Pakistan May Have Outed Chief of CIA’s Islamibad Station
Posted: December 17, 2010 | Author: bostonboomer | Filed under: Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Central Intelligence Agency, Foreign Affairs, Pakistan | Tags: Central Intelligence Agency, covert operations, drone strikes, Islamibad Station, Mumbai attacks, Pakistan |12 CommentsThings seem to be getting pretty dicey for the U.S. in Pakistan. The Guardian UK reports that:
The CIA has pulled its station chief from Islamabad, one of America’s most important spy posts, after his cover was blown in a legal action brought by victims of US drone strikes in the tribal belt.
The officer, named in Pakistan as Jonathan Banks, left the country yesterday, after a tribesman publicly accused him of being responsible for the death of his brother and son in a CIA drone strike in December 2009. Karim Khan, a journalist from North Waziristan, called for Banks to be charged with murder and executed.
In a rare move, the CIA called Banks home yesterday, citing “security concerns” and saying he had received death threats, Washington officials told Associated Press. Khan’s lawyer said he was fleeing the possibility of prosecution.
Banks may have only a business visa, and so wouldn’t have diplomatic immunity if he were required to testify in the trial. According to the article, recalling a station chief is extremely rare. Although the Pakistani government supposedly supports U.S. drone strikes, many Pakistanis are understandably outraged by them.
The recall comes at a sensitive moment for Washington. This week’s Afghanistan policy review brought fresh focus on Taliban safe havens in Pakistan’s tribal belt. Meanwhile CIA drone attacks – which are co-ordinated from the Islamabad embassy – have reached a new peak. Three drones struck targets in Khyber, a previously untouched tribal agency, on Friday, reportedly killing 24 people and signalling a widening of the CIA covert campaign….There have been over 100 strikes so this year, twice as many as in 2009.
The Guardian says there are rumors that Banks may have been outed by someone in the Pakistani intelligence agency (the ISI), because “several senior ISI officials were named in a New York legal action brought by relatives of the 2008 Mumbai attacks.”
The New York Times also has posted an article about this.
On Thursday and Friday, the United States appeared to make good on promises to expand its own efforts to attack the militants, with drone strikes for the first time hitting Khyber agency in Pakistan’s lawless tribal areas. Most drone strikes this year have targeted North Waziristan. Pakistani government officials said at least 26 militants were killed in the most recent attacks.
The outing of the C.I.A. station chief is tied to the spy agency’s campaign of drone strikes, which are very unpopular in Pakistan, although the government has given its tacit approval for them.
Gee, no kidding. I mean who wants to have their house blown up unexpectedly by agents of a foreign power? Interestingly, the Times avoided telling its readers the outed agent’s name, even though the Guardian had already published it. The Times is truly the Obama administration’s house organ. According article,
The intensifying mistrust between the C.I.A. and I.S.I., two uneasy but co-dependent allies, could hardly come at a worse time. The Obama administration relies on Pakistan’s support for the armed drone program, which this year has launched a record number of strikes in North Waziristan against terror suspects.
“We will continue to help strengthen Pakistani capacity to root out terrorists,” President Obama said on Thursday. “Nevertheless, progress has not come fast enough. So we will continue to insist to Pakistani leaders that terrorist safe havens within their borders must be dealt with.”
Not being an expert on foreign affairs, I’m not sure if this statement triggered anger in Pakistan or not. Maybe President Obama should leave diplomacy to his Secretary of State.
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- More






The New York Times has so little credibility left. They might as well change their name to the Obama Times.
These are very perilous times, and it appears that the U.S. is getting bested, which makes it all the more perilous. Unfortunately you folks are involved in what amounts to three wars, although in reality none have been declared other than the nebulous War on Terror. It is worrisome to say the least, particularly with the econimic situation in the mainland U.S. but the war profiteers are making out like bandits. Sad that, ordinary Americans losing their jobs and their homes, but the war mongers are making money hand over fist.
Pakistan is not a friend – personal opinion only of course.
Insofar as the NYTimes is concerned, only the elite continue to read them on a daily basis. The people outside the elite read to find out what the Obama administration is going to do next.
It really is scary. Obama should have gotten us out of the wars, but I’m sure the CIA sat him down and told him not to try it. After what happened to JFK, no president has dared to defy the CIA or the military again.
Banks will have a desk job in Washington, and will never be able to work in another country now. In the end isn’t that how it works?
Oh I know…when Obama made that comment about not everyone reads the op-ed section of the NY Times, I thought by saying this…he was again referring to himself, cause the Grey Lady works for him…
Headline on the Beeb:
I guess ‘someone’ is paying for outing the CIA guy. Here’s the link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12015959
Oh great. That ought to help a lot.
/snark tag
Thanks BB for bringing this up. I saw something about a CIA chief in Pakistan before I left the house. It was great to just come to SD and find about what was going on…without having to look all over web.
Thanks Minx. I’ve been learning a lot from your posts too!
Oh, man, I’m so glad Captain Sensitive Pacifist came to rid us of Cowboy Diplomacy and make the world love us. If anyone can make the people of Pakistan grateful to us for raining down death and destruction on their heads, yes he can.
He’s got a lot less people ‘drunk in the wishing well’ (h/t to BAR) than he used to, but unfortunately none of this is helping the soldiers who have their lives on the line or the children who need parents with jobs and a steady income.
Where the hell is Obama on this? He needs to get on it.