Saturday Morning Lightweight Reads

Good Morning!!

Since it’s Saturday, this will be a somewhat lightweight news roundup.

You probably heard that TMZ found a picture of Paul Ryan topless “after relentless research.” It was taken six years ago–before he started the now famous P90X workout.

The entire Internet is losing its collective mind over a shirtless pic of vice presidential candidate, and fitness freak, Paul Ryan. Before the photo was even uncovered by TMZ, “Paul Ryan shirtless” began trending on Google. We the people really, desperately want to see the 42-year-old’s legendary midsection.

Feverish coverage of the congressman’s grueling P90X workout routine, and reports of his 6 to 8 percent body fat, have helped stoke the fire. So too have his good looks: Media outlets from TMZ to the New York Times have waxed poetic this week about his sex appeal. There’s also the fact that some see his physique as rock-hard proof of his true character: As my colleague Willa Paskin said, it’s like people are thinking, “He really must be as disciplined and serious as he pretends. Look at those abs! Those are not the abs of a dilettante!”

Frankly, of those three guys pictured above, I’ll take the pale, unmuscled, slightly flabby–but really smart and interesting–Bill Clinton. And thank goodness The Daily Beast didn’t find a shirtless photo of Mitt Romney! They did post shirtless photos of a few other politicians though. My favorites were Rick Santorum and Vladimir Putin–check them out at the link.

RalphB posted this one in the comments last night, and I just had to include it in this mornings must reads: Romney Loves Ryan: What Mitt Sees in His New Beau, by Paul Constant at The Stranger.

If we’re being generous, Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan is a man of contradictions. If we’re being honest, Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan is an idiot. Mitt Romney’s vice presidential pick has problems beyond the basic teabagger contradiction of claiming to be for small government then passing an obscenely large military budget, voting to ban gay marriage, and enacting laws that lessen a woman’s access to abortion and birth control. This is a Republican who unabashedly supported George W. Bush’s war in Iraq and the Patriot Act, but also claims to be a big Rage Against the Machine fan. There is a dissonance, a bifurcation in Ryan’s brain that demands further investigation.

As I write this, the media’s love affair with Paul Ryan is still running hot and heavy. Since rumors of the Ryan pick broke late Friday night, reporters have not been able to say enough nice things about the man: good-looking, remarkably fit (anywhere from 6 to 8 percent body fat, multiple bloggers have cooed; a CNN headline on Monday swooned: “Paul Ryan’s workout: Is P90X for you?”), young, a decent public speaker, well-loved in his home district around Janesville, Wisconsin, where he was born and still lives today with his beautiful wife and children. Hell, compared to the stiff, awkward, and biologically unlikable Romney, Ryan is the second coming of George Clooney, with a practiced aw-shucksiness and a closely cultivated cowlick that are meant to imply Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

Constant spends the rest of the piece describing Ryan’s hypocrisy and his ability to lie and obfuscate at the drop of a hat. He’s the perfect match for Romney.

Is it any wonder that Romney loves Ryan, can seemingly spend hours sitting next to him and softly chuckling while gazing in his direction, his hands awkwardly curled up in his lap? It must be like looking into a mirror that shows you all your life’s possibilities. It must be like looking at all the potential he used to have. Here’s the distillation of everything Romney believes, and by some fluke, people even like this other guy. If Romney didn’t make Ryan his vice presidential candidate, he’d probably have killed him in a fit of jealous pique.

Perfect! I wish I had written that.

In science news, a new species of spider with really scary claws was discovered by some people exploring a cave in Oregon.

Amateur cave explorers have found a new family of spiders in the Siskiyou Mountains of Southern Oregon, and scientists have dubbed it Trogloraptor — Latin for cave robber — for their fearsome front claws.

The spelunkers sent specimens to the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, which has the West Coast’s largest collection of spiders. Entomologists there say the spider — reddish brown and the size of a half dollar — evolved so distinctly that it requires its own taxonomic family — the first new spider family found in North America since the 1870s.

“It took us a long time to figure out what it wasn’t,” said Charles Griswold, curator of arachnids at the academy. “Even longer to figure out what it is. We used anatomy. We used DNA to understand its evolutionary place. Then we consulted other experts all over the world about what this was. They all concurred with our opinion that this was something completely new to science.”

One more science story: Likely footprint of spiky dinosaur has NASA’s Md. campus on cloud nine

Eons before man dreamed of exploring the heavens, dinosaur tracker Ray Stanford is convinced, a low-slung armored beast roamed what is now a NASA campus in Greenbelt, stamping a huge footprint that went unnoticed until he spied it this summer.

A scalloped mini-crater with four pointy toe prints pressed into ruddy rock, the putative dinosaur track juts out from a scruffy slope at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, home to 7,000 scientists, engineers and other workers with their eyes firmly turned skyward.

Maryland’s signature dinosaur, an armored browser known as a nodosaur, made the track with its back left foot 112 million years ago, Stanford said as he led an entourage of NASA officials to the print Friday morning.

Sticking out of the grass in plain view, the elephant-foot-size impression — nearly 14 inches wide — elicited gasps. “Unbelievable!” said a NASA photographer. Someone else said, “Oh, my!”

Read more at the link.

I was amazed when I read this one: Construction Worker Survives After a Metal Bar Pierces his Head in Brazil

A 24-year-old construction worker survived after a 6-foot metal bar fell from above and pierced his head, doctors said Friday.

Luiz Alexandre Essinger, chief of staff of Rio de Janeiro’s Miguel Couto Hospital said doctors successfully withdrew the iron bar from Eduardo Leite’s skull during a five-hour surgery.

“He was taken to the operating room, his skull was opened, they examined the brain and the surgeon decided to pull the metal bar out from the front in the same direction it entered the brain.” Essinger said.

He said Leite was conscious when he arrived at the hospital and told him what had happened.
He said Leite was lucid and showed no negative consequences after the operation.

Phineas Gage

The reason I was so amazed is that this accident is so similar to one that everyone learns about in Psychology 101–the case of Phineas Gage.

The story of Phineas Gage illustrates some of the first medical knowledge gained on the relationship between personality and the functioning of the brain’s frontal lobe. A well-liked and successful construction foreman, Phineas Gage was contracted to work on the bed preparation for the Rutland & Burlington Railroad in Cavendish, Vermont in late 1840’s. On the 13th of September 1848, while preparing the railroad bed, an accidental explosion of a charge he had set blew a 13-pound tamping iron straight through Gage’s head, landing many yards away.

From all accounts, the front part of the left side of his brain was destroyed. Incredibly, almost immediately after the accident, Gage was conscious and able to talk, and insisted on walking to the cart that would take him into town to be treated. Despite his torn scalp and fractured skull, Gage remained lucid and rational during the ride and was able to speak with his attending physician, Dr. John Martyn Harlow. Dr. Harlow, a young physician in Cavendish, noted that although the tamping iron appeared to have gone directly through Gage’s frontal lobes, Gage was still able to speak rationally and answer questions about the injury. Gage was treated by Harlow and returned home to Lebanon, New Hampshire 10 weeks later.

Unfortunately, Gage’s recovery was not a complete success. The once friendly and well-liked man became “fitful, irreverent, and grossly profane, showing little deference for his fellows.” He was also “impatient and obstinate, yet capricious and vacillating, unable to settle on any of the plans he devised for future action.” Those who knew him before the accident said he was “no longer Gage.”

A couple of years ago the above portrait of Gage turned up and his story was all over the news for awhile. It remains to be seen whether Eduardo Leite will have a better outcome than Gage did. The bar that went through Gage’s head damaged his frontal lobes–basically giving him a prefrontal lobotomy. The doctor who operated on Leite claims that “the bar entered a ‘non-eloquent’ area of the brain, an area that doesn’t have a specific, major known function.” I have a feeling we’re eventually going to learn from Leite’s post-operative experiences what that part of the brain does.

I’ll end with a sad but heartwarming story from The New York Times Vows column: Angela Sclafani and Michael Olexa. I’m not going to excerpt from it, because you really need to read the whole thing. Just be sure to have a box of Kleenex handy.

Now it’s your turn. What are you reading and blogging about today?


53 Comments on “Saturday Morning Lightweight Reads”

  1. ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

    Thanks for the Saturday morning “eye candy” bb. But the Rymney photo is a darn good photoshop picture – such “a fine bromance, my friend” that is.

    I am an arachnophobe, and heard the new spider story this AM. The photo I found on Scientific American was not as creepy as the one you posted. My dream of living in a cave is now dashed. Personally I wish a living dinosaur had been found instead. My childhood fascination with dinos has continued into my “golden years.”

    Interesting story on Alternet about the 10 Mind Blowing Discoveries This Week http://www.alternet.org/environment/10-mind-blowing-discoveries-week-0?page=0%2C0 JJ, I thought of you when I read #2. I know it works for me – watching Buffy seems to make everything alright for me. #7 about a new way of looking at & treating gun violence is really interesting. Needless to say, #9 was my personal favorite – Purrrfectly Mysterious.

    But the coolest thing of all is that something so common and domestic is still so largely mysterious. Maybe the Egyptians were right and the cats are gods, beyond the comprehension of puny humans. Ask any cat; they’ll purr in agreement.

    Hope everyone has a wonderful weekend. Watch reruns of your favorite tv shows while petting a cat. The best medicine for what ails us.

    • Beata's avatar Beata says:

      “Watch reruns of your favorite tv shows while petting a cat.”

      Great prescription, Dr. Connie. Will do.

    • HT's avatar HT says:

      Dear Dr Connie (ht Beata – I like it), I have three cats and one dog. I have a problem that all three cats and the wonderdog want attention at the same time. My lap is only so large, but I’m afraid that I shall not give each friend the attention he/she needs. What shall I do?

      end of silliness – but I used to know people who read Dear Abby and Ann Landers on a regular basis, and couldn’t resist the nostalgia. I think I shall sit back and watch a few Buffy episodes (I loved that show) and perhaps a few Golden Girls. Of course, I shall be imbibing herbal tea and when I get to Nathan Filion in Firefly, it’s wine all the way. Then I shall sleep – but not before cleaning the litter boxes, providing fresh water, putting food out the back behind the fence for the ferals, and walking the wonderdog.

      • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

        Your day sounds perfectly delightful. Captain Tightpants FOREVER!

      • Beata's avatar Beata says:

        My favorite TV reruns are the old “Perry Mason” shows. Also “The Dick Van Dyke Show”, “Get Smart”, and “Peter Gunn”.

        I suspect Raymond Burr was a cat person. How could someone have such soulful eyes and not love cats?

        • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

          Excellent choices. For older shows, I’d pick all of the Warner Brothers series, especially Maverick. Then later James Garner, The Rockford Files. Absolute favorite oldie but goodie, The Smothers Brothers Show. Guilty pleasures? The Monkees & Lost in Space.

      • HT's avatar HT says:

        Beata, Raymond Burr (a Canadian, cough cough) was an animal lover, so despite him portraying a driven defense lawyer (Mason) or a murderous wife killer (Rear window), he was an erudite, eclectic person. He was a world renowned orchid grower (there’s one named after him) and a vintner. His wine is too expensive for me to buy, but I did taste it once, it was sublime. His life long partner has continued to keep the vinery going, but I suspect that if he’s not passed already, it won’t be long. Raymond Burr was an amazing man.

  2. ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

    Some interesting stories on Treehugger.

    For Ralphb in Texas: Keystone XL construction begins, along with protests: http://www.treehugger.com/environmental-policy/construction-begins-keystone-xl-protesters-hit-back.html
    Romney spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, was a lobbyist before becoming a Rombot mouthpiece:
    http://www.treehugger.com/environmental-policy/romney-spokesperson-lobbied-undermine-climate-science-exxon.html

    A new Greenpeace briefing points out that while at DCI, Saul worked on some controversial campaigns; notably, lobbying on behalf of the authoritarian military regime in Myanmar and helping ExxonMobil wage a disinformation campaign about climate science in 2009.

    And sharks for jj – Endangered shark species: http://www.treehugger.com/ocean-conservation/10-amazing-endangered-shark-species-how-many-do-you-know.html
    And a complete roundup of shark stories & pictures in honor of Shark Week: http://www.treehugger.com/ocean-conservation/most-jawsome-photos-videos-news-more-shark-week.html This link should keep you busy for weeks, jj.

    And with this one, maybe there should be a Mosquito Week: http://www.treehugger.com/ocean-conservation/11-animals-more-likely-kill-you-than-sharks.html

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      A few weeks ago I was at a surf camp with a couple of my grandchildren in Stuart and a couple of manatees came swimming by, right through us. Everyone got a nice close look as they meandered through. It made for some nice moments.

      • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

        Actually I’m surprised no one screamed. Manatees are so much bigger than expected when one gets an up close & personal experience. It is exciting to see a wild animal, especially a large one, in their natural habitat.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Apparently, it’s not that unusual there now. My ex DIL told me there are more of them now than in the past and they are seen more often at the beach.

        • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

          I cannot conclusively say that a population increase is the reason, although the winter aerial survey counts in recent years have remained around 3000. Personally, I think warmer weather, therefore warmer water, which both manatees & seagrasses (their food of choice) prefer could be one factor. Then there is somewhat better & consistent enforcement of protection measures along with raised awareness. More people know what manatees look like now than ever before.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        At least where those were they were safe from boat props and all that nastiness. So that’s a good thing.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Long lost Picasso work discovered in storage at Evansville, Indiana museum.

    It had sat unnoticed in storage for almost half a century after being mistaken for a work by the little-known, and non-existent, artist Gemmaux.

    But a closer inspection of the glasswork at Indiana’s Evansville Museum revealed the telltale signs of a 20th century European master. The bold lines, the nod to an earlier cubist aesthetic, the simultaneous use of full face and profile – the clues were all there.

    As was the signature, scrawled quite clearly in the top right corner and missed for 49 years following a cataloguing error.

    The museum now has to sell it, because they can’t afford the security that would be needed if they displayed it.

    • Beata's avatar Beata says:

      That museum in Evansville is a treasure, with or without their Picasso!

      I have a particular fondness for their permanent exhibit devoted to Abraham Lincoln’s boyhood years in Southern Indiana. The exhibit includes a large cupboard made by Thomas Lincoln ( a master carpenter ) and a small cabinet crafted by young Abraham. Scroll down on this link to see photos of the Lincoln exhibit:

      http:/www.emuseum.org/permanent-galleries-0

  4. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    Call me a “purist” but I never understood the fascination with Picasso’s works. I’m one of those who prefer to see a painting more or less representative of what an artists perceives that can be translated without having to question if what I am looking at isn’t the work of a toddler let loose among the pots of paint.

    I took an art appreciation course at one time and still came away with the same interpretation that when Picasso was in his “blue period” it may have been that he couldn’t afford to replenish his oils.

    Which only goes to prove that I’m not among the art “elite” who see genius where I see lousy art.

    • Beata's avatar Beata says:

      Oy, Pat. I don’t know what to say to change your mind. A toddler can accidently produce something of beauty with “pots of paint”. A true artistic genius creates a lifetime of masterpieces. There is a difference.

      I guess if you simply don’t like modern art, then you will never appreciate Picasso.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        I think every great artist probably does paint what they are perceiving in a subject–what’s interesting is that we all have different perspectives on reality. I also think a painting, like a work of literature, is open to many interpretations. Of course tastes differ, and there are works of art out there for every taste.

    • HT's avatar HT says:

      Pat, I echo what Beata and BB have said. I have a print of Picasso’s on my bedroom wall. It’s from his “blue” period. It’s a nude woman, curled up with her back to the artist. It truly is magnificent. Not all of Picasso’s work was impressionistic.

  5. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    I love this piece! Hillary Clinton does not have time for your games.

    Now, at age 64, Clinton continues to get heat for being, gasp, a 64-year-old political leader instead of Megan Fox. In May, after she’d dared to allegedly appear without makeup (and by the way, she was obviously wearing lipstick and she was only busy promoting democracy in Bangladesh, but whatever), Fox News couldn’t wait to call her “tired and withdrawn” looking. And in June, author Ed Klein took to the airwaves to dismiss Clinton’s chances of running for the White House in 2016 by saying, “She’ll be 69 years old. And as you know — and I don’t want to sound anti-feminist here — but she’s not looking good these days. She’s looking overweight, and she’s looking very tired.” Because you can’t run a country if you’re not under 35 and skinny. Also, if you have a vagina.

    What’s righteous about Clinton is how thoroughly emancipated from all the BS she seems to be lately. Hillary is too busy laughing it up with Angela Merkel about their shared love of pantsuits to care what Matt Drudge has to say about her face. (One gets the sense that Angela Merkel isn’t exactly losing sleep over whether or not you want to bone her, either.) And there is something really, really fantastic about a first lady, United States senator, and secretary of state who has just had it with your stupid questions about what she’s wearing, world. Last spring, she told CNN, “I feel so relieved to be at the stage I’m at in my life right now. Because, you know, if I want to wear my glasses, I’m wearing my glasses. If I want to wear my hair back, I’m pulling my hair back. You know, at some point it’s just not something that deserves a lot of time and attention.”

    Priorities! Other than the size of her butt! What a radical idea. And it’s why, though she may or may not ever get to be president, Hillary Clinton totally rules.

    • Beata's avatar Beata says:

      How freeing to come to that point in one’s life! I’m still working on it. I do wear my glasses proudly ( always have ), my pantsuits ( never cared for dresses and skirts – too restrictive ), and my hair naturally silver ( no hair dye ).

      Hillary, keep showing us the way.

      • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

        Yes. Never wear anything you can’t run in.

        In some far distant time, it will be normal for women of all ages to dress for comfort.

    • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

      I do think that one nearly consistent benefit of growing older is the “who gives a f**k” attitude. To put it nicely, we are less critical and more accepting of what & who we are and if someone doesn’t like it – that is THEIR problem, not mine (ours). HRC is an incredible role model for both women & girls, in so many ways.

    • She keeps working and lets them talk…

      Go Hillary GO!

  6. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Somehow I don’t think this swift boating is going to work out quite like they expected.

    Clown Team Six

    OPSEC, the crew behind the video accusing President Obama of taking too much credit for killing Osama bin Laden, and of leaking intelligence while doing so, might be ex-SEALs, but they’re also hypocrites:

    Rustmann and two other key members of the group, all self-described Republicans, have a history of talking openly to the media about national security, a review of articles and transcripts shows.

    Rustmann appeared on Fox News’ “Hannity and Colmes” in 2005 to discuss Valerie Plame Wilson, a covert CIA operations officer who was outed in July 2003 by members of the George W. Bush administration. […]

    Scott Taylor, chairman of OPSEC, is a former Navy SEAL. An unsuccessful Republican candidate for Congress in Virginia in 2010, he sat down with NBC News last summer for a documentary titled “Secrets of Seal Team Six.” The film said the military had urged former SEALs not to talk.

    And OPSEC member Chad Kolton, a former spokesman for the director of National Intelligence during the George W. Bush administration, helped make the office “more accessible to reporters, including regular off-the-record briefings by senior analysts on global hot spots […]

  7. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    I love Hillary’s outlook on style and fashion. It’s a “who gives a sh#t, I’m doing my job” statement.

    Remember when she was in college and the pictures at that time showed a woman who wore glasses, needed her brows plucked, and she dressed wthout for comfort rather than whatever was in “style” at that time?

    Then she gets to DC and there was not a month that went by that someone wasn’t “fussing ” about her looks as they kept changing her hairstyle and color in order to “appeal” to the audience who judged her by her looks and not that fascinating brain.

    As for Fox News, unless they are young, dumb and blonde, brains don’t enter into the dialogue. As evidenced when they continually drag out Quiterella and her wigs for inane “analysis” that more or less sums up the brainpower of that network.

    • HT's avatar HT says:

      Amen, just amen. Although I’ve never plucked my eyebrows – always thought it was a barbaric practice, so just did not do it. Mind you, I’m not afflicted with Frida Gallo’s unibrow, however why does the media focus on such trivial things. Can someone explain it to me?

      • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

        Because women are inherently imperfect?

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Because real women are scary and so must be reduced to objects with no purpose except to please others.

      • HT's avatar HT says:

        Ecat – thank you however I suspect the reverse is true – men are inherently imperfect and are desparate to deflect attention away from them, therefore women as scapegoats.
        BB – should we real women align and coalesce, then men would indeed have something to fear. Men however have their female co-dependents under their thumb, and said females will never rebel against their masters. Worse still, they will wage war against their own interests and gender at their master’s biding. Given thus, I’m afraid that women are their own worst enemy.

  8. Personally the whew factor for me is brain power and well Bill Clinton wins there hands down, he did what they only talk about and dream about, he left office with a surplus. As to the Paul Ryan and P90X, well my ex-husband of two decades was doing that (photos, mirror etc) and it turned out some 40+ woman (who claimed to be a virgin) was giving him a hands on inspection. So, I hope we don’t find out some not so nice things about Ryan, as his family is young and with children.

    I don’t get the naked Romney / Ryan photo though…age I guess or maybe I just don’t get naked photo things.

    So, the Romney campaign theme now is: WE ARE GOING TO RUIN, TRASH AND EVENTUALLY MEDICARE FOR THOSE UNDER 55 YEARS. Yea, how many of us lost more than half our SEPS or IRAS in the stock market crashes? Do, we want to go gambling with it, and has either one of these two checked that it costs nearly $1,200 a month for coverage for those 55 (so, when they have to purchase health care with their worthless vouchers they will be SCREWED) and that is WHY SENIORS TODAY GO ON MEDICARE!

    These candidates just don’t get it, they simply don’t get the real realities of working people and that is why all of Congress should loose their coverage so they begin to get a taste of what it is like for those out hear, in the real world.

    • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

      Very interesting and, if true, wouldn’t be the first time he has misrepresented his residency. bb covered what happened during his run for governor. To run for governor in MA the candidate must have lived in MA for at least the 7 previous years. While fixing the SLC Olympics he claimed residency in UT. Once that was discovered he had to modify those previous years’ tax returns. Apparently he claimed UT as home to pay lower taxes. I wonder how the CA tax rate compares to the MA tax rate. And, personally, I certainly can’t believe that he and Ann lived in Tag’s basement for a year or more. That sounds like an SNL comedy sketch premise.

      • Beata's avatar Beata says:

        Mitt and Ann were in Tag’s basement, living on the edge, not entertaining, for over a year! How dare any of you people question that?

      • That would be very Arnold Swarzhenneger, doing things to avoid California taxes while living in the good weather, but not willing to pay the taxes. If someone knows they should say the truth and bring this to a close.

        I can’t imagine that Romney really believes people believe he lives in his son’s basement when his California home has elevators for his cars. I mean come on…tell the truth and pay the California taxes already!

      • Oh, Arnold ‘CHEATER’ Swarzhenneger went to another state to buy his jet to avoid California sales tax…but tried to say Davis wasn’t honest!

    • ‘Michigan State Bar’, Romney isn’t an attorney, this reporter didn’t check all his facts…

  9. Beata's avatar Beata says:

    BB, the story about Phineas Gage is fascinating. It will be interesting to see the long-term results of the similar operation on Eduardo Leite’s brain.

    I am reminded of my appointment with a top neurosurgeon who wanted to perform radical surgery on my brain tumor. He said he would be removing quite a bit of “useless gray matter” from my brain along with the tumor. Well, it may have been useless to him, but I am not so sure it is to me. I decided not to let him perform the surgery. 🙂

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      Unfortunately, sometimes terrible accidents like this are the ways we learn about brain functions. Even with all the new machines, exploration of the brain is still in its early days.

  10. Beata's avatar Beata says:

    I hope everyone will read the story about Angela Sclafani and Michael Olexa linked at the end of BB’s post. An absolutely beautiful testament to true love. And, yes, have that Kleenex handy.

  11. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Dean Baker: Washington Post Strikes Out in Attack on Joe Biden’s Courage on Social Security

    The Washington Post once again confounded its critics who insisted that it couldn’t get any worse. Yesterday the paper ran an editorial that criticized Vice President Joe Biden for his lack of courage when he committed the administration to a policy of not cutting Social Security. Biden repeatedly told an audience in Southern Virginia that he guaranteed there would be no cuts to Social Security in a second Obama administration.

    The paper then laid out its case for cuts to the program and outlined its plan:

    “Tweak the inflation calculator and moderately raise the income limit for applying the payroll tax, and you can shore up Social Security with no harm to the safety net.”

    Did you catch the cuts in that sentence? If not, that is what “tweak the inflation adjustment” means. It means reducing the size of the benefit by 0.3 percent annually. This cut accumulates over time to roughly 3 percent after 10 years, 6 percent after 20 years, and for those who collect benefits long enough, 9 percent after 30 years. Certainly many people might think that a 9 percent cut in benefits for 10 percent of retirees who rely solely on Social Security for their income, or the 30 percent of retirees who rely on it for more than 90 percent of their income, does some harm to the safety net.

    The great part of this story is that in an editorial condemning Biden’s lack of courage on Social Security, the Post used a euphemism for cuts that probably eluded most readers. After all, cutting benefits for retirees by 0.3 percent a year doesn’t sound very nice, tweaking the inflation adjustment is much friendlier.

    Only in the Washington Post.

    As digby says, just tweak the cat food a little and it’ll taste like fresh mahi-mahi.

  12. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    The NYT editorial board calls out Romney and Ryan for their lies on Medicare.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Good informative editorial. Wish I thought it would make a difference to Vulture/Voucher supporters or those still leaning that way.

  13. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Paul Krugman: Ryan: The First Decade

    So if we look at the actual policy proposals, they look like this:

    Spending cuts: $1.7 trillion
    Tax cuts: $4.3 trillion

    This is, then, a plan that would increase the deficit by around $2.6 trillion.

    How, then, does Ryan get to call himself a fiscal hawk? By asserting that he will keep his tax cuts revenue-neutral by broadening the base in ways he refuses to specify, and that he will make further large cuts in spending, in ways he refuses to specify.

    And this is what passes inside the Beltway for serious thinking and a serious commitment to deficit reduction.

    Krugman’s hair is probably smoking a bit about now.

    • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

      Ryan does like to hunker down with the hawks, and likes come in the back door, and cut the benefits for working class and poor of this country. All those numbers he throws out, will not help in reducing the deficits………………….

      One more thing, one word for his B O D Y………………Lanky, or as my mother use to say, one long drink of water.