Justice And A Call For Public Hangings
Posted: January 28, 2012 Filed under: abortion rights, fetus fetishists, public hangings | Tags: abortion, North Carolina, public executions 15 CommentsWe’ve seen the Hollywood version:
The gallows is assembled. The dust is high and a sense of anticipation ripples through the air. There’s a hanging come tomorrow and it’s looking to be a good day. The condemned man manages to hoist himself to the jail window. He watches the ongoing construction. He doesn’t say anything. Fixing his jaw, he looks up at the sky and we know he’s silently wondering if he can keep it together, not cry out like a little girl. Or soil himself.
The morning of? Mothers pack a lunch because the hanging is midday and the children might get hungry. The righteous men in town think a hanging is a good, fine thing. God Almighty Hisself said it–An Eye for an Eye. And their sons, these righteous men whisper, will see what hard justice looks like then buck up, choose the straight and narrow.
The whole town turns out. Dogs bark, babies cry and the sun burns down. The condemned man turns his eyes away when the black clad minister offers up a prayer. He looks beyond the crowd as if he sees something way off, something no one else can see. Or maybe his mouth is trembling and the sweat is running in his eyes but we don’t get to see much because the thin-lipped sheriff yanks a black hood over the man’s head.
A few heartbeats later, the sheriff nods to the executioner. The lever creaks, the hatch opens. The man drops with a creaking whoosh. He drops like a stone, straight into eternity. He twitches–once, twice. But then all is still.
The crowd is quiet now. Some people look away. Some smirk. Others stare at the dead man, look right through him, only to turn with a quiet resignation and everyone, even the dogs and old timers, shuffle back to whatever they’ve left undone or are loathe to go back to.
Until the next time.
I’ve always watched these scenes and thought, Thank God, I wasn’t born back in the day when an execution was considered entertainment, a welcome respite from the hard-pressed, often dreary, short lives our ancestors lived. Cultures and mindsets change, evolve.
But sometimes they don’t.
Republican Representative Larry Pittman, District 82 from the great State of North Carolina wants to bring back public hangings. A deterrent to
crime, he says, but noted abortion doctors first in line for the gallows.
I could brush this off as a joke, the product of a small, twisted mind but it turns out Representative Pittman expressed his view via a note, which he then emailed to every member of the North Carolina General Assembly. Seems like a particular prisoner really ticked Representative Pittman off, yanked his chain good, when said prisoner wrote a letter to the local paper [published by a most discriminating editor] in which he bragged about his cushy prison life and how endless appeals would keep his hide from the executioner for years on end.
According to the email, Representative Pittman’s reaction was, in part, the following:
We need to make the death penalty a real deterrent again by actually carrying it out. Every appeal that can be made should have to be made at one time, not in a serial manner,” Pittman wrote in the email. “If murderers (and I would include abortionists, rapists, and kidnappers, as well) are actually executed, it will at least have the deterrent effect upon them. For my money, we should go back to public hangings, which would be more of a deterrent to others, as well.
To be fair to Representative Pittman, I do not know the details of this prisoner’s crime. As far as I know, he may deserve to rot in prison forever. He may even deserve to swing from a rope. Personally, I’m not a huge fan of the death penalty, particularly when I read stats like this:
Since 1973, at least 121 people have been released from death row after evidence of their innocence emerged. During the same period of time, over 982 people have been executed. Thus, for every eight people executed, we have found one person on death row who never should have been convicted. These statistics represent an intolerable risk of executing the innocent. If an automobile manufacturer operated with similar failure rates, it would be run out of business.
Our capital punishment system is unreliable. A recent study by Columbia University Law School found that two thirds of all capital trials contained serious errors. When the cases were retried, over 80% of the defendants were not sentenced to death and 7% were completely acquitted.
But that’s an argument for another day.
Representative Pittman did, in fact, back pedal on sending his ‘opinion’ to every member of the General Assembly, claiming it was intended for a single member. He was fatigued, he said, hitting ‘Reply All’ in error. He also said that perhaps he’d gotten carried away when he vented his disgust and agitation, but he was over-wrought by his concern for the victim of the letter-writing prisoner. He was concerned about the family’s right to see justice done.
But I missed this part:
Oh, and you know the inclusion of abortion doctors, saying that they should be first in line for the gallows? I apologize. Because even I know that since abortion is still legal in this country, hanging a doctor who has performed a legal abortion would be . . . murder. As a State Representative of the Great State of North Carolina I would not want to give the impression that murder is a good thing or understandable when committed against Pro-Choice Physicians, even those who perform abortions. Because to do so would set a bad example to the very populace I’m pledged to represent. Sending that email was a foolish, unseemly thing to do.
Sadly, he did not write or say that.
As for public hangings acting as a deterrent to crime? Though Timothy McVeigh’s execution was viewed on closed circuit TV for family members of the deceased and rescue workers, the last public execution in the US, a hanging, occurred in 1936 in Owensboro, Kentucky. It was that particular execution, the carnival nature of the hanging and the coverage received, that convinced public officials that going public was not a good idea. We can go back further to find ample examples of public hangings, death by firing squad, horse and quartering, beheadings, etc.
And lo and behold, we still had crime, oodles of it. Frequently during those festive-like affairs, pickpockets flourished and prospered.
Executions were good for business.
I vaguely recall Phil Donahue calling for televised executions, back when the electric chair was still favored. His reasoning was not a pretense that viewable executions would deter crime but that seeing a man or woman electrocuted, the true ugliness of the act, would serve as a deterrent to the death penalty itself.
Was Donahue right? I don’t know. At the time, I thought the suggestion was crazy.
But calling for public hangings, including doctors who perform legal abortions, even from a fatigued state legislator is, in my opinion, a step too far. Maybe we should thank Representative Pittman for offering a window into his mind’s secret workings. We can theorize that since his opinion was ‘intended’ for a single legislator, Representative Pittman assumed his recipient was a kindred spirit, someone who shared his ‘frustrations.’
That makes at least one like-minded person serving in the NC General Assembly. We can only guess how many others.
Oh, and there’s this–in addition to being a NC representative? Mr. Pittman lists his occupation as: Pastor, Shipping Worker and Company Chaplain.
You cannot make this stuff up.
Soylent Green Revisited? Nah, Just the Crazy Season in High Gear
Posted: January 25, 2012 Filed under: abortion rights, fundamentalist Christians, Reproductive Health, Reproductive Rights, Republican politics, Women's Rights | Tags: abortion, fetus fetishists, silly season, stem cell research 18 CommentsThere is no end to the terror and frantic posturing when it comes to the Republicans’ fetus fetish. I thought I had heard it all but a Oklahoma
legislator, specifically Republican State Senator Ralph Shortey, has introduced a state Senate Bill 1418 prohibiting the use of human fetuses in . . . our food. No that is not a typo. The proposed legislation reads as follows:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012)
SENATE BILL 1418 By: Ralph Shortey
AS INTRODUCED
An Act relating to food; prohibiting the manufacture or sale of food or products which use aborted human fetuses; providing for codification; and providing an effective date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1-1150 of Title 63, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: No person or entity shall manufacture or knowingly sell food or any other product intended for human consumption which contains aborted human fetuses in the ingredients or which used aborted human fetuses in the research or development of any of the ingredients. SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2012″
Why? you may ask incredulously.
Well, because a Christian anti-abortion group [reportedly, The Children of God] has made ‘allegations’ that a bio-tech firm and several food companies used embryonic stem cells to test the flavor of food and even more egregiously used stem cells to enhance the flavor of specific food products. The companies cited included Pepsi Co., Kraft, and Nestle. The accused bio-tech firm, Semomyx, was also connected to Campbell Soup Co. After the original accusations were made, Campbell cut its tie with the bio-tech program.
Bad PR is bad PR. And this, of course, is stomach churning.
But an accusation is easy to make.
The original allegations made last year went nowhere and the accused companies have flatly denied all charges. In addition, it’s absolutely illegal [not to mention unethical] under US law to use stem cells in the alleged manner.
That’s the true beauty of a witch hunt.
All one need do is scream, WITCH! Public passion is enflamed, fears are stirred and we’re off to the races [or the stake, as the case may be]. You can even get a state senator to introduce a bill that has absolutely no bearing to reality. Hell, it might be worth a vote or two.
Of all the idiotic fears I’ve read, this takes the cake. Not only is it disgusting fear-mongering, something the Republicans have turned into an art form, but it distracts from and delays any real effort in solving our economic issues.
Which are very real. And for which Republicans have few solutions.
But wait, let’s think about it as Stephan D. Foster, Jr. suggests at Addicting Info. [Addicting Info cites its mission as debunking Right-Wing propaganda.] If you were hell bent on forbidding any and all stem cell research and/or products for medicinal purposes, the sort that have been proposed for the cure of Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s or used to generate cell growth in brain or spinal-cord damaged patients, what better way to covertly outlaw scientific research than slide through a seemingly pointless bill outlawing fetuses entering our food chain. As Foster states:
Depending on the source, stem cell treatments could fall under a ‘product that contains aborted human fetuses.’ You “consume” medicine in the same sense that you “consume” food; it enters the body and is processed in some fashion. Whether it is used for energy or to heal a damaged brain is irrelevant to this law.
Convoluted? Crazy?
Certainly no crazier than Senator Shortey, originally unavailable for comment, who told Nicole Burgin, KRMG Talk Radio the following :
I don’t know if it is happening in Oklahoma, it may be, it may not be. What I am saying is that if it does happen then we are not going to allow it to manufacture here.
Oh, good Lord! Is this a disciple of Rick Perry? Senator Shortey claims he went ahead with the legislation because his research led him to believe a law was necessary.
Splendid!
Okay, I want a law of my own. I propose the following: If aliens land on the earth, toting a cookbook? And if they ask for ‘volunteers’ to visit their fine planet? I want Senator Shortey and all like-minded legislators to be the first to board said aliens’ spacecraft. Maybe they can convert a few Outworlders before the Barbeque gets going.
Rick Santorum: Pregnant Rape Victims should “Make the Best out of a Bad Situation”
Posted: January 23, 2012 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, abortion rights, U.S. Politics, Violence against women, Women's Rights | Tags: abortion, anti-choice, incest, religious freedom, Reproductive Rights, Rick Santorum 21 CommentsRick and Karen Santorum were on CNN’s Piers Morgan show on Friday night. I saw a little of it, but I missed this part. Via Think Progress, Morgan asked Santorum about his extreme anti-choice opinions–his goal of criminalizing all abortions, (and prosecuting doctors who perform the procedure) even in cases of rape or incest. Morgan also asked Santorum how he would respond if his own daughter were raped and became pregnant.
SANTORUM: Well, you can make the argument that if she doesn’t have this baby, if she kills her child, that that, too, could ruin her life. And this is not an easy choice. I understand that. As horrible as the way that that son or daughter and son was created, it still is her child. And whether she has that child or doesn’t, it will always be her child. And she will always know that. And so to embrace her and to love her and to support her and get her through this very difficult time, I’ve always, you know, I believe and I think the right approach is to accept this horribly created — in the sense of rape — but nevertheless a gift in a very broken way, the gift of human life, and accept what God has given to you. As you know, we have to, in lots of different aspects of our life. We have horrible things happen. I can’t think of anything more horrible. But, nevertheless, we have to make the best out of a bad situation.
Morgan didn’t ask Santorum about incest victims. What if an 11-year-old girl is impregnated by her own father? Should her father then tell her she has to “make the best of a bad situation” because the embryo or fetus is a “person?”
What about the girls and women who have been brutalized by rape and incest? Santorum seems unconcerned. Not only should they suck it up and take care of the “life” that has been forced upon them, they should also have to follow laws based on Santorum’s personal religious beliefs.
Santorum even had the nerve to claim that references to persons and life in the Constitution were “intended” to include fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses. Yet at the time of the writing of the Constitution, abortion was not even illegal.
This man is dangerous to all girls and women.
Paul Supporters Undermine Santorum’s Anti-Abortion Credentials at “Personhood” Forum
Posted: January 19, 2012 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, abortion rights, Planned Parenthood, PLUB Pro-Life-Until-Birth, religious extremists, U.S. Politics | Tags: abortion, fetus fetishists, Karen Santorum, Michelle Goldberg, Mitt Romney, Personhood USA, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, Tom Allen 9 CommentsAt the Daily Beast, Michelle Goldberg reports that Rick Santorum was put on the defensive yesterday at a Personhood USA forum in Greenville, South Carolina.
Wednesday afternoon, all the Republican presidential candidates except Mitt Romney spoke at a town-hall meeting in Greenville, South Carolina, organized by Personhood USA, the hardline anti-abortion group. It should have been Santorum’s sweet spot—after all, no other candidate has made social issues so central to his campaign. The forum seemed designed to amplify his attacks on Romney. Each candidate was questioned for 20 minutes by a panel of three anti-abortion activists, who made frequent reference to Romney’s pro-choice past and his refusal to attend the event. In the end, though, the night might have hurt Santorum most of all.
For one thing, the audience was dominated, unexpectedly, by vocal Ron Paul supporters, with only a small number of visible Santorum fans. That’s a bad sign for the ex-senator, since if he can’t dominate at an anti-abortion gathering, he can’t dominate anywhere. Worse, while hundreds of attendees were inside the Greenville Hilton ballroom, someone was slipping flyers on their windshields warning that when it comes to abortion, Santorum is really a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” who doesn’t mean what he says.
The flyers referred to Karen Santorum’s long-term relationship with Tom Allen, an abortion provider in Pittsburgh. The relationship ended after Karen met her future husband Rick. In addition the flyers charged that Santorum had voted to fund Planned Parenthood, without explaining that the funding had been included in an omnibus budget bill. Read the complete text of the flyer here.
Goldberg suggests that Paul supporters are taking a leaf from Karl Rove’s playbook, specifically his well-known strategy of attacking opposition candidates’ greatest strengths.
The letter ended by describing Santorum in terms more often used for Romney. “I’m worried the facts about Rick Santorum won’t get out in time for this South Carolina Primary, and pro-lifers will be fooled into voting someone [sic] like Rick Santorum who DOES NOT share our values,” it says. “He just wants to be President so badly, he’ll say anything to be elected.”
Indeed, if you hadn’t been following the primary, you’d have left the Hilton on Wednesday thinking that Paul, the OB/GYN, was the best-known abortion opponent in the race….Paul doesn’t dwell on this stuff when he’s speaking to libertarian crowds, which may be why some Paul supporters are under the misapprehension that he just wants to return the issue of abortion to the states. In fact, speaking at the Personhood forum, he made it clear that he only wants to do that while working toward an anti-abortion constitutional amendment. He even boasted of his ability to win libertarians to the anti-abortion cause.
Ron Paul was not even at the meeting, but addressed the crowd by video feed. Nevertheless, his supporters dominated the event.











Recent Comments