Lazy Saturday Reads: Wag The Dog

Good Afternoon!!

Yesterday Lawrence O’Donnell tweeted about what many of us have been thinking:

O’Donnell devoted his show last night discussing the fact that we cannot possibly be sure that Trump didn’t unleash his ineffectual missile strike on a Syrian air base in coordination with Russia’s Vladimir Putin. Here is O’Donnell’s epic rant:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1iy2bKNoJ8

 

Are we really supposed to believe that this classic narcissist, who clearly care not a whit for anyone but himself, has suddenly developed a conscience because he saw suffering Syrian children on TV? These are the same Syrian children whom he refuses to let into the U.S. because he fears they will grow up to be terrorists. Come on.

Of course plenty of young white male “journalists” swallowed the charade whole. Even Fareed Zacharia, who is usually quite prescient, plagiarized Van Jones’s pronouncement after Trump’s embarrassing exploitation of the wife of the Navy Seal who died in Trump’s first botched military action in Yemen.

https://twitter.com/foreignpolicy77/status/850490994038632448

What did Trump’s strike on Syria accomplish? Planes were taking off from the deliberately undamaged runways the next day, and The Washington Post reports today that: Warplanes return to Syrian town devastated by chemical attack.

Residents of the Syrian town devastated by a chemical-weapons attack earlier this week said that warplanes had returned to bomb them Saturday as Turkey described a retaliatory U.S. assault as “cosmetic” unless President Bashar al-Assad is removed from power.

At least 86 people died in Tuesday’s attack on the northwestern town of Khan Sheikhoun, which left hundreds choking, fidgeting or foaming at the mouth.

Eyewitnesses said Saturday that fresh airstrikes on the area — now a virtual ghost town — had killed one woman and wounded several others. Photographs from the site showed a pair of green slippers, abandoned by a blood-spattered doorway.

The U.S. military launched 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian military airfield early Friday in the first direct American assault on Assad’s government since that country’s six-year civil war began. Although American officials have predicted that the strikes would result in a major shift of Assad’s calculus, they appear to be symbolic in practice.

Within 24 hours of the American strikes, monitoring groups reported that jets were once again taking off from the bombed Shayrat air base.

The strikes also gave Putin an excuse to cancel a previous deal with the U.S. that the two countries won’t directly engage each others’ forces–recall that Trump has already sent U.S. ground troops into Syria.

From the Associated Press: AP Explains: What is the US/Russia “deconfliction line?”

A U.S.-led coalition has been bombing Islamic State-held territory across Syria, launching 24 strikes on Thursday alone, according to the U.S. military’s Central Command. The coalition includes some 60 countries, with some launching their own strikes into Syria. Russia is waging its own bombing campaign in support of President Bashar Assad’s forces, while the Syrian government has its own air force and air defense systems. That means a lot of aircraft are flying in a small airspace, which raises the danger for pilots. In November 2015, for instance, NATO member Turkey shot down a Russian jet fighter, nearly sparking an international conflagration….

To protect pilots, Moscow and Washington opened a so-called “deconfliction line” after Russia began its bombing campaign in September 2015. On the U.S. side, it is run out of the Combined Air and Space Operations Center at the vast al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which hosts the forward headquarters of U.S. Central Command. There, air traffic controllers and senior military officers are in contact with their Russian counterparts in Syria. They share coordinates and other data to avoid midair collisions or confrontations. One U.S. pilot flying missions over Syria credited his safety to it in a recent Associated Press interview….

On Thursday, U.S. President Donald Trump ordered a missile strike on the Shayrat air base, southeast of Homs, over a chemical weapons attack he blamed on Syria’s government. The U.S. used the “deconfliction line” to warn Russia ahead of time that the strike was coming. In the aftermath of the attack, which Syria said killed at least seven people, Russia announced it would suspend its cooperation in the information-sharing campaign, the first time the line has been severed. Russia still has several dozen warplanes and batteries of air defense missiles at its base near Latakia, Syria.

The article goes on the explain that the U.S. will try to keep negotiating with Russia on this issue. And guess what’s happening next week? The AP, via The Denver Post: Tillerson to visit Moscow as US, Russia face fresh tensions.

Tillerson will make the first visit to Russia by a Trump administration official just days after the U.S. launched cruise missiles against an air base in Syria, where Russia’s military is on the ground propping up its ally, President Bashar Assad. Until Thursday, the U.S. had avoided striking Assad’s forces, largely out of concern about being pulled into a military conflict with Russia.

Tillerson receives the Russian Order of Friendship

Yes, Tillerson, who was awarded the Russian Order of Friendship after inking an oil deal in 2012 with the Russian oil company Rosneft. Yes, the company that was mentioned in the famous Christopher Steele dossier. From Foreign Policy in February:

The dossier claims that a representative from Trump’s presidential campaign, Carter Page, met last July with Igor Sechin, head of the Russian oil monopoly Rosneft and a senior Kremlin official. Sechin reportedly offered brokerage on a 19 percent stake in Rosneft in exchange for lifting sanctions, and Page was “non-committal in response.”

As CEO of Exxon, Tillerson represented a giant corporation that is desperate for the U.S. Sanctions on Russia to be lifted. Of course Tillerson and Trump can’t immediately lift the sanctions. That would be too obvious and would not be accepted by most members of Congress. But perhaps there is a plan.

Remember that meeting in the Seychelles between Betsy DeVos’s brother and huge Trump supporter Erik Prince with a close Putin confidant? From the Washington Post:

The United Arab Emirates arranged a secret meeting in January between Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian close to President Vladi­mir Putin as part of an apparent effort to establish a back-channel line of communication between Moscow and President-elect Donald Trump, according to U.S., European and Arab officials.

The meeting took place around Jan. 11 — nine days before Trump’s inauguration — in the Seychelles islands in the Indian Ocean, officials said. Though the full agenda remains unclear, the UAE agreed to broker the meeting in part to explore whether Russia could be persuaded to curtail its relationship with Iran, including in Syria, a Trump administration objective that would be likely to require major concessions to Moscow on U.S. sanctions.

Though Prince had no formal role with the Trump campaign or transition team, he presented himself as an unofficial envoy for Trump to high-ranking Emiratis involved in setting up his meeting with the Putin confidant, according to the officials, who did not identify the Russian.

Prince was an avid supporter of Trump. After the Republican convention, he contributed $250,000 to Trump’s campaign, the national party and a pro-Trump super PAC led by GOP mega-donor Rebekah Mercer, records show. He has ties to people in Trump’s circle, including Stephen K. Bannon, now serving as the president’s chief strategist and senior counselor. Prince’s sister Betsy DeVos serves as education secretary in the Trump administration. And Prince was seen in the Trump transition offices in New York in December.

U.S. officials said the FBI has been scrutinizing the Seychelles meeting as part of a broader probe of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and alleged contacts between associates of Putin and Trump. The FBI declined to comment.

But . . . . according to the Post,

The Seychelles meeting came after separate private discussions in New York involving high-ranking representatives of Trump with both Moscow and the Emirates…

Flynn and Kushner were joined by Bannon for a separate meeting with the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, who made an undisclosed visit to New York later in December, according to the U.S., European and Arab officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters….

In an unusual breach of protocol, the UAE did not notify the Obama administration in advance of the visit, though officials found out because Zayed’s name appeared on a flight manifest.

Officials said Zayed and his brother, the UAE’s national security adviser, coordinated the Seychelles meeting with Russian government officials with the goal of establishing an unofficial back channel between Trump and Putin.

Could they have been discussing plans for coordination in the Syrian conflict? Could Trump and Putin be planning and escalation of conflicts between U.S. and Russian forces that later could be “resolved” by loosening the U.S. sanctions?

Of course no one is talking about all these “coincidences” anymore, because Trump impressed so many male pundits with his “beautiful” missile display.

The media needs to stop the macho swaggering and get back to the Russia investigation immediately. I don’t know for sure what’s going on here, but there’s enough smoke emanating from the Trump gang to be signaling an eight-alarm fire.

I’m going to wrap this up, because this post is so late, but I want to share one more story. Alex Morris of Rolling Stone weighed in on Trump’s narcissism a few days ago: Trump and the Pathology of Narcissism. Here’s the intro:

At 6:35 a.m. on the morning of March 4th, President Donald Trump did what no U.S. president has ever done: He accused his predecessor of spying on him. He did so over Twitter, providing no evidence and – lest anyone miss the point – doubling down on his accusation in tweets at 6:49, 6:52 and 7:02, the last of which referred to Obama as a “Bad (or sick) guy!” Six weeks into his presidency, these unsubstantiated tweets were just one of many times the sitting president had rashly made claims that were (as we soon learned) categorically untrue, but it was the first time since his inauguration that he had so starkly drawn America’s integrity into the fray. And he had done it not behind closed doors with a swift call to the Department of Justice, but instead over social media in a frenzy of ire and grammatical errors. If one hadn’t been asking the question before, it was hard not to wonder: Is the president mentally ill?

It’s now abundantly clear that Trump’s behavior on the campaign trail was not just a “persona” he used to get elected – that he would not, in fact, turn out to be, as he put it, “the most presidential person ever, other than possibly the great Abe Lincoln, all right?” It took all of 24 hours to show us that the Trump we elected was the Trump we would get when, despite the fact that he was president, that he had won, he spent that first full day in office focused not on the problems facing our country but on the problems facing him: his lackluster inauguration attendance and his inability to win the popular vote.

Since Trump first announced his candidacy, his extreme disagreeableness, his loose relationship with the truth and his trigger-happy attacks on those who threatened his dominance were the worrisome qualities that launched a thousand op-eds calling him “unfit for office,” and led to ubiquitous armchair diagnoses of “crazy.” We had never seen a presidential candidate behave in such a way, and his behavior was so abnormal that one couldn’t help but try to fit it into some sort of rubric that would help us understand. “Crazy” kind of did the trick.

The article summarizes the psychological assessments that have gradually emerged from professionals who were initially hesitant to discuss Trump’s personality because of the so-called “Goldwater Rule.” It’s a long, fascinating read.

What stories are you following today? Please share in the comment thread and have a great weekend!


25 Comments on “Lazy Saturday Reads: Wag The Dog”

  1. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    This “conspiracy theory” sure looks like a real conspiracy to me. Am I wrong?

    • Enheduanna's avatar Enheduanna says:

      This whole thing smells to high heaven. Joseph Cannon isn’t buying the official version and Joan Walsh is dubious too, so you are in good company BB.

    • Enheduanna's avatar Enheduanna says:

      By way of Wonkette, here is an excerpt from an AP story.

      http://bigstory.ap.org/4004f76ec46a499896100cfb358f3a08?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP

      ___

      12:40 p.m.

      Senior military officials say the U.S. is looking into whether Russia participated in Syria’s chemical weapons attack earlier this week.

      The officials say Russia has failed to control the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons.

      They say a drone belonging either to Russia or Syria was seen hovering over the site of the chemical weapons attack Tuesday after it happened. The drone returned late in the day as citizens were going to a nearby hospital for treatment. Shortly afterward, officials say the hospital was bombed.

      The officials say they believe the hospital attack may have been an effort to cover up evidence of the attack.

      The officials weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter and demanded anonymity. They say they’re still reviewing evidence.

      —Lolita C. Baldor

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      That’s what I think too.

    • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

      They’re all in league: Putin, Trump and Assad.

  2. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Interesting story about a feral child at The WaPo:

    A girl was found living among monkeys in an Indian forest. How she got there is a mystery.

    The claim is that she lived with monkeys since she was an infant, but she is supposedly already learning to communicate with gestures. If this isn’t a hoax, she will never develop true language. Children must be exposed to human verbal interaction at an early age to develop grammar. See Genie.

    Genie’s case provided convincing evidence suggesting that Noam Chomsky’s linguistic theory was incorrect.

    • Jslat's avatar Jslat says:

      Here’s update. Girl was abandoned because of disabilities.

      http://www.snopes.com/2017/04/07/girl-found-living-monkeys-india/

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Just as I suspected. Most of these feral child stories are hoaxes, although some are real. I find it very hard to believe that monkeys would actually raise a human infant. And were the monkeys or apes? Snopes uses both words. I’m going to have to look more into this.

        • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

          Doubtful she’d be “walking normally” after just a couple of months.

          • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

            The Guardian story is better than Snopes.

            JP Singh said the girl was actually found on a roadside near the forest, not deep in the wilderness. And though there were monkeys in her vicinity, his rangers “never found this girl living with monkeys”, he said.

            “I think the family members of this girl had been aware that she is not able to speak, and they may have abandoned her near the forest road,” he said. “If she was living with monkeys it would have been for a few days only, not for a long time.

            “It is clear from first time view, if you see the girl, that she is only eight or nine years old, but her facial expressions show that she is disabled, not only mentally but also physically,” he said.

            The forest is closely monitored by rangers and CCTV, and it was unlikely she could have survived in the wilderness for long without being spotted, he added.

            The chief medical officer of the hospital in Bahraich, where the girl has been receiving treatment since she was found in January, said it was difficult to “say exactly when she was abandoned”.

            “In India, people do not prefer a female child and she is mentally not sound,” DK Singh said. “So all the more [evidence] she was left there.”

            Ankur Lal, the chief medical officer for Bahraich district, said the nature of the child’s disability was “still under investigation”, but it was unlikely she had been raised in the forest.

            “When she was found, she was behaving violently. She had no toilet habits, no communication. So it was taken that she had been living in the jungle for long,” he said.

            But the rapid improvement she had made since being hospitalised now led doctors to believe she had in fact been raised by people. “Initially she was crawling but now she is walking normally – so she hasn’t been in the jungle since birth,” Lal said.

            Poor child. I hope she will get the treatment and care she needs now.

      • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

        First thing I thought of was the movie Nell………….Thanks for the follow up, remarkable that the girl survived.

    • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

      A little more about Susan “Genie” Wiley. She will be 60 on the 18 Apr. Born to Dorothy Irene Martin Wiley, and Clark Pearl Wiley. She had two older siblings that died young, and brother John Clark Wiley (b. 1952) died in Ohio no to many years ago.

      Genie’s father Clark Wiley is shown in 1900 Oakland, Douglas Co. Oregon, living with his father Juda/Judd Wiley born 1876, Oregon. Mother Pearl M. (Mae) born 1881, and Paul T. (Pearl) born Mar 1900, Oregon……..this would be Genie’s Dad. His father worked in Lumber Mills, and served in Military. Clark moved on to Colorado where he was found working in Lumber mills too. I am not sure when he met up with Dorothy “Irene” Martin, but he is living 1940, Arcadia, Los Angeles Co. Ca. is single and a salesman for s store there. His mother is living with him.

      John Wiley said his dad was brought up in a bordello…….I didn’t see that on the census, but that reminded me of Charles Manson, who was brought up in whore houses, and he felt at home in prison, he liked himself, and prison, that’s all he had ever known. John was about 6 or so when his grandma was killed by a truck. I don’t know if that was the turning point when his father lost his mind, or if he had been sick most of his life. Douglas County, was very rural, and very small population. I don’t know how they ended up in Los Angeles Co. but my guess is that is where he met up with Irene. Who was blind, but in early census, she is not shown as blind as a child. Since they brought their kids up in damn near total isolation, never letting them out of the house, I can’t help but wonder why somebody didn’t see something. Back in those days you damn did mind your own business. John did join the Navy, but as noted in the article he was “a live dead man” all his life, and his daughter also suffered from her relationship with her father. He does have a military headstone. Not sure where the rest of the family is buried.

      When the story broke all over the country (1970)……..and Clark and Irene were arrested, and they were released on bail, he shot himself in the head. It was reported by the news that people from all over Los Angeles drove up and down the road he lived on, and at all times of the day/night, and probably did more than just drive up and down to get a look at the family, and where the abuse took place. They probably were LOUD. What neighbors he had reported that they think that is why he killed himself. Although he wanted to talk, the police didn’t let him. Could be related to Miranda rights. I’d sure like to see the police reports.

      As it was they dismissed the case against Irene, as they couldn’t prove she intentionally harmed Genie, and they felt that it would serve no purpose for her to go to prison. She did get custody at some point, but that didn’t work out either. I suspect she didn’t have the support system to help her, considering she was blind, etc. What really got to me is the that it was reported by police, that they couldn’t fine a motive for this strange case! Good Lord, that right there freaks me out. He had to be mentally unfit to hurt his kids, and I suspect he hurt Irene too, they had been married for 30 years.

      What to you think BB?

      • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

        I ended up having company, so I didn’t quite finish. One thing that came to mind was giving the time, 1970’s……a couple years later Ronald Reagan did a release on the mentally ill in hospitals, and I wonder if she went into some private institution.

        • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

          I think she was finally allowed to go to a group home of some kind where she could live peacefully and not be tortured with all the psychological tests and attempts to teach her language that she endured for years.

        • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

          Another thought, I am haunted by the professionals and those who wrote about her, not being able to break through, or in the case of the one who went to France, and couldn’t run away, not from her, but himself. Do you think, again the “animal” factor comes into play?

          This if for Genie, happy birthday, I don’t know how you survived, but I hope you got out, and that you are living your life where you have good days, and can look people in the eyes, and smile because they are nice to you.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        It’s a famous case. I’m very familiar with it because my area of study was language development. It’s a terrible example of unethical research. There’s a good PBS film on it called Genie: Secrets of the Wild Child.

        Yes, I think Irene was also abused.

        • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

          It’s fairly common that all the females in a “family” are getting abused by the man/men in power.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    //platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    • minkoffminx's avatar Minkoff Minx says:

      I know I’ve been awol lately. But my daddy is part of this online survivor group, and the rumor on there is that a nuclear carrier and company was heading to Philippines and was diverted to Korea. That…tRump used his finesse of negotiations to get the “Chinese guy” to ok the kill on the “North Korean guy”. And the orgasmic reactions it is producing…is disgusting.

  4. Enheduanna's avatar Enheduanna says:

    Thanks for the link to the Rolling Stone article BB. What a strange world tRump must live in – inside his own head.

    Tonight we’re off to the movies to see “Life” – the space alien horror flick. It’ll be light entertainment compared to cable news.