Live Blog: Breitbart hijacks a Weiner Presser
Posted: June 6, 2011 Filed under: just because 133 Comments
There’s basically a media circus unfolding on TV right now. Congressman Weiner was supposed to hold an event this afternoon and Big Media Blowhard Andrew Breitbart showed up at the podium to defend himself against charges of hacking Weiner’s twitter stream.
It looks like Weiner is waiting in the wings. Breitbart has just left the podium. Many news outlets are now covering it live but not broadcasting the sound.
What a zoo!!!
Notable Tweets:
TheFix The Fix
Holy. Crap. Andrew Breitbart has hijacked the Weiner press conference. This. Is. Amazing.
AmandaMarcotte Amanda Marcotte
Shorter Breitbart: If 5% of what you say is kind of sort of like the truth, then no one can call you a liar again.
cspan CSPAN
WATCH: @RepWeiner Press Conference – LIVE shortly on C-SPAN3 http://cs.pn/C3LIVE
joshtpm Josh Marshall
make that the Breitbart press
Slate Slate
He’s hijacked Weiner’s presser. RT @thefix: CNN is live-streaming the Breitbart presser. You must watch this. http://ow.ly/5bp1W
Thedailybeast The Daily Beast
WATCH: Congressman Anthony Weiner to address his latest Twitter scandal (now hijacked by @andrewbreitbart?!) http://thebea.st/ixpvRL
politico POLITICO
RT @maghabepolitico Tweeps, this is a real Anthony Weiner presser. We were not punked into covering Breitbart http://politi.co/9Ax31v
HuffPostMedia HuffPost Media
by HuffingtonPost
Andrew Breitbart hijacks Anthony Weiner’s press conference, says the press asked him to do so http://huff.to/lMxMVx
MotherJones Mother Jones
Breitbart on Fox News Channel on a radio show explaining why he hijacked a press conference #SUPERmeta
Links:
Rep. Anthony Weiner: ‘The Picture Was of Me and I Sent It’
Monday Reads
Posted: June 6, 2011 Filed under: Economy, Foreign Affairs, morning reads, Yemen | Tags: jobs, John Edwards, the economy, Yemen 32 Comments
Good Morning!
The top stories on every one’s mind these days are the lousy jobs report last week and the tumbling stock markets. Democrats in the House are calling for new infrastructure spending as a way to create more jobs in the hopes that a few federal projects could provide some stimulus to the stalling recovery.
“The American people, while concerned about the deficit, place much more emphasis on job creation, and they see a role for the government,” Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) told The Hill. “A fast injection of job stimulus on the public side would help tremendously. … It [the job report] helps our argument about investment.”
Other Democrats delivered a similar message on Friday. Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) said “the answer” to the lingering jobs crisis is “investment” in the “communities and businesses who need confidence and resources to hire [people].”
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) said “investing in our communities goes hand in hand with full economic recovery.”
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) said that only in Washington is targeted new spending being demonized.
“Once you get outside the Beltway, almost everyone agrees that we should be rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure and investing in clean American energy that reduces our dependence on oil,” Blumenauer said.
Meanwhile, the major reason for home foreclosures these days isn’t the subprime loan scandal. It’s unemployment.
The Obama administration’s main program to keep distressed homeowners from falling into foreclosure has been aimed at those who took out subprime loans or other risky mortgages during the heady days of the housing boom. But these days, the primary cause of foreclosures is unemployment.
As a result, there is a mismatch between the homeowner program’s design and the country’s economic realities — and a new round of finger-pointing about how best to fix it.
The administration’s housing effort does include programs to help unemployed homeowners, but they have been plagued by delays, dubious benefits and abysmal participation. For example, a Treasury Department effort started in early 2010 allows the jobless to postpone mortgage payments for three months, but the average length of unemployment is now nine months. As of March 31, there were only 7,397 participants.
“So far, I think the public record will show that programs to help unemployed homeowners have not been very successful,” said Jeffrey C. Fuhrer, an executive vice president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
One additional question is popping up now that it appears more than certain that some entitlements will be subject to cuts, That is why aren’t Democrats defending Medicaid? Democrats have spoken out against cuts to Social Security and have defended Medicare. What about Medicaid?
…for all the Democrats’ posturing and campaigning against Republican plans for Medicare, the GOP budget actually makes more immediate and deeper cuts to Medicaid. But Democrats haven’t been blasting the GOP Medicaid plan with nearly the same fervor, even though Republicans would cut about $750 billion from the program during the next decade and end the guaranteed federal match for states.
With intense budget negotiations on the debt limit under way, health care insiders think Democrats won’t budge much on Medicare now that they have a significant campaign chip in their pockets: Kathy Hochul’s upset win in New York’s 26th Congressional District is Exhibit A of the power of Medicare.
And that makes advocates worry that Medicaid cuts are more likely to come out of budget negotiations led by Vice President Biden.
Medicaid covers more than 50 million people, including low-income children and seniors in long-term care, but it doesn’t pack the same political punch as Medicare. Some observers say that’s due to the lingering perception that Medicaid is just a program for poor people that holds a much less broad-based appeal.
That perception is definitely part of the challenge in communicating Democratic opposition to the GOP’s Medicaid plans, Rep. Robert Andrews (D-N.J.) told POLITICO.
Medicaid “doesn’t quite have the same political dynamic” as Medicare, Andrews said.
Protestors in Wisconsin have opened a ‘Walkerville’ Tent city in Madison as a reminder of the Great Depression and to protest the governor’s budget. Wisconsin is leading the way in protesting the way state budgets are being balanced on the backs of the poor and the working and middle classes.
In a move meant to evoke the infamous “Hooverville” tent cities of the Great Depression, protesters in Madison, Wisconsin opened “Walkerville” on Saturday evening, a tent city in the heart of Madison intended as a protest of Governor Scott Walker’s budget plan.
The Wisconsin Sentinel Journal calls the protest “the latest act in the 2011 political drama featuring the governor’s push to eliminate most collective bargaining rights for most public employees”.
By 9:00pm, an estimated 250 campers in up to 100 tents were arrayed throughout the designated protest area, with many campers pitching their tents on concrete sidewalks. City police, state troopers, and other law enforcement personnel were on hand, but on the whole a carnival air prevailed as families set up for the night, some intending to stay just for a night or two and others through June 20.
Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh is in Saudia Arabia recovering from injuries suffered in an attack on his palace last week. Many people are encouraging him to stay there.
The United States and Britain are pressing Saudi Arabia to persuade the Yemeni president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, to formally stand down after flying to Riyadh for treatment for injuries that were sustained in shelling in Sana’a on Friday.
Diplomats said that Washington and London were insisting that Saleh now be urged to implement a deal under which he would relinquish power in exchange for immunity from prosecution and financial guarantees about his future.
Pro-democracy protestors in Yemen were celebrating his departure after 33 years in power, but the Arab world’s poorest country still faces turmoil as well as immediate concerns over whether a truce will hold if Saleh tries to return and his relatives and supporters fight back.
The risks ahead were underlined by clashes in the southern city of Taiz, which left at least two dead and four injured. Shelling was also reported in Sana’a.
Saleh was described as recovering following emergency medical treatment in a Riyadh military; he was injured by shrapnel when his palace compound was attacked by tribal rivals.
Yemen’s ruling party, the General People’s Congress, insisted he would be back, but diplomats and analysts expressed doubt, suggesting that Saudi patience with an always fractious and often manipulative neighbour was exhausted.
It would be impossible for Saleh to return, argued Abdul Ghani Iryani, a respected Yemeni political commentator. “He is out. That is the only rational course. The exit of the president has defused some of the tensions and war is less likely today than it was yesterday.”
Evidently John Edwards is going to trial because the Feds offered him a plea deal that included prison time.
Just before John Edwards was indicted Friday, prosecutors made a final offer: They would accept his guilty plea to three misdemeanor campaign finance law violations in the $925,000 cover-up of his affair.
With the deal, the former Democratic vice-presidential nominee would avoid a felony conviction – and almost certainly keep the law license that had made him wealthy.
But there was a catch.
The government wanted to dictate a sentence that would result in up to six months of prison for Edwards, even with the plea to lesser charges.
Edwards and his lawyers were concerned. They wanted the ability to at least argue to a judge for alternatives, such as a halfway house, weekend releases, home arrest or some arrangement that would allow Edwards to be with his school-age children. He is a single parent after the death of his wife, Elizabeth, in December.
Yeah, right. My guess is he doesn’t want to be some one’s mistress.
So, that’s what I’ve dug up today. What’s on your reading and blogging list?
Late Late Night: Dumbasses of the Week (V.S. Naipaul and Kenneth Del Vecchio)
Posted: June 6, 2011 Filed under: just because 14 Comments
This past week, the Nobel laureate V.S. Naipaul was interviewed at the Royal Geographic Society in London about his phenomenal career, which spans six decades. It should have been a glorious moment. Instead, Sir Vidia told an interviewer that no woman could ever be his literary match. Then he singled out Jane Austen and said that he couldn’t possibly “share her sentimental ambitions, her sentimental sense of the world.”
Naipaul also called a book by his former female publisher, “feminine tosh.” And that, he said, is because a woman has a “narrow view of the world, since she is inevitably not a complete master of the house.” This from a man the New York Review of Books called “the greatest living master of English prose.”
His comments somehow reminded me of this guy and this scene:
The real dumbass above went after women authors and the fictional dumbass went after women characters and women readers, but the criticism pretty much seems to boil down to stereotyping all female writers, characters, and readers as irrational, overly emotional, unworldly chick lit lightweights.
On the other hand, Jack Nicholson was playing a misanthropic novelist whose life had been debilitated by obsessive compulsive disorder, whereas V.S. Naipaul is a Nobel laureate who once said of his mistress: “I was very violent with her for two days. I was very violent with her for two days with my hand. My hand began to hurt.”
His poor, poor hand. So burdened doing all those enriching “master of the house” things.
This is the guy who can’t think of any girl writer who is his literary equal? Or…gasp…a girl writer that is better than him?
I’m sorry we can’t all write from the experience of having physically assaulted someone for two days. Our poor little wimmen pea brains and our narrow little existences.
Here’s what I think.
Naipaul needs to go sit in a fetal position and put on some Depends if need be and read Zadie Smith.
As a matter of fact, I just did a cursory search on whether he has and found this from an interview in 2008:
The conversation turns briefly to Zadie Smith. Naipaul has not read White Teeth, but sympathises with the author’s predicament: ‘The problem for someone like that is: where do you go, how do you move? If you’ve consumed your material in your first book, what do you do?’ He shakes his head. ‘All those stages are full of anguish.’
Why hadn’t Naipaul read White Teeth by 2008? That’s pretty ridiculous. It was published in 2000 and was highly acclaimed. I think this is a case of a big ego masking insecurities.
Be sure to check out Diana Abu-Jaber’s open letter to this dumbass — From One Writer To Another: Shut Up, V.S. Naipaul (h/t Ramsgate, over in the comments at my Sat. crosspost at TM’s.) Teaser:
Your use of the word “master,” is chilling. My father’s family is from a part of the world that has been colonized and conquered many times over. For many Jordanians, education and literacy has come in the form of British schools and the English language: but can anyone claim that the colonized subject is the master of his or her own home?
Cujo359, another regular over at TM’s, had this to say about Naipaul:
I’ve never heard of that guy, but I’ve heard of Jane Austen. Just sayin’.
The Atlantic’s Ta-Nehisi Coates urges us–quelle surprise-to not deprive ourselves the genius of Naipaul because of Naipaul’s misogynist (and racist) blinders:
The fact of the thing is this: We don’t get to choose our teachers. If you’re going to be an artist, or a thinker, or even a full person, you better be able to make yourself into something more than the shadow of someone else’s bankrupt philosophies. You better be more than an obvious and predictable reaction.
To which I say, hey Coates, where was this attitude when you went off on Cornel West? Where was the PSA saying “Just ignore Cornel West’s comments about Obama as a black man and learn from what he is saying about Obama being a corporate tool. You don’t get to choose your teachers…” ? Just wondering.
Switching gears…
Here’s another creepy dumbass (h/t Dakinikat) — NJ GOPer Premieres Anti-Abortion Suspense Flick This Weekend:
Kenneth Del Vecchio, a Republican candidate for New Jersey state Senate and a producer of conservative-themed films, is premiering a psychological thriller this weekend with a pro-life twist: Three pregnant women, who intend to have abortions, are kidnapped and forced to carry their pregnancies to term.
The movie, called “The Life Zone,” was produced by Del Vecchio’s “Justice For All Productions,” and is premiering Saturday at the Hoboken Film Festival in Teaneck, N.J. A press release describes the festival as “one of the nation’s largest film festivals, which Del Vecchio founded and chairs.”
The controversial premise of THE LIFE ZONE: three women have been kidnapped from abortion clinics and are being held for seven months–until they all give birth. The film, which appears to cut right down the middle, examining the topic from both sides, offers a powerful, anti-abortion climactic twist.
Well this looks like as good a spot as any for me to put up some footage from The Last Supper. If you’re unfamiliar with this dark political comedy from the ’90s, it’s about a group of stereotypical bleeding hearts who invite all kinds of rightwing nutjobs to dinner to kill them and rid the world of their evil. Without giving the final scene entirely away, I’ll just say that the message of The Last Supper is that all politically motivated violence is ultimately futile.
Not sure whatever the hell the “anti-abortion climactic twist” is supposed to be with “The Life Zone” (interesting how the title mimics The Last Supper).
Is it that kidnapping women and holding them for seven months to force them to have babies is not a “culture of life” thing to do? Somehow, I’m not convinced.
Anyhow, here’s The Last Supper trailer:
Late Night Good News
Posted: June 5, 2011 Filed under: Foreign Affairs, Hillary Clinton, Libya, Women's Rights | Tags: Iman Obeidi 8 CommentsIman Obeidi is on her way to the U.S. compliments of Madam Secretary.
Marwa Obeidi told the Associated Press that a human rights group aided by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton arranged for Iman and their father to travel in a private plane to Washington by way of Malta and Austria.
The U.S. State Department had expressed concern for Obeidi’s safety after she was deported from Qatar.
Meanwhile, Libyan authorities in Tripoli have dismissed Obeidi as a drunk, a prostitute and a thief.
“Iman constantly felt scared and threatened even in Benghazi,” said her mother. “She was worried that at any moment Kadafi’s men would be near to kill her.”
Marwa Obeidi told the Associated Pres that her sister’s top priority in the U.S. would be to receive psychological treatment and to continue her studies.
“I am sure they will greet her with such warmth and kindness,” she said. “We are happy for her.”








Recent Comments