Posted: January 14, 2011 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: Bailout Blues, commercial banking, Corporate Crime, FBI raids, morning reads | Tags: bond ratings, income inequalities, Julian Assange, michelle obama, Moody's, Naked Capitalism, right wing violent rhetoric, S&P, Stephen Rose, violent rhetoric, Wall Street Bonuses, White House Blog, Wikileaks, Yves Smith |
Good Morning!
I want to open with a letter from the First Lady to American Parents on the White House Blog. You could tell that FLOTUS was obviously moved by the murder of a young girl so like her own children at the memorial service night before last. I have to say, Michelle has a heart that embraces children. She has turned this into a teaching moment. I haven’t found many inspiring words out there concerning the Tuscon tragedy. These are inspiring words.
We can teach our children that here in America, we embrace each other, and support each other, in times of crisis. And we can help them do that in their own small way – whether it’s by sending a letter, or saying a prayer, or just keeping the victims and their families in their thoughts.
We can teach them the value of tolerance – the practice of assuming the best, rather than the worst, about those around us. We can teach them to give others the benefit of the doubt, particularly those with whom they disagree.
We can also teach our children about the tremendous sacrifices made by the men and women who serve our country and by their families. We can explain to them that although we might not always agree with those who represent us, anyone who enters public life does so because they love their country and want to serve it.
It’s just really too bad that we all can’t grow up up in families like the Huxtables, and the Nelsons, and the Lopez family on TV. There probably would be fewer Manson families as a result. We also don’t have frames for families with surnames like Wu or Ahmadi or Gupta or lots of others. A lot of families are not in places where effective communication is possible. It’s easy to want to embrace those neighbors that look like the Huxtables, the Nelsons and the Lopez family. However, are those the families that really need our help and concern?
So what’s up with our Plutocratic overlords today? Read the rest of this entry »
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 13, 2011 | Author: bostonboomer | Filed under: Barack Obama, Crime, morning reads, psychology, Second Amendment, U.S. Politics | Tags: delusions, Jerad Lee Loughner, misogyny, murders, paranoid schizophrenia, Sarah Palin, Sharron Angle |

Good Morning!!
I’m going to focus this post on news and opinions relating to Jared Lee Loughner, the Arizona mass murderer. The news media is so focused on this story, it’s hard to find much else.
First, let me say that it has become abundantly clear that Loughner suffers from paranoid schizophrenia–a least I’m going to assume that unless someone comes up with a better explanation for his symptoms. I immediately suspected it when I first read descriptions of his behavior by people who knew him, but the more I read about him the more clear it becomes that Loughner suffers from this terrible illness.
Schizophrenia is characterized by a broad range of unusual behaviors that cause profound disruption in the lives of the patients suffering from the condition and in the lives of the people around them. Some common symptoms of schizophrenia are delusions, hallucinations (usually auditory), disorganized thought and speech, social withdrawal, and emotional unresponsiveness (flat affect).
Based on news reports, Loughner appears to be suffering from all of these symptoms. He was apparently experiencing delusions of persecution and delusions of control (e.g., his belief that the government was using mind control on him).

What Loughner did was driven by his delusions and his disorganized thought processes. Despite the repulsive campaign rhetoric used by tea party politicians like Sarah Palin and Sharron Angle, it really isn’t accurate to blame their words for Loughner’s crimes. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to shame politicians into speaking and behaving more civilly, but the real outrage is that this young man was able to buy a gun and ammunition. Loughner was a walking time bomb, and he lived in a state that allows people to buy guns easily and to carry concealed weapons without a permit!
Let’s condemn conservative politicians for helping to make guns far too easily available to troubled people and liberals for refusing to stand up to the gun nuts.
If you read this Wall Street Journal article, you’ll see examples of Loughner’s disordered thinking and communication. The WSJ writers found a collection of postings by Loughner to an on-line gaming forum. He talked about his inability to get a job and his failure with women, and sometimes his comments became bizarre and disturbing.
Look at these examples from the article:
On April 24, Mr. Loughner titled a new online thread: “Would you hit a Handy Cap Child/ Adult?” He wrote: “This is a very interesting question….There are mental retarded children. They’re possessing teachers that are typing for money. This will never stop….The drug addicts need to be weeded out to be more intelligent. The Principle of this is that them c— educators need to stop being pigs.”
Later that day, he posted a rant titled “Why Rape,” which said women in college enjoyed being raped. “There are Rape victims that are under the influence of a substance. The drinking is leading them to rape. The loneliness will bring you to depression. Being alone for a very long time will inevitably lead you to rape.”
[….]
On May 9 at 2:00 a.m., he asked: “Does anyone have aggression 24/7?” By noon, when others suggested he try smoking marijuana, he said: “No weed. No drugs. It’s not like I can’t see my brain.”
[….]
On June 3 at 12:14 a.m. Mr. Loughner described one confrontation with Mr. McGahee [his college math instructor], writing to his fellow gamers that he had asked the teacher: “Are you just getting a pay check for brainwashing?” as well as questioning if the class was a “scam” and asking, “can you tell me how to Deny math?” He wrote that the teacher told him it was a stupid question and he should “GET OUT OF MY CLASS!”
The next day, after he had to see a school counselor, he wrote: “Told her about brainwashing a child and how that can change the view of mathematics.”
This young man was extremely confused and delusional. It would be impossible for his parents not to have known that he was very ill. We may learn that they tried to get help for him; unfortunately it is not easy to get help for people with psychological disorders. People suffering from schizophrenia resist getting treatment–they don’t realize how sick they are. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult to force someone into treatment. Ironically, Arizona makes committing someone against their will easier than most other states, the state has also cut so much on mental health facilities and workers that services aren’t readily available.
Our mental health system is even more broken than the rest of our health care system. People who talk about “falling through the cracks” are clueless. Our mental health system is nothing but cracks.
More Loughner articles:
Mark Ames, author of Going Postal: Is the Giffords Shooting a New Kind of American Murder?
I studied countless rampage massacres for my book Going Postal, and this is the first instance I can think of in which the shooter—in this case, 22-year-old Jared Lee Loughner—carried out anything like a hybrid assassination-rampage: first, a planned, targeted assassination of a high-profile political figure, followed immediately by a seemingly indiscriminate shooting rampage. The first part of this hybrid assassination-rampage left a U.S. Congresswoman, Gabby Giffords, in critical condition with a serious head wound; the second part, the rampage, left six dead and another 13 wounded.
These two types of murders have little in common. In America, at least, the assassin is concerned about only one thing: taking out his target. While others may get shot in the confusion, political assassins never, to my knowledge, stick around after accomplishing their primary task just so they can keep murdering others indiscriminately.
[….]
In rampage shootings, on the other hand, media reports often describe the rampage murderer “shooting at random” before the bullet-in-the-head finale. But closer study of these shootings reveals that the attackers often have specific targets in mind—usually bullying supervisors or fellow workers. Sometimes, in the bloodiest cases, the shooter takes aim at the entire “company” or school, making everyone in it an intended target. In many of these cases, the shooters turn out to have been victims themselves of bullying, harassment, and social or financial ruin.
Judging from early reports, Loughner looks to be a pastiche of these two classic profiles.
Why psychiatrists can’t predict mass murderers
Let’s assume that we’ve identified a set of characteristics often exhibited by mass murderers. What does that buy us? It enables us to answer the question, “Given that someone is a mass murderer, what characteristics is he likely to exhibit?” That’s an interesting question, but it’s not the one we want to answer. Rather, the question we really want to answer is, “Given that someone exhibits this profile of characteristics, how likely is he to commit mass murder?” Answering this question is extremely difficult because the predictors are invariably far more common than the event we hope to predict, and mass murder is very rare. Although mass murderers often do exhibit bizarre behavior, most people who exhibit bizarre behavior do not commit mass murder.
Media reports about Jared Loughner, the alleged Tucson killer, illustrate this difficulty. His abnormal behavior, however unusual, is still far more common than the crimes of which he is accused.
Loughner pulled over hours before shooting
Hours before Saturday’s shooting, suspected gunman Jared Lee Loughner was stopped by an Arizona Game and Fish officer for running a red light.
Agency spokesman Jim Paxson confirmed Wednesday that an officer made the stop about 7:30 a.m. Saturday on an Interstate 10 access road several miles from the shopping center where congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and 18 other people were gunned down.
Loughner, who was described by the officer as “very forthcoming,” and “very polite, very subdued,” was driving an older-model charcoal gray Chevrolet Nova, which has since been seen parked outside the Loughner family home.
Police Release Documents Detailing Contact With Ariz. Gunman Prior to Deadly Rampage
The Pima County Sheriff’s Department released reports on Wednesday detailing contacts with Arizona gunman Jared Loughner and his family prior to Saturday’s shooting — contacts that ranged from petty nuisance complaints to a drug arrest.
[….]
The reports detail all personal contact Pima County deputies had with Loughner beginning on Sept. 23, 2004, when he was the victim of a reported assault.
Loughner was later arrested as a juvenile for possession of alcohol on May 15, 2006, and on Sept. 10, 2007, he also received a citation for possession of drug paraphernalia, according to the police reports.
The police reports do not appear to indicate a violent history. Instead, they reflect a man seemingly prone to destructive tendencies.
Read more at the link.
Records show fear of Loughner, lack of mental health intervention
Pima Community College in Tucson has released records of its campus police contacts with student Jared Loughner, showing the increasing fear that he stirred in his classmates and teachers.
A thread running through the documents is the difficulty of police finding a context in which to intervene: Until they found a violation of the student code of conduct, or a state law, police officers wrote in the reports that they weren’t sure what else they could do, even when a fellow student said she thought Loughner had brought a knife to class.
The records show no indication that the college took steps to get Loughner any mental health counseling.
Loughner also seemed not to understand the seriousness of the fears. When police spoke with him, Loughner said his free speech rights were being violated, and seemed to have trouble understanding why he had been called out of class.
Here’s a really interesting article by a researcher on why some people act heroically in situations like the Arizona shootings.
Rohit Deshpande, a professor at Harvard Business School, has delved into the science of heroism to find out what causes someone to spring into action despite the danger to help or save someone else.
In his research, Deshpande focused on how hotel workers took extreme risks to protect guests during the deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, in 2008.
After several desperate hours of explosions and gunfire, members of the kitchen staff locked arms and formed a cordon around guests as the attackers machine-gunned them down.
In another display of heroism, hotel operators stayed at their phones to call rooms with vital information.
[….]
He found heroism had nothing to do with age, gender or religion. It started with personality.
“It seems that they have a much more highly developed moral compass,” he said. “They have this instinct for doing something good for other people. We find this across a whole series of situations.
I’m going to end with an article by Joan Walsh of Salon on why Sarah Palin is too narcissistic and lacking in empathy to ever be elected president.
Good grief! Has Joan Walsh paid any attention to current President Barack Obama’s behavior or George W. Bush’s for that matter? Narcissism and lack of empathy have seemingly become de rigueur for holders of the office these days!
Sooooo…. What are you reading this morning?
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 8, 2011 | Author: Mona (aka Wonk the Vote) | Filed under: morning reads | Tags: Cinematherapy, Femicide, Gulf Oil Kill, Hillary Clinton, Hossein Vahedi, Invisible Americans, Mona Lisa, School Shooting, Suicide, War on Poverty, Wikileaks |

Photograph: Gianni Dagli Orti/Corbis
Good morning, news junkies! My Saturday offerings, hot off the presses…
On this day, January 8th, in 1962, the Mona Lisa was exhibited in Washington, marking the first time it was shown in America. From the link, which goes to the History Channel website: “Lady Jacqueline Kennedy and Andre Malraux, the French minister of culture, arranged the loan of the painting from the Louvre Museum in Paris to the United States.”
You may have caught the following story on the Mona Lisa from December, but in case you didn’t… From Tom Kington in the Guardian: “Mona Lisa’s eyes may reveal model’s identity, expert claims… Silvano Vinceti claims initials – possibly the model’s – are discernible in the left eye of the iconic Da Vinci painting.” Stephen Bayley wrote a piece in the UK Telegraph on this story as well called, “Mona Lisa: Leonardo was a genius, let’s leave it at that.“
Another piece of historical trivia for January 8th… In 1964, LBJ declared a “War on Poverty” in the US. (Link takes you to an essay hosted on blackpast.org.)
Who has taken up the call to fight the war on poverty today? Hillary spoke of and to “invisible” Americans when she ran in 2008, but the powers-that-be railroaded her and kept her powerful voice off the domestic stage. John Edwards tainted his “Two Americas” rhetoric on poverty with his “narcissism,” as he himself characterized it. Elizabeth Edwards, who was the genuine advocate for the least of these in that power couple, is no longer with us, though she left behind a body of thoughtful writings and interviews to guide us, much in the way she wrote a journal to her children. The other Liz–Elizabeth Warren–is fighting for us, but her hands appear to be tied.
Every day of this Administration that President Obama fails to govern for the people who elected him, he instead tries to win the approval of the corporations who will never openly adore him enough for all his efforts… because nothing he does for them will ever be enough. More and more, his former supporters are coming to realize that they endorsed an empty suit in 2008, which brings me to my first newsy item. From today’s NY Times: “Obama the Centrist Irks a Liberal Lion… ‘By freezing federal salaries, by talking about deficits, by extending the Bush tax cuts, he’s legitimizing a Republican narrative,’ Mr. Reich says. ‘Why won’t he tell the alternative story? For three decades we’ve cut taxes on the wealthy while real wages stood still.'”
I’ll answer Reich’s question with a question. When will the left understand that Obama fears and thus respects the Republican narrative and does not do the same when it comes to the liberal narrative? The so-called “caving” to Republicans is by design.
Bob Herbert has some good stuff covering the same ground today; I had a hunch he would: “Misery With Plenty of Company…Consider the extremes. President Obama is redesigning his administration to make it even friendlier toward big business and the megabanks, which is to say the rich, who flourish no matter what is going on with the economy in this country. (They flourish even when they’re hard at work destroying the economy.) Meanwhile, we hear not a word — not so much as a peep — about the poor, whose ranks are spreading like a wildfire in a drought.”
Indeed, but I’ll get off my rantbox for now. Here are some other headlines that struck a chord with me throughout the week…
Read the rest of this entry »
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 7, 2011 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: Anti-War, Federal Budget, Festivities, Food, Foreign Affairs, morning reads, New Orleans, U.S. Politics, Wikileaks | Tags: 12th night, Defense Spending cuts, GOP plans infrastructure cuts, inhumane treatment of Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, King Cake, King's day, mardi gras, The UK Guardian, troop cuts, Wikileaks |

Good Morning
You probably think you’re at the wrong blog!! I’ve had a few folks say the gray print and the gray background were hard to read and dreary. So, I spiffed up the front page a bit.
So, is this easier to read?
New Orleans has said so long to the holidays and used the Twelfth Night observance to kick off the Carnival season, which will be extra long this year.
Mayor Mitch Landrieu, accompanied by New Orleans clarinetist Pete Fountain, on Thursday served up slices of king cake at historic Gallier Hall, where the mayor greets parading royalty on Mardi Gras Day.Between Thursday and when Carnival celebrations wrap up March 8, about 100 parades will roll through area streets or float down waterways.
The Phunny Phorty Phellows rolled Thursday Night. They’re the first official parade of Mardi Gras. They rent one of the St. Charles Avenue street cars then ride and drink their way up and down St Charles Avenue to usher in the season! They’re a really old krewe that was resurrected in the 1980s. It’s one of the most fun and least commercial of the krewes and parades. You can see some pictures of them from last year if you follow the link.
Well, they’re off and dragging their knuckles through the Halls of Congress! Yes, Republicans are bringing greedy back. It’s so bad that the AFL-CIO and the Chamber of Commerce are joining up to fight them off. Yes, you read that right.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO — two powerful players that are often at each other’s throats — are considering teaming up for a campaign against the House GOP’s planned cuts to infrastructure spending, spokespeople for both groups tell me.
The two groups rarely agree on anything, and frequently target each other in the harshest of terms, but one thing they agree on is that they don’t want the House GOP to make good on its threat to subject highway and mass-transit programs to budget cuts. GOP leaders announced earlier this week that such cuts could not be taken off the table in the quest to slice up to $100 billion in spending.
The prospect of deep infrastructure cuts may now lead to the unlikely sight of the Chamber and the huge labor federation, both of which boast powerful and well-funded political operations, teaming up to campaign against the House GOP’s plans. The Chamber — a staunch ally of House Republicans that spent millions in the 2010 elections — has already been pushing back against cuts to highway spending because it could lead to more job losses in the construction industry.
MSNBC reports that protests are growing over the treatment of whistle blower Bradley Manning.
Read the rest of this entry »
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 6, 2011 | Author: bostonboomer | Filed under: Barack Obama, morning reads, psychology, Team Obama, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics | Tags: "professional left", 2010 Census, Barack Obama, BP oil spill, child pornography, Daryl Bem, dying birds and animals, Emptywheel, ESP, Howard Dean, John P. Wheeler III, memeorandum, murder, Pentagon, political advertising, Poverty, psychology, Robert Gibbs, senior citizens. social programs, smear campaigns |

Out of Town News, Harvard Square
Good Morning!!
Gee, it’s great to be back in Beantown, even though my house looks like it was hit by a tornado. I already had books stacked all over the place because of my book selling project. I brought more books with me from Indiana, and I haven’t completely unpacked and put my stuff away. I’ll be cleaning up for a couple of days. At least I got everything out of the car today and went to the grocery store. Driving 1,000 miles in two days makes me really spacey though, so if I don’t make sense in this post, please try to make allowances.
You’ve probably heard already that Robert Gibbs plans to leave the White House in February to be an “outside political adviser” to Obama’s 2012 campaign. It’s the top story on Memeorandum right now.
“Robert, on the podium, has been extraordinary,” Mr. Obama said, declining to answer questions about who he intends to hire for any position. “Off the podium, he has been one of my closet advisers. He is going to continue to have my ear for as long as I’m in this job.”
Mr. Gibbs will remain part of the president’s inner circle of political advisers, along with David Axelrod, a senior adviser, and Jim Messina, a deputy chief of staff, who also are leaving the White House to focus on the president’s re-election effort. Mr. Gibbs will defend Mr. Obama on television – and will expand his presence on Twitter and other Internet platforms – as well as beginning to define the field of 2012 Republican presidential candidates.
“Stepping back will take some adjusting,” Mr. Gibbs said in an interview Wednesday morning. “But at the same time, I have a feeling that I will keep myself quite busy, not just with speaking, but continuing to help the president.”
He said he has no intention of establishing a political consulting or lobbying business, but he intends to work from the same downtown Washington office where David Plouffe has spent the last two years.
When I first heard this news, my first thought was about the role that Gibbs played in 2004, when he resigned from the Kerry Campaign and joined an “independent” group that produced the infamous attack ad that showed a photo of Osama bin Laden while the announcer described Howard Dean’s supposed deficiencies in foreign policy. It sounds like Gibbs will be more out front in 2012, but I’m betting he’ll still play the attack dog role–smearing opponents and generally saying the things Obama doesn’t dare say himself.
According the NYT story,
The leading potential replacements for press secretary include Jay Carney, a spokesman for Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., along with Bill Burton and Josh Earnest, who work as deputies to Mr. Gibbs. Other candidates also could be considered, an administration official said.
Emptywheel says Robert Gibbs will now become part of the group he derided as press secretary: “the professional left.”
Back when Gibbs was attacking the Professional Left, he made a distinction between the Progressives outside of DC and those inside DC squawking on the cable programs.
But if Gibbs is going to stay in DC, hanging out on Twitter, and appearing on the speaking circuit, doesn’t that make him a card-carrying member of the Professional Left?
Except the bit about him being so conservative, of course.
LOL
Out in the land of real Americans, 1 of 6 of us lives in poverty–including many senior citizens.
Read the rest of this entry »
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Recent Comments