Light Bulbs Saved But American Light Diminished

We can no longer call Congress a do-nothing farce.  In case you haven’t heard our esteemed legislators have ‘saved’ the incandescent light bulb from its 2012 banishment.  Which means incandescent hoarders can display their beloved bulbs in public, display them with pride and patriotism—let freedom shine–without the fear of neighborly condemnation or the riot police knocking down the door.

Let there be light!

If only.

Other things we might have considered saving in 2011:

The Middle Class; Death by Strangulation

This week we were gifted with the sobering statistic that 50% of the American public is now considered ‘low income.’  Of course, the naysayers are quick to point out that this is a gross exaggeration, that terms like ‘low-income’ and ‘poverty’ are relative terms.  Go to Africa, they say.  Perhaps, Haiti would do.  Or North Korea.  Then you’ll know the ‘real’ meaning of misery.

Sorry but this strained logic belies the fact that unlike the above examples the United States of America is a developed world power. We beat our chests and claim ‘exceptionalism’ on the world stage yet are willing to use third world comparisons to shrug off bad news?  Lame comparisons are simply an exercise in don’t believe your lying eyes and for God’s sake never distrust the status quo.  What are you?  Some sort of Commie!

A small factoid from the St. Louis Federal Reserve, Economic Research group: the average length of unemployment in the United States is now over 40 weeks. And another from the New America Foundation:

The share of middle-income jobs in the United States has fallen from 52% in 1980 to 42% in 2010.

Middle income jobs have been replaced by low-income jobs, which now make up 41% of the work force.

The American Economy; Bleeding Out While Doctors Look On

While average citizens lost wealth and continue to struggle with unemployment and underemployment, face prospects of social programs stripped down to nothing, we’ve been gifted once again with startling news. The Federal Reserve over a three-year period bailed out large banks and corporations, domestic and foreign, to the tune of 29 trillion dollars.

Twenty-nine trillion!  To put this in some perspective one trillion dollars could be imagined thusly:

If you were to count to one thousand, one number every second, it would take seventeen minutes. Counting to one million at the same rate would take twelve days (counting nonstop, btw, day and night).  Counting to one billion would take thirty-two years.

Now, drum roll please:  Counting to one trillion?  Would take 32,000 years.

Then multiply by 29.

Meanwhile, with the money spigots wide open spewing a gusher of magic money, small business loans [the sort that Main Street depends on to fuel growth and employment, loans of 1 million or less] dropped to a 12-year low. Why is this a problem?  Because despite the GOP’s drone that the top 1% of the population are the ‘job creators,’ businesses with fewer than 500 employees created 65 percent of the jobs between 1993 and 2009, according to the Small Business Administration.

Another withering fact: between 2001 to 2009, 42,000+ factories and manufacturing-related businesses closed for good.  And, of course, the jobs associated with those companies went bye-bye, moved off-shore to exploit lower wages and the nefarious environmental regulations that vulture capitalists love to hate.

In addition, our trade deficits with China [84 billion in 2001 to 278 billion in 2010] and other countries [oil imports represent over 60% of our current deficit] have bled and continue to bleed jobs and wealth from the US.  Trade deficits represent a countries’ imbalance in terms of importing to exporting and the rate at which a nation’s wealth is transferred into foreign markets.  As a country, we’re being bled to death, according to the AAM.

The impact of the trade deficit with China extends beyond U.S. jobs lost or displaced, according to the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM). Competition with China and countries like it has resulted in lower wages and less bargaining power for U.S. workers in manufacturing and for all workers with less than a four-year college degree.

And yet the trade deficits go on unabated.  A recent example was the passage of the trade deals with Panama, Columbia and S. Korea, heralded as a great deal for the United States.  But according to Dylan Ratigan, MSNBC:

The key question we have to face as a country is how we want to govern ourselves. From World War II until NAFTA, our trading policies were based on geopolitical needs and what would increase prosperity for America. Since NAFTA, however, the mantra of free trade has been warped to generate rights for international capital and nothing else. The agreements Congress and the President are pushing continue this unfortunate trend. What unfettered capital wants is to avoid taxes, regulations, or any state power whatsoever.

In regards to oil imports, the drumbeat for several years has been: Drill, Baby, Drill. It’s all about jobs and keeping America strong, our oil-financed legislators are likely to say.  The problem is regulation, they’ll add, and big government working against the blessings of the free market.   Really?  Not so, says Dylan Ratigan.

We do not have a free market for energy, because the actual cost of fossil fuel in our economy is not reflected at the pump; the military’s not in there, the environment’s not in there, and there’s a wide variety of differing fuel subsidies and tax treatments for all sorts of different fuel sources depending on their relation with our government. So, how can a marketplace decide the fuel source, when one fuel, particularly being gasoline and fossil fuels, have such a substantial comparative subsidy?”

The answer is: the marketplace cannot decide the cost of fossil fuel or entertain the cost-effectiveness of alternative sources because the game is rigged as it has been for a century+ where fossil fuels rule the day, pay off politicians and are willing to drive us into economic and environmental ruin for the sake of profit and power.

Vulture Capitalism writ large.

The American Homeowner; Death by Drowning

In the second quarter of 2011, 10.9 million Americans or 22.5% of homeowners were ‘underwater’ with their mortgages, namely they owed more on their mortgages than their houses were actually worth, a result of the real estate collapse of 2007-2008.  Although the Home Affordable Refinance Program [HARP] has fallen short to relieve homeowners from onerous, often ballooning mortgage payments and subsequent home foreclosure, the Obama Administration has attempted to remove the key barriers in the refinancing procedures. This is expected to expand mortgage refi at today’s lower interest rate to larger numbers of struggling homeowners, particularly those with little to no equity in their homes.

Will it work?

The jury is still out, but at best this expanded program will only be available to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-backed loans.

In addition to providing relief, many citizens expected a thorough and public investigation into exactly what went wrong in the mortgage industry. We expected our own Pecora moment.

But that didn’t happen.

In fact the Administration has attempted to rush through settlements with major banks, requiring no admission of wrong doing and attaching immunity from civil or criminal liability to sweeten the deal. Countering this, several state Attorney Generals [five to date] have refused to accept the 50-state agreement and have proceeded with independent investigations of their own.  And just this past week, House Representative Tammy Baldwin [D-WI] introduced a resolution to block any agreement on the national foreclosure question, without proper and thorough investigation. Immunity from civil and/or criminal liability would be stripped and fraudulent practices prosecuted fully under the Rule of Law.

But still, for the 22.5% of American homeowners, the water level is already chin-high and rising fast.

Civil Liberties; Gutting of the Bill of Rights

Perhaps no other images brought home the dwindling nature of American civil liberties than the recent round up of Occupy Wall Street protesters.  We’ve watched young women pepper-sprayed, protesters manhandled and in one instance a young Iraqi veteran nearly killed by police who appeared ready for WWIII rather than crowd dispersal.  On several occasions over-zealous police action was caught on film not by the press but by protesters and onlookers.

In addition, we now know that drones developed for war applications have been deployed in country and that drone use is being marketed to police departments throughout the country.  Security is big business.

Obviously, the First Amendment’s guarantee to peaceable assembly is not.  And privacy?  Forget about it!

Add this to the Administration’s successful kill order on extremist cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen operating in Yemen, a kill order without benefit of due process. Otherwise known as execution without trial.  We can argue about the threat of the man but there is no argument about the danger of precedent and the shredding of the Rule of Law.  And so, should we be surprised by the most recent outrage, the passage of an indefinite detention authority tucked inside the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act?  The bill codifies the right of the President to order the arrest and indefinite detention of US citizens suspected of terrorism.  No trial, no appeal.  You can now be ‘disappeared,’ lawfully.

One fight that did end well [at least temporarily] was the controversial and previously reported Stop Online Piracy Act [SOPA].  The discussions between legislators were abruptly adjourned after stiff condemnation by online biggies Google, Wikipedia and even computer scientist Vint Cerf , one of the founders of the Internet, who claimed that the bill’s passage would begin “a worldwide arms race of unprecedented censorship of the Web.”

Rights of Women; Assaults Continue

In the contradictory world of Far Right extremists, where individual liberty is celebrated and government intrusion condemned, the individual rights of women and their reproductive decisions are the lone exception.  Family planning, contraception, abortion, even ordinary ob/gyn screenings are suspect and thereby targets of defunding and all manner of attack.  Bills have littered the landscape calling for the elimination of all abortive measures, even when a woman’s life and/or future fertility is in jeopardy.  The heartbeat of the unborn is made sacred, while the lives of the fully realized female is continually denigrated, dismissed and derided.  Personhood resolutions have been raised in referendums [and thankfully voted down], where the fertilized egg would be designated as a person with full legal rights under the law.

Fertilized eggs and corporations.  Perfect together.

The insanity of these rigid, ridiculous demands from zealots are all too real and dangerous when applied to the actual world.  Miscarriage, for instance, a completely normal biological occurrence, would take on the aura of a criminal act, requiring an investigation.  By the egg or zygote police, I imagine. Or a woman who suffers an ectopic pregnancy could be left to bleed until doctors were convinced of the unborn ‘person’s’ lack of viability.  The woman’s health is secondary in this scenario.

The personhood resolutions would also deny women certain contraceptive measures.  For instance, the day after pill would be in violation.  And, in fact, Health and Human Services’ recently overruled the FDA’s recommendation on Plan B for young women under the age of 18 and refused to lift the emergency contraception’s restriction.

The assault on women’s rights have been unrelenting, not only in terms of reproductive decisions but in basic health services.  Planned Parenthood and their related clinics and facilities provide services to many poor to middle income women, offering important medical screenings, tests for cancer, diabetes, high-blood pressure, etc.  Only 3% of what Planned Parenthood does is related to abortion services.  And yet, the 90-year organization has become the Boogie Man for right-wing fundamentalists, who would deny many women the only health provider they have.

Sorry, the barefoot and pregnant dictum has no place in the 21st Century.

Our Children; Gross Neglect of Our Most Important Resource

A higher percentage of children today are living in poverty than was the case in 1975.  The rate of poverty has increased every year for the last four years, from 16.9 percent to nearly 22 percent as of 2010.  In the UK and France that number is under 10%.  The 2011 Child Well Being Index indicates that it is American children, the country’s future, who will bear the greatest damage by widening income disparities and proposed cuts to education, food stamps and health insurance programs.

Some sobering factoids:

Child homelessness has risen 33% in the last 3 years to 1.6 million

There are over eight million children in the United States today that are not covered by health insurance.

Today, one out of every seven Americans is on food stamps and one out of every four American children is on food stamps.

Nearly 20 million children participate in school lunch programs.

This is not what Democracy looks like.

The Poor, the Immigrant and/or Muslims; The Inadequacies of Scapegoating

Scapegoating has a long history, even Biblical references, where a goat is used as a vessel of purification.  The sins of the community are spiritually transferred to the animal after which Mr. Goat is banished to the wilderness.

Out of sight, out of mind.

In times of social unrest and/or economic distress, the act of scapegoating is often employed as a distraction, a way of diverting the public’s attention from the real problems and their causes . . . to something or someone else.  Scapegoating has been popular of late.

It’s the fault of the poor, the hangers on, the moochers.  Michelle Bachmann quoted Paul the Apostle:

“He who does not work, neither shall he eat.”

That would imply the poor are merely shirkers, those expecting a free lunch.  Tell that to the one in four children surviving on food stamps.  If Newt Gingrich and his ilk are to be taken seriously, the problem can be solved by revoking Child Labor Laws or having school children take on the school’s janitorial services.

Better yet, cut all safety nets.

Immigrants, too, have been cast as the country’s main economic problem.  Too many Latinos taking away American jobs.  We’ve all heard it. Only the number of illegal immigrants entering the country has been shrinking dramatically since the Great Slump, the biggest population decline in the last 20 years.

Unemployment, however, is still with us.

With the immigrant bashing, deportation and subsequent population shrinkage, Georgia and several other states had a difficult time harvesting their crop this year without their standard work force in place.

Be careful what you wish for.

Since 9/11, Muslims have been targeted as the root of all our problems, basically an evil agent working to undermine the country . Anti-Muslim sentiment has risen with irrational fears over Sharia Law dominating, perhaps even replacing the American Constitution.  Last week, hardware giant Lowe’s pulled ads from a reality show, ‘All American Muslim,’ in response to a conservative Christian group, that contended:

Clearly this program is attempting to manipulate Americans into ignoring the threat of jihad and to influence them to believe that being concerned about the jihad threat would somehow victimize these nice people in this show . . .

It’s disturbing to read something that ugly.  And it created a huge PR stink for Lowe’s, rightfully so.

Also important to note is that Muslim Americans represent approximately 6 million citizens, a quarter of whom are African American converts.  In a country of 311 million?  That’s a tiny, tiny percentage.

And on 9/11?  People of all faiths died, including Muslims.

Pointing fingers in all the wrong directions will not cure the country’s financial crisis, anymore than wishing for quick, easy solutions.  Saving what’s best about our country–our religious tolerance—is far more important.

There were many things worth saving in 2011.  But hey, at least we rescued the American incandescent light bulb.

I feel so much better.  How about you?


9 Comments on “Light Bulbs Saved But American Light Diminished”

  1. The priorities of Congress the Future Lobbyists of America on display.

    Well done, Peg.

    • peggysue22 says:

      Thanks, wonk. The modes of distraction and deflection are endless. It’s hard to believe this is still an issue for some voters–lightbulbs. The world is falling down around our ears and we’re going to argue and spend time on Lightbulbs???

      And yet it still works. You’re probably right, too. With the thousands of lobbyists in DC, I’m sure there’s at least one pushing incandescent lightbulbs along with free drinks at the local bar :0).

      It’s always something. And it rarely makes sense.

      • Fannie says:

        Thanks Peggysue22…………….I can relate totally to your article, even when I don’t need the truth, I mean crisis after crisis, and what do we get, lights on, lights off.

  2. Roofingbird says:

    Wow ? What a list!

    As one of those light bulb hoarders, but one who hasn’t read the bill, I don’t know their reasons.

    My reasons for hoarding include:

    1) New bulbs often do not fit old collectible or antique lamps, thus requiring that we spend more money on additional imports. ( I wondered about the older WH and Congress lighting, when it was first proposed.)
    2) Failure for over a year, of my grocery store to provide 3 way bulbs, and rarely anything close to 100 watts.
    3)New bulbs must be disposed of as hazardous material. (I don’t like exchanging a larger problem for a smaller one.)
    4) Disingenuous advertising. Check around an new building and see how many more lights have been added to meet minimum safety standards.(Have you looked at the wattage equivalencies? They are not the same.)
    5) Use of historic commercial overhead lighting as part of the equation in determining overall light needs. ( We all knew that Fifties overhead light glared. It was a cheap way to light all corners without purchasing accessory local lamps. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over-illumination
    6) My use of constant burning heat producing incandescent bulbs in otherwise unheated rooms. (Hey, a couple of hot filaments in a small CA bedroom works.)

    I did spring for LED xmas lights this year. They aren’t as bright, but I guess that’s okay. $300 just to use the same pattern over the house. Think I will ever amortize that?

  3. northwestrain says:

    I’m seeing two conflicting news items — no surprise to any of us.

    1) The in the crapper economy. 29 Trillion given away by the Gov.
    During times of major economic downturns the birth rate drops — children are expensive and when there are already children in the family . ..

    We are already in a depression and it will be years if ever — 50% at or below the poverty line.

    2) A religious cult wants to turn back the clock and outlaw birth control and abortion. Women’s bodies (if this cult wins) will belong to the church. IF women survive childbirth — with little or no medical supervision — then the child can starve.

    The future looks grim.

    Forced pregnancy and no way to feed or care for the child.Perhaps the right wing cults want to turn back the clock further to allow slavery.

  4. Woman Voter says:

    Welcome To The United Police States of America, Sponsored By Twitter

    Imagine my surprise this morning when, without warning, my shiny new Twitter account (@d_seaman) was suspended and taken offline.

    No more tweets for you. You now have 0 followers.

    My crime? Talking too much about Occupy Wall Street (I’m not an Occupier, but as a blogger and journalist it strikes me as one of the most important stories out there — hence the constant coverage), and talking too much about the controversial detainment without trial provisions contained in the FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which would basically shred the Bill of Rights and subject American citizens to military police forces. The same level of civil rights protection that enemy combatants in a cave in Afghanistan receive!

    Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/welcome-to-the-united-police-states-of-america-sponsored-by-twitter-2011-12?utm_source=twbutton&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sai-contributor#ixzz1gvEx9NUn
    @bi_contributors

    People from Europe want to know why there is no mention of Obama’s request for citizen’s indefinite detention and all the other draconian items in the NDAA and SOPA bills…guess oppression is at full speed and we will only rely on blogs for news. OWS isn’t chanting his name so it is being arrested and put on the terrorist list. Just like the ‘NO ONE CAN PRIMARY OBAMA’, we are also forbidden from speaking about what he asked for in the NDAA bill. 😦

    • Woman Voter says:

      November 28, 2011
      Dear Senator:
      We are members of a nonpartisan group of forty retired generals and admirals concerned about
      U.S. policy regarding enemy prisoner treatment and detention.
      We write to urge you to vote for Amendment 1107 to the National Defense Authorization Act
      which would strike all of the controversial detention provisions in sections 1031, 1032 and 1033
      and, in their place, mandate a process for Congress to consider whether any detention legislation
      is needed.
      As retired general and flag officers, we clearly do not make this request lightly. It is clear,
      however, that there is significant disagreement over the impact on our national security of these
      provisions. There should be no disagreement that legislation which both reduces the options
      available to our Commander-in-Chief to incapacitate terrorists and violates the rule of law would
      seriously undermine the safety of the American people.
      We appreciate that our leaders are constantly striving to make America more secure, but in doing
      so, we must be careful not to overreact and overreach, resulting in policies that will do more
      harm than good. At the very least, the current detention provisions merit public debate and
      should not be agreed to behind closed doors and tucked into legislation as important as our
      national defense bill.
      Sincerely,
      General Joseph P. Hoar, USMC (Ret.)
      General Charles C. Krulak, USMC (Ret.)
      General David M. Maddox, USA (Ret.)
      General William G. T. Tuttle Jr., USA (Ret.)
      Lieutenant General Robert G. Gard Jr., USA (Ret.)
      Lieutenant General Charles P. Otstott, USA (Ret.)
      Lieutenant General Harry E. Soyster (Ret.)
      Major General John Batiste, USA (Ret.)
      Major General Paul D. Eaton, USA (Ret.)
      Major General Eugene Fox, USA (Ret.)
      Rear Admiral Don Guter, USN (Ret.)
      Major General William L. Nash, USA (Ret.)
      Major General Thomas J. Romig, USA (Ret.)
      Major General Murray G. Sagsveen, USA (Ret.)
      Major General Walter L. Stewart, Jr., ARNG (Ret.)
      Major General, Antonio ‘Tony’ M. Taguba, USA (Ret.)
      Brigadier General John Adams, USA (Ret.)
      Brigadier General David M. Brahms, USMC (Ret.)
      Brigadier General James Cullen, USA (Ret.)
      Brigadier General Evelyn P. Foote, USA (Ret.)
      Brigadier General Gerald E. Galloway, USA (Ret.)
      Brigadier General Leif H. Hendrickson, USMC (Ret.)
      Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.)
      Brigadier General John H. Johns, USA (Ret.)
      Brigadier General Anthony Verrengia, USAF (Ret.)
      Brigadier General Stephen N. Xenakis, USA (Ret
      http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/2011.11.28%20RML%20on%20Udall%20Amdt%20to%20NDAA.pdf

      List is growing…

  5. bostonboomer says:

    Great post, Peg. The country is falling apart while Obama plays golf and the Republicans obsess about women’s bodies and protest against science. It’s the new dark ages.