McCainonomics: Red faces, voters who Whine, and Blue homeowners

While John McCain is calling the U.S. economy a shambles, Economic Adviser Phil Gram says buck up  America and quit whining.  He says it’s ALL in our head.

So which of these guys has the correct answer?   Well, on the one hand there’s this guy trying to get elected president, so what else is he going to say?  Then on the other hand, we’re really not technically in a recession yet so Phil has a point.  They are both right and they are both wrong which is something only an economist could say and I couldn’t resist living up to the old joke. Okay, I’ll break it down into a few more  stylized facts.

Our growth rates is somewhere between 0 and 1, our unemployment rate is pretty much where it should be, and most of the economic indicators are mixed, at best.  We’re in a very slugglish growth period, but there still some major economic indicators that are showing neutral or positive.  That doesn’t mean that all of us are living the same reality, however.  The real answer to the question depends on WHO you are and WHERE you live.  The economy is stagnant at the moment, and we’re in for a period of time where Americans are going to have to get use to making some tough choices and not seeing forward momentum.  We’re basically all working and staying pretty much in the same place.  Our clothing is costing us a lot less. We’ve got electronic gadgets galore and they are all really cheap.  Have you priced computers, dvd players, or stereos recently?  They’re all pretty cheap and just about any one can get to them.  However, health care, driving, and eating are going from cheap to pricey.

The question of high energy prices and the segments of America that aren’t doing so well come mostly from globalization of the world economy that brings both good developments and bad. This is not going to reverse.   As the economy adjusts, all buyers will win from global trade but those whose jobs go abroad will loose, and some will loose big time. We buy cheap stuff from the Chinese, they turn around and buy cars and they want gas.  This increased demand for gas means higher gas prices.  The Chinese also take jobs away from the manufacturing sector because Chinese labor comes extremely cheap and doesn’t require a pension or health plan.  Those folks working for those companies that are outsourcing to other countries are miserable.  While the USA has a relatively low unemployment rate of around 5%, places like Michigan and Pennsylvania have 10%  unemployment rates.  They are suffering.  So, if you’re in the medical sector, you’re going to be happy as a clam.  If you’re in manufacturing, prepare for a new career. Also, the government has grants out there to retrain folks loosing jobs from NAFTA.  If you can prove it’s from NAFTA, go get it now!

438,000 jobs have been lost bringing unemployment to 5.5 percent.  This is not a bad situation now, but if it continues, chances are we will be looking more like  recession.  Economists consider this rate to be close to the rate that represents what it should be if we are operating at capacity.  The big question is:  WILL IT GO UP?

So what about the financial crisis?  How widespread is the mortgage problem?  The housing crunch is wrecking the construction industry in places like Miami, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles.  However, down here in New Orleans, the construction industry can’t find enough workers and is booming like never before.  So Housing Foreclosures are a major problem in places like California, Nevada, and Florida.  Many of these foreclosures are for house flippers.  These folks are speculators and can whine all they want but that’s business and that’s what you get when the market moves against you.   However, folks that were suckered into bad loans by mortgage brokers are a different matter.  These folks are loosing their homes for banks that were looking for high fee income and basically put people into mortgages they couldn’t handle.  Government regulation and help is required here.  We’re not likely to get that as long as Dubya is in office. He’s threatening to veto the current bill.  (All of the sudden our prez (the BIG spender) goes fiscally responsible on us!)  I’m waiting for both McCain or Obama to come up with specific plans here.  Hillary Clinton was the only one who spoke to this situation and her answer was a moratorium on rates.  I think we’re going to need some federal bonds to fund some of these folks.  It’s something similiar to what we did during the Great Depression to keep families in their homes and off the street.

So there are several markets that are a huge mess.  The automobile industry and some sectors of manufacturing and  the financial industry which has spilled into the housing industry,  But again, most of the impact from these sectors is hitting some states hard and other states not so much at all.

Unfortunately, a lot of the higher prices are due to those high food and gas prices which are not a function of a bad U.S. economy, they are a function of problems in the global economy. There is also a continuing pattern since the 1980s that has left the rich getting richer and the poor and middle class getting poorer.  The income inequality problem is worsening in this country and it looks as though it will continue. This is why it is essential that everyone has access to quality education at all levels.  We should consider allowing more students attend university on the taxpayer’s dollar.  Aid should definitely be mean income tested.  It is much cheaper to send a teenager to school than it is to house him in a jail for the rest of his life.

These are some steps we can take to solve some of these things.  First, as long as U.S. business has to pick up the tab for worker’s health insurance, the U.S. worker will not be competitive.  We need universal health care paid for by individuals/taxpayers on an ability-to-pay basis.  Second, all agriculture price supports, set aside programs, and subsidies, especially to ethanol, should be halted.  Third,  we all need to conserve energy and switch to other fuels sources (with the exception of ethanol made from things that are food).  If we are making biofuels, then we need to use garbage or chicken fat or some byproduct, not food itself.

So, which of the candidates are up to the challenge?  I don’t think either of them are, but I’m waiting.


And now awaiting your approval: Dumb and Dumber

Have you notice the quality of discourse on issues has gone decidedly downhill since the candidates given ‘get home free passes’ by the media during the primary are what we now seem stuck with?  As an economist, I’m still waiting for one of them to actually say something about economic policy other than the usual discourse on taxes and spending.  As a citizen, I’m thinking about building a bomb shelter in my backyard.

I can only second this sentiment by the International Herald Tribune on what small details the two have offered up to date.

“McCain is placating economic conservatives in the Republican party by promising tax cuts that would lead to a fiscal nightmare. Obama is pandering to labor with protectionist threats that would endanger relations with important trading partners.”

The one thing I will point to is this telling Obama candidate-of-change sidebar:

“Obama is backtracking somewhat on Nafta, and if he wins, don’t be surprised if he gives a green light to Democratic congressional leaders to pass the Colombia trade pact in a lame-duck session.”

source:http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/22/america/letter.php

I’m completely buying this one since the FISA sell-out.  Remember we already had the wink, wink, nudge, nudge moment with Goolsbee and the Canadian ambassador as a preview.

I’m just waiting to get my hands on the new issue of Forbes which supposedly has a side-by-side comparison.  I’ve gleaned both of their sites, and believe me, they both supposedly have economic advisors.  Now, if they’d just put forth coherent economic policies I could actually WRITE about.

I was hoping for a little more on the international side, given our foreign policy is in a deplorable state and this is McCain’s supposed forte.  Both seem inadequate although there is a change in direction against Obama coming from, of all places, Europe.  The WaPo, here to date a good member in standing of the Obama pep club has recently started this discussion:

“European officials are increasingly concerned that Sen. Barack Obama‘s campaign pledge to begin direct talks with Iran on its nuclear program without preconditions could potentially rupture U.S. relations with key European allies early in a potential Obama administration.”

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/21/AR2008062101658.html

Oh, great job guys!!  Beat up on Senator Clinton for her pant suits and emasculating use of a microphone, THEN tell us that the hopie changie guy could potentially threaten our relations with allies.  Way to go!

Meanwhile, Senator Obama has managed to be endorsed by every tinpot dictator remaining on the planet while garnering heavy criticism from even the European press for undermining the ongoing diplomacy on Iran and its nuclear weapons development.   I have several things I want to share with you on this front.  The first is an appalling Gaddafi video discussing the importance of an Obama presidency.  Savage politics has an excellent blog providing a great analysis on this development. (http://savagepolitics.com/?p=797) so I’ll point you in that direction for more on him.

At last count, Fidel Castro, Kim Jon Il, Obama’s Kenyan cousin, Hamas, and Muammar al-Gaddafi are all giddy on Obama.  Maybe they all have the same koolaid supplier as Obamba or maybe they see that some one so incredibly in over their head has to give them some kind of advantage. Castro did have one small bone to pick with Obama saying “When he was a candidate, he of course committed the error of yearning for “a democratic Cuba.”  Well, I guess Wright, Ayers, Farahkhan, and Pflegle didn’t completely capture Obama’s attention for 20 years.  Maybe he can take a few pointers from cousin Odingo who appears completely ready to embrace his cousin.  This nugget  is from the BBC.

“Barack Obama’s cousin Raila Odingo (a radical Muslim African Arab) planned and executed the ‘ethnic cleansing’ of Kenya’s Rift Valley.”

Which leads me to a sidebar question:  If Obama is supposedly a Black American, why is Odingo, his cousin doing ethnic cleansing on native Africans?   This only makes sense if Odingo is ethnically an Arab which would implies that Obama isn’t actually a Black American but an Arab American. I frankly don’t care what his ethnicity actually is because I’ve had it with identity politics, but it brings up a larger question of why Obama would pose as an African American if he’s an Arab American?

Now, we have Bomb Bomb Iran McCain’s advisors doing the 9-11 re-shuffle.  Charlie Black plays the wow, what if we get attacked again card and comes up with McCain wins. This is our war-hero candidate who is supposed THE ONE with foreign policy creds and shouldn’t need surrogates dropping 9-11 references. This happens after the we had found out that McCain’s strategest Peter Madigan was a lobbiest for, of all places, IRAN. McCain is using Bush’s play book a little too much for comfort.

“In an interview with the Atlantic in late May, McCain said that “Iran is hell-bent on the destruction of Israel, they’re hell-bent on driving us out of Iraq, they’re hell-bent on supporting terrorist organizations, and as serious as anything to American families, they’re sending explosive devices into Iraq that are killing American soldiers.” In a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee this month, McCain again mocked Obama’s willingness to enter into dialogue with the Iranians, saying, “The idea that they now seek nuclear weapons because we refused to engage in presidential-level talks is a serious misreading of history.”

source: http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/06/19/mccain_iran/index.html?source=rss

Again, if sanctions and saber-rattling were working so well, we’d have settled this issue already.  McCain needs to voice some real options here or be defined as the third Bush term.

Can we find some kind of policy that doesn’t include threatening all out war or suggesting it’s okay for a President to talk to ANY of these jerks without preconditions?  Is there any one in either of these campaigns that can get these guys a really quick lesson on diplomacy and international relations?  Both of them seem to be clueless and we can’t seem to get the press to go after either of them at the same time on this.

Is this really the best leadership we can offer the world?  Haven’t we done enough damage with 8 years of a president completely in over his head?   Do we need four more years of cluelessness?


Queensbury Rules and Politics

  I wish we could all agree on certain rules in politics.  They could operate much the same way the Queensbury Rules do in boxing.  The seminal rule would be no hitting below the belt.  It’s basically a way to say, win with fair play and by solid punches to your opponent.

One thing I would like to put forward as below the belt is ranting on candidate military records.  This is especially true when the military ends those records with served honorably. Many good democrat vets were criticized by the Republican hate machine for honorable military service.  John Kerry, John Murtha and Max Cleland all were treated unfairly by the bloviators in the right wing echo chamber.  This is why it suprises me that the HuffPoop would allow the same treatment of John McCain. 

 

Jeffery Klein blogs today:

McCain apparently was not surprised when his Vietnamese captors went relatively easy on him compared to his fellow POWs.”

source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-klein/mccains-secret-questionab_b_107409.html

You would think that progressives would hold to some kind of principled standard where we realize it’s the apex of hypocrisy to do the same thing to others that we hated done to us and ours. 

Now, I don’t think Dubya’s national guard record was quite in the same vein.  He did receive special treatment during a draft time and there are questions if he even showed up for duty eventually.  John McCain, however many planes he crashed, showed up for duty.   I will never ever pretend that I could understand, criticize or hyperbloviate over time spent in Vietnam let alone time spent in a prison camp.  It was all honorable service to me.  I find plenty of his votes objectionable and if I criticize him, I will focus on that.

The second area which we could argue the use of some kind of Queensbury rule is on first ladies.  Nancy Reagan, Hillary Clinton, and Laura Bush have all been swiftboated in their own way.  Things that potential and sitting first ladies say as public figures are okay to criticize.  Michelle Obama’s  statement about the first time in her adult life she is really proud of her country is fair game.  However, I don’t want to see another strong career woman swiftboated just based on the fact she’s a strong, black, intelligent, outspoken woman.  

Again, Republicans, remember that Nancy Reagan was treated harshly.   Hillary endured endless critiques of her hair, her outfits, her cookie recipes, etc.  Cindy McCain is receiving similary treatment.  So democrats, what Cindy McCain wears and does with the permission of her Dermatologist should be kept on pages concerning beauty tips.  For political bashing, can we just stick to the content of their speeches please?  

 

 

 

Here’s a youtube that I think we can talk about under Queensbury rules.  Michelle made an outrageous statement.  Criticize away!  But please leave the rants about her hair, her dress, and those other sexist or racist statements back in the bathrooms of middle school where teachers can punish the stupid!

Michelle’s Hillary jab:  Inexcusable and Low

This is all I’m asking of fellow bloviators, can we agree on something akin to the Queensbury rules?

Now shake hands and come out fighting!