Extra Lazy Saturday Afternoon Reads


Good Afternoon!!

It’s looking like Massachusetts may be on the verge of electing another Republican governor, and suddenly I’m feeling even sicker than I have been with this cold I can’t get rid of.

Breaking news this morning from The Boston Globe, Charlie Baker jumps 9 points in new Globe poll.

Republican Charlie Baker has opened up a 9-point lead over Democrat Martha Coakley, 45 percent to 36 percent, according to a new Globe poll that depicts a far more comfortable advantage than either candidate for governor has enjoyed in months.

The poll reflects an October surge in independent voters toward Baker’s column. It was independents who provided Governor Deval Patrick with his margins of victory in 2006 and 2010.

Baker’s standing has improved from last week’s poll, which showed the two candidates dead even. It can be attributed largely to the gains he has made in voters’ perceptions of who would improve the economy and manage state government, areas that already were tilting his way. At the same time, Baker has offset the deficits he faced on issues such as education and health care, where Coakley still holds an edge, but a diminished one.

“There is just positive movement in every single metric we can ask around Baker,” said pollster John Della Volpe, chief executive of SocialSphere Inc., which conducts the weekly poll for the Globe. “The more voters have gotten to know him, the stronger he performs.”

What is it with this supposedly liberal state? Since I moved here more than 40 years ago, we have had mostly Republican governors. I can’t understand why Massachusetts would elect another one, especially after our experience with Mitt Romney. We’ve also never had a woman elected governor. Republican Jane Swift was governor for two years, but that was because, as lieutenant governor, she took over for Paul Celluci, who resigned to become ambassador to Canada under George W. Bush.

As for getting to know Baker, what does that mean? Do voters really know his history? Or are they responding to political advertising?

Overall, Baker has moved from 38 percent support to 45 percent since late August. Coakley dropped 5 points this week, the poll found, after having held steady throughout much of the fall. Baker’s growth, said Della Volpe, has come almost entirely from voters who have made up their minds since the beginning of September. Eleven percent of voters remain undecided….

The poll depicts an electorate highly susceptible to the recent barrage of political advertising on television. Two weeks ago, Coakley, the state’s attorney general, led Baker by 5 points in the same poll. According to estimates from Kantar Media/CMAG, a firm that tracks political television commercials, $2.2 million in ads paid for by gubernatorial candidates and allied groups — more than 1,700 individual spots — aired on broadcast television from Oct. 12 through Oct. 19.


I didn’t know much about Baker until I read a very disturbing story in the Globe this week, Mental health record may be predictor for Charlie Baker. It turns out Baker was the architect of a damaging mental health privatization policy in Massachusetts that is still reverberates across the state today. (I’ve emphasized some points in the article with bold type.)

It was early 1991, Baker was Massachusetts’ new undersecretary for health, and the 34-year-old Harvard grad was having his first look at the state’s decrepit mental hospitals.

Soon after, a special state commission recommended closing nine of the state’s most antiquated institutions, including Danvers and two other hospitals for mentally ill patients, and moving much of that care to the community. It was Baker’s job to get it done. His strategy involved a first-in-the-nation use of a for-profit company with power to approve or deny treatments for low-income mental health patients.

Baker’s blueprint saved Massachusetts millions of dollars at a time when the state was staring at a nearly $2 billion deficit, but it left thousands of mental health patients often waiting weeks for treatments. The controversial approach became his template for rescuing financially ailing Harvard Pilgrim Health Care a decade later.

The aftershocks of both initiatives are still being felt as the now 57-year-old Republican runs for governor, and those experiences, say Baker supporters and critics, provide a window into how he might handle similarly fraught and costly issues if elected.

Baker’s claim to fame is that as CEO of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, he  kept the company from going bankrupt. Democratic ads have publicized the fact that he “raised premiums 150 percent and tripled his own salary to $1.7 million during his decade at Harvard Pilgrim.” One of the ways he saved money for Harvard Pilgrim was by laying of lots of workers and outsourcing their jobs to India. He even won an “Outsourcing Excellence Award” in 2008.

Back to the Globe article on Baker’s mental health record. There were vast financial profits for the state, and some low income mental health patients did benefit short-term. But overall,

…the separate move to privatize mental health care, with a for-profit company controlling treatment and costs, meant 800 state mental health workers were laid off and their work farmed out to private clinics that received less state money. Long waiting lists ensued for community services.

“It was a disaster,” said Dr. Matthew Dumont, former director of the Chelsea Community Counseling Center, where the number of psychiatrists and other caregivers, including Dumont, was cut from 23 to six. Dumont said the clinic was no longer able to provide a critical service he believes was a lifeline for mental health patients — home visits.

Over the next several years, suicide rates among mental health patients who had received state services soared. That prompted a blistering 1997 report from a legislative panel that criticized the Weld administration for lax monitoring of patients and failing to investigate their deaths in a timely way.

Two years later, a Brandeis University study gave the state high marks for innovative community-based mental health programs launched during the 1990s, but found too many patients waiting for services….

“It’s still a revolving door,” said Dumont, the former director of the Chelsea counseling center who lives with the legacy of privatizing mental health services when he evaluates patients for the state’s public defender agency. He said he has to scrounge to find places that will take indigent defendants who have been in and out of mental health facilities.

Read about Baker’s future plans for mental health care in Massachusetts at the link.


What’s happening in Kentucky?

Is Mitch McConnell getting nervous about holding onto his Senate seat? The Hill reports today that McConnell has just written a personal check to his campaign for $1.8 million dollars to counter the recent DSCC purchase of TV ads in support of challenger Alison Lundergan Grimes. From The Hill:

A week ago it appeared the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee was giving up on the race when it pulled the plug on television advertising after a $1.4 million buy.

But the Democratic Party committee plunged back into this fight this week by announcing it would spend another $650,000 on television ads to help Alison Lundergan Grimes against McConnell. The Senate Majority PAC, a Democratic super-PAC, followed up with a pledge to spend $850,000 in the state.

McConnell has a stable lead in polls, but doesn’t want to let the new Democratic ads go unmatched. He has long pledged to his Republican colleagues that he would not take any party funds to help win reelection.

Maybe it doesn’t mean anything; we’ll have to wait and see. Meanwhile a couple more articles on the Kentucky Senate race.

The Courier-Journal, Grimes pledges to fight for Kentuckians’ rights.

On the stump, she’s a Clinton Democrat. In GOP attacks, she’s a cheerleader for Barack Obama. Political allies — and opponents — know her as the daughter of Jerry Lundergan, former head of the Kentucky Democratic Party.

For her part, Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes calls herself a “Kentucky filly,” charging toward victory in her bid to unseat Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell and become the state’s first female U.S. senator.

“This is a strong … independent Kentucky woman,” Grimes tells crowds on the campaign trail, while pledging to defend Medicare and Social Security benefits, fight for a higher minimum wage and support pay equality for women.

“She will fight for the people of Kentucky like we have never been fought for before,” she promises, speaking in the third person.

But 16 months after announcing her candidacy, political observers say Grimes still faces challenges in defining herself to Kentucky voters who overwhelmingly dislike Obama and have largely turned away from Democrats in most federal elections.

Apparently, it’s all about how much Kentuckians feel about Clinton and Obama. I hope Bill has plans to stump for Grimes again close to election day.


Brian Beutler at The New Republic reports on McConnell’s refusal to respond to questions about privatizing Social Security.

The reporters appear to be referencing this encounter McConnell had at the Louisville Rotary Club with reporter Joe Sonka. At the event, McConnell had expressed remorse that he couldn’t wrangle any Democrats into supporting George W. Bush’s 2005 effort to, as McConnell put it, “fix Social Security.”

Sonka asked him if he’d revisit that effort in 2015, and McConnell said, “I’m not announcing what the agenda would be in advance. We’re not in the majority yet. We’ll have more to say about that later.”

So McConnell dodged a pretty straightforward question about the Republican policy agenda, and, should he become majority leader, his own substantive goals.

A central theme of McConnell’s campaign is that Kentuckians shouldn’t replace a guy who stands to become an agenda setter in Washington with Grimes, who would be a freshman with comparably little power. Vis a vis less politically contentious issues, he’s more than happy to explain how he’d use that power.

One of the goals McConnell has been open about is “going after the EPA,” which he claims is hurting Kentucky’s economy.

So it’s inconsistent of him to hold his cards close to the vest when the issue is privatizing Social Security rather than gunning for the EPA. It would’ve been easy enough for him to say that private accounts are going to stay on the shelf, where they’ve been, for all intents and purposes, since 2005. Or that it wouldn’t be worth the hassle, since President Obama would surely veto such a bill. Instead he said the agenda isn’t up for public discussion until he’s granted the agenda-setting power.

I’m sure McConnell realizes that his constituents wouldn’t be too happy about attacks on Social Security . . .

The Texas Voter ID Law


From MSNBC, a depressing story about the Texas voter ID law, Texas woman threatened with jail after applying for voter ID.

An Austin, Texas woman told msnbc she was threatened with jail time for having an out-of-state driver’s license when she went to apply for a voter identification card so she could vote under the state’s controversial ID law. She said she was so intimidated she left without getting the ID she needed — and which she’d been trying to get for a year.

Lynne Messinger’s account highlights the obstacles that some Texans face as they try to obtain a voter ID — despite the state’s assurances that getting one doesn’t pose a burden.

Messinger, 62 and a musician, said she brought her birth certificate to aTexas’ Department of Public Safety (DPS) office in south Austin Thursday in an effort to get a voter ID. She needs one because Texas’s strict ID law doesn’t accept out-of-state driver’s licenses.

Messinger said she spoke to a clerk at the desk, and explained that she had a California driver’s license. She has houses in both California and Texas and goes back and forth between the two, but decided several years ago to switch her voting residency to Texas.

The clerk left for a few minutes, then told her to take a seat. At that point, Messinger said, a state trooper summoned her into his back office, saying he needed to speak to her. Once inside his office, Messinger said the trooper insisted on seeing all the documentation she had brought, and demanded to know where she lives and pays taxes. He even told her she could be jailed for driving with a California license.* It is illegal to drive in Texas on another state’s driver’s license 90 days after moving into the state.

“It was like a Nazi interrogation about how I cant be driving with a California ID,” Messinger said. “I was completely intimidated and freaked out.”


Here’s a very interesting read on Chief Justice Roberts and Voter ID laws from The Atlantic, On Race and Voter ID, John Roberts Wants It Both Ways. The author, Garrett Epps discusses Roberts’ views on race, and concludes that “[t]he idea that government must not discriminate by race seems to be important to the chief.” But . . .

Which brings us to Veasey v. Perry, the voting-rights case in which the Court issued its 5 a.m. order on Saturday. That order allowed Texas’ draconian voter-ID law, known as SB 14, to take effect for the midterm elections next month—the first general election to which it will be applied. It is customary to speak of SB 14 as a “tough” voter-ID law, but it might be better to speak of it as a discriminatory voter-ID law, inspired by the intent to disfranchise black and Latino voters.

That’s not my inference; it was the considered factual finding of federal district Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos. (Ramos is an Obama appointee, but one endorsed for the bench by Republican Senators Kay Bailey Hutchinson and John Cornyn.) Ramos based her conclusion on a nine-day trial in which both the state and the plaintiffs presented evidence about SB 14’s history and effect. That effect is startling—Ramos found that the law might disfranchise as much as 4.5 percent of the state’s eligible voters. But more important is her conclusion about the law’s intent (emphasis added):

The record as a whole (including the relative scarcity of incidences of in-person voter impersonation fraud, the fact that SB 14 addresses no other type of voter fraud, the anti-immigration and anti-Hispanic sentiment permeating the 2011 legislative session, and the legislators’ knowledge that SB 14 would clearly impact minorities disproportionately and likely disenfranchise them) shows that SB 14 was racially motivated.

This is a devastating finding. The judge is not saying that the law has a disproportionate effect on minorities; she is saying that it was specifically written to prevent them from voting. Because it was intentional race discrimination, she found, it violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, the prohibition of racial restrictions on the vote in the 15th Amendment—and also the prohibition of poll taxes in the 24th Amendment.

Read much more at the link. It’s an important article.


Washington School Shooting

More details are coming out about the school shooting in Washington state. From The Seattle Times, Teen shooter targets 3 girls, 2 male cousins.

A freshman homecoming prince, reportedly angry about a girl, pulled out a gun and opened fire in a crowded cafeteria at Marysville-Pilchuck High School Friday morning, killing one classmate and wounding four others before fatally shooting himself.

At 10:39 a.m., as hundreds of students gathered for lunch on the sprawling campus, Jaylen Fryberg walked up to a cafeteria table, pulled out a gun and shot three teen girls and two teenage male cousins, witnesses and authorities said….

Fryberg and a girl were confirmed dead. The girl’s name was not released.

Two boys and two girls were taken by ambulance to Providence Regional Medical Center in Everett. As of Friday night, the two girls were alive and in intensive care with gunshot wounds to the head, said Dr. Joanne Roberts, chief medical officer for Providence. It will be several days before a prognosis could be made, she said.

The wounded boys were identified by family members as Andrew Fryberg, 15, and Nate Hatch, 14 — both cousins to Jaylen Fryberg. Both also were shot in the head. They were initially taken to Providence and later transferred to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, where Andrew was in serious condition and Nate was in critical condition.

“He shot people he cared about,” said friend and football teammate Dylen Boomer.

I guess we’ll learn more as time goes on. These school shootings make no sense to me.

So . . . what stories are you following today? Please share your links in the comment thread and enjoy your weekend!

58 Comments on “Extra Lazy Saturday Afternoon Reads”

  1. bostonboomer says:

    From TPM, evidence that Jeb Bush may opt out of running for president in 2016.

    Report: Fox News Is Too Negative For Jeb Bush

    CNN’s Peter Hamby reported that during a speech Thursday night at a South Carolina fundraiser, Bush “singled out Fox News” while expressing “annoyance with the polarizing fights and constant negativity of the political news media.”

    Bush reportedly said that he only watches Fox “for a few minutes a day before switching over to SportsCenter.”

    • janicen says:

      Or it may be his Sister Souljah moment when he disses the extreme of his party to win over the independents.

      • bostonboomer says:

        I just hope he doesn’t run. I can just imagine how horrible that would be. And what if Romney runs too?! I don’t think I could handle it.

  2. bostonboomer says:

    USA Today:

    High school cafeteria worker tried to stop gunman in school shooting near Seattle.

  3. Sweet Sue says:

    Thanks for the art.
    Did the city clean up your driveway?
    Election night is going to be very blue (as in sad, not Democratic), here, in Ohio.
    I doubt if I’ll even turn on the television.
    I am tired of the Party expecting the Clintons (especially, Bill) to drag the sorry asses of their candidates over the finish line. That doesn’t apply to Ms.Grimes who is a good candidate,imo.
    Jerry Lundergan? Wasn’t that William Macy’s name in “Fargo?”
    What a sap he was.
    Off to Google.

    • bostonboomer says:

      Thanks. I haven’t done anything about the driveway yet. I’ve been too sick to go out.

      The character in Fargo was named Jerry Lundegaard. I don’t know if Lundergan is Scandinavian.

  4. Sweet Sue says:

    Jerry Lundegaard.
    Ha, ha, I’m laughing just thinking about that wonderful movie.

    • janicen says:

      Ohhhh! 😦 I’m thinking we’ll be drinking some wine and popping in some Cream CD’s tonight.

      • bostonboomer says:

        Cream covering Robert Johnson.

        • janicen says:

          Freakin’ awesome. Great close ups of Bruce’s string work. Ginger Baker was whaling on those drums!! We saw Clapton live when we lived in Seattle. It was like being in the presence of a god. I can’t think of anyone today who can compare to any of the musicians in Cream.

          As an aside, we are going to see Fleetwood Mac live on Halloween up in DC. I can’t wait to see Lindsey Buckingham live. Christine McVie will be back with them as well. I wonder if they’ll play a tribute to Jack Bruce.

  5. bostonboomer says:

    An interesting ancient history/science article from the CSM

    Did ancient Easter Islanders have friends from afar? Yes, say scientists.

    They lived on a remote dot of land in the middle of the Pacific, 2,300 miles (3,700 km) west of South America and 1,100 miles (1,770 km) from the closest island, erecting huge stone figures that still stare enigmatically from the hillsides.

    But the ancient Polynesian people who populated Easter Island, or Rapa Nui, were not as isolated as long believed. Scientists who conducted a genetic study, published on Thursday in the journal Current Biology, found these ancient people had significant contact with Native American populations hundreds of years before the first Westerners reached the island in 1722.

  6. ANonOMouse says:

    Good post BB. I live in one of the Teaparty totally red states and, except for one tight House race there will be little to cheer about here on election night, but I will be watching because of all of the tight senate races. I think Grimes is still in the mix and Nunn in Georgia is slightly ahead. Also the NC Senate race has Hagan leading and the Louisiana race has Landrieu scratching her way back into the race. I have to confess that I’m a political junkie so for me it’s something I can’t stop watching and/or reading about. Will y’all be live blogging election night?

    • bostonboomer says:

      Oh, I’m sure we will have a live blog. I’ll probably be a nervous wreck!

    • ANonOMouse says:

      There are some good Governor races too, especially Wisconsin and Florida. Both of those races may give us something to cheer about.

      As for your Governor’s race BB, it’s so confusing. I would think Coakley would be enjoying a lead. So what’s up with that? Is she a bad on the campaign trail or in debates or is it that the voters don’t particularly want a Woman Governor? I know Warren had a bit of trouble pulling out the win.

      • bostonboomer says:

        I really don’t know. She started out with a big lead, but the same thing happened with Scott Brown. She doesn’t come across as all that dynamic, but she has been a terrific attorney general and was great as Middlesex district attorney. She is really the one who started the push to get Obama to stop defending DOMA. She filed a lawsuit over it and won.


        Unfortunately, I think it’s partly the GOP ads and partly that she’s a woman.

        • RalphB says:

          I doubt it’s possible to overestimate the amount of innate hostility toward a woman candidate, especially when she’s the first to have a chance to win. Wendy Davis has taken a lot of mindless sexist BS from the press and she would be our 3rd woman governor.

        • ANonOMouse says:

          I really hope she finds a way to pull it off.

  7. RalphB says:

    This is just funny, which is good with everything else being so not.

    Watch: Louis CK crashes Brad Pitt’s hilariously awkward ‘Between Two Ferns’ interview

  8. bostonboomer says:

    Nurse arrives in NJ from Sierra Leone and gets quarantined for 21 days even though she tested negative for Ebola.

    I was tired, hungry and confused, but I tried to remain calm. My temperature was taken using a forehead scanner and it read a temperature of 98. I was feeling physically healthy but emotionally exhausted.

    Three hours passed. No one seemed to be in charge. No one would tell me what was going on or what would happen to me.
    I called my family to let them know that I was OK. I was hungry and thirsty and asked for something to eat and drink. I was given a granola bar and some water. I wondered what I had done wrong.

    Four hours after I landed at the airport, an official approached me with a forehead scanner. My cheeks were flushed, I was upset at being held with no explanation. The scanner recorded my temperature as 101.
    The female officer looked smug. “You have a fever now,” she said.

    I explained that an oral thermometer would be more accurate and that the forehead scanner was recording an elevated temperature because I was flushed and upset.

    I was left alone in the room for another three hours. At around 7 p.m., I was told that I must go to a local hospital. I asked for the name and address of the facility. I realized that information was only shared with me if I asked.
    Eight police cars escorted me to the University Hospital in Newark. Sirens blared, lights flashed. Again, I wondered what I had done wrong.

    I had spent a month watching children die, alone. I had witnessed human tragedy unfold before my eyes. I had tried to help when much of the world has looked on and done nothing.

    At the hospital, I was escorted to a tent that sat outside of the building. The infectious disease and emergency department doctors took my temperature and other vitals and looked puzzled. “Your temperature is 98.6,” they said. “You don’t have a fever but we were told you had a fever.”

    After my temperature was recorded as 98.6 on the oral thermometer, the doctor decided to see what the forehead scanner records. It read 101. The doctor felts my neck and looked at the temperature again. “There’s no way you have a fever,” he said. “Your face is just flushed.”

  9. bostonboomer says:

    Government recognizes same sex marriages in six new states

    Same-sex married couples in Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, North Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming will now qualify for Social Security benefits and other types of social insurance typically reserved for married couples.

    “With each new state where same-sex marriages are legally recognized, our nation moves closer to achieving of full equality for all Americans,” said Holder in a Justice Department statement.

    “We are acting as quickly as possible with agencies throughout the government to ensure that same-sex married couples in these states receive the fullest array of benefits allowable under federal law.” he added.

    The announcement comes barely one week after a similar Justice Department decree regarding Colorado, Indiana, Nevada, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

  10. dakinikat says:

    Forty percent of mass shootings start with the gunman targeting his wife, girlfriend, or ex. And access to firearms makes it seven times more likely that a domestic abuser will kill his partner.


  11. Extra lazy reads? Damn BB, don’t know about that one…

    Unfortunately the black out is still on:

    Seriously, I am screaming like Liz was in that photo.

  12. Sweet Sue says:

    I’m sorry, J J. I hope you’ll get your TMC back. soon.
    I’ve done a bit of stage acting, but not film, and looking at La Liz, I have to wonder how do movie stars perform with honking equipment like that in front of their faces?
    Talk about concentration!
    A fair bit of acting is convincing your body that something is actually happening.
    Film and TV actors are strangely and wonderfully talented.,

  13. Mary Luke says:

    Baker’s mental health plane WAS a disaster? Not was. IS. As in, right now, today, he should have to start following me around for a week. There is almost no mental health care in MA which any reasonable person would call adequate. Yes, the old snake-pit hospitals had to be closed, but they should have been renovated and re-opened with adequate staff. Anyone with a brain who works in the system will tell you de-institutionalization has been an almost complete failure, especially for the poor and schizophrenic. At best, severely mentally ill people are living in minimally staffed group homes. At worst, they are on the street. Oh, and did everyone forget about that 27 year old woman who was left alone to staff a group home and was stabbed by a resident a few years ago? This is not a success. And Harvard Pilgrim is a joke. They can barely prescribe penicillin. You can get a cheap HMO policy from them and tell yourself you have insurance, but you’d better hope you never get really sick.

  14. bostonboomer says:

    Does the media have any memory of 2008? They keep acting as if Hillary Clinton is some kind of conservative warmonger when she clearly ran a populist campaign in the 2008 primaries, and she has continued to be more liberal than Obama throughout his administration.

    She was in MA yesterday, and they are claiming she “shifted left” because she said corporations don’t create jobs.

    BOSTON, Oct. 25 (UPI) — Hillary Clinton was in Boston on Friday showing support for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley, and her comments on economics have stirred controversy.

    “Don’t let anybody tell you it’s corporations and businesses create jobs,” Clinton said. “You know that old theory, ‘trickle-down economics,'” she continued. “That has been tried, that has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly.” She also jested that she tells people her husband brought arithmetic to Washington, D.C.

  15. dakinikat says:


    Elizabeth Peña died of diseases related to alcoholism. This article discusses how 12 step programs may not best fit women.

    • janicen says:

      That is really interesting about women who attend AA. Thank you for the link.

      • bostonboomer says:

        I am a woman who went to AA when there were very few women in the meetings. I have no doubt that women get taken advantage of in some AA meetings. Women also are sexually abused by doctors and therapists. Girls are molested by their parents and close relatives (boys are too). Women and children are at risk in our culture, period.

        I can only hope that that article doesn’t keep some desperate woman from seeking help in AA. Keep in mind that for poor women, it may be the only possibility for help available. AA costs nothing. Doctors, therapists, and medications are very very expensive.

        I would have a bit more respect for Gabriel Glaser if she could have found a woman to write about who actually went to AA for help instead of writing about a woman who may have never sought treatment at all. She wrote the piece to flog her book.

        • janicen says:

          Obviously, your actual experience trumps Glaser’s conclusions. I don’t think AA is bad for women but after reading her article I would think that some women might have more success in all-female AA meetings. Or is that not really a solution?

          • bostonboomer says:

            Of course. And there are many women’s meetings. Don’t get me wrong, I have some issues with AA. I just don’t think it’s particularly “scientific” that Gabrielle Glaser based that article on a woman who never went to AA or sought any treatment, as far as anyone knows.

            My biggest problem with Glaser is that she claims that alcoholics can drink “moderately.” That’s also not “scientific.” There is a strong genetic component. Some people with French (like me) or Native American ancestry have no control over alcohol because they are lacking an enzyme that helps detoxify it in the liver. Some people will never be alcoholics because they have such negative effects from drinking. People like me drink because we like the effects and we can handle a lot of it.

            Glaser seems to be focused mainly on environmental issues in the development of alcohol addiction. She also doesn’t appear to be an alcoholic herself, so she really may not understand the the problem clearly.

    • bostonboomer says:

      AA saved my life, what can I say? I still live by the program, although I haven’t gone to meetings in years. I did attend AA meetings for the first five years or so and they changed my life. On May 10, I passed my 32nd anniversary of sobriety. The article is about Elizabeth Pena, and the author admits she doesn’t even know if Pena sought treatment, much less that she went to AA.

      We don’t know whether Peña, known for her roles in “Modern Family,” “La Bamba,” and “Down and Out in Beverly Hills,” sought help for her alcohol use. But if she did, it’s likely she was treated with one of a myriad 12-step programs derived from the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous. The program, developed in the 1930s, demands that it members abstain from drinking, cede their egos, and accept their “powerlessness” over alcohol.

      That summary of the AA philosophy is complete bullshit. The “powerless” notion is about acceptance that drinking doesn’t work for you and letting go of the desire to control alcohol, not your being powerless as an individual–far from it.

      Others, such as the Centers for Motivation and Change in Manhattan, employ a variety of tools, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing, a goal-oriented form of therapy, with their patients.

      That’s hilarious. People in AA were using cognitive behavioral therapy before anyone else ever heard of it. The AA program is all about changing your thinking patterns and dealing with negative thoughts and feelings.

      I could go on and on, but why bother? People will believe what they want. I speak from experience, but sometimes people have to have the experience before they understand what alcoholism and drug addiction are all about.

      There are many ways to recover from addiction, but as far as I know the successful ones involve peer support and changing thinking patterns

      A growing number embrace the use of anti-craving medications long approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the use of alcohol dependence.

      OMG! Save me from the medical “experts”!! All those medications do is put off the inevitable day when the person relapses–unless she learns the tools to deal with her problems.

      I do not believe it is possible for a person who is physically addicted to alcohol to ever drink safely again. Therefore, to recover, you must let go of your substance of choice and find new ways to deal with stress, anxiety, and life problems.

    • bostonboomer says:

      OK, now I went and learned about Glaser’s book. She argues is the book that alcoholics can learn to control their drinking and return to social drinking. That is dangerous and scary. Recent research shows that the roots of alcoholism are genetic. This woman is deluded, and her book could lead to the deaths of vulnerable women.

      I only hope a few people read these comments I’m writing here. I am serious about this. Alcoholism kills.

  16. ANonOMouse says:

    Good News for Alison Lundergan-Grimes. Endorsement by Louisville Courier-Journal