When the Music’s over … Turn out the Lights
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: Republican politics 15 CommentsNotice the link sources and you’ll get the drift of the title.
“The GOP’s Payroll Tax Fiasco: How did Republicans manage to lose the tax issue to Obama? ”
Rove: Republicans should fold in payroll tax cut standoff : Interview with Karl Rove at Fox News
and my final offering:
Boehner’s office cuts off C-SPAN cameras as GOP takes verbal beating
Any one heard of a speaker doing that before?
A strange thing happened Wednesday morning on Capitol Hill.
As Rep. Stenny Hoyer (D-MD) attempted to call for a vote to extend a payroll tax cut to middle class and working Americans, his Republican colleagues adjourned the House and walked out of the chamber. And if that weren’t odd enough, it got even stranger: As Hoyer railed against them for failing to help working Americans, footage from C-SPAN went silent, then cut away.
Moments later, C-SPAN took to the Internet to explain that it wasn’t their doing, but someone working for House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH).
The incident occurred mere moments after the House went into session. Hoyer made a motion for a vote on the Senate’s payroll tax cut extension, which would extend the lower rates for another two months, but the Republican presiding over the House did not acknowledge the motion. He instead adjourned the House, then got up and walked out.
“As you walk off the floor, Mr. Speaker, you’re walking away, just as so many Republicans have walked away from taxpayers, the unemployed, and very frankly, as well, from those who will be seeking medical assistance from their doctors, 48 million senior citizens,” Hoyer can be heard saying.
“We regret, Mr. Speaker, that you have walked off the platform without addressing the issue of critical importance to this country, and that is the continuation of the middle class tax cut, the continuation of unemployment benefits for those at risk of losing them, and a continuation of the access to doctors for all those 48 million seniors who rely on them daily for help.”
And that’s when the audio cut out. Seconds later, footage faded to a shot of the capitol from outside.
Moments later, someone at C-SPAN took to Twitter and explained: “C-SPAN has no control over the U.S. House TV cameras – the Speaker of the House does.”
It’s for reasons just like this, one might infer, that Boehner told C-SPAN back in February it would not be allowed control its own cameras.
Some times you just have to let an event just politics flow all over you. (Apologies to the script writers of the Big Chill.)
The Politics of Extreme
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign 22 Comments
I pulled this graphic from its original source at Rand. It came via Wonkblog at WaPo that shows an entire set of nifty graphs chosen by economic “experts” as their favorite charts of the year 2011. This was the graphic chosen by former Obama budget guru Peter Orzag who now works for Citigroup. Here’s his explanation.
“If you want to understand the debt limit debate this year and the ongoing gridlock we are likely to experience for years, study this graph. In the late 1960s, the most conservative Democrats in the House and the most liberal Republicans voted together frequently enough (as shown by the overlap between the two distributions) to make centrist legislating successful. By the late 1980s, that overlap was dwindling. Today, it is largely gone.”
You can actually read the Rand study that begins by discussing the first of the US polarization debates: Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists. If you check out the graphics on voter demographics, you’ll see there’s still a split in party identification. However, there seems to be an increasing tilt towards identification with the Democratic Party from about 1980 onward. Still, you wouldn’t know it by the way congress gridlocks over the most simple business of the people.
There are several news items that have me thinking today about this in some detail. First, is the seemingly endless policy hostage-taking coming out of the House of Representatives these days. Second, is this ad made by Romney as he tries to sell out the last vestige of common sense and education he ever demonstrated in search of the credibility that no right winger will ever give him. Romney’s disingenuous spiel about the fairness frame is beyond any explanation other than crass politics. It continues to play into the Obama is a socialist meme. You think it would get old hack for Republicans to exclaim socialist at every human attempt to actually level the playing field and remove the gross incentives these days to maintain the wealth and incomes of the very few.
Just a couple of weeks ago in Kansas, President Obama lectured us about Teddy Roosevelt’s philosophy of government. But he failed to mention the important difference between Teddy Roosevelt and Barack Obama. Roosevelt believed that government should level the playing field to create equal opportunities. President Obama believes that government should create equal outcomes.
In an entitlement society, everyone receives the same or similar rewards, regardless of education, effort, and willingness to take risk. That which is earned by some is redistributed to the others. And the only people who truly enjoy any real rewards are those who do the redistributing—the government.
The truth is that everyone may get the same rewards, but virtually everyone will be worse off.
This last statement is a baldface lie. The great income inequality that exists is bad for the entire country and that includes the very rich. However, no amount of historical analysis of economies and finance seems to ever throttle the hysteria surrounding protecting the very wealthy these days. Romney seems hell bent on attacking Obama on his Republican perceived “otherness” rather than the actual policies. It’s just nasty code for secret Muslim Kenyan. This is undoubtedly because Obamacare really is Romneycare is DoleCare and most other things Obama has done are seriously no different than any Republican of Romney’s type–or for that matter of the earlier Gingrich incarnations–would’ve done. Like a magician pulling some kind of slight of hand, Romney and Gingrich both need diversions from their past.
When you look at all the Big Lies Romney has told in recent months, you’ll see a common thread running through them all. They’re all about conveying a sense that you should find Obama’s intentions towards America vaguely suspect; that Obama harbors a deep seated indifference or even hostility towards the fundamentals that make America what it is; and that Obama is in some basic way undermining the foundation of American life as we know it.
Obama has been so good at maintaining the status quo that most liberals have turned on him including Matt Damon who says Obama “rolled over” to Wall Street.
So this leads me to the third thing that has me thinking about the current plight of governance in the US. Robert Reich has written a shrill piece on “Why the Republican Crack up is bad for America”. I’ve frequently accused Haley Barbour, Ron Paul and Rick Perry of being neoconfederates much to the chagrin of libertarians I know. It really confuses me that a libertarian could support incredible intrusions into personal liberties and constitutional rights under the guise of state rights. To me, these neoconfederates use this excuse in the same way that slave owners used it to maintain the right to own black people. They use it to control who votes, what women do with their bodies, when stores can sell alcohol, who can get married in civil ceremonies, and all kinds of things. These are the very people that Romney and Gingrich are morphing, shucking, and dancing for.
Reich’s commentary on the recent power surge of the right wing’s John Birch Society/Neoconfederate wing in the Republican party is scathing. The only problem that I can see is that Reich believes these folks artifacts from the Southern part of the US. All you have to do is listen to some of the stuff coming out of Republicans in Iowa to know that this mentality isn’t limited to the deep South or places where confederates migrated. These folks have been with us a long time. The Nixonian Southern Strategy captured them from the Dixiecrats although there are still a few of them floating around both parties.
As Michael Lind has noted, today’s Tea Party is less an ideological movement than the latest incarnation of an angry white minority — predominantly Southern, and mainly rural — that has repeatedly attacked American democracy in order to get its way.
It’s no mere coincidence that the states responsible for putting the most Tea Party representatives in the House are all former members of the Confederacy. Of the Tea Party caucus, twelve hail from Texas, seven from Florida, five from Louisiana, and five from Georgia, and three each from South Carolina, Tennessee, and border-state Missouri.
Others are from border states with significant Southern populations and Southern ties. The four Californians in the caucus are from the inland part of the state or Orange County, whose political culture has was shaped by Oklahomans and Southerners who migrated there during the Great Depression.
This isn’t to say all Tea Partiers are white, Southern or rural Republicans — only that these characteristics define the epicenter of Tea Party Land.
And the views separating these Republicans from Republicans elsewhere mirror the split between self-described Tea Partiers and other Republicans.
In a poll of Republicans conducted for CNN last September, nearly six in ten who identified themselves with the Tea Party say global warming isn’t a proven fact; most other Republicans say it is.
Six in ten Tea Partiers say evolution is wrong; other Republicans are split on the issue. Tea Party Republicans are twice as likely as other Republicans to say abortion should be illegal in all circumstances, and half as likely to support gay marriage.
Tea Partiers are more vehement advocates of states’ rights than other Republicans. Six in ten Tea Partiers want to abolish the Department of Education; only one in five other Republicans do. And Tea Party Republicans worry more about the federal deficit than jobs, while other Republicans say reducing unemployment is more important than reducing the deficit.
In other words, the radical right wing of today’s GOP isn’t that much different from the social conservatives who began asserting themselves in the Party during the 1990s, and, before them, the “Willie Horton” conservatives of the 1980s, and, before them, Richard Nixon’s “silent majority.”
Through most of these years, though, the GOP managed to contain these white, mainly rural and mostly Southern, radicals. After all, many of them were still Democrats. The conservative mantle of the GOP remained in the West and Midwest — with the libertarian legacies of Ohio Senator Robert A. Taft and Barry Goldwater, neither of whom was a barn-burner — while the epicenter of the Party remained in New York and the East.
But after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as the South began its long shift toward the Republican Party and New York and the East became ever more solidly Democratic, it was only a matter of time. The GOP’s dominant coalition of big business, Wall Street, and Midwest and Western libertarians was losing its grip.
So, this is the group that has Romney and Gingrich forgetting their earliest roots. It’s also why Romney is so busy playing up the Obama as “other” meme and Gingrich is shouting about arresting judges that disagree with him. The judiciary has consistently stopped the overreach of the neoconfederates in blocking the ability to vote, restricting women’s rights, segregating schools, and forcing fundamentalist christianity into public life. Gingrich clearly knows who and what he’s playing to. We definitely see their dynamic in Congress where there is that incredibly shrinking ability to produce policy that represents any kind of bipartisan overlap as show in the Rand chart above.
Clearly, all recent polls show utter frustration on the part of the majority of Americans–Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike–with these games. Those of us that live in states that are now captured by these forces–up until the Katrina disaster Louisiana was a swing state–are experiencing a backslide towards the 19th century. The deal is that gerrymandering has made many politicians safe. Caucuses and limited primary voting continues to reinforce the patterns of polarization. Campaigns that rely on the funds of select few donor bases exacerbates all of the above.
I continue to wonder if some third party will develop that can manage to capture the frustrated moderate voter. Until then, we may have to watch the polarization problem play out. Reich thinks that the main vulnerability is within the Republican party, but I’m not so sure. I think that polls show a major amount of dissatisfaction with what’s being produced by today’s political environment. That includes both establishment parties. It’s only a matter of finding the correct vehicles for change and reform. My personal thoughts are that the Tea Party permanents will be hung out to dry in 2012 in many places outside of the South. I still have no idea where the rest of voter frustration will go. There appears to be no beneficiary at this point. I wonder how long this can continue without some of these cracks in the system becoming unrepairable.
Greed is Good Redux
Posted: December 20, 2011 Filed under: #Occupy and We are the 99 percent!, The Bonus Class | Tags: Banksters, one perecent 17 CommentsThe real life Gordon Gekko set went to an investor’s conference in Gotham City to defend wealth this month. I dare you to find much difference between some of the quotes I read in this Bloomberg article and the Greed is Good speech. Remember most of these are guys are bankers. These aren’t guys that make cars, produce wheat, or build houses. These are functionaries of overhead and gambling. They still don’t seem to get that people don’t hate rich people that come by their money without manipulation of laws, favorable tax treatment, and government subsidies and bailouts. It’s people that get wealthy by gaming the system, raiding the US treasury, and extracting huge salaries for running failed casino operations that are the targets of anger these days. I guess all that money doesn’t guarantee you’ll actually be able to use your brain or your common sense to solve a problem.
Here’s a pretty good example of some whining that deserves no sympathy.
The organization assisted John A. Allison IV, a director of BB&T Corp. (BBT), the ninth-largest U.S. bank, and Staples Inc. co- founder Thomas Stemberg with media appearances this month.
“It still feels lonely, but the chorus is definitely increased,” Allison, 63, a former CEO of the Winston-Salem, North Carolina-based bank and now a professor at Wake Forest University’s business school, said in an interview.
At a lunch in New York, Stemberg and Allison shared their disdain for Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires public companies to disclose the ratio between the compensation of their CEOs and employee medians, according to Allison. The rule, still being fine-tuned by the Securities and Exchange Commission, is “incredibly wasteful” because it takes up time and resources, he said. Stemberg called the rule “insane” in an e-mail to Bloomberg News.
“Instead of an attack on the 1 percent, let’s call it an attack on the very productive,” Allison said. “This attack is destructive.”
Oh, wait. There’s more.
Asked if he were willing to pay more taxes in a Nov. 30 interview with Bloomberg Television, Blackstone Group LP (BX) CEO Stephen Schwarzman spoke about lower-income U.S. families who pay no income tax.
“You have to have skin in the game,” said Schwarzman, 64. “I’m not saying how much people should do. But we should all be part of the system.”
Some of Schwarzman’s capital gains at Blackstone, the world’s largest private-equity firm, are taxed at 15 percent, not the 35 percent top marginal income-tax rate. Attacking the banking system is a mistake because it contributes to “a healthier economy,” he said in the interview.
Paulson, the New York hedge-fund manager who became a billionaire by betting against the U.S. housing market, has also said the rich benefit society.
“The top 1 percent of New Yorkers pay over 40 percent of all income taxes,” Paulson & Co. said in an e-mailed statement on Oct. 11, the day Occupy Wall Street protesters left a mock tax-refund check at its president’s Upper East Side townhouse.
I’ll quote just one more and then you can read the others on your own.
Tom Golisano, billionaire founder of payroll processer Paychex Inc. (PAYX) and a former New York gubernatorial candidate, said in an interview this month that while there are examples of excess, it’s “ridiculous” to blame everyone who is rich.
“If I hear a politician use the term ‘paying your fair share’ one more time, I’m going to vomit,” said Golisano, who turned 70 last month, celebrating the birthday with girlfriend Monica Seles, the former tennis star who won nine Grand Slam singles titles.
There’s an entire rogue’s list of the persecuted 1 percent there along with some eye popping quotes. I can’t decide if I should close with a reference to the Julio-Claudian period in Rome or the Bourbon monarchy in France. Do these guys really think their contributions to civilization are all that? Since when did destroying the savings and home values of most of the country become something to brag about?
Pitchforks or Guillotines?
Tuesday Reads
Posted: December 20, 2011 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, morning reads, Republican politics, Republican presidential politics, U.S. Economy, U.S. Military, U.S. Politics, unemployment | Tags: Christmas, Eric Cantor, holiday season, homeless children, House Republicans, intelligence failure, Jeb Bush, Jessica Lynch, John Boehner, Kim Jon Il, Newt Gingrich, North Korea, payroll tax holiday, Ron Paul, Scrooge, unemployment insurance, winter storm. blizzard 31 CommentsGood Morning!!
Frankly, I’ll be very glad when this holiday season is over. It goes on way too long. This year I saw Christmas stuff at Halloween! At least I don’t get depressed at this time of year anymore, and I’m very happy for people who enjoy the celebration. I’ll probably have a nice time at Christmas dinner, but why do we need a two month build-up? Please forgive my grumbling…. I’ll get to the news, such as it is.
MSNBC’s First Read reports that Boehner and his merry men in the House “punted” on the payroll tax cut bill last night; supposedly they’ll vote on it today.
House Republican leaders emerged following a meeting with rank-and-file members to say that the House would take up their votes on Tuesday. Lawmakers had planned to vote around 6:30 p.m. ET on Monday evening, but the 6 p.m. meeting of GOP lawmakers lasted longer than expected, over two hours.
Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) said that the House Rules Committee, which sets the parameters for votes in the House, would meet tonight to set the stage for tomorrow’s series of votes. Those Tuesday votes would include a measure to reject the Senate’s two month extension, and instead instruct lawmakers to meet in a conference — the formal process of resolving differences with legislation in the Senate.
“Our members do not want to just punt and do a two-month, short-term fix where we have to come back and do this again,” House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) told reporters at the Capitol.
House Republicans prefer legislation to extend the expiring tax cut by a whole year, and produced legislation to that effect. But Democrats in the Senate rejected that proposal because of some of the cuts used to offset the cost of the bill, which also includes an extension of unemployment insurance.
Meanwhile, Jake Tapper is reporting that the two month extension passed by the Senate and backed by President Obama cannot be implemented in it’s current form.
Officials from the policy-neutral National Payroll Reporting Consortium, Inc. have expressed concern to members of Congress that the two-month payroll tax holiday passed by the Senate and supported by President Obama cannot be implemented properly.
Pete Isberg, president of the NPRC today wrote to the key leaders of the relevant committees of the House and Senate, telling them that “insufficient lead time” to implement the complicated change mandated by the legislation means the two-month payroll tax holiday “could create substantial problems, confusion and costs affecting a significant percentage of U.S. employers and employees.”
ABC News obtained a copy of the letter, which can be read HERE. Isberg agreed that it would be fair to characterize his letter as saying that the two-month payroll tax holiday cannot be implemented properly.
Why on earth can’t those morons on Capital Hill just extend the unemployment insurance for Pete’s sake? The Congressional Republicans make Scrooge look like a piker when it comes to mean-spiritedness. Aren’t most of them supposed to be “Christians?” Good grief!
Please, can’t someone force Boehner and Cantor to visit some homeless shelters and perhaps some parks and street corners in Washington D.C., where no doubt some of the 1.6 million homeless children in the U.S. reside? One out of every 45 kids in this country were homeless last year! And these evil bastards are trying to make this horrendous situation worse!
A huge winter storm was pounding the Southwest and the lower Great Plains States last night.
Interstates and highways were shut down Monday night as a large winter weather system brought heavy snow, fierce winds and ice to at least five states in the West and Midwest.
There were blizzard conditions in parts of western Kansas and southeast Colorado, with visibility of less than a quarter-mile, said Ariel Cohen, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service’s Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Oklahoma.
A blizzard warning was in effect for those areas along with northeastern New Mexico, the northwest Texas panhandle and the Oklahoma panhandle, he said. The severe weather was starting to affect Missouri late Monday, with a winter weather advisory in effect for the northwest corner of the state.
Roads were closed in Texas and New Mexico because of blizzard conditions. Wow, some of those people rarely see snow. If you live in the storm area, please stay inside and don’t drive!
The New York Times calls handling of Kim Jong Il’s death “an extensive intelligence failure.”
Kim Jong-il, the enigmatic North Korean leader, died on a train at 8:30 a.m. Saturday in his country. Forty-eight hours later, officials in South Korea still did not know anything about it — to say nothing of Washington, where the State Department acknowledged “press reporting” of Mr. Kim’s death well after North Korean state media had already announced it.
For South Korean and American intelligence services to have failed to pick up any clues to this momentous development — panicked phone calls between government officials, say, or soldiers massing around Mr. Kim’s train — attests to the secretive nature of North Korea, a country not only at odds with most of the world but also sealed off from it in a way that defies spies or satellites.
Asian and American intelligence services have failed before to pick up significant developments in North Korea. Pyongyang built a sprawling plant to enrich uranium that went undetected for about a year and a half until North Korean officials showed it off in late 2010 to an American nuclear scientist. The North also helped build a complete nuclear reactor in Syria without tipping off Western intelligence.
As the United States and its allies confront a perilous leadership transition in North Korea — a failed state with nuclear weapons — the closed nature of the country will greatly complicate their calculations. With little information about Mr. Kim’s son and successor, Kim Jong-un, and even less insight into the palace intrigue in Pyongyang, the North’s capital, much of their response will necessarily be guesswork.
Not good. Maybe the CIA and NSA should concentrate on actual intelligence gathering rather than bugging Americans phone calls and reading their e-mails and tweets and Facebook postings.
Did you notice that Jeb Bush had an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal yesterday? With Gingrich tanking and Ron Paul rising in Iowa, are the Republicans getting ready to push another Bush for president? Charlie Pierce of Esquire thinks it looks that way:
He was supposed to be the savvy one, the presidential one, not that dolt of a brother who ducked his National Guard duty, ran several businesses into the dust of west Texas, got drunk and challenged the Auld Fella to a fistfight, and kept driving his car into the bushes. But the dolt got Daddy’s money and Daddy’s lawyers behind him and got installed as president, where he did his utmost to lodge the family brand somewhere between those enjoyed by Corvair and leprosy. Meanwhile, the golden child got to be governor of Florida for a while longer.
And now, in the widening gyre, slouching toward Manchester to be born, our moment of… Jeb (!)
Make no mistake. You don’t write an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal at this point in the Republican primary process unless somebody, somewhere wants to make people think you’re an legitimate option. You certainly don’t write one as stuffed full of free-market banana-oil as this one unless somebody, somewhere wants to raise enough money to make the world think you’re a legitimate option. There was enough Jeb (!) buzz over the weekend that it’s becoming plain that some very important someone’s have looked over the current Republican field and decided that, by god, it’s just bad enough that there’s room in there to bring back the most discredited surname in American politics. The slogan writes itself:
“Jeb! This time, let’s try the smart one.”
I don’t know. I don’t think any of the Bushes are all that bright. They’re way too inbred. Maybe another Bush presidency is what the Mayans predicted as the world-ending event?
I’ll end with an upbeat story. Remember Jessica Lynch? She just graduated from college.
I don’t really like to talk about what it took to get here. I don’t want anyone to feel sorry for me, or to think I don’t know how fortunate I am. Everyone else in my vehicle in Iraq was killed. My best friend, Lori Piestewa, died as a prisoner of war. I’m still here.
I’m also incredibly proud of this moment. I always dreamed of becoming a teacher, ever since my own kindergarten teacher took me under her wing when I was frightened on the first day of school. We are still in touch today. That’s the kind of teacher I want to be.
In the eight years since my captivity, I’ve had 21 surgeries. I have metal parts in my spine, a rod in my right arm, and metal in my left femur and fibula. My right foot is held together by screws, plates, rods, and pins. I have no feeling in my left leg from the knee down, and I wear a brace every day. Sometimes I’ll get a flash of pain, or feel upset because I can’t run, and then I’ll remind myself: I’m alive. I’m here. Take some ibuprofen.
Go read the whole thing. It’s not very long, and it’s a nice, inspirational story.
Now what are you reading and blogging about today?







Recent Comments