Guest Post by Shtuey: Women’s rights: They’re not just for Women anymore
Posted: July 15, 2008 Filed under: Women's Rights | Tags: Hillary Clinton, Human Rights, Seneca Falls Convention, Sexism, Women's Rights 5 CommentsOn March 25, 1911 a tragedy struck the city of New York that forever changed the Women’s Movement.
Near closing time, from an unknown source, a fire ripped through the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory killing 146 people. Of those, 126 were women. Though valiant efforts were made to save the Triangle workers, a locked exit and inadequate fire escapes doomed many of the immigrant men and women that worked there. The grizzly scene of young girls holding hands with their coworkers, leaping to their deaths, rather than face the flames behind them, their burned and mangled bodies strewn upon the sidewalk, shocked the nation.
The women’s labor movement had been called to action two years earlier by Clara Lemlich, a 19 year old Ukranian Jewish immigrant who had been savagely beaten for her union involvement. Her modest but impassioned call for a vote for action began a shirtwaist makers’ strike that rocked New York City. The movement found new force in the deaths of the young women in the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, an event which also drove the final push in the fight to secure the right of franchise for women in America, as was seen at the 1912 New York City March for Suffrage. Some 20,000 people marched. A reported half million lined the streets. But the coals that stoked the fires of these movements were not kindled on those ill fated floors of the Asch Building in Manhattan. The match was struck upstate, with relative quiet, 63 years earlier in the town of Seneca Falls.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott found themselves in a situation oft repeated in the past 160 years. Denied seats at the 1840 anti-slavery convention in London, due to their gender, Mott and Stanton agreed that a convention on women’s rights needed to be held. Eight years later it came to pass, the result of Mott visiting family not far from Stanton’s home in Seneca Falls, New York.
The call was unassuming. An unsigned notice was placed in the local paper advertising the convention. Three hundred-forty women and forty men, most from within a five mile radius, attended the convention.
The task of constructing a declarative document fell upon Stanton. Using the Declaration of Independence as her guide she constructed what she entitled the Declaration of Sentiments. Within this document lay the undeniable and unshakable truth still contested by the ignorant today (some of whom can be seen blathering away on an almost daily basis on cable television news networks): “All men and all women are created equal.”
One hundred and forty-seven years later, then First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, went to Beijing to address an international women’s conference themed, “Listen to the Women.” In a singular act of bravery, and at great political and personal risk, Senator Clinton, standing on the shoulders of Stanton, Mott, Anthony, Lemlich, Roosevelt and others too many to name, changed the course of the conversation of women’s rights forever. Echoing Stanton’s declaration she proclaimed to the world; “Women’s rights are human rights, and human rights are women’s rights.”
In other words, women’s rights: they’re not just for women anymore.
It is no longer acceptable to discuss women’s rights as being owned solely by women. This is an issue of what it means to be human. In 1995 Hillary Clinton made it plain that it is no longer acceptable for anyone, regardless of gender, skin color, religion, sexual orientation, age, nationality, or creed to be oppressed whether it be physically, emotionally, sexually, or economically, and that it is time for all of us to take responsibility for protecting and defending each other’s rights to live lives of freedom and equality. Whether it is being paid equal wages for equal time, access to the same employment opportunities, or to share our lives with the partners of our choice, every American citizen should have equal protection under the Constitution of the United States, and every citizen of the world should be recognized as having equal protection of their inalienable human rights. There is only one race; the human race. When the rights of one human are violated, we are all violated. When one of us has obstacles thrown up against them, is oppressed, insulted, attacked, or enslaved then we are obligated by our mutual humanity to stand up in their defense. That is what Dr. King saw from the top of the mountain.
When Senator Clinton entered the 2008 Presidential Race she asked America to join her in a conversation, a conversation that began 160 years ago in Seneca Falls, New York. Today we ask you to continue that conversation. On Saturday July 19th, 2008 we ask you don your Hillary gear and gather together with your friends, your neighbors, your community, your country. We ask you to look at yourselves, look at your nation, look at your world, and take up the path that Hillary laid before us in Beijing. Convene in your homes, or in a public place. Read the Declaration of Sentiments. And read and sign a new declaration; a declaration that reaffirms the original Declaration of Sentiments, and issues a new call to embrace women’s rights as human rights; that demands that the rights of all people be protected and upheld.
You will find event details, and copies of both declarations at http://www.seneca160.us/
Join us in Seneca Falls. Celebrate the anniversary of Seneca Falls. Celebrate Hillary. Come join the conversation.
Winning the Trifecta of Poverty: Black, Older, Woman
Posted: July 2, 2008 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Esmin Green, Hillary Clinton, human development index, John Edwards, Poverty, taxes, universal health care 3 CommentsJust about the time I think civilization has hit rock bottom, I find something else disturbing. An American Woman, Esmin Green, died because of antipathy, the abhorrent state of health care in this country, and her demographics. She basically won the lottery for what it takes to be an invisible person in this country. She was black, older (49), a woman, and in need of mental health care. The folks in the room did nothing. A security guard did nothing. There is evidence that the staff fudged the details of her death.
“A shocking video shows a woman dying on the floor in the psych ward at Kings County Hospital, while people around her, including a security guard, did nothing to help.
After an hour, another mental patient finally got the attention of the indifferent hospital workers, according to the tape, obtained by the Daily News.
Worse still, the surveillance tape suggests hospital staff may have falsified medical charts to cover the utter lack of treatment provided Esmin Green before she died.”
There is no reason for these things to happen in an industrialized modern country. We are able to treat all people humanely and there are plenty of resources and wealth to make this possible. What we lack is the will. We would rather buy toys and have comfy huge cars and homes than take care of the least among us with our tax dollars or even our charity.
This is from Wikipedia:
Poverty in the United States refers to people living in poverty in the U.S. Within the U.S. the most common measure of poverty is the “poverty line” set by the U.S. government. The official poverty threshold is adjusted for inflation using the consumer price index. Poverty in the United States is cyclical in nature with roughly 12% to 15% living below the federal poverty line at any given point in time, and roughly 40% falling below the poverty line at some time within a 10 year time span. While there remains some controversy of whether or not the official poverty over or understates poverty, the United States has some of the highest absolute and relative pre and post-transfer, poverty rates in the developed world. Overall, the U.S. ranks 16th on the Human Poverty Index.
Those under the age of 18 were the most likely to be impoverished. In 2006 the poverty rate for minors in the United States was the highest in the industrialized world, with 21.9% of all minors and 30% of African American minors living below the poverty threshold. Moreover, the standard of living for those in the bottom 10% was lower in the U.S. than in any other developed nation except the United Kingdom, which had the lowest standard of living for impoverished children.
That’s right, the U.S. is not number one in anything right now when it comes to economics. However, we’re close to achieving the number one for developed nations with high levels of income disparity and poverty. We are no longer the the economy with the highest GDP (the European Union has passed us). We have not been the economy with the highest living standard or income per capita in the world for some time. We’re 9th now in GDP per capita( http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?c=cu&v=67 ) per the CIA’s World Fact Book. We’re all losing ground, but there are those in our country who never reached that ground at any point in their lives. Their numbers are growing rapidly.
We’re very low ranked on all indexes that measure how we treat the least among us for wealthy, developed nations. This is especially true when it comes to comparing the U.S. to other developed nations. Here’s the Human Development Report link for 2007/2008. The United States now ranks 17th in the world on this index. (http://hdrstats.undp.org/indicators/5.html)
How can such a rich nation with so many resources and positive gifts to human civilization rank so low on how it treats its most vulnerable citizens? The answer must lie some where within us. It lies within the people that watched this woman fall and die. It lies within the guard that did nothing. It lies within the hearts of the folks responsible for her treatment that ignored her for so long and then lied to cover their actions. It lies within a system where the big economics discussion during a presidential campaign is how can I get away with paying the least amount of money possible to move this country and its citizens forward?
Look at the roads, the schools, the electrical grids, the Levees, the hospitals and then look very closely at the state of their decay. Every time you scream don’t raise MY taxes to a politician, another crack in our infrastructure appears. Another wounded soldier sits in Walter Reed with rat feces and mildew. Another Esmin Green falls to the floor dying without help or hope.
I hope you all enjoy your plasma tvs, your big ol Toasterlike SUVs, and your summer vacations at Disneyworld because those are obviously more important than showing the world that the U.S. takes care of its own. The future requires us to save, to invest, to pay taxes to build infrastructure and to provide funds for research and technology. Our humanity requires us to provide basic services to our fellow citizens.
Now I’m not saying I want to pay for a bridge to nowhere or a museum that glorifies mules or Woodstock. I do, however, want to pay for whatever it would take to stop another person like Esmin Green from dying, to stop toxic food and toys from killing U.S. children, animals, and adults, to ensure that our returning wounded soldiers have everything they need, and to provide for adequate basic health care for all Americans.
I know Hillary Clinton shared this vision with me. I know that John Edwards shared this vision. I know many of you do. It is time we spoke up. It is also time we offer to make sacrifices to ensure that all Americans share the promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. My pursuit of happiness does not necessarily require a plasma tv, but it does require that we stop folks like Esmin Green from winning the trifecta of poverty ever again. We need the type of universal healthcare plan offered by John Edwards and Hillary Clinton. Let us commit to the sacrifice and work it takes to achieve it.
Queensbury Rules and Politics
Posted: June 18, 2008 Filed under: Action Memo | Tags: bloviate, crit, Hillary Clinton, max cleland, mccain, michelle obama, military records, queensbury rules, swiftboat 1 Comment
I wish we could all agree on certain rules in politics. They could operate much the same way the Queensbury Rules do in boxing. The seminal rule would be no hitting below the belt. It’s basically a way to say, win with fair play and by solid punches to your opponent.
One thing I would like to put forward as below the belt is ranting on candidate military records. This is especially true when the military ends those records with served honorably. Many good democrat vets were criticized by the Republican hate machine for honorable military service. John Kerry, John Murtha and Max Cleland all were treated unfairly by the bloviators in the right wing echo chamber. This is why it suprises me that the HuffPoop would allow the same treatment of John McCain.
Jeffery Klein blogs today:
“McCain apparently was not surprised when his Vietnamese captors went relatively easy on him compared to his fellow POWs.”
source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-klein/mccains-secret-questionab_b_107409.html
You would think that progressives would hold to some kind of principled standard where we realize it’s the apex of hypocrisy to do the same thing to others that we hated done to us and ours.
Now, I don’t think Dubya’s national guard record was quite in the same vein. He did receive special treatment during a draft time and there are questions if he even showed up for duty eventually. John McCain, however many planes he crashed, showed up for duty. I will never ever pretend that I could understand, criticize or hyperbloviate over time spent in Vietnam let alone time spent in a prison camp. It was all honorable service to me. I find plenty of his votes objectionable and if I criticize him, I will focus on that.
The second area which we could argue the use of some kind of Queensbury rule is on first ladies. Nancy Reagan, Hillary Clinton, and Laura Bush have all been swiftboated in their own way. Things that potential and sitting first ladies say as public figures are okay to criticize. Michelle Obama’s statement about the first time in her adult life she is really proud of her country is fair game. However, I don’t want to see another strong career woman swiftboated just based on the fact she’s a strong, black, intelligent, outspoken woman.
Again, Republicans, remember that Nancy Reagan was treated harshly. Hillary endured endless critiques of her hair, her outfits, her cookie recipes, etc. Cindy McCain is receiving similary treatment. So democrats, what Cindy McCain wears and does with the permission of her Dermatologist should be kept on pages concerning beauty tips. For political bashing, can we just stick to the content of their speeches please?
Here’s a youtube that I think we can talk about under Queensbury rules. Michelle made an outrageous statement. Criticize away! But please leave the rants about her hair, her dress, and those other sexist or racist statements back in the bathrooms of middle school where teachers can punish the stupid!
Michelle’s Hillary jab: Inexcusable and Low
This is all I’m asking of fellow bloviators, can we agree on something akin to the Queensbury rules?
Now shake hands and come out fighting!
and NOW, for the latest sexist analogy: Electile Dysfunction
Posted: June 9, 2008 Filed under: No Obama | Tags: First Wives, Hillary Clinton, Little Blue Pills, No Obama, Trophy Wife Comments Off on and NOW, for the latest sexist analogy: Electile DysfunctionI just read that all the ‘older’ women aren’t voting Obama because we’re like first wives that have just been thrown over for a trophy wife.
Here’s the link:
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-the-trophy-wife/
The article (written by a woman) opens:
“It seems as if Hillary Clinton is just the latest mature, dependable, experienced woman to be unceremoniously dumped for a younger, prettier doe-eyed companion.”
After a few unflattering things to say about Harriet Christian (the now famous angry woman captured by Jane Hamshear of Firedog Lake), we are regaled by yet another round of woman-baiting verbiage.
“The anger of Ms. Christian and her Democrat sisters has perhaps less to do with the fact that Barack Obama is an “inadequate black male” than that he is the trophy wife for whom Mrs. Clinton — and by extension, her graying, menopausal supporters — has been thrown over.”
So now Barrack Obama is a trophy wife. Elizabeth Scalia just keeps on with this analogy and digs in deeper.
“As a trophy wife, Obama would be content to let the Democrats pull out of Iraq; Hillary might actually suggest they stay. Obama would be able to sell the socialized health care Hillary couldn’t pull off. Most importantly, Obama would schmooze and photo-op with the elites for whose approval the Democrats so desperately yearned; Hillary was untrustworthy, there. She might snub Ahmadinejad and, like Bill Clinton before her, pledge to jump into a trench with a rifle to defend Israel. Obama would smile and look good while doing neither.”
While Obama is a trophy wife, women not supporting him are now called “Youtube women”. Any one who knows me, also knows I could not let this just drop without a response. I also couldn’t let the analogy drop. So, join me while I explain why Obama doesn’t cut it in the performance arena. Maybe this is why Michelle Obama is so angry all the time.
Actually, I say that women of a certain age and level of experience are not willing to vote for a guy of a certain age and level of performance that needs a medicine cabinet full of little blue pills to perform.
Obama cannot speak intelligently and with facts off teleprompter. Let’s also make it clear that his speeches are about “change you can xerox”. Besides leaning heavily on the speeches of others, he also has twenty paid speech writers on staff.
His list of accomplishments is thin. He really lacks that carry through and finish the project well factor. He appears to have gotten the few positions he has attained by something other than achievement and brains. Folks in high schools with mostly B’s do not get into the Columbia University as a general rule. It used to be that one could not be the President of the Harvard Review without having achieved the top grade in the class. It also used to be they clerked with supreme court associates and at the very least with an associate of one of the major appeals courts without exception. It is unique that one is the President of the Harvard Law Review and doesn’t clerk for any prestigious court AND never publishes a single article. That’s right UNIQUE.
Usually, one does not win elections by getting the other candidates thrown out on a technicality. He’s done that twice. Now, he’s received the democratic nomination (sic) under highly suspicious circumstances. One, there have been lots of overly-weighted caucuses in states that usually don’t have caucuses. Two, he voluntarily pulled his name off a ballot and still managed to get pledged delegates from that race while taking voters who voted from a different candidate.. Isn’t this just one more symptom premature electile dysfunction? Pulling out before you lose it? Could it just be that women are keener judges of who can cut it and who can’t perform?
Again, is this the real reason Michelle is perpetually grumpy, angry and mean?
Today’s ACTION MEMO: Tell the DNC you’re not going to TAKE IT!
Posted: June 9, 2008 Filed under: Action Memo | Tags: DNC, Grass Roots, Hillary Clinton, No Obama, Women 1 Comment
This Grass Roots Action was put together by LAMusing and Shtuey
ALL HANDS ON DECK!
18 million hands – send them to the DNC!
1. Trace your hands on an 8×11 sheet of paper. Make it colorful to grab attention.
2. Write your name and city/state in the center of your hands and the words “I am one of 18 million.”
3. Above the hands, write: “These hands are on the front lines of democracy. I pledge I will not vote for Obama.”
4. Below the hands, write a line or two about your reasons you won’t vote for BO, why you are upset with the DNC, or whatever stirs your soul. We suggest you keep it fairly brief for maximum impact.
5. Put it in an envelope and send it off to the DNC.
Democratic National Committee
430 S. Capitol St. SE
Washington, DC 20003
6. Pass it on!!! Post this call to arms wherever you can! Let’s bombard the DNC with the millions of hands of the voters they dismissed, ignored, disenfranchised and belittled. And remember the old saying – “Many hands make light work.”
Special note if you live in Florida: Make it just half a hand! Let them know you’d like to be a whole person again.









Recent Comments