White Terrorist Apologia
Posted: January 9, 2011 Filed under: Breaking News, John Birch Society in Charge, Surreality, The Media SUCKS, Violence against women | Tags: Jared Loughner, Juan Cole, libertarian and militia extremists, right wing apologia, White male terrorism 80 Comments
Professor Juan Cole has written a powerful piece on White Terrorism that explains why Tuscon shooter Jared Loughner’s shooting spree was a political act. Loughner was undoubtedly mentally ill. He was rejected by Army recruiting because of drug use. Disturbing accounts of his behavior while attending community college are now being reported by the press. He was clearly a ticking time bomb with access to high powered weapons. All of these, however, do not change the basic political nature of his closing diatribes on MySpace and on Youtube. The right wing is trying to use one cite of The Communist Manifesto as a favorite book to frame him as a leftie when evidence is becoming more clear that he was probably an extremist libertarian. The two most outspoken libertarians at the moment are Glenn Beck and Ron Paul. They are not leftist or Democratic. They are happily situated in the Right Wing of the Republican party.
Apologia for white terrorism is every where today and coming from the usual suspects. High among them is any media outlet with Rupert Murdoch financing and ownership. Remember all the right wing outrage over the Homeland Security report citing the possible increase in young, white male domestic terrorism?
(U//FOUO) The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.
I’ve included Glenn Beck’s reaction to the report. Listen to the characteristics he describes as harmless and considers patriotic, then think, hmmm, does this sound like the Tucson Shooter to you? Do you honestly believe that some young man starting to go over the edge to insanity can’t listen to this and feel empowered? Jerrod Loughner looks like the archetype for lone wolf extremist. The Feds are currently investigating his ties to Pro-White racist organizations. Specifically, the “American Renaissance”. Jerrod Loughner’s rants were parcel and part of the current Bircher Bunch’s diatribes against the Federal Government
Wing Nut Scramble (Live Blogging a Shooter Tragedy)
Posted: January 8, 2011 Filed under: Crime, Live, psychology, U.S. Politics | Tags: bans on automatic weapons, campaign violence, gun control, Jared Loughner, mentally ill with access to automatic weapons, right wing violent rhetoric and images, Tea party Rhetoric 72 Comments
You don’t have to have a doctorate in psychology to figure out that the latest spree shooter had serious mental illness problems. What’s odd to me is the sudden scramble–typical in these situations–by ideologues ready to label his mental illness as a symptom of political ideology. No where is this more rampant than the number of right wingers that are taking one mention of one book–The Communist Manifesto–as an indication that suspected shooter Jared Loughner was a leftie. That’s pretty interesting given that WAPO is reporting that he’s a veteran. Loughner tried to enlist in the military but was rejected. (See update below.) They’re screaming ‘leftie’ while simultaneously scrubbing their sites of items like the Palin Tweet and the Palin Map of Congressional Critterz’ Districts–including that of shooting victim Congress Woman Gifford–with rifle sight images over the top. Is this kind of after-the-fact scrubbing a mea culpa of sorts? They’re sure acting like they own it.
Giffords has been a target of violent threats for some time now. The threats have come from the right wing and the majority have occurred since the HCR vote last summer. Folks that say that this shooter’s acts–no matter how linked to his personal mental hell–can’t be put into the context of encouraging and enabling violence haven’t been paying attention. Violent imagery and rhetoric is a loaded gun. It’s the same denial that comes from anti-abortion supporters and their disconnect from the shooting of Dr. Gun. You encourage it. You own a role in it. It’s not the root cause of mental illness, but it establishes violence as a potentially heroic act. Most psychotic people are crazy but not stupid. They can feel the heroic myth. Many seek a way to go down with it.
But it’s worth noting that Giffords — who in 2006 became the youngest woman ever elected to Congress, at 36 — has, for more than a year, been the target of violence-tinged rhetoric from political opponents and of threats that appear to have come from right-wing activists.
Asked by the New York Post whether his daughter had any enemies, Giffords’s father replied: “The whole tea party.”
In August 2009, an attendee at a Giffords town-hall meeting dropped a handgun, leading Giffords’ staff to call the police. “We have never felt the need before to notify law enforcement when we hold these events,” her spokesman said at the time.
After Giffords voted in favor of the health-care overhaul in March, she said that vandals had broken the glass door of her Tucson office. “The rhetoric is incredibly heated, not just the calls but the emails, the slurs,” she told MSNBC at the time. “Things have really gotten spun up.”
Ben Smith has a brief thread up on the foot prints left in social media by alleged shooter Jared Loughner. Some of them are bizarre rants about currency and the gold standard that are worthy of a Glenn Beck or Ron Paul fan. There’s also some crazed references to correct English grammar and mind control. Who knows which flake in the vast American Breakfast Bowl of ideology some of this stuff comes from?





Recent Comments