8 Year Old Saudi Girl’s Message to Mubarak (Updated)
Posted: January 29, 2011 Filed under: Breaking News, The Media SUCKS | Tags: 2011: days of revolt, Egypt, Palestine Papers, Western media bias 42 CommentsCheck out Juju’s message to President Mubarak to the right. What a smart girl!
When people want to know who’s in charge, and when people keep trying to ring the Islamists’ alarm bell, the people answer: “We’re in charge.”
The thousands of Egyptians braving the brutality of Mubarak’s security apparatus are having none of it. It’s about freedom and dignity for them, not about the dictator and the Islamists. It’s the West that’s hung up on that. And it’s hung up on it because for decades the West has sided with “stability” — which has come at the cost of the freedom and dignity of Egyptians, Tunisians and other Arabs.
More:
One of the main demands of the protests is an end to Mubarak’s rule. In presidential elections later this year, he was expected to seek a sixth term in office. I would sincerely love to see Mubarak go, and if he does, those Egyptians who smashed through fear must be the ones to decide who they want to replace him.
They don’t want a Mubarak-lite. They will not sacrifice their freedom and dignity so Western allies can feel better about Egypt — which means a future government must reflect all those Egyptians out there, day after day.
On the Palestine Papers… from the Christian Science Monitor:
Why Palestine papers didn’t spark outrage against Abbas’s government
But the Palestine papers published by Al Jazeera have further dented Abbas’s already low credibility, calling into question his ability to negotiate a lasting peace deal.
This is an Open Thread on Egypt, the Palestine Papers, and the rest of the Middle East…and whatever else is happening this Saturday evening.
To the left: A picture of the human wall protecting the Cairo museum, circulating on twitter.
Update
Stacyx has a brilliant post up called “Egypt: Democracy For Me But Not For Thee“ — she has said everything I’ve been thinking watching the Western media’s coverage and said it better than I could! Please go over and read the whole thing.
Teaser:
As I watch some of the coverage of what is going on in Egypt it’s interesting to see that some of the biggest supporters of “democracy” and “freedom” have now decided that maybe democracy isn’t such a good thing. At least not when it comes to Arabs.
It’s a rehashing of the theme of ‘Fear of a Muslim Planet’ and quite a few commentators I have seen or heard or read are now offering us all a false choice between a corrupt, oppressive dictatorship in Egypt and crazy, America-hating Islamists, as though there is nothing in between those two things. This is interesting because thus far the protesters in Egypt seem concerned with things like food prices, unemployment, repression, government corruption and nepotism, etc. as opposed to promoting Islamic fundamentalism. We’ve heard a lot about the Muslim Brotherhood in the media over the last two days and while I think that discussing any role they play in these protests or their aftermath is certainly very important, a lot of the commentary seems to be hyping a threat that really hasn’t manifested itself, at least as of yet.
Update II
From the Tahrir demonstrations:
CSM: “Inspired by Tunisia, Egypt’s protests appear unprecedented”
Posted: January 25, 2011 Filed under: Breaking News, Egypt, Foreign Affairs, Lebanon, Middle East, The Media SUCKS, Tunisia | Tags: 2011: days of revolt 43 Comments
Egyptians protest in central Cairo today. Photograph: Khaled El Fiqi/EPA (Click image for live updates from the Guardian)
Good afternoon everyone. I wanted to put up a quick thread of the headlines and developments coming out of Egypt so we have a place for us to discuss and keep adding more links as they become available. It’s a true shame that Obama’s upcoming SOTU is driving so much of the news coverage today, not to mention a convenient distraction since “power to the people of the Middle East” doesn’t exactly fit the Western media’s narrative. Take a look at what is going on–it is simply incredible.
Guardian: “Protests in Egypt and unrest in Middle East – live updates”
CSM: “Inspired by Tunisia, Egypt’s protests appear unprecedented”
NYT: “Broad Protests Across Egypt Focus Fury on Mubarak”
BBC: “Egypt protests: Clashes in Cairo on ‘day of revolt’”
BBC: “Anger of protesters in Cairo ‘surprised police‘”
BBC: “Egypt protests: Three reported dead in ‘day of revolt’”
Looks like censors are hard at work trying to stop the twitter revolution:
WaPo: “Twitter blocked in Egypt as protests turn violent (Video)”
Heredict.org is tracking the reports of twitter outage in Egypt today (H/T Minkoff Minx who found the heredict.org link via the AFP’s report on the twitter blockage)
Live Tweets
Nonetheless, the revolution continues to be tweeted. Check out Blogs of War for live tweets (H/T Taylor Marsh)
Another good place to check for updates: Ahram online
via the WaPo link above — “Live updates: Opposition groups protest on Police Day… Ahram Online will be posting updates about planned protests by opposition activists in Cairo and elsewhere”
Also, some links on Lebanon’s Day of Rage…
Guardian: “Lebanon protesters clash with army over new Hezbollah-backed PM… Supporters of previous prime minister, Saad Hariri, clash with troops and burn tyres as Najib Miqati assumes office”
Guardian: “Lebanon’s ‘day of rage’ – in pictures”
NYT: “Amid Protests, Ex-Lebanon Leader Assails New Premier”
And, on Tunisia…
LA Times: “Key diplomat says U.S. approves of Tunisia revolt… Jeffrey D. Feltman, assistant secretary of State for Near Eastern affairs, says Washington has offered Tunisia ‘whatever support is appropriate and requested’ in conducting a nationwide election.”
Update –Video on Cairo protests posted on youtube by Al Jazeera English a couple hours ago:
Update 2 — see the twitter/live tweet section above. I added some links.
Update 3 — Amazing Photo (Egypt, Jan 25) circulating on twitter:
Now, isn’t this special?
Posted: January 24, 2011 Filed under: Breaking News, U.S. Politics | Tags: Chicago mayor race, Rahm Emanuel eligibility 66 Comments
Breaking News:
![]()
Rahm Emanuel booted off ballot in 2-1 Appellate Court decision
Rahm Emanuel was thrown off the ballot for mayor of Chicago today by an appellate court panel, a stunning blow to the fund-raising leader in the race.
An appellate panel ruled 2-1 that Emanuel did not meet the residency standard to run for mayor.
Appellate judges Thomas Hoffman and Shelvin Louise Marie Hall ruled against Emanuel. Justice Bertina Lampkin voted in favor of keeping President Obama’s former chief of staff on the Feb. 22 ballot.
“It’s a surprise,” said Kevin Forde, the attorney who argued on Emanuel’s behalf.
Emanuel’s attorneys are expected to use Lampkin’s dissenting opinion to appeal the case to the Illinois Supreme Court.
In today’s ruling, Hoffman wrote: “We … order that the candidate’s name be excluded (or if, necessary, be removed) from the ballot from Chicago’s Feb. 22, 2011.”
Notable Tweets:
ThePlumLineGS Greg Sargent
RT @brianbeutler BREAKING: Chicago fish-markets experience unprecedented Monday sales. #rahm
daveweigel daveweigel
Money well spent, Rahm donors!
daveweigel daveweigel
Can’t Obama just take over the city and make Rahm the Chicago Czar?
@PachacutecVA Pachacutec
Somewhere, Nancy Pelosi is trying not to smile in public #rahm
Update:
Rahm at a just held presser. Some how I think we need a caption contest for this. He looks like the pissed off Staypuft marshmallow man to me
Jessica Yellin at CNN:
Emanuel is expected to appeal the decision to the Illinois Supreme Court, and a federal appeal could follow.
According to a recent Chicago Tribune/WGN survey, 44 percent of the city’s voters backed Emanuel, 21 percent backed former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun and 16 percent backed former Chicago Board of Education president Gery Chico. City Clerk Miguel del Valle received seven percent and nine percent remained undecided.
Emanuel is expected to speak at 2:30 p.m. ET. Moseley Braun is expected to make a statement at 3:30 p.m. ET Monday.
The source close to the Emanuel campaign told CNN his legal team anticipated there was a chance the court would rule against them and they have an emergency appeal already written.
Oops. She did it again.
Posted: January 12, 2011 Filed under: Breaking News, Civil Liberties, Civil Rights, Crime, Gun Control, Hillary Clinton: Her Campaign for All of Us, the blogosphere, the internet, U.S. Politics | Tags: Blood Libel, Glenn Beck, Nazi Tourettes, Tuscon massacre 98 Comments
Click on Max Headroom for a great Wired read on How Max Headroom Predicted the Demise of TV Journalism
While I was doing some grant writing, the Palin video detailing her supposed victimization during the events surrounding the Tucson Massacre was scrubbed. It’s amazing how many things disappear from there these days.
benpolitico Ben Smith
Weird – Palin video’s gone. http://is.gd/npdcKe
The phrase “blood libel” was introduced into the debate this week by Instapundit’s Glenn Reynolds, and raised some eyebrows because it typically refers historically to the alleged murder of Christian babies by Jews, and has been used more recently by Israeli’s supporters to refer to accusations against the country. It’s a powerful metaphor, and one that carries the sense of an oppressed minority.
This morning, Palin launched an aggressive Facebook and web-video campaign to counter what she deemed a “blood libel” against her by the media to connect her infamous cross-hairs map and other right-wing incendiary rhetoric to violence.Of all the terms Palin could have used, from “defamation” to even “implicating me in murder,” why did Palin choose “blood libel”? As the conservative National Review’s Jonah Goldberg, who says he “agree[s] entirely with…Palin’s, larger point,” notes, “Historically, the term is almost invariably used to describe anti-Semitic myths about how Jews use blood — usually from children — in their ritual.” Indeed, many Jews consider the term extremely offensive, and the Anti-Defamation League and other prominent Jewish organizations have spoken out against its use dozens of occasions in the past.
Indeed, Jewish groups are taking offense to Palin’s choice of the term. Noting that accusations of blood libel have been “directly responsible for the murder of so many Jews across centuries,” the National Jewish Democratic Council condemned Palin’s use of the term:
Instead of dialing down the rhetoric at this difficult moment, Sarah Palin chose to accuse others trying to sort out the meaning of this tragedy of somehow engaging in a “blood libel” against her and others. This is of course a particularly heinous term for American Jews, given that the repeated fiction of blood libels are directly responsible for the murder of so many Jews across centuries — and given that blood libels are so directly intertwined with deeply ingrained anti-Semitism around the globe, even today. […]
All we had asked following this weekend’s tragedy was for prayers for the dead and wounded, and for all of us to take a step back and look inward to see how we can improve the tenor of our coarsening public debate. Sarah Palin’s invocation of a “blood libel” charge against her perceived enemies is hardly a step in the right direction.
Likewise, the president of the pro-Israel, pro-peace Jewish lobby J Street, Jeremy Ben-Ami, said he was “saddened by Governor Palin’s use of the term ‘blood libel,’” adding that he hopes “she will choose to retract her comment [and] apologize“:
Could this be the reason the video’s been scrubbed? moved to a less prominent place? (updated, see note below)









Recent Comments