←
→

Friday Morning Reads

Posted: September 23, 2011 | Author: | Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, Gulf Oil Spill, morning reads, religious extremists, Republican politics, Republican presidential politics, right wing hate grouups | Tags: , , , , , , |22 Comments

Good Morning!

I’ve been working on a lot of research recently to get ready for the big job market event for finance professors in October in Denver.  As a result, I’m enviously reading that a lot of you are already reading the Suskind book and kind enough to comment here.  Keep it up so I can live vicariously through your ability to read it and get a little fix and distraction while I work!

I found a few interesting links this morning to share.  Bill Clinton offered his opinions on the death penalty and the Troy Davis execution which was based solely on notoriously bad eye witness accounts that were later found to be coerced.  He believes that hard evidence is the essential to making our justice system do what its supposed to do.

While in office, Clinton signed into law the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, which, according to Time, “reduced new trials for convicted criminals and sped up their sentences by restricting a federal court’s ability to judge whether a state court had correctly interpreted the U.S. Constitution.” The law has been cited as one of the major obstacles that prevented Davis from being granted a new trial.

Clinton’s comments on Thursday seemed to suggest that he believes some of these cases should be slowed down in light of advances in technology.

He added that increased reliance on DNA evidence and its ability to decisively prove the innocence or guilt of a defendant is the “the most important thing that’s happened in criminal justice in the last 30 years.”

“When there’s any chance a DNA test can resolve this, then there should be no proceeding with the [death] penalty until that’s resolved,” he said.

“I actually spent some time yesterday on this appeals case, just listening to the news coverage,” he continued. “The thing I found strange was that even though there were some people who apparently wanted to change their testimony when there was a hearing before the court — the lawyers for the defendant didn’t bring them on to say what they had to say. So it’s an unusual case.”

Davis’ attorney did not immediately return a request for comment.

Clinton supported the death penalty as president and oversaw four executions while serving as governor of Arkansas, including the controversial case of Ricky Ray Rector.

In 2000, Clinton stayed the execution of Juan Raul Garza, who was just five days away from being the first federal prisoner executed since 1963. He ordered the Justice Department to examine “racial and geographic disparities in the federal death penalty system.” Garza was eventually executed in 2001.

Clinton held a round table with bloggers in a side conversation during his Global Initiative being held in NYC.  He also addressed the Middle East situation mourning the losses of Rabin to assassination and Sharon to illness.  He did not have the same kind words for current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu whom Clinton blames for the current problems in the peace process.  He also blames Arafat for being unreasonable during the peace process when he was directly involved with negotiations.

“The two great tragedies in modern Middle Eastern politics, which make you wonder if God wants Middle East peace or not, were [Yitzhak] Rabin‘s assassination and [Ariel] Sharon‘s stroke,” Clinton said.

Sharon had decided he needed to build a new centrist coalition, so he created the Kadima party and gained the support of leaders like Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert. He was working toward a consensus for a peace deal before he fell ill, Clinton said. But that effort was scuttled when the Likud party returned to power.

“The Israelis always wanted two things that once it turned out they had, it didn’t seem so appealing to Mr. Netanyahu. They wanted to believe they had a partner for peace in a Palestinian government, and there’s no question — and the Netanyahu government has said — that this is the finest Palestinian government they’ve ever had in the West Bank,” Clinton said.

“[Palestinian leaders] have explicitly said on more than one occasion that if [Netanyahu] put up the deal that was offered to them before — my deal — that they would take it,” Clinton said, referring to the 2000 Camp David deal that Yasser Arafat rejected.

But the Israeli government has drifted a long way from the Ehud Barak-led government that came so close to peace in 2000, Clinton said, and any new negotiations with the Netanyahu government are now on starkly different terms — terms that the Palestinians are unlikely to accept.

“For reasons that even after all these years I still don’t know for sure, Arafat turned down the deal I put together that Barak accepted,” he said. “But they also had an Israeli government that was willing to give them East Jerusalem as the capital of the new state of Palestine.”

Republicans attending the debates for presidential candidates continue to set lows for hateful, angry, bigoted, nasty behavior.  First, they scream loud approving hoorays at Perry’s horrible record of state murder in Texas, then then screamed “let him die” in response to a question to Ron Paul on people with no health insurance.  This time they boo’d an active duty soldier serving our country in the Iraq War in the second Fox News Hater Fest.   These are people that are sick sick sick and I wonder who invited them to the shindig and how we can export them all to Devil’s Island where they can create a hell realm all to themselves.

Planet Michele was in full alignment last night with the alternate universe.  She thinks taxpayers should keep all the money they earn.  I guess the government will have to hold bake sales to run the war in Afghanistan.  What ever happened to those t shirts?  We’ll have to redo them for her bits of policy wisdom, I guess.

Former IRS lawyer Michele Bachmann has an interesting approach to taxation: she thinks Americans should get to keep “every dollar” they earn, though she says the government needs to get money somehow.

Fox News host Megyn Kelly asked Bachmann about a question at a previous Republican debate on how much of every dollar taxpayers should get to keep. Bachmann said that she talked to the young man who asked the question at the last debate.

“I said ‘I wish I could have answered that question, because I want to tell you what my answer is. I think you earned every dollar, you should get to keep every dollar that you earned,’” Bachmann said. “That’s your money, that’s not the government’s money, that’s the whole point.”

Some one needs to check when the jeebus cult love bombs that  just keep going off in her mind for expiration dates.  Also, her campaign staff

New poster woman for WHAT NOT TO WEAR

needs to send her to TLC and What to Wear where: “Stacy London and Clinton Kelly help the frumpy by giving them life-changing fashion makeovers and fashion advice.” She looks and acts like the Manchurian candidate for Wonderland.  Michele, when you are standing as the only woman in a line up of men and want to be taken seriously, you cannot wear ghost white panty hose and tacky tacky sandals.  Isn’t the styler for Quitterella available? She always looked terrific! It almost made you forget the insanity that spewed from her mouth.  I really think Marcus HAS to be dressing Michele from his secret wardrobe.  I found the picture on the left to be just as bad as it gets.  Look at those shoes!!!  If you want to be a power player, you freaking have to dress like one!  Notice that none of the men are ever out of their traditional corporate monkey suits!  Bachmann’s a total ditz and I wouldn’t want her in charge of anything, but I really think women in positions that should command respect have to go out of their way dress themselves to avoid looking trivial unless they want to be treated that way!  It’s still a power suit world in politics and business. Strappy sandals are for cocktail parties given by lobbyists!

The Villagers are obsessed with the nonperformance of Perry who appeared to have left the Texas part of his personality at home. That didn’t leave much.  Frank Luntz was trying to convince every one that would listen that Perry was yesterday’s plate of grilling beans and that Romney was becoming more Reaganesque every debate and waking moment. He was even seen directing his post debate ‘focus group’ to mimic his talking points.  His eyes kept pleading “Romney can beat the one!  Please LIKE HIM DAMMIT!”  The group describe Perry as a waffler and that Romney held himself accountable for all those ‘mistakes’ that seemed a lot like complete flip flops to the rest of us.  There were some fireworks between the two on Social Security among other issues. Oh, and the newbie to the crowd, some governor whose name I forget from New Mexico ripped a joke off from Rush Limbaugh.  Every one thought it was great until they discovered the source.  Hint to yahoo politicians from New Mexico:  don’t plagiarize any one on your first major TV appearance. You may think that ripping off Rush gives you creds with the ditto heads but it really brings out the worst in the media.

Face to face in confrontational debate, Republican presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney and Rick Perry sarcastically accused each other Thursday night of flip-flopping on Social Security and health care, flashpoints in their early struggle for the party nomination.

Romney accused Perry of having said the federal government “shouldn’t be in the pension business, that it’s unconstitutional,” a reference to Social Security benefits.

The Texas governor disputed the charge, saying it “wasn’t the first time Mitt’s been wrong on some issue before.” But Romney mocked his rival’s denial, adding crisply, “You better find that Rick Perry and get him to stop saying that.”

Perry soon returned the favor, saying that Romney switched his position on health care between editions of a book he had published. In one edition, Perry said, Romney advocated expanding the health care program he signed in Massachusetts to the rest of the country. “Then in your paperback you took that line out, so speaking of not getting it straight in your book, Sir.”

“It’s like badminton,” said Perry.

WTF is it with men and really stupid sports metaphors?  Sheesh! They’re always like two small steps away from being those little boys on the little league team that can’t do anything right. Oh, and the joke rip off has already gone to Rush’s big fat lying head …

Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson brought down the house at Thursday night’s Fox News/ Google debatewhen he joked about how his “next-door neighbor’s two dogs have created more shovel-ready jobs than this current administration.”

The joke killed among the GOP faithful. But was Johnson the first to use it?

Just today, talk radio host Rush Limbaugh delivered a similar joke on air.

“My dogs have created more shovel-ready work than Obama has just this week alone,” Limbaugh said. “The new puppy. Honest to God. More shovel-ready work for me this week than Obama has created all two and a half years.”

So what does Limbaugh think of the similarity?

“I guess I’ve become show prep for the GOP debates now, too,” Limbaugh told The Huffington Post in an email. Limbaugh said he thought he used the line yesterday, “but the days run together, so I’m not really sure.”

Well, the guy’s name is Gary Johnson–how could I forget that!–and he used to be the Governor of New Mexico. His one chance to be remembered and he’ll be known as the guy that plagiarized Rush Limbaugh!  Alrighty then … I’m continuing my policy of making sure we don’t forget the BP Oil spill.  Here’s one from my local rag that’s worth your reading time about the silencing of Gulf oil spill Investigators.

A U.S. House committee was forced to postpone a hearing on the findings of a federal investigation into the causes of the BP oil spill because the Obama administration suddenly refused to let investigators testify, the committee chairman said.

The alleged silencing of the members of the joint Coast Guard and Interior Department investigative team comes in the wake of the sudden resignation of Interior’s lead investigator, Hammond resident David Dykes.

In a news release late Thursday afternoon, Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., the chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, blasted the Obama administration.

“It took far too long for the final report to be issued and the Obama administration is now further delaying proper oversight by suddenly refusing to allow members of the investigation team to testify,” Hastings said in a statement.

Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement and the Coast Guard said they never wanted “line investigators” to testify. They are seeking to clarify that with Hastings at a meeting Friday, apparently to offer more senior agency officials to testify.

“BOEMRE and the Coast Guard were responsive to Chairman Hastings and his Committee’s request late last week for a hearing. However, we felt strongly from the beginning it was inappropriate for BOEMRE and Coast Guard line investigators to testify, and presented alternative options,” a joint statement from the two agencies said.

Wow!  I just think I made it through an entire morning news post without mentioning ONE economics story.  Must be a record!  What’s on your reading and blogging list today?

22 Comments on “Friday Morning Reads”

  1. Rick Reynolds's avatar Rick Reynolds says:
    September 23, 2011 at 6:05 am

    So Gary Johnson is now known as they guy who plagiarized a Rush Limbaugh joke. Pity. Even sadder is that he is one of only two candidates who are against endless wars abroad or on citizens here, and the other one is NOT Barack Obama.

  2. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:
    September 23, 2011 at 8:10 am

    The audiences for these debates look like a well fed, well groomed, smiling bunch of self satisfied morons who applaud and boo like a crowd of trained seals.

    From their responses we know they loathe medical treatment for the poor, detest extending unemployment benefits to people “doing nothing but sitting around collecting checks, love the death penalty, and hate gays.

    Pretty sad.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:
    September 23, 2011 at 8:44 am

    Top of the front page story on Solyndra in NYT

    The government’s backing of Solyndra, which could cost taxpayers more than a half-billion dollars, came as the politically well-connected business began an extensive lobbying campaign that appears to have blinded government officials to the company’s financial condition and the risks of the investment, according to a review of government documents and interviews with administration officials and industry analysts.

    While no evidence has emerged that political favoritism played a role in what administration officials assert were merit-based decisions, Solyndra drew plenty of high-level attention. Its lobbyists corresponded frequently and met at least three times with an aide to a top White House official, Valerie B. Jarrett, to push for loans, tax breaks and other government assistance.

    Administration officials lay the blame for Solyndra’s problems in part on the global collapse in the price of solar energy components, which forced the company to sell its innovative solar panels at less than it cost to make them. Some lawmakers on Capitol Hill question whether the firm’s executives may have engaged in a cover-up of their precarious financial condition, allegations the company denies.

    But industry analysts and government auditors fault the Obama administration for failing to properly evaluate the business proposals or take note of troubling signs already evident in the solar energy marketplace.

    “It was alarming,” said Frank Rusco, a program director at the Government Accountability Office, which found that Energy Department preliminary loan approvals — including the one for Solyndra — were granted at times before officials had completed mandatory evaluations of the financial and engineering viability of the projects. “They can’t really evaluate the risks without following the rules.”

    The Energy Department’s senior staff has acknowledged in interviews the intense pressure from top Obama administration officials to rush stimulus spending out the door.

  4. glennmcgahee's avatar glennmcgahee says:
    September 23, 2011 at 8:44 am

    Please keep harping and sharing anything you can on the Gulf Oil Spill. The lack of coverage and lost memory (like it never happened) just blows me away. I had family visit recently and we went on a dive trip to a reef off the Keys we’ve frequently visited in years past. The damage was obvious. One of my nephews even mentioned that there seemed to be a sheen to the water and as we looked, there was a definite sheen, although slight, to the water out there. It could have been from a ship but I wonder. The coral damage was so bad we had no reason to return to the site.

  5. paper doll's avatar paper doll says:
    September 23, 2011 at 10:18 am

    Sharon had decided he needed to build a new centrist coalition, so he created the Kadima party and gained the support of leaders like Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert. He was working toward a consensus for a peace deal before he fell ill

    well that was a 180 on the part of the butcher of Sabra and Shatila. 　

    Thursday night’s Fox News/ Google debate

    just that phase shows how crazy it’s become

    Mitt smirking humor can stand him in good stead in trading barbs with Perry.
    But he has to stop using it on voters …..like the knee slapper when he remindied them he’s unemployed too

    The media doesn’t like to see uncredited plagiarizing on the small fry’s part since they haven’t paid for it …plus a case so obvious even the media will spot it insults thier intelligence. They are paid to be clueless by those with vastly more juice that the Gov of New Mexico…they don’t give thier finely honed cluelessness away for free . He hasn’t the right to thier mop up services. As an extreme example : Bush 2 can say twice we had to go to war because Saddam would not let UN inspectors in and bring nothing forth beside the chirping of crickets. The governor doesn’t have anything like that privilege…plus they will defend one of their own of course ( Rush)

    This GOP field is like a fun house version of the Dem’s group in 08!

    As always, thanks for the BP update!

  6. The Rock's avatar The Rock says:
    September 23, 2011 at 11:15 am

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/64268.html#ixzz1Yn1pVDl3

    Asshats.

    Hillary 2012

  7. Sweet Sue's avatar Sweet Sue says:
    September 23, 2011 at 11:19 am

    I’m no fan of Michelle’s ideas but I loves me some espadrilles.

    Regardless,Stacey and Clinton criticizing Michelle Bachman’s wardrobe is no different than Tim Gunn making fun of Hillary Clinton’s fashion choices.
    It’s just not important; not where the focus should be.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:
      September 23, 2011 at 12:37 pm

      They haven’t criticized her. I just suggested she needed their help. They teach women how to look good in age appropriate, body appropriate, and situational appropriate settings to give them confidence and help them. I consider that kind of advice for a woman in the public eye to be a kindness. Men suits–unless cheap and tailored badly–automatically look decent and provide an air of professionalism. Women have too many choices in “fashion” and many are ill suited for their age, body, and situation. They’ve dealt with women that are challenged to do so because of the way the fashion industry designs. They’re not friendly towards aging women and women with hips. Bachmann needs some help. Look at how Sarah Palin looked with a wardrobe budget and a stylist. It not only helps the woman, but it teaches other women how to wear a look suited to them that will help them to be taken seriously. Espadrilles are great for a day at the mall or the beach or a weekend shopping trip.

  8. minkoffminx's avatar Minkoff Minx says:
    September 23, 2011 at 11:30 am

    And this is the kind of excuse the right is giving for the Boos at last nights debate when a gay soldier asked butt love santorum a question:

    Don’t Ask Don’t Tell | GOP Debate | The debate audience didn’t boo the soldier | The Daily Caller

    the people who were booing weren’t booing the soldier per se; they were booing his question: “Do you intend to circumvent the progress we’ve made for gay and lesbian soldiers in the military?”

    The audience members who booed the soldier’s question were wrong to have done so, but let’s have a little perspective. Let’s not pretend that soldiers are fragile beings who must be treated with kid gloves.

    Surely this soldier has seen and encountered worse than a few boos. Given the world that we live in, surely he’s been deployed and seen combat. And, even if he hasn’t, surely he has been trained and prepared for combat.

    Nor was the soldier visibly disabled or injured — unlike, say, the wheelchair-bound soldier who was booed at Columbia University for speaking out on behalf of ROTC. So it’s not as if the louts were picking on an infirm or injured soldier, which would have been much more objectionable.

    American politics is a tough sport: It ain’t for the faint of heart; that’s for sure. Our soldiers are, for the most part, physically and mentally tough. They are not victims and they should not be treated as such.

    The reality is that anyone who asked that question would have been booed by these louts. The fact that the questioner was a soldier didn’t matter to them — and it shouldn’t have. He was and is fair game.

    Assholes…

  9. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:
    September 23, 2011 at 11:38 am

    My copy of “Confidence Men” just arrived. Can’t wait to read!

  10. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:
    September 23, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    Whoa … the Republican elite are not happy. Guess the southern strategy and baiting and switching on the evangelicals isn’t the look they were hopping for. Looks like this is what asking people to take political virginity pledges gets you ..

    Wiliam Kristol at the Weekly Standard:

    THE WEEKLY STANDARD’s official reaction to last night’s Republican presidential debate: Yikes.

    Reading the reactions of thoughtful commentators after the stage emptied, talking with conservative policy types and GOP political operatives later last evening and this morning, we know we’re not alone. Most won’t express publicly just how horrified—or at least how demoralized—they are. After all, they still want to beat Obama—as do we. And they want to get along with the possible nominee and the other candidates and their supporters. They don’t want to rock the boat too much. But maybe the GOP presidential boat needs rocking.

    The e-mails flooding into our inbox during the evening were less guarded. Early on, we received this missive from a bright young conservative: “I’m watching my first GOP debate…and WE SOUND LIKE CRAZY PEOPLE!!!!” As the evening went on, the craziness receded, and the demoralized comments we received stressed the mediocrity of the field rather than its wackiness. As one more experienced, and therefore more jaded, observer wrote: “I just thought maybe it’s always this bad…they’re only marginally worse than McCain and Bush.”

  11. CinSC's avatar CinSC says:
    September 23, 2011 at 12:55 pm

    $35,800. How much per plate 10 lucky diners spent to have dinner with Joe Biden in Charleston last night at a Obama fundraiser. Just amazing. Your corporate flag photo you ran a few posts back keeps coming mind.

  12. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:
    September 23, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    Paul Krugman’s op ed is worth reading today.

    Republicans claim to be deeply worried by budget deficits. Indeed, Mr. Ryan has called the deficit an “existential threat” to America. Yet they are insisting that the wealthy — who presumably have as much of a stake as everyone else in the nation’s future — should not be called upon to play any role in warding off that existential threat.

    Well, that amounts to a demand that a small number of very lucky people be exempted from the social contract that applies to everyone else. And that, in case you’re wondering, is what real class warfare looks like.

    • northwestrain's avatar northwestrain says:
      September 23, 2011 at 4:04 pm

      Elizabeth Warrens rant comes to mind — nobody gets rich on their own — they had help — help from the taxpayers. The rich use the infrastructure (and the cops to beat up any protesters).

  13. northwestrain's avatar northwestrain says:
    September 23, 2011 at 4:08 pm

    BP oil spill — this quote caught my attention — and my question WHY?

    “It took far too long for the final report to be issued and the Obama administration is now further delaying proper oversight by suddenly refusing to allow members of the investigation team to testify,” Hastings said in a statement.

    Only thing I can think of is that 0bowma doesn’t want to lose campaign contributions — so he’ll keep the cover up going and protect BP — just like he protected his Wall Street Buddies and gutted legislation by Blanch Lincoln which would have put some control on the Banks and their gambling. (In Suskind’s book)

  14. Uppity Woman's avatar Uppity Woman says:
    September 23, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    I really think Marcus HAS to be dressing Michele from his secret wardrobe.

    Hahahahahahahahaha.

    Methinks she wore those tacky platform thingies because she’s so short. I mean, she’s really short. Also short on sanity.

←
→