Monday Reads


Good Morning!!

Today is another slow news day, and that could be bad news for some folks in Norfolk, Nebraska. Dakinikat alerted us to the story yesterday, and now it’s in the process of going viral. So far the headlines on the story seem highly understated. From the Lincoln Journal-Star: Obama float at Norfolk parade sparks controversy.

It was the parade float that elicited the loudest cheers Friday at Norfolk’s Fourth of July parade. The crowd lining the streets clapped and laughed as the flatbed truck went by.

But one loud voice rose above the rest: “This is not OK,” Glory Kathurima said. “That’s not OK.”

She kept repeating herself as the float passed, she says. She started to raise her phone to take a picture of the blue truck with the outhouse on its flatbed, along with a dark figurine in overalls propped up by a metal walker.

And nailed to the sides of the wooden privy, two signs in all-black capital letters: “OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY.”

Kathurima’s daughter Malaika saw the disrespectful depiction of the President of the United States, and asked her mom, “Mommy, what does that mean? What’s so funny?”

Kathurima moved to Nebraska from Kenya when she was Malaika’s age and became a naturalized citizen a few years ago. She’s raised her daughter in Norfolk and has found ways to explain the meaning of skin color. She’s turned on the TV and pointed to President Obama, showing Malaika that there was someone that looked like her — half Kenyan, half American.

“I’m angry and I’m scared,” Kathurima said. “This float was not just political; this was absolutely a racial statement.”

If a 9-year-old can see the problem, you’d think the parade organizers in Norfolk would have at least foreseen what the reaction to the float would be from normal people across the country. But apparently they didn’t.

Obama float1

Parade committee member Rick Konopasek said the float wasn’t meant to be any more offensive than a political cartoon would be….

“We don’t feel its right to tell someone what they can and can’t express,” he said. “This was political satire. If we start saying no to certain floats, we might as well not have a parade at all.”

Konopasek and parade announcer Wally Sonnenschein said the outhouse float was the most popular one in the parade, and the three judges awarded it an honorable mention.

“It’s obvious the majority of the community liked it,” Konopasek said. “So should we deny the 95 percent of those that liked it their rights, just for the 5 percent of people who are upset?”

Konopasek and Sonnenschein actually claimed that the float demonstrated the freedom of speech and independence that the country celebrates on the Fourth of July, and that “the man who built the float has been a longstanding member of the community, and people shouldn’t be quick to judge him for expressing his opinions.” How odd then that the “man who built the float” didn’t put his name on his handiwork and he is still anonymous, according to

A Fourth of July parade float that depicted a figure standing outside an outhouse labeled the “Obama Presidential Library” has created a stir on social media and is also receiving criticism in Norfolk, Nebraska.

The float, in Norfolk’s annual Independence Day parade, was on a flatbed trailer being pulled by a blue pickup truck. The figure was dressed in overalls and standing next to a walker outside of the outhouse. The hands and head of the figure were greenish and appeared to be zombielike; the hands were pressed against the sides of the figure’s head. Miniature American flags were atop the float and on the truck.

 Neither the float nor the pickup identified a sponsor; a sign in the windshield said it was entry No. 29.

Why isn’t “the man who built the float” expressing pride in his creation?

Actually the design of the float wasn’t original. I’ve seen this depiction of Obama before. From Huffington Post:

The presidential library outhouse comparison has become somewhat of a conservative meme in recent years. A similar structure was on display at Montana’s state Republican convention in 2012. And last fall, an outhouse with a “presidential library” sign drew criticism in a small New Mexico town.

It will be interesting to see how this story plays out in the next few days. Certainly if this is not racism per se (I think it is), it demonstrates a shocking lack of respect for the office of the Presidency. Will Norfolk parade officials continue to defend the float? Will “the man who built the float” come forward and defend what he did? Stay tuned.

In other news,

In his latest column, E.J. Dionne calls attention to “an article in draft” by Joseph Fishkin & William E. Forbath called “The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution” (PDF).  The article addresses the issue of economic inequality, and is the basis for a planned book by Fishkin.

Dionne writes that Tea Partiers and other “conservatives” constantly talk about the Constitution to justify their extreme views on multiple issues. Dionne argues that “progressives” should “think constitutionally” too, and “challenge conservative claims about what the Constitution really demands.”


In the May issue of the Boston University Law Review, Joseph R. Fishkin and William E. Forbath of the University of Texas School of Law show that at key turning points in our history (the Jacksonian era, the Populist and Progressive moments and the New Deal), opponents of rising inequality made strong arguments “that we cannot keep our constitutional democracy — our republican form of government — without constitutional restraints against oligarchy and a political economy that maintains a broad middle class, accessible to everyone.”

Their article is called “The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution,” though Forbath told me that he and Fishkin may give the book they’re writing on the topic the more upbeat title “The Constitution of Opportunity.” Their view is that by empowering the wealthy in our political system, Supreme Court decisions such as Citizens United directly contradict the Constitution’s central commitment to shared self-rule.

“Extreme concentrations of economic and political power undermine equal opportunity and equal citizenship,” they write. “In this way, oligarchy is incompatible with, and a threat to, the American constitutional scheme.” …. they make a similar critique of what they call an excessively “court-centered” approach to constitutionalism. “Constitutional politics during the 19th and early 20th centuries” was very different and the subject of democratic deliberation. In earlier eras, they say, the Constitution was seen as not simply permitting but actually requiring “affirmative legislation . . . to ensure a wide distribution of opportunity” and to address “the problem of oligarchy in a modern capitalist society.”

 The authors remind us of Franklin Roosevelt’s warning that “the inevitable consequence” of placing “economic and financial control in the hands of the few” would be “the destruction of the base of our form of government.” And writing during the Gilded Age, a time like ours in many ways, the journalist James F. Hudson argued that “imbedded” in the Constitution is “the principle” mandating “the widest distribution among the people, not only of political power, but of the advantages of wealth, education and social influence.”

The idea of a Constitution of Opportunity is both refreshing and relevant. For too long, progressives have allowed conservatives to monopolize claims of fealty to our unifying national document. In fact, those who would battle rising economic inequalities to create a robust middle class should insist that it’s they who are most loyal to the Constitution’s core purpose. Broadly shared well-being is essential to the framers’ promise that “We the people” will be the stewards of our government.

Fishkin’s proposed book sounds like a worthwhile companion to Thomas Picketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century.

A somewhat related article from Raw Story by Bill Moyers and Co., July 4th note to tea partiers: Your politics would baffle the Founding Fathers.

Editor’s note: These days, if you see a protester donning a tricorn hat and waving a Gadsden Flag, it’s a safe bet that he or she is a Republican activist who’s furious about “death panels” or the prospect of the government meddling in the Medicare program. But the tea party movement isn’t the first to claim itself to be the true defenders of the Constitution, or to enlist its Framers in a political cause. Throughout American history, activists across the ideological spectrum have insisted that the Framers would roll over in their graves upon encountering the perfidy of their political opponents.

The reality is that the Framers disagreed about almost everything, and produced a Constitution that was filled with expedient compromises. As Jill Lepore, a professor of American history at Harvard University, pointed out in her book, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party’s Revolution and the Battle Over American History, “Beginning even before it was over, the Revolution has been put to wildly varying political purposes.” Between 1761, when the first signs of discontent with England became apparent in the Colonies, and 1791, when the Bill of Rights was ratified, Lepore wrote that Americans debated an “ocean of ideas” from which “you can fish anything out.”

One of the few areas where the Framers approached a consensus was a belief that their Constitution shouldn’t be fetishized. According to Lepore, it was none other than Thomas Jefferson who wrote, “Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the arc of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human.” 

Read an excerpt on Constitutional originalism from Jill Lepore’s book at the Raw Story link.


From NBC News: Pope Francis Meets Abuse Victims, Begs Forgiveness for Church.

The pontiff invited six victims of abuse from Ireland, Germany and Britain to attend an early-morning private Mass at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, the residence next to St. Peter’s Basilica where he lives.

 Francis called the abuse a “grave sin” decrying how it was hidden for “so much time” and “camouflaged with a complicity that cannot be explained.”

“I ask for the grace to weep, the grace for the Church to weep and make reparation for her sons and daughters who betrayed their mission, who abused innocent persons,” the pope said in his homily. “I beg your forgiveness, too, for the sins of omission on the part of Church leaders who did not respond adequately to reports of abuse.” ….

Francis strongly praised the victims’ courage in speaking up and shedding “light on a terrible darkness,” telling the mass he is deeply aware of their deep and unrelenting pain.

“Sins of clerical sexual abuse against minors have a toxic effect on faith and hope in God,” he said, adding that the victims’ willingness to come to the Vatican “speaks of the miracle of hope, which prevails against the deepest darkness.”

I guess it’s a start, but I agree with victims advocates who say it’s too little, too late. What concrete actions is the Church going to take to identify abusers and potential abusers before they act out? Child sexual abuse is a systemic problem that has continued for centuries. It’s difficult to see how it can be overcome with apologies and meetings with a few survivors.

I’ll end with a fascinating story from New Scientist, via Raw Story: Oldest case of Down’s syndrome from medieval France.

The oldest confirmed case of Down’s syndrome has been found: the skeleton of a child who died 1500 years ago in early medieval France. According to the archaeologists, the way the child was buried hints that Down’s syndrome was not necessarily stigmatised in the Middle Ages….

The new example comes from a 5th- and 6th-century necropolis near a church in Chalon-sur-Saône in eastern France. Excavations there have uncovered the remains of 94 people, including the skeleton of a young child with a short and broad skull, a flattened skull base and thin cranial bones. These features are common in people with Down’s syndrome, says Maïté Rivollat at the University of Bordeaux in France, who has studied the skeleton with her colleagues….

Oldest case of Down’s syndrome from medieval France – life – 04 July 2014 – New Scientist#.U7qdknlOXEd <!—->

Rivollat’s team has studied the way the child with Down’s syndrome was buried, which hasn’t been possible with other ancient cases of the condition. The child was placed on its back in the tomb, in an east-west orientation with the head at the westward end – in common with all of the dead at the necropolis.

According to Rivollat, this suggests the child was treated no differently in death from other members of the community. That in turn hints that they were not stigmatised while alive.

Another researcher of Down’s Syndrome in ancient history, John Starbuck of Indiana University, says drawing cultural conclusions from the method of burial is very difficult. Read more at the link.

What stories are you following today? Please post your links in the comment thread.

26 Comments on “Monday Reads”

  1. bostonboomer says:

    Coincidentally, Norfolk, Nebraska is the birthplace of Johnny Carson. No wonder he got out of there as soon as he could!


    • Pat Johnson says:

      The hatred for this president is based on race, pure and simple.

      He may not be what was proposed during the 2008 election as another JFK, FDR, or MLK but he surely does not deserve to outrank George W. Bush for being the worst.

      He has disappointed so many of us Dems for not standing up to the obstructionists in the GOP since he took office but he certainly does not deserve the vitriol that has been shown since he took the oath. In actuality, he is more to the Right than we would have suspected.

      But having said that, he has taken more “hits” for the color of his skin as the Loony Tunes argued over his birth certificate and there is no end in sight. The people of Norfolk, NB should be ashamed.

      This nation has yet to overcome the battles of the Civil War and it is not only the South who should hang its head in shame. The GOP is populated by racists since they seem to condone these outrageous events while they beat their bibles and wrap themselves in the flag.

      The truth is that we have not advanced at all no matter how much we tell ourselves otherwise.

      • RalphB says:

        That rings true to me. Pierce has a good post on the Texas GOP platform this morning for a bit of the crazy…

      • bostonboomer says:

        I agree.

      • dakinikat says:

        I just deleted a racist screed on our facebook page saying we obviously had no since of human and didn’t support the first amendment. … that’s the shorter version of the horrible stuff that was printed.

        • ANonOMouse says:

          Ironically they believe the 1st Amendment only applies to themselves. People who are objecting to that tacky, obnoxious, obscene, childish, ridiculous, ignorant float have the 1st Amendment right to free speech in their objection. The sponsors of the parade have the right to decide whether they want OFFENSIVE floats in their parade in the future. That goddam 1st Amendment door swings both ways and the friggin trolls need to learn that lesson.

          • dakinikat says:

            They don’t understand that the first amendment applies to us and the federal government and doesn’t mean we have to tolerate their nasty outbursts or be quiet about it.

        • NW Luna says:

          That was not something in some racist troll’s back yard, as I suspect that ugly commenter has. It was on a city-wide parade intended to celebrate a great and diverse country with respect for human rights and civil rights for all.

    • Fannie says:

      According to the Mayor of Norfolk, Sue Fuchtman, they allowed the permit for Oddfellows to use the streets. She says that the Norfolk, Ne. Oddfellows Lodge is the organization that developed and approved of that particular float. You know, I know that is a historic fraternal organization all over this country, since the 1870’s. There exist millions of Oddfellow cemeteries….I have a brother buried in one. They all parked at the VFW Club parking lot, and when I call their number, it is no longer in use. I cannot get through to them, so I am calling the Democratic Party of Nebraska. We cannot let them expose our children to such hatred. Glory Kathurima attended with her black children, and I stand by her, this is WRONG.
      You don’t do this to children, they need good role models, and libraries to help them learn in positive ways, not this hatred.

      • bostonboomer says:

        Yes, that was in the articles. The Oddfellows approved the float and gave it “honorable mention.” Supposedly there is going to be a meeting to discuss the float and what to do in the future. The city should take the permit away from the Oddfellows. The NE Democratic Party and a city councilor have condemned the decision to allow the float in the parade.

        The Oddfellows probably got so many calls that they shut off their phone.

  2. bostonboomer says:

    This is beyond strange:

    TPM: Newspaper Ran Op-Ed About Obama With N-Word In The Headline (PHOTO)

    A local New York newspaper ran an op-ed that used the N-word in its headline about President Barack Obama.

    The op-ed, in the monthly West View News of the West Village in New York, by James Lincoln Collier, was actually not a piece criticizing Obama. Collier argued that “far right voters hate Obama because he is black.”

    “The simple truth is that there is still in America an irreducible measure of racism,” the op-ed said. “America’s increasing tolerance of far-right opinion has made racism more acceptable.”

    The New York Post printed an image (pictured) of the headline with the n-word blurred out.

    The West View News also ran a column below Collier’s by Alvin Hall, an African-American columnist, titled “This headline offends me.”

    No kidding . . .

    • RalphB says:

      Collier sure got his point across in a very forceful manner. Even though the headline was offensive.

  3. bostonboomer says:

    Slate: BBC reporters told to “stop giving airtime to crackpots.”

    Will the American media get the message?

    • NW Luna says:

      I’ll note that giving cranks the boot is only Step 1. What’s Step 2? Stop electing them to office.

      That’s a great read!

  4. bostonboomer says:

    Bill Sher: Privacy Panel Report Undercuts Snowden’s NSA Claim

    If you blinked you probably missed it, but the government’s privacy watchdog panel just declared, in a unanimous report, that the National Security Agency’s phone and email collection program is “valuable and effective in protecting the nation’s security” with “no evidence of intentional abuse.”

    The prior report from the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board received gobs of press attention. But that January report, with the board divided 3-to-2 on its conclusions, deemed the NSA’s domestic metadata collection program in violation of the law. “Illegal and Should End” blared the headlines in both the New York Times and Washington Post. Last week’s report had the temerity to validate a government surveillance program. Boring.

    Of course, it’s not boring at all that the PCLOB, so recently the toast of NSA critics, has just destroyed what Edward Snowden and his allies considered their game-set-match talking point — that our own government said the NSA’s surveillance program was both illegal and impotent against terrorism.

  5. RalphB says:

    MoJo: Forget Red State, Blue State: Is Your State “Tight” or “Loose”?

    A new theory about the cultures of different regions could go a long way toward explaining why the United States is so polarized.

  6. RalphB says:

    Another visitation of Hobby Lobby …

    Charles P Pierce: Sin In The Afternoon

    What the majority of the Supreme Court did, although the majority never would have the courage to admit it publicly, was to take it upon itself to decide the legitimacy of an individual concept of sin. Take their claim on its face—which I don’t, but play along—and the Greens are arguing that being required to provide the earned benefit of contraception medicine to their employees would make them complicit in the sin those employees would commit by using those medicines. That is the heart and soul of the “religious liberty” argument in this case. That is also the sum total of Douthat’s argument; otherwise, why is he making the “official beliefs” of” traditional religious bodies” a legitimate governmental interest in the lives of millions of people who might not belong to any of them? “Religious liberty” doesn’t exist in a vacuum. In this case, the right of the Greens to practice their religion is not in question In this case, it means to be free from the obligation of being complicit in what you (publicly, at least,) proclaim to be sin. The Supreme Court could not have decided this case were it not willing to determine the legitimacy of the Green family’s concept of sin. Good god, is that ever not Sam Alito’s job.

  7. bostonboomer says:

    Controversial Nebraska parade float creator speaks out.

    NORFOLK, Neb. (KTIV/US92) –
    Attendees of the Norfolk Fourth of July Parade would say one float stood out in particular last weekend.

    A mannequin on the side of an outhouse read “Obama Presidential Library” was believed to portray President Obama.

    The creator of the float, rural Norfolk resident and veteran H. Dale Remmich, said he’s sorry for the misconception.

    Dale Remmich, float maker said, “It’s me. I’ve got on my bibs. Yes, I’ve got my walker. I’m turning green and some say I look like a zombie. But I am not a hate-monger and I’m not a racist.

    Remmich said he did not mean any disrespect for the presidency. He also said one of the reasons that contributed to the making of the float is the ongoing issues of the Veteran’s Affairs administration.

    Remmich said, “I have three very close friends that are under VA care, or lack there of it, right now.”

    Remmich said the second reason he constructed the float was because he was disappointed with the government’s handling of the Bergdahl scandal.

    Remmich said, “I tried to use political satire as best I could, but to be honest with you it’s mostly political disgust, simply no more or no less.”

    Lying asshole.