Gaslighting America
Posted: January 22, 2011 Filed under: The Media SUCKS, the villagers, Violence against women | Tags: Fox News, Francis Pivens, Glenn Beck and the Becksters 63 CommentsSome people really do live in alternative realities. A good deal of them are not confined to obscure blogs or city street
blocks screaming things that people frankly know aren’t true. However, if you manage to get yourself a show on Fox News and you get to repeat the lies day in and day out, people think some one may actually fact check you. Critical masses of people can mistakenly believe the lies. Glenn Beck just keeps gaslighting America and a good number of people appear to be stupid enough to believe him.
I frankly can’t watch him. He’s so obviously got issues that you wonder how he has managed to escape treatment for mental health problems. I guess if you’re a gravy train, people will ride you no matter what. What really bothers me is that he actually does have an impact on some people.
Just ask an obscure 78 year old professor retired from CUNY, Frances Piven, who is receiving death threats because Beck’s decided that something she wrote 45 years ago has brought the “United States to its knees”. It’s amazing to me what a really disturbed mind can self create. Facts are abused out of necessity. Beck seems to think if you just keep writing the same things and saying the same things over and over you can gaslight enough of the people enough of the time. He manages to make a living and stay within the disturbed little bubble he’s created to rationalize his own failures. He’s empowered by delusions and denial and paid very well for them. Every thing that happens to Frances Piven as a result of his words is just one more symptom of poor little Beck. It’s all about his suffering, his problems, his brilliance, and his deluded truth.
Saturday: Roe turns 38!
Posted: January 22, 2011 Filed under: morning reads | Tags: Abu Dhabi, Cinematherapy, Clarina Howard Nichols, Female education and literacy, feminism, Gabrielle Giffords, gender politics, Globetrotting with Hillary, Kalam Nawaem, No Profit Left Behind, Roe v. Wade, Stupakistan, What Would Alice Paul Do 27 Comments
Thirty-eight years ago today the Supremes handed down Roe v. Wade.
It’s instructive to go further back and note that from the outset, the history of criminalizing abortion in the US has been rooted in a culture not of life but rather of No Profit Left Behind (via the history.com link above): “Abortion itself only became a serious criminal offense in the period between 1860 and 1880. And the criminalization of abortion did not result from moral outrage. The roots of the new law came from the newly established physicians’ trade organization, the American Medical Association. Doctors decided that abortion practitioners were unwanted competition and went about eliminating that competition. The Catholic Church, which had long accepted terminating pregnancies before quickening, joined the doctors in condemning the practice.”
In addition to keeping score, I always keep in mind a Bill Clinton interview that went under the radar in 2009: “With all the fights in the world about abortion rights and choice and family planning and all that there is only one proven strategy that is not opposed by religious authorities—except some fanatics and cultural authorities—that slows the birthrate and raises per capita income. The only proven strategy is to put all the girls in the world in school.”
On that note, let’s get this roundup started.
Hillaryland: When Hillary was in the Persian Gulf last week, she taped an interview with Kalam Nawaem–the Abu Dhabi version of The View. The UPI newswire ran the following headline after the show aired on Sunday: “Clinton calls women’s progress inevitable.” Here’s a full state.gov transcript.
I’ve gathered some clips, but I don’t want to bog down the rest of this roundup, so I’ll post the video treats in the comments. My favorite moment for now (hard to pick just one!):
“MODERATOR: That’s very interesting, Madam Secretary, and yet the Western media often depicts the Arab woman as oppressed, as having basically no human rights, as being uneducated. Why and how can we solve this problem? SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I think it comes from a lack of awareness or understanding that needs to be slowly but surely changed. And there – it’s one of the reasons why I very much appreciate the chance to do a program like this, because I have a lot of the American press with me and they look at the three of you, and maybe that breaks down some stereotypes. Maybe that begins to create what I know to be a much more comprehensive and complex view of women’s roles in this part of the world or in many parts of the world.”
Hillary understands that to lift up the world we have to not only lift up women and girls but that to truly lift up anyone we can’t parade around caricatures of helpless little women–we have to support each other in being our own best advocates and lifting ourselves up. Her approach is a stark contrast to the right-wing paternalism which seeks to selectively “champion” damsels in distress, for reasons other than empowering women.
Feminism–fiction vs. fact: Speaking of rightwingers who couldn’t care less about women or their rights, about a month ago, Real Clear Politics featured a video called “Feminism explained.” I wouldn’t advise clicking on it unless you’re a fan of annoying xtranormal animations and enjoy hearing a laundry list of every canard that’s already been thrown at a feminist. Deadbeat women’s orgs have made it all too easy for con-artists to skewer feminists in this fashion.
Fiction: Feminists don’t care about women! Fact: NOW, NARAL, and Planned Parenthood do not represent feminism or feminists but instead have become mere fundraising arms of the Democratic party, which itself is one of America’s two corporate arms (the GOP being the other)–a set of distinctions that the vast-right wing idiocy avoids making for obvious reasons.
Organizational otiosus? Once upon a time, NOW et al. helped get the fire started. Then they retired from the lowly world we inhabit only to drop back in sporadically and pass around the collection plate or remind us to tithe. (Perhaps the problem with NOW et al. is the more generalized conundrum of institutionalizing anything.)
From “ew, a feminazi!” to the C-Street takeover of feminism: For years, blowhards on the right have been capitalizing on the disconnect between the self-designated gatekeepers of feminism and the grassroot everyday feminists, turning feminism into the enemy. But, now conservative women are taking the opportunism one step further, trying to turn feminism into something it’s not (as dakinikat put it “Why oh why do people think they get to make up their own definitions?“).
What Would Alice Paul Do? As much as I think the right’s perversion of feminism deserves pushback, that chart I put up back in August still irks. The root of the problem is right there next to the Democratic position on “Right to Choose” — it’s that question mark next to “Support.”

Original sin: Feminist superdud (yes that's what he looks like, Ms. Magazine) signs a piece of paper that relegates women to second class status in Stupakistan.
Case-in-point: The introduction of the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act this Thursday– or rather the *return* of Smith-Lipinski, as madamb presciently wrote about back in August. Wonk Room at ThinkProgress has an aptly titled response: “Forget Jobs And Economy, GOP To Introduce Government-Expanding Abortion Measure As H.R. 3.” The problem with pinning this solely on the GOP, though, is that doing so omits everything the so-called Party of Women did to create the environment in which the GOP could even dare to push Stupakistan-Act IV in the middle of a persistent unemployment crisis.
Act I: Then-Speaker Pelosi cut a deal allowing Stupak-Pitts to be brought to a vote to secure the passage of a deeply flawed piece of healthcare legislation. Act II: President Obama ordered a “model set of segregation guidelines on women’s health.” Act III: Soon enough, mini-Stupaks erupted across the country (that’s a pdf link).
Not looking forward to Act V.
Of regressive progressives: Switching gears to discuss the Steve Cohen trainwreck briefly. I would simply like to remind everyone that Cohen was the creep who in May of 2008 used the movie Fatal Attraction as an analogy for Hillary’s primary campaign, saying “Glenn Close should have just stayed in the tub.”

Gloria Giffords, the congresswoman's mother, center, talks with her daughter during the flight from Tucson to Houston. Giffords' husband, Mark Kelly, left, talks with Giffords nurse Tracy Culbert. (Office of Rep. Giffords)
A hometown update on Gabrielle Giffords: Gabby arrived here in Houston safe and sound! Video report of her doctors reacting, calling the transition “flawless,” by the Houston Chronicle. The chron’s Medical Center reporter Todd Ackerman has been doing some excellent work covering the TIRR facility over the past few days. Ackerman’s latest: “Houston rehab giant ready for Giffords.” I’ll put more in the comments for anyone who’s interested in local media reporting.
Bookworm: A recent piece in the Brattleboro Reformer takes a look at a new book about frontier feminist Clarina Nichols. Compare the present-day inanity of a bear growling at the end of a faux pioneer woman marketing ploy to the following:
Kathleen Sebelius: “Clarina Nichols was a single mother, abolitionist, women’s rights advocate and visionary, whose work paved the way for women to eventually become full citizens of the United States.” History of Woman Suffrage (published in 1887): “No woman in so many fields of action has more steadily and faithfully labored than Mrs. Nichols, as editor, speaker, teacher, farmer…” Here’s a woman whose “knowledge of the legal system would distinguish her in the women’s rights movement, leading one of its founders to observe that Clarina Nichols was ‘as conversant with the laws of her state as any judge or lawyer in it” (Revolutionary Heart, Eickhoff 2006).
Grizzlyfolk won’t learn any of that history by palling around with Glenn Beckistan, ahem.
Cinematherapy: First a tidbit about 20-year old Kristen Stewart of Twilight fame, from her interview in February’s Vogue (via yahoo) — “As it turns out, Kristen does have a plan for her newfound fortune (or at least, part of it) – she wants to set up a network of halfway houses to help those who are struggling get back on their feet – a cause Kristen saw first-hand while researching for a role as a runaway from a sex slave trafficking ring, according to Vogue. ‘That would be amazing,’ she continued. ‘Right now it’s the thing I feel most connected to.'”
Now for my movie pick: The Cake Eaters, a 2007 indie that Kirsten Stewart filmed before she became the epicenter of the campy Twilight series. Stewart’s rising star has helped the Cake Eaters find a wider audience as a little-indie-that-could. From the writer of the film who also starred as part of the ensemble cast: “The Cake Eaters is a term I grew up with in Pennsylvania. My mom used to use it to describe those who had it made, had their lives mapped out for them, where the most likely to succeed…’The Cake Eaters.’ I thought it was an interesting metaphor for this group of misfits who begin the story searching and longing for love, trying to overcome grief, and through the course of the story…find their ‘cake’. They find some love, happiness, peace… The title gets a lot of questions, it’s pretty controversial…and unforgettable.”
Oh, and this just breaking as I try to wrap up: Keith-O and MSNBC are O-V-E-R! (I can’t resist… MSNBC and Keith went into a room, and… Countdown got canceled.)
Dhanyavad for reading, and tag, you’re it! What headlines are you following this Saturday?
Originally published by Wonk the Vote at Let Them Listen. Crossposted at Liberal Rapture and Taylor Marsh.
Breaking: Keith Olbermann Signs off “Countdown” for the Last Time.
Posted: January 21, 2011 Filed under: Media, Surreality | Tags: breaking news, Comcast, Keith Olbermann, MSNBC 36 CommentsHere is the video of Olberman’s goodbye statement.
The NYT has a banner up saying “Breaking News: MSNBC Says It Has Ended Keith Olbermann’s Contract.”
That’s all I can find so far. My only guess on the reason for the termination is that it has something to do with the NBC/Comcast merger. I will update as I learn more–or anyone else can feel free to update this post.
Terse statement released by MSNBC:
21 Jan 2011 8:02 PM
STATEMENT REGARDING KEITH OLBERMANNSTATEMENT REGARDING KEITH OLBERMANN:
MSNBC and Keith Olbermann have ended their contract. The last broadcast of “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” will be this evening. MSNBC thanks Keith for his integral role in MSNBC’s success and we wish him well in his future endeavors.
For more information contact:
Jeremy Gaines
e: jeremy.gaines@nbcuni.com
From the NYT Media Decoder blog:
Keith Olbermann, the highest-rated host on MSNBC, announced abruptly on the air Friday night that he is leaving the show immediately.
The host, who has had a stormy relationship with the management of the network for some time, especially since he was suspended for two days last November, came to an agreement with NBC’s corporate management late this week to settle his contract and step down.
In a closing statement on his show, Mr. Olbermann said simply that it would be the last edition of the program. He offered no explanation other than on occasion, the show had become too much for him.
According to the post, Lawrence O’Donnell’s show “The Last Word,” will replace “Countdown” at 8PM. MSNBC’s “settlement with Olbermann will keep him from moving to another network for an extended period of time.” It sounds like this was Olbermann’s idea, but if so, why announce it so suddenly?
.
What Next?
Posted: January 21, 2011 Filed under: Team Obama, U.S. Economy | Tags: General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt, President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Robert Skidelsky 37 CommentsThe more I read the news, the more I’m convinced that the powers that be are purposefully trying NOT to get it. I don’t
think they realize that the Great Recession was not just the normal little business adjustment that comes from a hiccup in markets. It wasn’t just some short run misalignment of Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply. There are serious systemic problems in the financial system and the way we do things. Politicians in the United States are hellbent on repeating the same damned mistakes. We’re seeing massive presidential appointments of the people that created the problems to positions that recommend future policy. Companies like General Electric have been part and parcel of our problem, and yet, who does the President want to ‘reboot’ jobs and competitiveness?
Signaling a shift to a new phase of the administration’s response to the nation’s economic woes, President Barack Obama will sign an executive order Friday establishing a new Council on Jobs and Competitiveness that will be led by General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt. The signing coincides with a visit to a GE branch in Schenectady, N.Y., the birthplace of the company.
The new panel will replace the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, and will have a new mission: to find “new ways to promote growth by investing in American business to encourage hiring, to educate and train our workers to compete globally, and to attract the best jobs and businesses to the United States,” according to the White House.
You don’t promote competitiveness by hiring the head of a monopoly that feeds on no bid contracts and promotion of military adventurism. It’s like putting Count Dracula in charge of your blood banks. Again and again, I see this President do something I would expect a mainstream Republican to do while the current crop of Republicans are hammering out which crazed creationist will lead the country back to the third century. What fresh hell is this?
There’s people asking those questions over at Project Syndicate. Brit economist and member of the House of Lords Robert Skidelsky who wrote the book ‘Life after Communism’ has written a new article. It’s called ‘Life after Capitalism’. I guess I’m not the only one thinking that this current house of cards is about to collapse. While the running dog congressional lackeys of multinational corporate interests here are trying to keep the mess afloat, a few folks realize that there are economies out there in the greater world about ready to clean our clock. They are not all doing it by selling their souls to multinational corporations, believe me.
Friday Reads
Posted: January 21, 2011 Filed under: just because 32 CommentsGood Morning!
It seems that most of the country is getting some form of nasty precipitation again today. We’ve had some rain and clouds that have made for a few dreary days and I’ve just about had enough of it. I keep looking for some cheery news and all I can come up with are links about Republicans cutting budgets, Republicans attacking reproductive rights, and Republicans wanting to repeal Health Care Reform. I guess some one in the country has some energy right now. It just isn’t me. I’ve been suffering from blurry brain all week. I was on campus yesterday and the students and faculty still standing after Jindal’s hack and slash budget cuts don’t look cheery either.
So, let’s see if any of us can do some justice to headlines today. Right now, I’d just like to see something other than hacked off Republicans in the news.
So, let me start off with this odd couple bit of news from Politico: Walmart joins FLOTUS health push.
In an unusual endorsement, Michelle Obama appeared with Walmart executives at a community center on Thursday as the discount giant announced long-term plans to encourage healthy eating, including cutting prices of fresh fruits and vegetables and working with suppliers to reduce the content of sugar, fat and sodium in the products on its shelves.
The first lady – whose signature cause is reducing childhood obesity and promoting nutrition and exercise, particularly among low-income families – praised Wal-Mart as a retail giant with “the potential to transform the marketplace and let Americans put healthier foods on their table.”
Their plans “show us that, yes, we can improve how we make and sell food in this country,” the first lady said. “It’s a huge victory for folks all across this country. It’s a victory for parents. It’s a victory for families. But most of all, it’s a victory for our children.”
As part of the program, Walmart plans to overhaul thousands of packaged food items by 2015 to reduce salt and sugar content as well as eliminate unhealthy ingredients such as trans-fats. In addition, the chain would help create a seal to be placed on packages which would help consumers identify healthy products.
Suppose that will cause an increase in pedestrian deaths in Virginia?
Okay, so here’s some presidential political warm ups from NBC: First Thoughts: Are the political winds changing?
Are the political winds changing? … New NBC/WSJ poll has Obama approval at 53%… Also, 40% now label him a political moderate — which is maybe why we haven’t heard “Obama is a socialist” in a while… But is this bump for Obama a transition or a transitory moment?… Poll also shows a short honeymoon for the GOP… Handicapping 2012… And polling birthright citizenship.
Now, you know why we New Orleans folks put champagne in our orange juice! It’s the only way we can handle the morning news!
Maybe this is why we haven’t heard “Obama is a socialist” in a while: We’ll take it one step further: These might have been Obama’s best six weeks since Fall 2008. Indeed, the bump in Obama’s approval was across the board — independents moved from 35% approval to 46%; Democrats went from 76% to 86%, and Republicans went from 11% to 15%. Perhaps the most surprising result in the poll? Try 40% labeling the president as a political moderate, compared with 45% who see him as a liberal and 11% who view him as a conservative. That moderate number is the highest for Obama in the NBC/WSJ poll, even higher than it was before his inauguration.
Some people appear to be very sloooowwwww learners. Only took a little over two years for them to figure that one out. Now how long do you think it will take them to figure out that the Democrats passed the Republican Health Care Reform proposed as Dolecare to fight Hillarycare?
Congresswoman Giffords is own her way to to a rehabilitation center in Houston and made a trip outside today. She appears to be responding to various stimuli and her doctors continue to be encouraged. Gabby Giffords still has a long way to go but we’re pulling for her. Her next steps will be to recover the use of her right side and the use of language.
Dr. Michael Lemole, the chief of neurology at University Medical Center in Tucson, said Giffords has made “fantastic advances,” but he warned “she has a long road ahead of her.” Giffords’ husband Mark Kelly said his wife has tried to speak, but the breathing tube in her windpipe has made it impossible. Giffords will be transferred Friday to the TIRR Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research in Houston, one of the world’s leading facilities for brain injuries.
In the meantime, Kompassionate Konservative Kooks continue to call for Governor Jan Brewer to appoint a replacement for the Congresswoman who survived an assassination attempt less than 2 weeks ago.
In an article published on theloop21.com, John Wilson, a “regular contributor to Hip Hop Republican,” mused that Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) should resign her seat as she recuperates from her gunshot wounds. Citing media reports about Gifford’s medical condition, Wilson compared Giffords to the late Rep. Gladys Spellman (D-MD), who went into a coma while in office. He then asked, “Should constituents allow members to hold onto their seats like political Brett Favres with no concept of when it is time to go?” FrumForum, the conservative news site managed by former Bush administration official David Frum, promoted the article on its website this afternoon.
The Times of India reports on a survey which has grave implications for women, the spread of HIV and pregnancies. A survey showed that nearly half of HIV infected women in 13 “high-prevalence” districts in Tamil Nadu had no knowledge of contraceptives. More than half of the women were also not aware of sexually transmitted infections. A majority of HIV positive women had not shared their status with their children or any information about sex or sexually transmitted diseases. The women also do not have property rights which exacerbates attempts to manage their treatments.
The National Federation for Wildlife reports that Pesticides Poison more than 200 Endangered Species in the U.S. They are also endangering people. As a result, activists are filing lawsuits to stop their use and recover damages.
According to the Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), more than 300 pesticides are seriously harming 214 species of endangered and threatened animals protected under the federal Endangered Species Act. What’s worse is that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fails to prohibit farmers from spraying these dangerous toxins in the regions that endangered species call home.
So PANNA and the Center for Biological Diversity are stepping up to the plate and actually taking legal action to help these struggling species. Today, the two groups filed a lawsuit against the EPA, claiming that the agency fails to conserve the hundreds of species offered federal protections under the Endangered Species Act. The groups aim to force the EPA to put measures in place that would prevent harmful pesticides from being sprayed in endangered and threatened species’ habitats.
That’s no small feat considering America’s massive chemical use. The EPA has registered more than 18,000 pesticides, with farmers spraying more than one billion pounds of the toxins on their fields every, single year. According to PANNA and the Center for Biological Diversity, more than 300 of these registered pesticides are posing huge health implications to people and 214 threatened and endangered species.
If you have 15 minutes to spare today, you may want to listen to NY Fed President Marco Del Negro speak to the European Economic Association in Glasgow on the Fed’s nonstandard monetary policy actions. The mp3 is available for a listen or a download are at VOXEU.
Will your state be the first to seek bankruptcy? There are a number of deadbeat states in the country. Illinois is one of the states in worst shape at the moment. Lawmakers all over the country are finding ways for states to restructure or weasel out of their debt because it’s pretty much assumed the federal government will not bail them. My guess is this is really a way for most of them to dodge their pension obligations to retirees. Yes, and there that small matter sits. Right there in the first paragraph. Maybe I should be glad I didn’t take the defined benefit plan offered here in Louisiana and have managed to barely keep my principle above water in an account that’s now heavily invested in other countries. Yes folks, I’m investing in the countries trying to pull their people out of poverty, not dump them into it.
Policy makers are working behind the scenes to come up with a way to let states declare bankruptcy and get out from under crushing debts, including the pensions they have promised to retired public workers.
Unlike cities, the states are barred from seeking protection in federal bankruptcy court. Any effort to change that status would have to clear high constitutional hurdles because the states are considered sovereign.
But proponents say some states are so burdened that the only feasible way out may be bankruptcy, giving Illinois, for example, the opportunity to do what General Motors did with the federal government’s aid.
Beyond their short-term budget gaps, some states have deep structural problems, like insolvent pension funds, that are diverting money from essential public services like education and health care. Some members of Congress fear that it is just a matter of time before a state seeks a bailout, say bankruptcy lawyers who have been consulted by Congressional aides.
Alas, in today’s new USA nothing is safe from the reapers of Wall Street.
Okays, so that wasn’t too rough of a read was it?










Recent Comments