Live Blog: Iowa Caucuses
Posted: January 3, 2012 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, Republican politics, Republican presidential politics, U.S. Politics | Tags: 2012 presidential election, Iowa Caucuses, live blog, Republican primaries 121 CommentsThe caucuses are just wrapping up, and it looks like I may get my wish. Ron Paul seems to be leading at the moment with Romney second, and Santorum third. I can’t wait to see the elite Republicans freak out if Paul wins. From CBS News:
Doors have closed at caucus precincts across Iowa, and early results from CBS News entrance polls show a three-way race for the Republican presidential nomination among Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum.
Entrance polling reveals that Paul’s voters are male, younger, and many are first-time caucus goers. Romney’s voters are looking for someone who can beat President Obama, while Santorum’s voters looking for a true conservative.
Much data has yet to be collected, and those arriving earliest may not reflect the total caucus voters. The precincts closed their doors at 7 p.m. CT, leaving Republican voters in the Hawkeye State to be the first to weigh in on this year’s presidential contest. Mitt Romney took the lead among the early entrance polls four years ago, but finished second in the caucuses to Mike Huckabee, who was then the choice of evangelical conservatives.
USA Today has a Live Blog of events in Iowa, and so does CNN. CNN also has live video from several caucus sites.
I’m listening to MSNBC on satellite radio. What are you watching or listening to? What are you hearing? Who do you think is going to win this thing? Let us know in the comments. If you have found a good place to watch on-line, let me know and I’ll post it up here.
The Art of Doublespeak
Posted: December 1, 2011 Filed under: #Occupy and We are the 99 percent!, 2012 presidential campaign, double-speak, Economy, income inequality, unemployment | Tags: 2011: days of revolt, 2012 presidential election, Financial Crisis 9 CommentsLanguage is important. Words can inspire, inflame, enrage. Words can hide a speaker’s intentions. Sing me a lullaby. Spin me a fairytale. Sell me a load of bull-hockey.
One of today’s best-known language twisters is Frank Luntz. Pollster and political consultant, Luntz is the Master of Political Doublespeak. He would have made Orwell proud: War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength. He crawls out during every election cycle with the creepy focus groups, wired up and ready to go. We learn ‘what words work.’ Otherwise known as ‘what words obfuscate, spin and get the best reaction from would-be voters.’
Well, here’s a Newsflash: Luntz is worried about Occupy Wall Street, all those sorry slackers the GOP and various critics have sidelined as hippies, losers and Obama-lovers. Seems from Luntz’s point of view, OWS is having an impact on political discourse.
No kidding Sherlock!
And so, Luntz decided a tutorial was needed to school Republicans how to “speak” when asked questions about the very issues that the Occupy wave has been raising.
Fascinating! A defense against the so-called irrelevant. But even more fascinating is the list of rules on how to ‘discuss and defend against’ the grievances that Occupy members have introduced into the public sphere.
The very first instruction made me laugh:
Don’t say capitalism.
Because people might start questioning the broken economic construct that’s taken root in the US. Btw, I haven’t heard OWS slamming capitalism, per se. It’s Vulture Capitalism, the darling of the neoliberal/libertarian set, that’s being questioned and panned, where only the well-heeled financial class takes the booty while the rest of the country is left to collect unemployment checks and shop with food stamps. Sorry, don’t think ‘free market’ or ‘economic freedom’ will wash in a country where poverty is rising at an alarming rate and over 20% of American kids are classified as food insecure.
Politicians whether Right or Left need to do far better than that. Like maybe tell the truth: that the financial class in this country has been running a huge Ponzi scheme, that transnational corporations are willing to run roughshod over everything in a blind pursuit of profit, that endless war makes money for the few, while the many bleed.
That would be refreshing.
Don’t say the government taxes the rich. Tell them the government takes from the rich.
Oh yes, that’s much better. Then pull out Warren Buffet’s statement that his tax rate
[as a multi-billionaire] is lower than what his secretary is required to pay. And please, take a spin over the corporate history of negative taxes after all the loopholes and government largesse heaped on the ‘job creators’ is taken in to account. Then too, let’s not forget the ‘off-shore’ pooling of tax-free profits and tidy nest eggs. The beat goes on for those with the courage to look.
The government takes from the rich? Hahaha. More like the government sucks up to the rich and their ever-present lobbyists.
Republicans should forget winning the battle for the middle-class. Call them hardworking tax-payers.
Yes, Republicans should forget winning the middle-class since they’ve gone out of their way to eliminate them, crush them out like last year’s cigarettes.
Frank Luntz is ‘really’ scared of the Occupy Movement ? With rules like this he may be out of a job. If the Republican’s go-to wordsmith can’t get his head or words around the basic complaints of not simply Occupy but most Americans and/or the very real economic and political discontent, then they are deaf, dumb and blind.
Or maybe smart like the wily fox. Because the evidence is everywhere. What to do? Keep the disinformation and propaganda machine in high gear. I won’t belabor the hypocrisy and cynicism of Luntz’s list. He and the entire stable of political pollsters, consultants and analysts on all sides are merely symptoms of a system flailing in the wind, a system that’s forgotten how to reach out or even talk to real people in anything approaching honest discourse. A system that has no respect for its citizenry.
Will the Luntz approach work as it has in the past?
We shall see. But I invite you to read the Ten Commandments of Political Doublespeak for 2012 at the link above. Some examples will make you laugh. Several will make you mad as hell.
Oh, and here’s a tip: Don’t say the word ‘Bonus.’
Mitt Romney Celebrates Veterans Day by Proposing Privatization of VA
Posted: November 11, 2011 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, U.S. Economy, U.S. Military, U.S. Politics, voodoo economics | Tags: 2012 presidential election, medicare, Mitt Romney, Veterans Administration, Veterans benefits, Veterans of Foreign Wars 5 CommentsMitt Romney was in South Carolina today to lunch with some veterans who told him about their struggles with getting health problems dealt with quickly and efficiently by the VA.
From the NYT Caucus Blog:
After listening to several men talk about problems they had encountered with their Veterans Affairs benefits and health care, Mr. Romney mused that it sounded like some free-market competition might help.
“When you work in the private sector and you have a competitor, you know if you don’t treat this customer right, they’re going to leave me and go somewhere else, so I’d better treat them right,” he said. “Whereas if you’re the government, they know there’s nowhere else you guys can go. You’re stuck.”
He added, “Sometimes you wonder if there would be some way to introduce some kind of private sector competition, somebody else who could come in and say, you know, each soldier gets X thousands of dollars attributed to them, and then they can choose whether they want to go with the government’s system or a private system.”
The idea is similar to Romney’s plan for Medicare, which wold allow recipients to choose a private plan instead of the classic government-run health care structure.
The plan did not go over well with one veteran among the 12 discussing the VA with Romney. Auston Thompson, a veteran of the Iraq War and former Marine, told TPM after the session that though the idea of the plan was sound to his fiscally conservative ear, the implementation would likely lead to problems.
“Eventually it would become too much of a nuisance,” Thompson said. He doubted a voucher system would cover the benefits like the existing VA system does. “Private health care is already so expensive, you’d need some kind of health care reform to make it work.”
Jerry Newberry, a spokesman for Veterans Of Foreign Wars, told TPM his group has long opposed policies along the lines of Romney’s proposal.
Nice timing, Mitt. Instead of trying to find new ways to give more of our national treasure to Wall Street, maybe he should come up with some ways to actually create jobs. As for the VA, how about cancelling a couple of Defense Department boondoggle contracts and giving spending the money on health care for vets?
How to Buy the US Congress
Posted: November 9, 2011 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign, Congress, Corporate Crime, corruption, Crime, Economy, fundamentalist Christians, George W. Bush, K street, lobbyists, Regulation | Tags: 2012 presidential election, systemic failure, U.S. Economy 13 CommentsLots of political earthquakes and eruptions going on recently, so many that I missed 60
Minutes this past Sunday evening. But fortunately, I picked up the CBS clip of an extraordinary interview that Lesley Stahl conducted with the infamous Bush-era lobbyist, Jack Abramoff. If you haven’t seen it, gird your loins. If you saw the original program, watch again because this 14-minute video explains in good measure exactly how the ‘train’ [the US government] went off the rails.
In one word: corruption. But let’s use two words: systemic corruption.
Some will insist that Abramoff is an unreliable narrator, considering he spent 4 years in a medium security prison for conspiracy, fraud and tax evasion.
But who better to describe the underbelly of a wrecked, thoroughly compromised system than the best lobbyist that money could buy? Btw, before Abramoff was nailed, he claims he ‘owned’ 100 US Congress people. He considered that number woefully low. See 60 minutes link here. It’s mind boggling.
That Indian Reservation scandal mentioned in the interview? It should be noted that no other than Grover Norquist [No Taxes Ever] and Ralph Reed [Moral Majority’s darling] were involved as well. Somehow they escaped prosecution. The vein of corruption that infects and compromises the very heart and soul of this country runs deep. Abramoff may be a despicable character but he’s actually doing a service [redemption?] by pulling the curtains back, letting in the light. As Bostonboomer has said a number of times: sunlight is always the best disinfectant.
Herman Cain has been fending off accusations of inappropriate sexual conduct left and
right. I certainly don’t wish to minimize those charges. If proven credible in the court of public opinion, those accusations will end Cain’s Presidential bid. But Abramoff and his crew of buddies? They’re the real professionals in the art of the screw, subversive actions raping and robbing an entire Nation.
The question is: will the American public demand a return to the Rule of Law and rout out the corruption that’s killing us. Because as my mama always said: there’s never only one cockroach in the pantry.









Recent Comments