Posted: January 19, 2011 | Author: bostonboomer | Filed under: Barack Obama, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics | Tags: Barack Obama, Christina Romer, jobs, Larry Summers, New York Times Magazine, Obama economic team, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics, unemployment |
I’ll bet Dakinikat can’t wait to start plowing through the New York Times Magazine’s cover story this week: The White House Looks for Work: Inside Obama’s Struggle to Bring Down Unemployment, by Peter Baker.
Who knew Obama was involved in a struggle over jobs? As far as I can tell jobs are about the last thing on Obama’s mind. But what do I know? Apparently, there has been a life and death struggle going on within the President’s economic team over jobs.
Let me just buy them a clue: the answer isn’t cutting the deficit and wiping out the social safety net. Anyway, back to the Caucus blog’s preview of the upcoming NYT mag story and some of the “surprisingly newsy nuggets” we can look forward to reading on Sunday morning.
Mr. Baker writes that the president’s economic team “fractured repeatedly over philosophy (should jobs or deficits take priority?) and personality (who got to attend which meetings?), resulting in feuds that ultimately helped break it apart.”
Wait…that’s news?
The most sensible “tidbit” in the article comes from Christina Romer.
“In Washington, she said, ‘you’re not supposed to say the obvious thing, which is that in retrospect of course it should have been bigger. With unemployment at 10 percent, I don’t know how you could say you wouldn’t have done anything different. Of course you would have made it bigger.’”
— In the article, Ms. Romer said the Obama administration should have gone back to Congress for more stimulus money to bolster the economy when it was clear how bad things really were.
He writes: “‘In my mind,’ she said, ‘the problem was not in the original package; it was in not adjusting to changed circumstances.’ Once it was clear that the situation was deteriorating, she said, the White House should have gone back to Congress for more stimulus money. ‘That was where we could have been bolder,’ she said.”
Duh. For that kind of truth-telling, you get sent to Siberia UC Berkeley.
There’s a supposedly funny story about Larry Summers that I don’t understand. Can someone explain it to me?
Mr. Baker offers this fun tidbit about Mr. Summers: “Tan from a holiday in Jamaica and trying to get his bearings again at Harvard, where he plans to teach a course on Obama’s economic policy and write a book, Summers sat at a corner table and ordered bisque and — from the lighter-fare menu — a steak ‘as rare as your chef will make it.’”
On second thought, maybe Dak should skip the NYT mag article. If these are the highlights, it sounds like a crashing bore. And I didn’t see anything about jobs in there either.
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 18, 2011 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: morning reads, Social Security, Team Obama, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics, Women's Rights | Tags: BP Austrailia, car theft history for Issa, Darrell Issa, Dick Cheney praises Obama, Gulet Mohamed, illegal detention, insurance scams, micro finance, women entrepreneurs |

Good Morning!!!
It’s the end of a long weekend that celebrates the life of an American with vision, purpose, and fortitude in the pursuit of principle. The news at the moment is as glum as the weather. I will try to end the morning reads on higher and lighter ground. I promise.
With that, I start with Glenn Greenwald at Salon and ‘The U.S. role in Gulet Mohamed’s detention’. Thought we were done torturing people and denying them due process? Dream on! This is the story of a young American held in extraordinary conditions in the extraordinary country of Kuwait that basically still owes us their oil fields and freedom from the occupation by Saddam Hussein. Gulet’s been held in some horrible situations that beg the question of who is responsible? Is it some Sultan or President Obama? Yes, this is change you can believe in if you’re Dick Cheney. Gulet and his family were led to believe that he would be released and sent home. Home is the U.S. because he is a US citizen. He deserves a lawyer and due process. Now, he’s on the no-fly list and you know what that means.
As an American citizen, Gulet has the absolute right to return to and re-enter his country. But by secretly placing him on the no-fly list while he was halfway around the world — and providing no information about why he was so placed — the U.S. Government is denying him his right to return. Worse, they know that this action is not only preventing him from returning, but is keeping the 19-year-old in a state of absolute legal limbo, where’s he imprisoned by a country that admits it has no cause for holding him and does not want to hold him, yet which cannot release him. The U.S. government has the obligation to assist its citizens when they end up detained without cause; here, they are doing the opposite: they’re deliberately ensuring it continues.
If there’s any evidence that he has has done anything wrong, he should be charged, indicted, and brought back to the U.S. for trial. What the Obama administration is doing instead is accomplishing what they could not do if he were in the U.S.: holding him without a shred of due process, interrogating him without a lawyer present, and — if his credible claims are to believed — using beatings and torture to get the information it wants (or false information: Gulet told me he was very tempted to falsely confess to make the beatings stop). This abuse of the no-fly list is a common tactic used by the U.S. Government to circumvent all legal and constitutional constraints when it comes to its own citizens; this case just happens to be extra viscerally repellent.
Let’s see what our Secretary of State can do about this.
Not too long ago, our intrepid frontpager BostonBoomer took us down memory lane in pursuit of the vast criminal background that fills the resume of our head Inquisitor, Darrell Issa. Now, it appears The New Yorker does the same. Just remember, your read it here first. Skip the first two pages, those read like some blah blah blah American Fairy Tale. When you hit the rest, look for the pattern of insurance scams, crime, and a fortune that appears to be based in car theft. The justice system is likely the force behind young Issa going into the military. The unraveling of the Fairy Tale begins in 1998–like so many do–with a political tall tale that reflects the spin and not the facts. Some one fact checked Issa’s campaign material.
In May of 1998, Lance Williams, of the San Francisco Examiner, reported that Issa had not always received the “highest possible” ratings in the Army. In fact, at one point he “received unsatisfactory conduct and efficiency ratings and was transferred to a supply depot.” Williams also discovered that Issa didn’t provide security for Nixon at the 1971 World Series, because Nixon didn’t attend any of the games.
A member of Issa’s Army unit, Jay Bergey, told Williams that his most vivid recollection of the young Issa was that in December, 1971, Issa stole his car, a yellow Dodge Charger. “I confronted Issa,” Bergey said in 1998. “I got in his face and threatened to kill him, and magically my car reappeared the next day, abandoned on the turnpike.”
Bergey died of lung cancer in 2002, but his widow, Joyce, recently said to me that she remembered her husband telling the story of the stolen Dodge Charger. She laughed when she heard that Issa is now a prominent member of Congress. “Well, he probably figured he was borrowing it from a friend,” she said. “But now we’re discussing politicians, so we all know how honest they are. When I meet a good one, I’ll let you know.”
Issa was transferred to a supply depot in the military. That explains a lot. For example, how does a guy coming out of the army find the funds for a really expensive sports car? Only in America can this sort’ve fractured fairy tale occur and play out in success. Issa is bad news. This is the second time I’ve linked to BB’s expose and it will not be the last. We can muckrake with the best of them here and we intend to keep it up.
Read the rest of this entry »
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 17, 2011 | Author: dakinikat | Filed under: Bailout Blues, Barack Obama, Populism, The Bonus Class, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics, Voter Ignorance | Tags: Looting Social Security, The End of New Deal Liberalism, The Nation, William Grieder |
If you haven’t read William Grieder’s powerful piece ‘The End of New Deal Liberalism’ at The Nation, you really should.
Let me give you a taste.
In these terms, the administration of Barack Obama has been a crushing disappointment for those of us who hoped he would be different. It turns out Obama is a more conventional and limited politician than advertised, more right-of-center than his soaring rhetoric suggested. Most Congressional Democrats, likewise, proved weak and incoherent, unreliable defenders of their supposed values or most loyal constituencies. They call it pragmatism. I call it surrender.
Obama’s maladroit tax compromise with Republicans was more destructive than creative. He acceded to the trickle-down doctrine of regressive taxation and skipped lightly over the fact that he was contributing further to stark injustices. Ordinary Americans will again be made to pay, one way or another, for the damage others did to society. Obama agrees that this is offensive but argues, This is politics, get over it. His brand of realism teaches people to disregard what he says. Look instead at what he does.
Greider outlines the goals of the plutocracy so clearly that you wonder when he’ll be put up for trumped up espionage charges or at least some made-up sex scandal. His opening paragraphs on the capture of our government by corporate interests are just about the most compelling and apt description I’ve read recently. He’s awakened some how to the spokesmodel-in-chief. (h/t to Cinie wherever she may be)
Government has been disabled or captured by the formidable powers of private enterprise and concentrated wealth. Self-governing rights that representative democracy conferred on citizens are now usurped by the overbearing demands of corporate and financial interests. Collectively, the corporate sector has its arms around both political parties, the financing of political careers, the production of the policy agendas and propaganda of influential think tanks, and control of most major media.
What the capitalist system wants is more—more wealth, more freedom to do whatever it wishes. This has always been its instinct, unless government intervened to stop it. The objective now is to destroy any remaining forms of government interference, except of course for business subsidies and protections. Many elected representatives are implicitly enlisted in the cause.
Read the rest of this entry »
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 17, 2011 | Author: bostonboomer | Filed under: Corporate Crime, Gulf Oil Spill, morning reads, U.S. Economy, U.S. Politics, Women's Rights | Tags: Andrew Bacevich, Bank of America, BP Oil Gusher, dispersants, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Gulf Of Mexico, Julian Assange, Martin Luther King's Birthday, military-industrial complex, Ms Magazine, Naomi Klein, New Yorker Magazine, oil, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Sargent Shriver, Sexism, Wikileaks |

Good Morning!! Today is the official Martin Luther King birthday holiday. I hope everyone has the day off. I think I have a few interesting reads for you this morning.
I’ll start with this in depth report by Naomi Klein on scientific studies of the impact of the BP oil gusher on the ecology of the Gulf of Mexico. While the government reassures Americans that everything down in the gulf is safe safe safe, scientists are finding plenty of evidence that that’s not the case. According to
Ian MacDonald, a celebrated oceanographer at Florida State University. “The gulf is not all better now. We don’t know what we’ve done to it.”
MacDonald is arguably the scientist most responsible for pressuring the government to dramatically increase its estimates of how much oil was coming out of BP’s well. He points to the massive quantity of toxins that gushed into these waters in a span of three months (by current estimates, at least 4.1 million barrels of oil and 1.8 million gallons of dispersants). It takes time for the ocean to break down that amount of poison, and before that could happen, those toxins came into direct contact with all kinds of life-forms. Most of the larger animals—adult fish, dolphins, whales—appear to have survived the encounter relatively unharmed. But there is mounting evidence that many smaller creatures—bacteria, phytoplankton, zooplankton, multiple species of larvae, as well as larger bottom dwellers—were not so lucky. These organisms form the base of the ocean’s food chain, providing sustenance for the larger animals, and some grow up to be the commercial fishing stocks of tomorrow. One thing is certain: if there is trouble at the base, it won’t stay there for long.
There is evidence of permanent changes in organisms likely caused by the oil and dispersants, and those changes may be passed on to future generations as mutations. In addition, the damage to creatures at the lower end of the food chain is so extensive that it may lead to collapses and even extinctions in larger species. While it will be difficult to directly pin all the damage on BP, there really isn’t much doubt that the oil and dispersants are at the root of the problems. It’s very bad, folks.
Ms Magazine has gotten involved in a protest against the New Yorker.
Last week, Anne Hays put her latest copy of the New Yorker back in the mail, with a note explaining that the august publication owed her a refund for putting out the second issue in a row featuring almost no pieces by women. In a December issue of the New Yorker content by women made up only three pages of the magazine’s 150; one January issue contained only two items by women, a poem and a brief “Shouts and Murmers” item.
“I am baffled, outraged, saddened, and a bit depressed that, though some would claim our country’s sexism problem ended in the late ’60s, the most prominent and respected literary magazine in the country can’t find space in its pages for women’s voices in the year 2011,” wrote Hays in the letter, promising to send back every issue containing fewer than five female bylines. “You tend to publish 13 to 15 writers in each issue; five women shouldn’t be that hard,” she concluded.
Her letter, posted to Facebook and widely circulated last week, has prompted Ms. magazine to start an online petition reminding the magazine’s editors that there are in fact lots of women in the world and that many of them write feature articles, reviews and poems, and that the premier literary/current events magazine in the country should reflect that fact.
According to the article, the New Yorker is not alone in ignoring women writers. Read it and weep.
Read the rest of this entry »
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Posted: January 14, 2011 | Author: bostonboomer | Filed under: Crime, Surreality, U.S. Politics | Tags: Arizona shootings, Jerad Lee Loughner, Pima County Sheriff |
According to ABC News, the night before his shocking rampage, Jared Loughner tried to develop photos of himself wearing only a g-string and holding his Glock. The photos were turned over to police by a Tucson Walgreens.
The Pima County Sherriff’s Office confirmed to ABC News they had received the photographs from the store and turned them over to the FBI.
The photos, presumably shot in a mirror, show Loughner, 22, posing with the same make of gun he allegedly used in the Jan. 8 shooting. In the photos he holds the pistol against his crotch and buttocks while wearing a bright red thong, sources told ABC News.
The visual I got from that is of Travis Bickel in Taxi Driver talking to himself in the mirror while drawing his guns. What a surreal nightmare this story is!
Have you heard right wingers claiming that if someone had been present at the scene of the shooting who had a gun it could have saved lives? Well, it turns out there was someone like that present, and he almost shot the man who had just disarmed Loughner!
“I carry a gun so I was — I felt like I was a little bit more prepared to do some good and than maybe somebody else would have been,” Joe Zamudio told MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Monday.
“As I came out of the door of the Walgreens, sir, I saw several individuals wrestling with him and I came running. I was already at a full sprint and you know, there’s no time to think about anything,” he explained.
“I saw another individual holding the firearm. I kind of assumed he was the shooter. So I grabbed his wrist and you know told him to drop it and forced him to drop the gun on the ground. When he did that, everybody says, no, no, it’s this guy.”
[….]
…when I came through the door, I had my hand on the butt of my pistol and I clicked the safety off. I was ready to kill him….”I would have shot the man holding the gun,” he added.
Unbelievable.
Is it possible that Loughner had been threatening other legislators than Giffords? According to KGO TV in San Francisco, investigators in the Arizona case have contacted a California State Senator, Leland Yee about threats he received after criticizing Sarah Palin in 2010.
Detectives investigating the shooting of U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona last weekend are considering a connection to California Sen. Leland Yee, who received death threats for criticizing former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin last year.
It’s not clear what connection Arizona authorities suspect.
Yee’s spokesman Adam Keigwin….said Yee’s office received threats relevant to Giffords’ investigation in April 2010, when the senator helped reveal that officials at California State University, Stanislaus shredded documents related to Palin’s contract fees as a keynote speaker.
During the incident, students dug through a trash bin outside a campus administration building and found a shredded contract with a speaker who required first-class air travel from Anchorage, Alaska.
Yee chided the university in news reports, and in response, several voice, text and graphic threats were sent to his office.
Here’s a Huffpo article from April that give details on the threats.
You’ve probably heard that one of the survivors of the shooting, Eric Fuller, blames right wingers like Beck, Angle, and Palin for Loughner’s rampage. You can watch an interview with him at Democracy Now.
Tonight there’s news that Fuller tried to visit Loughner’s parents at home.
Suffering from a bullet-wound to the knee, Fuller got out of his car and limped to the door. He said he decided to stop by on the way to a doctor’s appointment.
“So I thought I’d come over here and try to forgive them,” he said. “I know that sounds crazy.”
He sounds really traumatized. It’s kind of scary to think of what these survivors face in a place like Arizona where there may not be a lot of public health support to help them deal with what they are going through. They really need to be in touch with each other in some kind of therapy group situation, IMHO. On the other hand, the police might not like that, because they could end up getting their stories mixed up.
Police have released a timeline of Loughner’s activities leading up to the shootings.
NPR has an article on “The Other, Better Arizona” by Jeff Biggers
I’d love to read some good news, but I haven’t been able to find any. If you have any, feel free to post links in this thread.
Did you like this post? Please share it with your friends:
Recent Comments