a policymaker, which is the third function of my job, is to make sure this doesn’t happen again,” said state Sen. Roland Gutierrez, a Democrat who represents Uvalde.
“How in the world are we going to be able to do anything if we can’t figure out what happened in that building in those 40 minutes?”
The shifting police narratives, unanswered questions and the horror of knowing 21 victims were trapped with a gunman for more than an hour — despite repeated 911 calls for help from inside the classrooms — is tormenting this small Texas city.
Gutierrez has questioned whether the responding officers on scene were aware of those calls as they stood outside the classrooms. It’s also unclear whether the incident commander, who made the call for the officers not to confront the shooter immediately, was on scene as the shooting unfolded.
Victims’ families and other local residents are angry. At a school board meeting last night, Superintendent Hall Harrell said that Robb Elementary would not reopen. After that, the board went into a “lengthy closed-door session.
Angela Turner, a mother of five who lost her niece in the shooting, expressed outrage. “We want answers to where the security is going to take place. This was all a joke,” she told reporters, referring to the meeting. “I’m so disappointed in our school district.”
Turner insisted that she will not send her children to school unless they feel safe, adding that her 6-year-old child told her, “I don’t want to go to school. Why? To be shot?”
“These people will not have a job if we stand together, and we do not let our kids go here,” she said as she pointed to a vacant school board podium.
Dawn Poitevent, a mother whose child was slated to attend Robb Elementary as a second-grader, was tearful as she told reporters that she wants the board to consider letting her child stay at his current school, Dalton Elementary.
“I just need to keep my baby safe, and I can’t promise him that. Nobody can promise their children that right now,” Poitevent said. “At least if he goes to Dalton, he’s not going to be scared, and he’s not going to be having the worst first day that I can possibly imagine.”
Poitevent added that her son, Hayes, has been telling her that he’s scared to go to school because a “bad man” will shoot him.
“We’re just trying so hard to get past everything,” she said. “We’re trying to bury our babies and say goodbye to people that really mattered.”
It took more than an hour for police officers to enter and stop the gunman who killed 19 children and two teachers at Uvalde’s Robb elementary school last Tuesday in Texas.
In that time, 18-year-old Salvador Ramos fired more than 100 shots while as many as 19 police officers stood outside waiting and desperate parents tried to break victims out of the school windows. It has been reported that one teacher and several children placed 911 calls while the gunman was inside the building….
The officers on duty had received active shooter training just two months before the massacre, prompting questions from parents, politicians and public safety officials about exactly what officers should have done and casting doubt on how effective such training is in reality.
What does the training manual say about dealing with school shooters?
“A first responder unwilling to place the lives of the innocent above their own safety should consider another career field.” Those are the words, from an active shooter training manual used to train Uvalde’s school police on 21 March 2022, that have been repeated again and again since the shooting on Tuesday.
The Summer – Cat On A Balustrade, Theophile Steinlen
They refer to the lessons post-Columbine, the high school shooting in 1999 that led to the deaths of 15 people (including the suicides of both shooters). Before Columbine – which was the most deadly US mass shooting in history at the time – officers had been taught to form a perimeter around the school and wait for backup in the event of a school shooting, not unlike what allegedly happened at Uvalde on Tuesday. But after Columbine, law enforcement officials learned that not going in and directly confronting the shooter costs precious minutes and possibly lives.
The training materials encourage officers to confront the attacker in an active shooter situation, driving them away from victims, isolating and distracting them, even when it means putting themselves in harm’s way: “If they are engaged with the officer(s) they will be less capable of hurting innocents,” the manual says.
If officers are at the scene alone, they must go in alone, it says. “Time is the number one enemy during active shooter response … The best hope that innocent victims have is that officers immediately move into action to isolate, distract or neutralize the threat, even if that means one officer acting alone.”
The manual makes clear that not doing so will cost lives. “The number of deaths in an active shooter event is primarily affected by two factors: How quickly the police or other armed response arrives and engages them; How quickly the shooter can find victims,” it states.
Frankly, I don’t see why what happened is still being treated as a mystery. Let’s face it: those police officers are cowards. And Pete Arrendondo should be fired. Instead, he is now on the city council.
Everyone in town is waiting to hear from Pete Arredondo.
As chief of the Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District Police Department, it was his call to wait more than an hour for backup instead of ordering officers on scene to immediately charge the shooter who killed 19 students and two teachers at Robb Elementary School. The chief of the state police later said this was the “wrong decision, period.”
Now, Arredondo is a man in hiding, as calls for answers and accountability grow louder each day.
In the week since state police singled him out for blame, Arredondo has hardly been seen.
By Vladimir A Abat Cherkasov
Police officers stand guard outside his home. He has declined to explain his actions, telling a television crew that staked out his office he would not do so until after the victims’ funerals. City officials, too, have assisted in the vanishing act. They canceled a previously scheduled public ceremony Tuesday and instead swore in Arredondo in secret for his latest role on the City Council.
Even state police complained this week that Arredondo has remained elusive to them, accusing him of not cooperating with a Texas Department of Public Safety investigation into the shooting, a claim Arredondo refuted. The New York Times reported Friday that the chief arrived on scene without a radio, hampering his ability to organize the response.
Residents here remain in mourning. Each day repeats a cycle of at least two funerals followed by processions to the cemetery on the west edge of town. Their grief, however, is giving way to frustration about how local officials have responded to the tragedy and conversations about how to hold them accountable.
For many, this starts with firing Arredondo and overhauling his department, which they believe failed the students it was supposed to keep safe.
That’s all I have for you today. Please post comments and links on any subject that interests you. This is an open thread.
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
I heard sometime this week,the investigation is being turned over to DoJ or FBI. But the local police have refused cooperation.So, then the investigation continues,right?
I can’t help think this goes all the way to the top,meaning Abbott…..and underlined by fraud.
bostonboomer
I’m not sure what the DOJ is doing, but the Texas Rangers are doing an investigation. They say the chief and Uvalde PD are refusing to talk to them.
I’m wondering about the protocol issue. If he hadn’t yet been sworn, was he really in charge? Who had his role before that?
bostonboomer
He was sworn into the city council. He had the chief job already. They are still letting him be a city councilor after his royal fuck up as school police chief.
darthvelma
Pretty sure he was elected to the city council. So it isn’t a matter of them “letting” him serve.
Supposedly, he has 2-3 years to live. Some media outlets say he has blood cancer, some say abdominal cancer, and some say pancreatic. If it’s pancreatic, I doubt he he’ll live 2 more years.
NW Luna
Pancreatic would carry him off within 6 mos, probably less. The terms blood cancer and abdominal cancer include several dozen conditions, some of which are indolent and others aggressive.
For Ukraine’s sake, let him go quickly or be incapacitated and someone more pragmatic take his place.
the BBC had an article on the likeliest successors. Both hardline tinhats. So no hope for Russia there. But at least it’s not “their” war so maybe that would be an opening to stop attacking Ukraine.
substitute “die” for fizzle out, and it does make Pencian sense. He thought he was going to be President, and that was worth any price.
And I’m equally sure he only stopped going along with the invent-the-vote-count part of the coup when he thought for a second and realized they didn’t have the military in their pocket. So the whole dumb coup could fail. And _he’d_ be under the bus. Not President.
And, of course, once he started edging toward the exits is when the shambling orange lump of triglycerides decided he’d be more useful as an excuse for martial law. It all makes sense in my head…. 😛
Comments
26 responses to “Lazy Caturday Reads: Young Guns”
Have a nice weekend, Sky Dancers!
I heard sometime this week,the investigation is being turned over to DoJ or FBI. But the local police have refused cooperation.So, then the investigation continues,right?
I can’t help think this goes all the way to the top,meaning Abbott…..and underlined by fraud.
I’m not sure what the DOJ is doing, but the Texas Rangers are doing an investigation. They say the chief and Uvalde PD are refusing to talk to them.
and since he’s now on the city council there is unlikely going to be any move to get rid of any of them
I’m wondering about the protocol issue. If he hadn’t yet been sworn, was he really in charge? Who had his role before that?
He was sworn into the city council. He had the chief job already. They are still letting him be a city councilor after his royal fuck up as school police chief.
Pretty sure he was elected to the city council. So it isn’t a matter of them “letting” him serve.
https://twitter.com/hshaban/status/1533167726595907584
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/03/us/uvalde-police-response.html
https://twitter.com/brettachapman/status/1533102615256608768?s=20&t=5shniosf5mslf_54dLuTSg
“stop living in the past”
WHAAAAAAT????
(These really are the mole people……………..)
I’d like to slap the shit out of that “random white man”. I’ve enough of the lot of them!
U.S intelligence says Putin may have terminal cancer.
https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss/status/1532360106511421440?s=20&t=5shniosf5mslf_54dLuTSg
Supposedly, he has 2-3 years to live. Some media outlets say he has blood cancer, some say abdominal cancer, and some say pancreatic. If it’s pancreatic, I doubt he he’ll live 2 more years.
Pancreatic would carry him off within 6 mos, probably less. The terms blood cancer and abdominal cancer include several dozen conditions, some of which are indolent and others aggressive.
For Ukraine’s sake, let him go quickly or be incapacitated and someone more pragmatic take his place.
the BBC had an article on the likeliest successors. Both hardline tinhats. So no hope for Russia there. But at least it’s not “their” war so maybe that would be an opening to stop attacking Ukraine.
wow
https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1533097969507082240?s=20&t=5shniosf5mslf_54dLuTSg
This is by Maggie Haberman, but it’s not her usual gossip column stuff. It’s interesting.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/03/us/politics/trump-pence-safety-jan-6.html
https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/1533137804779200512
https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/1533134582500974595
Sure, Pence. You saw his incendiary behavior close up for 4+ yrs.
substitute “die” for fizzle out, and it does make Pencian sense. He thought he was going to be President, and that was worth any price.
And I’m equally sure he only stopped going along with the invent-the-vote-count part of the coup when he thought for a second and realized they didn’t have the military in their pocket. So the whole dumb coup could fail. And _he’d_ be under the bus. Not President.
And, of course, once he started edging toward the exits is when the shambling orange lump of triglycerides decided he’d be more useful as an excuse for martial law. It all makes sense in my head…. 😛
https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/1533098836897501184
https://twitter.com/samsondenver/status/1533167026461622272