Late Night Wonk: Nifty Graphs and such (plus some “new” street photography!)

Original photography by Vivian Maier. Click on thumbnail to go to vivianmaier.blogspot.com and see a larger view.

I’m going to start with the Vivian Maier photography link from David Dunlap at the New York Times LENS real quickly because otherwise it will probably get missed! It’s linked to up on memorandum right now, but it’s way at the bottom. Check it out! Here’s a link to more of her discovered work. I’m including a brief thumbnail to encourage you to go look. These are brilliant and thought-provoking images, largely from the fifties and sixties.

Alright, now for the meat of this post. It is a somewhat weighty post for a Saturday night, but there hasn’t been much time to discuss a variety of topics today with all the tragic and distressing news out of AZ understandably dominating the coverage–just look at that archive link to memeorandum, from what the page looked like at 11:30 PM on Sat. It is stunning and devastating all at once.

Anyhow, I doubt most people had the time to click over on the nifty graph pick from my roundup this morning. So I decided to spotlight it.

From Economix — “Comparing Recoveries: Job Changes” (emphasis in bold is mine):

The chart above shows job changes in this recession compared with recent ones, with the black line representing the current downturn. The line has risen since last year, but still has a long way to go before the job market fully recovers to its pre-recession level. Since the downturn began in December 2007, the economy has shed, on net, about 5.2 percent of its nonfarm payroll jobs. And that doesn’t even account for the fact that the working-age population has continued to grow, meaning that if the economy were healthy we should have more jobs today than we had before the recession.

The unemployment rate (measured by a different government survey, and based on how many people are without jobs but are actively looking for work) fell to 9.4 percent in December, from 9.8 percent in November. That might sound like good news — it is, after all, the lowest rate since July 2009 — but part of the reason for the drop was that so many people simply gave up looking for jobs.

Keep reading after the jump, because there’s a youtube worth watching if you haven’t seen it already. Read the rest of this entry »


Wing Nut Scramble (Live Blogging a Shooter Tragedy)

You don’t have to have a doctorate in psychology to figure out that the latest spree shooter had serious mental illness problems. What’s odd to me is the sudden scramble–typical  in these situations–by ideologues ready to label his mental illness as a symptom of political ideology.  No where is this more rampant than the number of right wingers that are taking one mention of one book–The Communist Manifesto–as an indication that suspected shooter Jared Loughner was a leftie.  That’s pretty interesting given that WAPO is reporting that he’s a veteran. Loughner tried to enlist in the military but was rejected. (See update below.) They’re screaming ‘leftie’ while simultaneously scrubbing their sites of items like the Palin Tweet and the Palin Map of Congressional Critterz’ Districts–including that of shooting victim Congress Woman Gifford–with rifle sight images over the top.  Is this kind of after-the-fact scrubbing a mea culpa of sorts?  They’re sure acting like they own it.

Giffords has been a target of violent threats for some time now.  The threats have come  from the right wing and the majority have occurred since the HCR vote last summer.  Folks that say that this shooter’s acts–no matter how linked to his personal mental hell–can’t be put into the context of  encouraging and enabling violence haven’t been paying attention. Violent imagery and rhetoric is a loaded gun.  It’s the same denial that comes from anti-abortion supporters and their disconnect from the shooting of Dr. Gun. You encourage it.  You own a role in it.  It’s not the root cause of mental illness, but it establishes violence as a potentially heroic act.  Most psychotic people are crazy but not stupid.  They can feel the heroic myth. Many seek a way to go down with it.

But it’s worth noting that Giffords — who in 2006 became the youngest woman ever elected to Congress, at 36 — has, for more than a year, been the target of violence-tinged rhetoric from political opponents and of threats that appear to have come from right-wing activists.

Asked by the New York Post whether his daughter had any enemies, Giffords’s father replied: “The whole tea party.”

In August 2009, an attendee at a Giffords town-hall meeting dropped a handgun, leading Giffords’ staff to call the police. “We have never felt the need before to notify law enforcement when we hold these events,” her spokesman said at the time.

After Giffords voted in favor of the health-care overhaul in March, she said that vandals had broken the glass door of her Tucson office. “The rhetoric is incredibly heated, not just the calls but the emails, the slurs,” she told MSNBC at the time. “Things have really gotten spun up.”

Ben Smith has a brief thread up on the foot prints left in social media by alleged shooter Jared Loughner.  Some of them are bizarre rants about currency and the gold standard that are worthy of a Glenn Beck or Ron Paul fan.  There’s also some crazed references to correct English grammar and mind control.   Who knows which flake in the vast American Breakfast Bowl of ideology some of this stuff comes from?

Read the rest of this entry »


Breaking: Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords Shot in AZ

The story broke via NPR, but I’m quoting Jay Bookman’s blog at the AJC because the NPR link hasn’t been updated to report her death yet:

U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, an Arizona Democrat beginning her third term, has reportedly been shot in the head at a public appearance in a Tucson supermarket.

NPR, citing the local sheriff’s office, reports that GIffords and six others have died.

The gunman is in custody. There is no information available regarding his identity or motive. Other victims reportedly include congressional staff members.

For more information on the shooting and on Giffords, here is the NPR link.

Update: Giffords’ spokesperson says Giffords is alive and in surgery. Via Wapo blogger Felicia Sonmez.


New Chairman of House Oversight Committee Lacks Moral Gravitas (To Put It Mildly)

New House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA)

Now that the Republicans control the House of Representatives, the new Chairman of the House Committee for Oversight and Reform will be five-term California Representative Darrell Issa.

According to Wikipedia, Issa is the wealthiest member of Congress with a net worth of $250 million. Before running for office Issa was CEO of Directed Electronics, which makes car alarms and other security devices for autos.

In a recent appearance on the In an October 2010 appearance on the Rush Limbaugh radio show, Issa told the right wing host that Obama is “one of the most corrupt presidents in modern times.”

Issa later tried to backtrack on this statement, saying he was referring to the Obama administration, not the President personally. On Wednesday, he defended his remarks by telling John King that he and CNN did not understand the meaning of the word “corrupt.”

Speaking to CNN’s Chief National Correspondent John King Wednesday, Issa offered his definition of the word “corrupt”:

“I think people misunderstand the meaning of the word corrupt, and obviously, CNN does. ‘Corrupt’, or ‘corrupted’ or ‘failure’, it’s no different than a disc drive that’s given you some bits that are wrong,” Issa said on CNN.

Issa continued, “I have never said it’s illegal.

Issa then explained that the “corruption” he is most concerned about is government regulation of corporations. In fact, Issa recently sent letters to business leaders, asking them to say which regulations they would like to get rid of.

Recipients of the letters include the American Petroleum Institute, The Association of American Railroads, and Toyota. Politico reports that the invitation has garnered complaints against a wide-range of regulations. Environmental protections have drawn lots of criticism. Everything from limiting waste-water flows from construction sites, to greenhouse gas and hazardous air pollutant controls, have been attacked. in the name of economic growth industries are also requesting repeals or blocks on everything from labor safety regulations, financial reforms, and consumer safety.

At Huffington Post, Ryan Grim reported yesterday that Issa plans to investigate the foreclosure crisis by focusing primarily on Fannie and Freddie instead of corporate giants like Bank of America.

This is the man who will be “investigating” the Obama administration and “the operations of Government activities at all levels with a view to determining their economy and efficiency.” Incidentally, one of Issa’s sidekicks on the committee is Dan Burton of Indiana, the guy who “investigated” death of Vince Foster by shooting a watermelon in his backyard in front of reporters.

According to Donald Cohen and Peter Dreier at Alternet,

Issa plans to hold hearings of his Oversight and Government Reform Committee to explore how he can help corporate America rid itself of “burdensome government regulations.” According to Politico, Issa asked businesses, including Duke Energy, FMC Corp., Toyota and Bayer, to supply him with their wish lists. He also sent letters to industry lobby groups including the American Petroleum Institute, National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), the Association of American Railroads, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) and entities representing health care and telecommunication providers.

It isn’t hard to imagine what that their wish list will look like. Indeed, it hasn’t changed much in the past century. The specific bills and issues ebb and flow, but the business mantra is always the same. Get government off our backs. Let the “free” market determine what we make and how we make it. We can police ourselves. Too many government rules kills jobs.

This would almost be fun to watch if there weren’t so much at stake.

So Who is Darrell Issa? Read the rest of this entry »


Saturday Reads: the Mona Lisa and War on Poverty edition

Photograph: Gianni Dagli Orti/Corbis

Good morning, news junkies! My Saturday offerings, hot off the presses…

On this day, January 8th, in 1962, the Mona Lisa was exhibited in Washington, marking the first time it was shown in America. From the link, which goes to the History Channel website: “Lady Jacqueline Kennedy and Andre Malraux, the French minister of culture, arranged the loan of the painting from the Louvre Museum in Paris to the United States.”

You may have caught the following story on the Mona Lisa from December, but in case you didn’t… From Tom Kington in the Guardian: Mona Lisa’s eyes may reveal model’s identity, expert claims… Silvano Vinceti claims initials – possibly the model’s – are discernible in the left eye of the iconic Da Vinci painting.” Stephen Bayley wrote a piece in the UK Telegraph on this story as well called, Mona Lisa: Leonardo was a genius, let’s leave it at that.

Another piece of historical trivia for January 8th… In 1964, LBJ declared a “War on Poverty” in the US. (Link takes you to an essay hosted on blackpast.org.)

Who has taken up the call to fight the war on poverty today? Hillary spoke of and to “invisible” Americans when she ran in 2008, but the powers-that-be railroaded her and kept her powerful voice off the domestic stage. John Edwards tainted his “Two Americas” rhetoric on poverty with his “narcissism,” as he himself characterized it. Elizabeth Edwards, who was the genuine advocate for the least of these in that power couple, is no longer with us, though she left behind a body of thoughtful writings and interviews to guide us, much in the way she wrote a journal to her children. The other Liz–Elizabeth Warren–is fighting for us, but her hands appear to be tied.

Every day of this Administration that President Obama fails to govern for the people who elected him, he instead tries to win the approval of the corporations who will never openly adore him enough for all his efforts… because nothing he does for them will ever be enough. More and more, his former supporters are coming to realize that they endorsed an empty suit in 2008, which brings me to my first newsy item. From today’s NY Times: Obama the Centrist Irks a Liberal Lion… ‘By freezing federal salaries, by talking about deficits, by extending the Bush tax cuts, he’s legitimizing a Republican narrative,’ Mr. Reich says. ‘Why won’t he tell the alternative story? For three decades we’ve cut taxes on the wealthy while real wages stood still.'”

I’ll answer Reich’s question with a question. When will the left understand that Obama fears and thus respects the Republican narrative and does not do the same when it comes to the liberal narrative? The so-called “caving” to Republicans is by design.

Bob Herbert has some good stuff covering the same ground today; I had a hunch he would:Misery With Plenty of Company…Consider the extremes. President Obama is redesigning his administration to make it even friendlier toward big business and the megabanks, which is to say the rich, who flourish no matter what is going on with the economy in this country. (They flourish even when they’re hard at work destroying the economy.) Meanwhile, we hear not a word — not so much as a peep — about the poor, whose ranks are spreading like a wildfire in a drought.”

Indeed, but I’ll get off my rantbox for now. Here are some other headlines that struck a chord with me throughout the week…

Read the rest of this entry »