and the Band Played On
Posted: September 12, 2009 Filed under: Bailout Blues, Equity Markets, Main Stream Media, Surreality, The Bonus Class, U.S. Economy, Voter Ignorance | Tags: bank failure, Banking, banking cartel, banking regulation, FDic Comments Off on and the Band Played On
So the so-called conservatives are having their so-called freedom event with so-called commentators and news anchors from so-called news stations. It’s all a side show to the real problems of the country. It’s easy to misplace anger in an environment where misinformants rule the airwaves.
So, let me show you where the real theft is happening, in case you may have missed it.
First, the FDIC released yet another move towards creating a financial banking cartel. Another one bites the dust.
Corus Bank, National Association, Chicago, Illinois, was closed today by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with MB Financial Bank, National Association, Chicago, Illinois, to assume all of the deposits of Corus Bank, N.A.
But you know there’s really nothing to see here at the NY Times: A Year After a Cataclysm, Little Change on Wall St. Much more important to focus on creeping socialism and taking our government back from imagined enemies.
One year after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the surprise is not how much has changed in the financial industry, but how little.
Backstopped by huge federal guarantees, the biggest banks have restructured only around the edges. Employment in the industry has fallen just 8 percent since last September. Only a handful of big hedge funds have closed. Pay is already returning to precrash levels, topped by the 30,000 employees of Goldman Sachs, who are on track to earn an average of $700,000 this year. Nor are major pay cuts likely, according to a report last week from J.P. Morgan Securities. Executives at most big banks have kept their jobs. Financial stocks have soared since their winter lows.
No nothing to see here. Wait, a minute. Maybe we should listen to people with some expertise instead of Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh who couldn’t even get one college degree or a freshman’s worth of credits between them . Maybe we shouldn’t focus on sycophants like Chris Matthews or Keith Olbermann who just want to hear themselves talk and hump each others legs until they tingle.
In fact, though, regulators and lawmakers have spent most of the last year trying to save the financial industry, rather than transform it. In the short run, their efforts have succeeded. Citigroup and other wounded banks have avoided bankruptcy, and the economy has sidestepped a depression. But the same investors and economists who predicted, and in some cases profited from, the collapse last fall say the rescue has come at an extraordinary cost. They warn that if the industry’s systemic risks are not addressed, they could cause an even bigger crisis — in years, not decades. Next time, they say, the credit of the United States government may be at risk.
Yup, what have we been talking about here for month after month after month, while we get named called every imaginable insult from one end of the political spectrum to another. I must defy definition if one day I can be called a racist republican ratfucker then be called a greenie and a leftie the next.
Oh, meanwhile …
And you wonder why we can’t have a Public Option
Posted: September 11, 2009 Filed under: Health care reform, Surreality, The Bonus Class, Voter Ignorance | Tags: K Street, Nancy Pelosi, UHC Fundraiser Comments Off on And you wonder why we can’t have a Public Option
H/T David Sirota and Open Left
I just got this link via David on Facebook. I’m speechless but not surprised.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the first time yesterday suggested she may be backing off her support of the public option. According to CNN, Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid “said they would support any provision that increases competition and accessibility for health insurance – whether or not it is the public option favored by most Democrats.”
This announcement came just hours before Steve Elmendorf, a registered UnitedHealth lobbyist and the head of UnitedHealth’s lobbying firm Elmendorf Strategies, blasted this email invitation throughout Washington, D.C. I just happened to get my hands on a copy of the invitation from a source – check it out:
From: Steve Elmendorf [mailto:steve@elmendorfstrategies.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 8:31 AM
Subject: event with Speaker Pelosi at my homeYou are cordially invited to a reception withSpeaker of the House
Nancy PelosiThursday, September 24, 2009
6:30pm ~ 8:00pmAt the home of
Steve Elmendorf
2301 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Apt. 7B
Washington, D.C.$5,000 PAC
$2,400 IndividualTo RSVP or for additional information please contact
Carmela Clendening at(202) 485-3508 or clendening@dccc.orgSteve Elmendorf
ELMENDORF STRATEGIES
GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS SOLUTIONS
900 7th Street NW Suite 750 Washington DC 20001Again, Elmendorf is a registered lobbyist for UnitedHealth, and his firm’s website brags about its work for
UnitedHealth on its website.
Paging Law Enforcement: Can we try using RICO ?
digg!!! tweet!!! share!!!
Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | Newsvine
If you think you’re worse off now, you’re right and not alone
Posted: September 11, 2009 Filed under: Economic Develpment, Global Financial Crisis, Health care reform, Human Rights, Populism, Surreality, The Great Recession, U.S. Economy Comments Off on If you think you’re worse off now, you’re right and not alone
From CBPP
I put this article from yesterday’s NYTimes in the comments section of my thread yesterday. I’m not sure every one read it so I thought I’d front page it. It’s on the increasing poverty and median income declines in the U.S. as reported by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) and the Census Bureau. The depressing reality of The Great Recession and the Dubya years has set in and there’s several obvious trends. First, the the nation’s poverty rate climbed from 12.5 percent in 2007 to 13.2 percent in 2008. This is the highest level since 1960 and the highest rate since 1997. The number of people in poverty is 39.8 million. Second, there’s been decline in employer-provided health insurance coverage for adults. It would’ve been bad for children and the poor too, but the increased participation in SCHIP and MEDICAID offset that. (You’re probably aware that I support de-linking employment and health insurance coverage since this is happening any way and switching to means-tested payments with basic plan provision for all.) Third, median income declined.
In another sign of both the recession and the long-term stagnation of middle-class wages, median family incomes in 2008 fell to $50,300, compared with $52,200 the year before. This wiped out the income gains of the previous three years, the report said.
Adjusted for inflation, in fact, median family incomes were lower in 2008 than a decade earlier.
“This is the largest decline in the first year of a recession we’ve seen since the Census Bureau started collecting data after World War II,” said Lawrence Katz, an economist at Harvard University, referring to household incomes. “We’ve seen a lost decade for the typical American family.”
The share of American residents who said they lacked health insurance throughout the entire year remained steady, at 15.4 percent, or 46.3 million people. But the total masked some more worrisome trends that are helping to drive the debate over a national health care overhaul.
Continuing an eight-year trend, the number of people with private or employer-sponsored insurance declined, while the number of people relying on government insurance programs including Medicare, Medicaid, the children’s insurance program and military insurance rose.
And Next Up, A Good Game of RISK
Posted: September 6, 2009 Filed under: Bailout Blues, Equity Markets, Global Financial Crisis, Surreality, The Bonus Class | Tags: death derivatives, life insurance policies, securitization Comments Off on And Next Up, A Good Game of RISK
If you still need motivation to get on my bandwagon for new bank regulation, go read “Back to Business: Wall Street Pursues Profit in Bundles of Life Insurance.” While the nation is having a good scream over communists in the White House and Bolshevik health care reform, the bankers are playing Risk with your tax dollars.
After the mortgage business imploded last year, Wall Street investment banks began searching for another big idea to make money. They think they may have found one.The bankers plan to buy “life settlements,” policies for life insurance for elderly parents which allow the ill and elderly people sell for cash — $400,000 for a $1 million policy, say, depending on the life expectancy of the insured person. Then they plan to “securitize” these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die.
The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return — though if people live longer than expected, investors could get poor returns or even lose money.
Either way, Wall Street would profit by pocketing sizable fees for creating the bonds, reselling them and subsequently trading them. But some who have studied life settlements warn that insurers might have to raise premiums in the short term if they end up having to pay out more death claims than they had anticipated.
The idea is still in the planning stages. But already “our phones have been ringing off the hook with inquiries,” says Kathleen Tillwitz, a senior vice president at DBRS, which gives risk ratings to investments and is reviewing nine proposals for life-insurance securitizations from private investors and financial firms, including Credit Suisse.
“We’re hoping to get a herd stampeding after the first offering,” said one investment banker not authorized to speak to the news media.
Oh, that’s just great! The same folks left unregulated and un-rebuked from the mortgage meltdown (and rewarded with subsidies) get to misprice yet another set of iffy securities. If this isn’t a more “exotic” investment than credit default swaps and harder to price, I’ll turn in all my Phd class credits (including the one specifically geared to Risk Theory) for an electrician’s license. Investment bankers seem to be on hyperdrive to find the next big thing before congress even realizes the horses are back out of the barn again.
Some Things are too Important to be left to the Market
Posted: September 2, 2009 Filed under: Diplomacy Nightmares, Surreality | Tags: Afghanistan, ArmorGroup, Blackwater Security Firm, Mercenaries, Pentagon jobbers Comments Off on Some Things are too Important to be left to the Market
Guys GONE WILD!!!! http://www.mahalo.com/armorgroup-hazing (Your tax dollars at work).
I always have to give this lecture near the beginning of my class when we talk about why some markets work well without government interference, and others, well, they require government interference. How would you feel, as an example, about letting our uranium supplies go to the highest bidder in a completely unregulated market? Does that strike you as a good idea? I can’t imagine any responsible American citizen arguing for that position. That’s a pretty unsubtle example but there are more. I’ve found any story that talks about farming out other stuff related to national security (rampant in the Rumsfeld Doctrine) usually puts me in a no-way frame of mine. Really, some things are just too important to be left to the profit motive.
So, here’s the three headlines and they all belong to stories concerning the State Department and the Pentagon. ABC news reports in a exclusive story that the Controversial Blackwater Security Firm Gets Iraq Contract Extended by State Dept;Company Banned From Operating by Iraqi Government Earlier This Year. I read that story right after I read this one in Politico entitled ‘Lord of the Flies’ in Kabul. I then went to the LA Times to skim U.S. to boost combat force in Afghanistan where I found the following lead paragraph.
Support units will be replaced by up to 14,000 ‘trigger-pullers,’ and noncombat posts will be contracted out, Defense officials say. The swap will allow the U.S. to keep its troop level unchanged.
Didn’t we replace Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush or did I miss something? What is going to get contracted out to the lowest
bidder looking for high profits? What costs are they going to cut to provide something resembling “service”? What service will that be?
Let me just backtrack to that Lord of the Files article a moment.
About 10 percent of the 150 English-speaking guards employed at the embassy by ArmorGroup, a private security company headquartered in Britain and Florida, approached the Project on Government Oversight and described “a pervasive breakdown in the chain of command and guard force discipline and morale,” according a letter sent to Clinton by executive director Danielle Brian.
An e-mail from one of the guards described parties on days off, during which guards and their supervisors urinated on themselves and others and ate potato chips and drank vodka from the cracks of buttocks.
“You will see that they have a group of sexual predators, deviants, running rampant over there,” one guard, whose name was withheld, said in an e-mail to POGO, adding, “They are showing poor judgment.”
Pictures accompanying POGO’s letter corroborate at least some of the allegations. The e-mail and photographs were given to reporters by POGO.

UnitedHealth on its website















Recent Comments