Open Thread: Romney Campaign “Fed Up” With Attacks on Bain
Posted: July 9, 2012 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, open thread, U.S. Politics | Tags: Bain Capital, Corporate outsourcing, federal taxes, liars, Mitt Romney, obama campaign, offshore tax havens, snark, Swiss bank account 29 CommentsBe afraid, Obama campaign, be very afraid! You’ve really gotten under Romney’s skin with your nasty attacks on Bain Capital. Buzzfeed reports:
The Romney campaign will begin to aggressively push back against President Obama’s accusations that the Republican was an “outsourcing pioneer” today, a source privy to the the campaign’s strategy told BuzzFeed.
In a conference call Monday morning, senior staff said Romney’s surrogates would stop shying away from the word “lie” in responding to Democrats’ attacks on his business record, and plan to go on TV to call Obama a “liar,” the source said.
“They are very fed up with these attacks,” said the source.
Wow! Now that’s scary. They’re going to call Obama a liar? That should knock the President right out of the running, don’t you think? The Romneyites are still upset about that Washington Post story from June 21 that characterized Bain as a “pioneer” in outsourcing.
In response, Romney surrogates are going to make the case that most of the offshoring happened after the Republican left Bain, and that much of it was simply to help firms sell products overseas.
To spread the message, the source said, the campaign is going to start circulating a document to press that compiles “presidential falsehoods and exaggerations.”
Yikes! I don’t know if Obama can survive such a powerful pushback!
Meanwhile the Obama campaign has moved on from the Bain issue and begun attacking Romney about his secrecy about his personal finances, based on the Vanity Fair article by Nicholas Shaxon. Obama’s surrogates were out all weekend hammering Romney on his secrecy about his multiple secret investments in offshore tax havens, his Swiss bank account, and his failure to release more than one year’s tax returns.
I guess about three weeks from now, the Romney campaign will gear up to fight back on these latest attacks by the Obama campaign. Of course by then there probably will be new revelations about Romney. I’m betting pretty soon we’ll be hearing more about how Romney never really left Bain in 1999, as he claims.
Here we go again …
Posted: September 25, 2008 Filed under: Human Rights, No Obama, Women's Rights | Tags: ageist, gay hating, No Obama, obama campaign, sexist 8 Comments
It’s true. On issue after issue, I pretty much disagree with Sarah Palin. I see nothing positive about hunting or fishing unless you have no other way to eat. I see killing things for fun as a completely immoral action. I do not consider a gestating protohuman to be ‘ensouled’ and the same as a walking talking human being or even a walking, eating moose. I’d rather see Nebraska, Kansas, and North Dakota be turned into fan farms than drill in ANWAR. I’d also rather see Arizona turned into a one big solar panel that do any more drilling off the Florida coast. I think the death penalty is something right out of the dark ages and has no place in a civilized country. I don’t care if gay people marry, they have every right to be as miserable and trapped in dead end relationships as straight folks. I’m definitely a libertarian on the civil rights issues. My position on anything like this–even those multiple wife holding Mormon men– is it’s not my business and it’s certainly not the government’s business. If you’re not hurting some one and it applies to a person capable of giving reasoned consent (exceptions for minors and the disabled), it shouldn’t be the subject of a law. I don’t even care if folks smoke marijuana or use heroin as long as they stay put where they are and don’t try to drive a car. I am pro-science and I think Christianity was invented by the Romans to control slaves. I think folks that believe in it are victim to the biggest on-going sham in history. That pretty much puts me very much at odds with about everything Sarah believes in. But you know what? She has a right to say it, believe in it, and run for vice president without being called every nasty, misogynistic, stereotypical, hateful thing you can call a woman. Senator Obama delivers lectures to us on racism and his campaign accuses every one of using subtle racist code words. However, he and the rest of his democratic cronies are more than happy to use not so subtle code words or ads against women and the elderly. Today’s example from the NY Times Op-Ed page.
I have to hand it to Palin, she may be onto something in her batty way: the election is very much about American exceptionalism.
Roger Cohen in Today’s New York Times
When I read “batty”, all I can think of his Archie Bunker calling Edith a ‘dingbat’. It’s the ultimate insult to any woman’s intellgence.
While I’m at it, I’d like to say that any of my gay and lesbian friends and their related activist groups need to start looking (without stars in their eyes) at a candidate that will announce a series of Values Forums and be seen in public over and over again with a homophobic, gay-baiting preacher. It is also time for Senator Obama to start having a conversation about hating on homosexuals with the black religious community. He is not holding them to the same standard of supporting civil rights that he expects of white people when it comes to the civil rights of black people. So it’s okay for Obama and this group to hate on gay folks AND it’s okay for Obama and his cronies to hate on women who hold socially conservative positions since racism is the only relevant evil in this race. Is that the deal here?
Also, Senator Obama and his nation of clueless cult members should be more respectful of their elders and stop using ageism in his commercials attacking Senator McCain. I think portraying the elderly as addled, unable to keep up with technology, and incapable of change is exactly what Obama keeps pulling on Senator McCain. Any one who spends time teaching at universities, as Senator Obama has, should know that the emeritus professor is the most respected position. Many, many professors continue teaching and researching way into their nineties. They may need some additional support from staff, but they continue to be vibrant contributers to their areas way past their retirements. If Senator Obama thinks that he doesn’t want to be judged on his “funny name” or the color of his skin, he needs to extend the same level of respect to older Americans. Not all folks with Hussein in their names are terrorists and not all senior citzens have alzheimer’s disease. The latest mailing I keep getting from the Obama supporters to get McCain to release his ‘real’ medical reports is a thinly veiled whisper campaign made to make folks take notice of McCain’s age. While there are hate groups out there to remind folks of Obama’s race, there are only Obama supporters out there bringing up McCain’s age and Senator Palin’s sex and fundamentalist beliefs. Like I said, I disagree on almost every social position possible with the Republican party, but I’ve never seen them say anything blantantly racist about Senator Obama. However, I see Obama and his supporters spew misogynistic, ageist, and gay-hating terms daily. I’ve also seen them play the race card at the drop of a hat. This should stop. It’s ugly and it’s un-American.
UPDATE TODAY: YET AGAIN …
From Fox New:
Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings on Wednesday warned two minority groups to beware of Sarah Palin because “anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks.”
Hastings, who is black and a Democrat, made the comment in Florida at a panel discussion hosted by the National Jewish Democratic Council.
source:
http://http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/25/congressman-warns-jews-blacks-to-beware-of-palin/
You Don’t Fool Me: Candidates ARE responsible for the tone of their Campaign
Posted: June 22, 2008 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: attack ads, campaign attack, campaign violence, NEGATIVE campaigning, obama campaign, Paula Abeles, racisms 1 CommentI was working late on a research paper last night when some one from Bitterpoliticz sent me to HireHeels to give a word of support to Paula Abeles’ response to the threats she’s been receiving from overzealous Obama supporters. Here’s the link:
http://hireheels.com/blog/2008/06/21/paula-abeles-responds-to-daily-kos-racist-attacks/
I wrote an immediate, supportive response because I know how it feels. Back in the year of the woman, I ran for the Nebraska unicameral. I was a republican back then and basically had the squeakiest clean of normal lives. The problem was I was a pro-choice republican woman and the anti-choice side will have none of that.
The seat was held by an anti-choice democratic man at the time I ran. He was a powerful incumbent. He choose not to run after I successfully pulled a lot of support away from him by doing basic grass roots work. No one knew he wasn’t running for re-election until a day before the final filing date expired. Labor scrambled and came up with a very weak candidate. A trial lawyer signed up. All the usual types of special interest candidates were on the ballot. There were a total of 7 of us during the primary. The anti-choice folks found a beautician who had lived in the state for six months that began the run as a simple housewife. I won the primary handily. I continued knocking on doors and talking to people. I never changed my positions, my image, or my promises.
The general election was a different story. It was the ugliest, nastiest dirty campaign and you’d have thought Rove was running it. By the time it was over, I was having nightmares and afraid to walk in my own neighborhood. This candidate not only completely remade herself into a small business person, but an incredibly large number of people with serious personality and emotional disorders were running amok in my kid’s schools, in my church, in my neighborhood. There were whisper campaigns, hateful things said from evangelical church pulpits, and phone calls every night to my answering machine explaining where my small children had been that day and exactly which abortion procedure would be applied to them if the caller had their way. I had to deal with the newspaper calling me up and asking me if I’d been fired from a teller job in college for stealing money (complete fabrication on ALL accounts). My good pictures all disappeared mysteriously from their files and the only one that they had left to run was one of me when I had just recovered from inoperable cancer and looked exactly like I’d been sick for two years. The evangelical churches bussed folks into the state from surrounding areas to make my life a living hell. All because I was a pro-choice woman republican candidate.
After that experience, I moved to Minneapolis, Minnesota and re-registered democrat. I had lost the election by a small margin,but the impact it had on my life was not marginal. Folks that I had gone to school with since I was a kid were no longer speaking to me.
I had tons of donated money and support in that campaign because my opponent was so out of her league and so far to the right that she scared every interest group from the firefighters and policemen to the bankers. She ran her campaign with her own funds and some support from the Biker anti-helmet crowd, truckers (her husband was one), and the anti-choice movement. I never ran ONE negative ad. Believe me, I even had the money to do tv ads and I could’ve done it. I told my campaigners to stay out of her immediate neighborhood and focus on my message which was basically one of economic development and re-doing the tax structure of Nebraska. I made it clear I wanted to sit on the expenditures committee and that I had no plans of staying in there once I’d worked on these things because I had a successful consulting firm and wanted to return to it. I kept waiting for the press to do some research, but all they were interested in was starting a cat fight on the choice issue between two women. (It was the first time two women had come through the primary in the state, you’d have thought they’d have better things to focus on.)
If a campaign goes hyper negative and acts hyper angry and incensed all the time, it attracts emotionally damaged people and simply hypes them into a frenzy. The candidate may get an ego charge from all that worship, but that frenzy will turn on the opposition’s campaign. Innocent people will experience threats of violence for just doing their thing as an U.S. citizen. This kind of evil is a DIRECT reflection on the character of the candidate. A candidate calls the shots and can reel back the attack dogs. A candidate can be honest about who they are and what they stand for or they can let their campaign remake them and sell them like a can of soup. A candidate may say they have no control over their minions, but that is NOT true. The character of the candidate is ALWAYS THE ISSUE and always at the center of ANY decision. If you see a campaign doing questionable things, it is because that candidate has questionable character. As an example, the race-baiting started with the Obama campaign. They have a pattern. Take an innocent comment, some surrogate blows it out of proportion and labels it racist. Obama comes out a few days later to say, ah no, maybe not. But by then, the damage is done. By then, the angry, whipped up mob has gone into attack mode and the damage is done to innocent people.
Paula, I am so sorry for what you are going through. It’ll end. Right now, you’re living a nightmare and that means your children will too. But just think, if you stop now, your country, OUR country will be living that nightmare for at least 4 years. You are my hero.
Senator Barrack Obama … YOU DO NOT FOOL ME and you didn’t fool 18 million other voters. Call off your attack dogs.







Recent Comments