Soledad Spins the Spinners Again
Posted: October 9, 2012 Filed under: 2012 elections, The Media SUCKS | Tags: lies, media, Romney, Ryan, Soledad O'Brien 12 CommentsTara Wall was put to the Soledad Truth treatment yesterday. She was unable to defend a contradictory set of statements on Israel and Palestine made by Wall yesterday after Romney’s NeoCon speech.
Here’s the basic gist from Alternet.
The exchange over the Israel/Palestine conflict has attracted the most attention, with O’Brien grilling Wall on Romney’s “contradictory positions.”
The topic of the segment wasRomney’s foreign policy speech earlier today at the Virginia Military Institute.
O’Brien first tried to get into the fine points of Romney’s foreign policy, questioning whether Romney was laying out any different options on Iran than President Obama. O’Brien asked three questions about Iran, but Wall was not interested in getting into specifics.
Then O’Brien turned to the Middle East. O’Brien juxtaposed the remarks Romney made at the infamous Florida fundraiser that was secretly taped, and his planned remarks today. In Florida, Romney said that peace with the Palestinians was not an option because the “pathway to peace is almost unthinkable to accomplish”–meaning a Palestinian state is unthinkable.
But in Virginia, Romney vowed to work for a “democratic, prosperous Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with the Jewish state of Israel.”
O’Brien asked Wall about these “contradictory” positions. Wall fired back, and said, “the fact is that it’s the president who’s failed.” O’Brien then talked over Wall’s remarks, saying, “Tara, that was an excellent shift, but answer for me about Gov. Romney.”
O’Brien repeatedly tried to get an answer to her question, but it was to no avail. “I’m not going to get into a big foreign policy debate with you here,” said Wall, explaining that foreign policy is not in her purview in the campaign
Wouldn’t it be nice if all the media wouldn’t act like stage props and actually call out campaigns on inconsistencies and lies?
Interestingly enough,Paul Ryan was rude to a reporter in Michigan who was evidently asking unwanted questions about guns and violence. There’s some indication that Ryan actually walked off the interview.
A Michigan ABC affiliate posted video of an animated exchange between Paul Ryan and a local
reporter on Monday evening, prompting questions about whether Ryan walked out of the interview.
When it aired, reporter Terry Camp characterized the interview as ending badly, and said Ryan was “not specific in his answers.” Meanwhile, the Ryan campaign said the candidate was asked a “weird question” relating gun violence to tax cuts.
The Ryan campaign said the interview had simply run past its allotted time, but that Ryan didn’t end the interview prematurely. Video of the interview that was posted to YouTube shows an off-camera aide (later identified as Ryan spokesman Michael Steel) calling the interview to a halt while Ryan is standing, still in casual conversation with the reporter while removing his microphone.
“Does the country have a gun problem?” Camp asked Ryan during the interview, held in the library of the Cornerstone School.
“This country has a crime problem,” Ryan responded.
I guess that Republicans expect the “Fox” treatment wherever they go. Good to know that some reporters keep after them. I just wish they all would!!
Soledad O’Brien should be moderating the next debate, not Candy Crowley.
Hell, yes O’Brien should be.
And the question asked by Charles Pierce “Why is Mary Matalin allowed on TV?” Driftglass answers
http://driftglass.blogspot.com/2012/10/today-on-shoddiest-obit.html
That kind of thing only happens when the campaigns don’t determine the particulars of debates like they used to do.
I just happened to read an article at Democracy Now! about the so-called “Commission on Presidential Debates”:
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/10/3/ahead_of_first_obama_romney_debate
I had no idea! A secret contract between Dems and Repugs…how sweet. I’d already decided not to vote for a legacy party presidential candidate, and that article took every last doubt I had about doing that away.
Yes, I watched that last week. It was good. I also put it up in one of the morning threads so people could watch it.
LOL – I’m so slow sometimes! But thank you for putting all this out there for us!!!
Oh, no problem! I’m glad you mentioned it again! I had forgotten all that went on back then to remove the League of Women Voters from the process. It’s a great thing to keep reminding people!
The question Ryan was asked didn’t sound “weird” to me. It sounded like the reporter asked how Romney/Ryan could cut down on crime while making their massive tax cuts. I may have heard wrong.
An ‘Angry Birds’ for Political Junkies
http://influencealley.nationaljournal.com/2012/10/an-angry-birds-for-political-j.php
Thanks! I downloaded it.
Be sure to let us know if you like it.
It’s OK. It’s just a trivia game where you answer questions and make bets. At first the questions were really easy and then they got a little harder. So far I’ve only missed a couple of questions….