Friday Reads

Republicans be like
It’s Friday!

I’ve found a few things that make for interesting reading so let’s get started.

Why have Democratic Governors and Republican Mayors become rare?  This is a great article describing which party seems to have a lock on what levels of state, local and national politics.  It’s hard to imagine any one wanting to live in a state with a Republican governor given the miserable economic and civil rights performance of states that have them.  Here’s the explanation for this particular office.  Is one of the few offices where it’s not the economy that matters?  Like many elections, it’s a matter of who tends to turn out when the election occurs.

Historically, gubernatorial elections have tended to be up for grabs between the parties. Statewide electorates are sufficiently eclectic to encourage candidates in both parties to run toward the center, expanding their bases. But the pattern of results is changing, and for an unexpected reason.

For obscure reasons, 36 states hold their gubernatorial contests during midterm cycles. This hasn’t seemed to matter much in the past. But in recent elections, the types of voters who cast ballots in midterm elections has diverged significantly from those that do in presidential cycles. Midterm electorates tend to be smaller, whiter, older and more Republican; presidential electorates tend to be larger, more demographically diverse, and more Democratic.

This pattern helped Republican gubernatorial candidates in 2010. That year, the GOP won governorships in such bluish states as Maine, Michigan, New Mexico and Wisconsin. But it proved to be an even bigger help in 2014, another GOP wave year. On the eve of the 2014 election, Governing’s final handicapping of the gubernatorial seats included an unusually large field of 12 tossup races. In a neutral environment, one would expect these races to go roughly half to one party and half to the other. Instead, Republican candidates won eight of those 12 races, plus another contest in Maryland that had been rated lean Democratic. Highly vulnerable Republican incumbents, such as Sam Brownback in Kansas, Scott Walker in Wisconsin, Rick Scott in Florida and Paul LePage in Maine, also won new terms, buoyed by the GOP-friendly electorate.

Currently, the breakdown of the gubernatorial ranks is 31 Republicans, 18 Democrats and one independent. Historically, the number of Republican governors has only been that high on rare occasions, so it’s likely that the GOP number will fall somewhat in the coming years, especially after the 2018 election, when a number of two-term Republican governors will be term-limited out, creating competitive open seats. Still, on balance, it’s going to be a tough challenge for Democrats to take back governorships when so many of them are contested during midterm election cycles.

I’m just going to let the headline speak for itself in this analysis piece by Hillary’s Communication’s Director Jennifer Palmieri,  “Hillary Clinton’s No Good, (Record-Breaking, Poll-Winning), Very Bad Week.”HIllary

If you believe the mood and headlines from some of the press, it’s been a pretty rough week for Hillary Clinton. While there was widespread and substantive coverage of the rollout of her economic agenda, politically, it’s a different story. One poll showed so much trouble for Hillary that she only had a higher favorability number than any other candidate it tested.

Even worse, multiple polls released this week show that she leads every candidate running in head-to-head matchups. While it is widely known that the growing Hispanic electorate is critical in deciding the election, new polling shows that Hillary Clinton has a disastrous 68 percent approval rating among Hispanic voters and only leads her closest Republican competition (Bush) by 37 points, 64% to 27%.

Not only that, she raised a record amount of primary money for a candidate in their first quarter, with only $8 million (a sum larger than most Republican campaigns raised in total) in donations of less than $200. Hillary also spent too much money building her organization and was only left with more cash on hand than any other campaign raised and more in the bank than the top three Republican campaigns combined.

It’s true. Hillary is left in the terrible position of having the most resources of any candidate and being voters’ top choice to be the next President of the United States.

So, now for the news from the crazy side of the politic spectrum.  You know that highly doctored video on Planned Parenthood that every low iq Republican christofascist has fallen for?  Well, Republicans are going to make hay with it despite the fact that nearly no legitimate media outlet has even gone near it because it’s so obviously stupid.  Republicans are after Planned Parenthood again and will be pushing more–if possible–stupid laws meant to meant to ensure our constitutionally protected right to an abortion is next to impossible to act on. Nullification any one?

Republicans on Capitol Hill are betting the secretly filmed Planned Parenthood video — depicting an executive allegedly discussing the sale of fetal organs from terminated pregnancies — will give them cover to more aggressively push abortion issues without the political ramifications that have haunted the party in the past.

In recent years, Republicans have worked to soften their tone when it comes to contentious issues such as abortion, wanting to avoid a repeat of gaffes like Todd Akin’s “legitimate rape” comments that have turned off many female voters.

ut now, the GOP is going hard on abortion politics — and Planned Parenthood specifically — following the release of the video depicting a top official for the group casually talking about doctors collecting fetal organs for biomedical companies during abortions.

“The gravity of the situation most definitely” changes things, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) told POLITICO Thursday. “This is not just Republicans. It’s independents. It’s Democrats…. Americans don’t want their tax dollars spent doing what they’re doing.”

McCarthy is already talking about defunding the organization through the appropriations process. And in the Senate, GOP leaders who have been eyeing a vote on legislation banning abortions after 20 weeks of gestation say this will give them momentum to clear the bill later this session.

“I think it really probably enhances the prospects of something like that passing right now,” South Dakota Sen. John Thune, the third-ranking Senate Republican, said Thursday. “I think that’s such an egregious, awful, horrible example out there, which I think just elevates the importance of addressing it. So I think it probably helps the bill.”

Planned Parenthood says the video is a misconstrued smear campaign using “heavily edited videos to make outrageous claims about programs that help women donate fetal tissue for medical research.”

Of course, the drive for all of this usually comes from the same people that poor shame while ensuring no one makes a living wage.  Here’s an article on How the American South Drive the Low Wage Economy from American Prospect’s Harold Meyerson.

The American South before the Civil War was the low-wage—actually, the no-wage—anchor of the first global production chain.

Today, as the auto and aerospace manufacturers of Europe and East Asia open low-wage assembly plants in Tennessee, Alabama, South Carolina, and Mississippi, the South has assumed a comparable role once more. Indeed, the South today shares more features with its antebellum ancestor than it has in a very long time. Now as then, white Southern elites and their powerful allies among non-Southern business interests seek to expand to the rest of the nation the South’s subjugation of workers and its suppression of the voting rights of those who might oppose their policies. In fact, now more than then, the South’s efforts to spread its values across America are advancing, as Northern Republicans adopt their Southern counterparts’ antipathy to unions and support for voter suppression, and as workers’ earnings in the North fall toward Southern levels. And now as then, a sectional backlash against Southern norms has emerged that, when combined with the Southern surge, is again creating two nations within one.

Bill Clinton and CharlotteSo, here’s a cute break and a picture of Baby Charlotte and her Grandad!! There are more at this like from the UK’s Daily Mail.

Bill Clinton was spotted spending some quality time with his granddaughter Charlotte on Thursday morning.

The pair were photographed in New York City’s Madison Square Park as the former president took the infant to see a kids concert.

This is not the first time Clinton has been on babysitting duty either, saying last week that he and wife Hillary were recently in charge of the tiny tyke for her parents.

President Obama continues to be on a roll that cements his legacy.  Alaska’s Governor announced his will be the 30th state to take the Medicaid Expansion offered through the ACA.  

Gov. Bill Walker said Thursday he would use his executive power to expand the public Medicaid health-care program to newly cover as many as 40,000 low-income residents.

The decision comes after the Alaska Legislature earlier this year rejected Walker’s efforts to expand the program through the state budget process, then adjourned without allowing a vote on a separate expansion bill.

Republicans seem to be okay with living breathing people dying, starving, and living lives with no future.  Zygotes get preferential treatment while they assign folks to living hells.

Here is a good list from Robert Reich on The Three Biggest Lies republican tell about poverty.

Lie : Jobs reduce poverty.

Senator Marco Rubio said poverty is best addressed not by raising the minimum wage or giving the poor more assistance but with “reforms that encourage and reward work.”

This has been the standard Republican line ever since Ronald Reagan declared that the best social program is a job. A number of Democrats have adopted it as well. But it’s wrong.

Surely it’s better to be poor and working than to be poor and unemployed. Evidence suggests jobs are crucial not only to economic well-being but also to self-esteem. Long-term unemployment can even shorten life expectancy.

But simply having a job is no bulwark against poverty. In fact, across America the ranks of the working poor have been growing. Around one-fourth of all American workers are now in jobs paying below what a full-time, full-year worker needs in order to live above the federally defined poverty line for a family of four.

Why are more people working but still poor? First of all, more jobs pay lousy wages.

While low-paying industries such as retail and fast food accounted for 22 percent of the jobs lost in the Great Recession, they’ve generated 44 percent of the jobs added since then, according to a recent report from the National Employment Law Project.

Second, the real value of the minimum wage continues to drop. This has affected female workers more than men because more women are at the minimum wage.

Third, government assistance now typically requires recipients to be working. This hasn’t meant fewer poor people. It’s just meant more poor people have jobs.

Bill Clinton’s welfare reform of 1996 pushed the poor into jobs, but they’ve been mostly low-wage jobs without ladders into the middle class. The Earned Income Tax Credit, a wage subsidy, has been expanded, but you have to be working in order to qualify.

Work requirements haven’t reduced the number or percent of Americans in poverty. They’ve merely increased the number of working poor – a term that should be an oxymoron.

Meanwhile, the man most responsible for the mess that is Greece is now a Billionaire. All of his wealth has come from Goldman Sachs but not his salary.  However, he has said this about the poor.  Too bad he hasn’t acted on getting laws passed to relieve poverty.

In recent years, Blankfein has spoken about the need for public policies that promote fairer distribution of wealth while not overly crimping its creation.

“I know I’m a big fat cat, plutocrat kind of guy, but I will tell you I’ve been the beneficiary of some of these redistribution policies,” Blankfein told business school students in South Africa in April, noting he grew up in public housing and got need-based scholarships to Harvard. “Sometimes I wish I had amnesia, because there’s lots of things I’d like to forget, but that isn’t one of them.”

President Obama was met with Confederate flags while heading toward an Oklahoma prison for this speech.  The president is taking on mandatory minimums for small drug “crimes”.  The Confederate Flag waving was shameful.  The speech was compelling.

What’s on your reading and blogging list today?

 

 


Monday Reads: The Heart is Still a Lonely Hunter

Dance Magazine Diana Huntress Varga greyhound art printGood Morning!

I am in one of those becoming states.  It’s heartening in some way, I suppose, to think that one can be so firmly planted in adulthood and smug only to realize they still have so much work to do on issues that seem to crop up out of no where. I remember clearly where I was when Princess Diana died in Paris in that tragic auto crash 16 years ago.  I was in my French Quarter apartment with the man who brought me to New Orleans.  I thought he would be the love for and of the rest of my life. I have never known such passion right up and beyond the day it ended. It did not end well.

It is sixteen years later and life and love remain ephemeral as they are by design. Those days gave birth to my intense Buddhist practice.  These days I do not feel like I can find the pure wisdom of dakinimind. The day of Diana’s death was a turning point for me because I was about to be left for a woman half my age and everything would fall apart by the end of the year. I had a creeping feeling that summer when he spoke of a certain student but felt that taboos where too big to cross.  They were not.

“We” fell apart.  I fell apart. My job disappeared.  The ink on my divorce decree dried well.  This man actually wrote to me right before my daughter’s wedding last year to reconnect. He congratulated me on the doctorate because he knew that it was a central pursuit of my life and he knew what it was like to get one.  He found me again or had been watching me evidently. The e-missive was ignored because I have grown in many ways and I have no desire to revisit that relationship.  At that point, nearly 15 years after, it seemed impossible for me to believe I would ever mutter the words “I love you” again to another man and I haven’t until last month.  Too much had been lost even though much had been gained like the kathouse, the mighty mustang, the doctorate, and the wonders of New Orleans and my tangential career in music. My life has been an adventure that would have been unknown in Nebraska.  You know that  I have had a rich life here and met many of my goals. But, I tossed the love thing and men in general in the dustbin of expendable items by the time Diana’s death was a year old.  Hence, I have earned the nickname “Cold Pizza” because that’s about how I’ve treated men for the last 16 years of my life.   It never tastes good reheated so might as well toss it out.  I actually sustained several simultaneous relationships for a number of years.  One for nearly 7 years.  Still, no mention of the goal of the lonely hunter.  So now, on this nearing anniversary of Diana and her tragic death and her endless search to just be loved by one person without reservation and without boundary, I  am drawn back to the hunt of her lonely heart.  This path is one I know well no matter how overgrown or recently cleared it may be.

Hers is one of those stories that still draws others in too but for many different reasons. For me, it is because I so desperately understand her need to be loved unequivocally.  You’d have to know the troubled story of my mother to really understand that statement but you are not my psychologist and this post is not directly about the bonds of early attachment. It is about the result of attachment gone unresolved.  It is why I try to let  all the people in my life know they are loved without condition. This includes you.  I have Bodhisattva vows even though I fall sadly short of them and I try to expand love to encompass every being out there.   DIana appeared universally loved but yet that was not enough for her.  There was something compelling her from childhood to find the one sort of love that she felt she had never experienced. I think she loved without bounds too because it was the one thing she felt she never was given in her most basic relationships. To me, she exists beyond the boundaries of time and history like a tragic Shakespeare heroine or a mythical being.  Her central story is still her quest for unconditional love.

Conspiracy theories are back surrounding the deaths of Princess Diana and her companion Dodi al Fayed, after British media reported allegations that the couple may have been murdered by British special forces.

Despite a $7 million joint French and British police investigation that concluded that Diana, al Fayed and their driver Henri Paul’s deaths in 1997 were accidents, a report in The Mirror claims they were allegedly murdered and it was all covered up.

The allegation surfaced at a second court martial of Sgt. Danny Nightingale, who was found guilty of illegal gun possession, The Mirror reported. Among the evidence presented at the trial was a letter from a former soldier’s estranged in-laws that makes the claim that the SAS (Special Air Service) “was behind Princess Diana’s death,” the newspaper reported.

On Saturday, Scotland Yard said that British police were looking into new information that has surfaced in connection with the deaths of Diana and al Fayed, but police declined to say what that new information was.

“The Metropolitan Police Service is scoping information that has recently been received in relation to the deaths and assessing its relevance and credibility,” Scotland Yard officials said in a statement. “The assessment will be carried out by officers from the specialist crime and operations command.

“This is not a re-investigation and does not come under Operation Paget,” the statement said.

These new conspiracy theories are not what has driven me back to the Diana chronicles.  It was her portrait once again shining from my issue of Vanity Fair. This story is about another love in Diana’s life.  It makes me wonder what drove her on this endless search for love and acceptance when the world offered it up to her?

Diana’s closest confidants in her last years did not need an inquest to know the absurdity of Al Fayed’s claims. Not only was she not planning to marry Dodi Al Fayed, or pregnant with his child, they say, but she was in fact still “madly in love,” as one of them describes it, with another man, an unassuming Pakistani heart surgeon named Hasnat Khan.

Perhaps, her hunt for love will be better memorialized in yet another movie. My hope is that it will not be one more sophomoric soap opera filled with less complex people than you find at any mundane Republican convention. The royals are anything but simple folk.

With the birth of her first grandson she’ll never meet, Princess Diana is again in the headlines. Now she’s gazing out at us from the September cover of Vanity Fair, just as a new and controversial movie about her final love affair is preparing to open.

It is hard to imagine two more unparallel lives than me and my two daughters and the late Diana and her heir and spare.  Yet, I continue to be drawn by her story because her search and mine seem inexorably linked by more than the timing of her death and a betrayal that made me such an Ice Queen for so long. Her post-betrayal life was seriously different.   I am still here in New Orleans and trying to deal once again with outcroppings of our shared pursuit.  Even after all these years of time on the mat and time in my mind, of trying to find a way to love without grasping, love without differentiating between my flesh and blood and the hungry dog on the street, and seeking the ability to understand that love should be beyond just two, I struggle again.

1788-22716The endless pursuit of humans for all kinds of things seems to be all encompassing at times.   Some of them are higher pursuits, some of them are the tasks and errands of fools.

The Weekly Standard‘s Bill Kristol was one of Sarah Palin’s earliest supporters to be picked as the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, and now he says she can “resurrect herself” by running to be a senator from Alaska.

In an interview on Sunday, ABC’s Benjamin Bell asked Kristol if Palin had disappointed him after he pushed so hard for her to be on the 2008 ticket.

“I was for taking the gamble of putting her on the ticket, I don’t think it hurt the ticket in 2008,” Kristol explained. “I think her stepping down as governor of Alaska was a big problem. People don’t like to see a candidate, a governor, an executive — absent some medical reason or whatever — just leave office early. And she had been a good governor — incidentally — of Alaska until then. So, I think that is something, I think, she has to recover from in terms of being a serious leader in the party. Still has a lot of loyalty, still can shape the debate, she still has a great political touch.”

“I think the way Palin would possibly resurrect herself — if that’s the right word or rehabilitate herself, I think is a better way of putting it — run for Senate in Alaska in 2014,” he continued. “I’m not urging that. I’m just saying, if I were her adviser, I would say, ‘Take on the incumbent, you have to win a primary, then you have to beat an incumbent Democrat, it’s not easy.’”

“But if she did that, suddenly — if you can imagine that,” Kristol added, smiling. “Sarah Palin, freshman senator, January 2015 in Washington having beaten an incumbent. That would be pretty interesting.”

Bell also asked Kristol about the presidential ambitions of billionaire mogul Donald Trump.

“I don’t think he’d be a particularly good one, and I don’t think he’s going to be one,” the conservative columnist quipped.

But Kristol did have some ideas about how Republicans nationwide could be in “good shape” by following the lead of conservative lawmakers in North Carolina.

I just have one thing to say to that interview.  WTF?

Unfortunately, many start filling the days of an uneventful hunt with drugs.  What has mandatory drug sentencing done to our society?  Why not treat the disease instead of punishing the outcomes?  The money appears to be in the punishment these days as the profit motive and the Reagan/Nixon Drug Wars creates more US Gulags than Stalin. This is from the keyboard of Adam Gropnik at The New Yorker.

 As I wrote last year, there are more African-American men now incarcerated in America than were held in slavery in 1861, and more Americans under “judicial control” of one kind or another than Stalin held in his Gulag.

But even if this is the first decisive small stone pitched against a national shame, its specific effect on the imprisoned will still be minimal. Most diana-the-huntressprosecutions are not federal, no one now in prison will be released, and the careful hedge of politic exceptions—no mercy for drug gangs, dealers, etc.—is bound to create many complications. As so often, though, the critics, I suspect, both underestimate the difficulty of big change and the geometric, multiplier effect of small ones. The mandatory-minimum movement was a way, typical of the fear-and-revenge cycle of the eighties, to prevent those damned liberal judges from letting drug offenders loose. It was a way to short-circuit permissiveness—not to mention decency, common sense, and simple mercy—by insisting that an offense that is no worse, really, than being caught with a Martini in a speakeasy should be met with enough prison time to ruin a life. It expressed an ideology. By expressing its opposite, the new rules discredit the old one. As with gay marriage, a signal from on high can often have as much value as a successful bit of comprehensive legislation. The clarity of the sign is plain even if the power of the signal is weak: the thirty years of irrational vengefulness expressed in those mandatory minimums that filled our prisons to no real social purpose is now robbed of its appearance of natural legitimacy, of social consensus. What should follow, surely, is its end.

Republicans are in search of something.  Obama’s media guru David Plouffe says that they don’t have anything to sell.  How does a party repackage and sell bupkis?  Here’s what Plouffe has to say about Preibus saying that no media outlet that isn’t interested in Republicans gets a debate.

“They (Republicans) don’t have a product to sell.” He elaborated, while trying not to laugh too hard at the endless endurance of Republican delusion, that they could open all of the field offices in the world but without a product to sell, it would not translate to national electoral victory.

Plouffe said, “Chairman Priebus just talked about all of the field organizers — by the way 160 people in this big country isn’t very much — they don’t have a product to sell. You can hire 10,000 people to win the presidency in 2016, 2020 — these are facts, not opinions — but they have to grow their vote with Hispanics, suburban women, younger voters, the growing Asian communities.”

Plouffe added that the GOP is not rehabilitating; they are retrenching.

This is accurate. The media likes to portray Democrats as partisan and thus as blind and inaccurate as Republicans, but that is a lazy false equivalency. Plouffe is the author of The Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama’s Historic Victory, in which he laid out the strategies and tactics that he used during Obama’s groundbreaking 2008 campaign. He didn’t do that by pretending that opening field offices in areas where minorities reside would sell them on policies that would harm them.

Obama opened field offices (largely manned by volunteers, I might add) in areas where his policies were a natural fit — that is, anywhere that the 98% and/or the morally responsible reside.

diana Diana2During the 2012 campaign, the Obama team kept telling the media that their polls told them something different than the polling companies. The media and the Romney campaign happily ignored these warnings. That was a mistake, because it turned out that the Obama team weren’t bluffing. It turned out that they actually dealt with reality in order to strategize a winning plan.

Republicans can’t win until they either face reality or come up with a new way to sell people on policies that are harmful for them. So far, Republicans are doubling down on their Southern Strategy, which is not new and is finally starting to backfire. And let’s face it, if they believed in their own press, they wouldn’t be working so hard to disenfranchise the very people they claim their field offices are going to appeal to. They know that they can’t sell bigotry and hate to minorities, but they must sell it to whatever is left of the whites-only contingency because it is all they have.

With that, I leave you to hunt some good links and blog threads to share with us.  Have a great day!