I read the news today, OH BOY!

If I was in need of a mini-vacation then I have to tell you that reading the latest Vanity Fair was not going to do it for me.  There were three articles that brought me down to earth with a thud!  One was the account by Christopher Hitchens who voluntarily underwent water boarding and concluded that it really is torture.  I think the most valuable quote I got from the article was bolded and oversized and said  “If waterboarding does not constitute torture, then there is no such thing as torture.”

Hitchens was one of the biggest drummers in the drumbeat to the Iraq War. This article is about four pages and has some very close up and big pictures showing the manner in which George Bush has defined the “American Way’ to the world.  You can also find a video of his experiences on youtube.  It is not for the faint of heart and I’ll let you google it.

The second article was a dissection of Hillary’s campaign.  This was a depressing walk down the first six months of  the year.  My favorite part of the article was this bit:

“The air began to go out of Barack Obama’s balloon on the night of March 13, when ABC News ran clips from inflammatory sermons by the pastor from an Afro-centric church in Chicago, in which Reverend Jeremiah Wright twisted “God Bless America’ into “God Damn America.”  Then on April 11, less than two weeks before the Pennsylvania vote, Penn read comments on the Huffington Post from a closed door speech Obama had given at a San Francisco fund-raiser.  He seized on Obama’s characterization of small-town, working class Pennsylvania voters as “bitter’ because of economic distress and disposed to cling to “guns or religion.”

This was the turning point that came a little too late for Hillary but still is turning on Barrack Obama.  Of course, after we were told that this was NOT the Jermiah Wright Obama knew, he moved on.  After the FISA vote today, I’m sure there are a lot of folks saying this is not the Obama they thought THEY knew.  Obama has now decided that granting Telecom companies immunity for conspiring to spy on American citizens is acceptable. Perhaps this version is not the IMMUNITY GRANT he once knew and swore he’d filibuster.  He voted for it. Hillary stood by her convictions and voted against it.

This came after a week of selling-out on so many issues so noticeably that we caught a rare morsel of the frustration of black activists on primetime with Jesse Jackson’s poignant but crude remark.  He wanted to “cut off Obama’s nuts” for “talking down to black people on morality” without mentioning the bigger issues of many young black men who grow up in neighborhoods filled with violence, horrid schools, and Mt. Everest-level unemployment rates. I’m pretty sure NARAL felt that way too when Obama implied that women will seek unnecessary third term abortions just because they feel a little ‘blue’.  However, nice ladies talk about removing men’s private parts away from live microphones

The final article was about the Bear Sterns bailout.  This was again pertinent since we’re now talking about multi-million dollar bailouts of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  Ben Bernanke has been on the stump for expanded regulatory powers of the Fed in the mortgage and mortgage derivatives markets.  Afterall, if they’re stuck with these nonperforming assets on the tax payer’s books, they might as well have the ability to stop these demons of greed before they strike again. This while more foreclosures are imminent and the illustrious Secretary of the Treasury says there’s no way to bail out the poor unfortunates stuck into risky mortgage vehicles because banks really wanted some high points.  This is going to be no solace to anyone shortly.  Even if you are making your mortgage payment, it only takes a few neighbors not paying to put your home’s equity on a downward spiral.  I don’t know about you, but I’ve heard NADA, zilch, ZIP, NOTHING about this big problem from either of the presidential candidates.  Probably because Obama’s finance committee and big donors are mostly the folks that created this problem and well, let’s face it, I’ve never met a Republican willing to go mano-y-mano with the American Banker’s Association.

All of this after I woke up to the news that Iran had just successfully tested a new long range missile capable of hitting Israel AND carrying a nuclear warhead.  Of course, the Russians and Chinese, those folks whose sudden turn to capitalism has made them friends of Dubya, had something to do with this.  As far as I can tell, once a totalitarian regime, ALWAYS a totalitarian regime. But you know, it’s more important that George gets to wave from the stands of the Olympic Opening ceremonies rather than stand for anything like, NOT throwing folks in prison for disagreeing with the government.  OH, right, I forgot, that’s what could happen with the FISA thing and Obama voted for it and McCain just didn’t think it significant enough to show up and do anything about.  Plus, Obama is just looking forward to getting elected so he can have a kumbayah moment with these guys. Yeah, that’s going to work real well.  Perhaps he can send Jesse and Jeremiah over there to soften them up a bit.

So, this is the best our democracy offers us–two men who have no compass to point out what is right or wrong.

Two men who will say and do anything to be president while the newspapers are filled with situations outlining serious problems that need solutions.  Next time I feel like a good summer read, I think I’ll find a good comic book.   Maybe I’ll look for some thing from Japan with one of those Ninja warriors that takes on all the injustices of the world and lives by the samauri code.  Maybe we can find one that will fight for truth, justice and the American way.


Senator Backtrack Hussein Obama: Doing the Chameleon!

Even the MSM (in this case Jennifer Loven of the AP) can’t miss the flip-flops and backtracks that are coming so fast and furious as the DNC anointed one takes the fast back track to the center and beyond.  Love raises the specter of the last DNC Presidential candidate.  At this rate, I believe the RNC will just have to paste Obama’s head on the Kerry windsurfing ad and it’ll be President McCain.  Far from sounding like some kind of new politician that transcends politics-as-usual, Obama is channeling the worst kind of pandering to try to capture independent and moderate republican voters. The problem is that he only has about 54% of the Democratic base at the moment.  Judging from the howls of protests from the leftie blogs, he may be losing more of that base even though he’s  telling that group they have no place else to go.  Perhaps he’s forgetting the Gore/Bush election where Ralph Nader pulled the votes of issue-voting lefties.  Nader is in again and there is Cynthia McKinney and the Green Party.  She has already won the support of the Black Agenda Report.  I’m not sure that Senator Backtrack Obama can count the lefties as part of his firm base of support.

Here’s Loven’s succinct list of Backtrack Obama’s flip flops for the week:

On Iraq, Obama said Thursday that his upcoming trip there might lead him to refine his promise to quickly remove U.S. troops.

He now supports broader authority for the government’s eavesdropping program and legal immunity for telecommunications companies that participated in it, supporting the bill after some protections were added.

A handgun control proponent, he reacted to the Supreme Court overturning the District of Columbia’s gun ban by saying he favors both an individual’s right to own a gun as well as government’s right to regulate ownership.

Obama became the first major-party candidate to reject public financing for the general election after earlier promises to accept it.

He not only embraced but promised to expand Bush’s program to give more anti-poverty grants to religious groups, a split with Democratic orthodoxy.

He objected to the Supreme Court’s decision outlawing the death penalty for child rapists, drawing attention to his support for the death penalty if used only for the ”most egregious” crimes.

She also reports this that the RNC is reading to pounce on him.  Suprised?  Uhhhhh, nope!

”There appears to be no issue that Barack Obama is not willing to reverse himself on for the sake of political expedience,” said Alex Conant, a spokesman for the national Republican Party.

It might be working. Despite disarray in Republican John McCain’s camp, Bush’s dismal approval ratings and just 17 percent of the public saying the nation is moving in the right direction, recent polls show Obama unable to build a solid lead over his GOP rival.

Look at that last line.  George W Bush has a dismal approval rating,  the Iraq war is highly unpopular and poll after poll shows how unhappy the American people are with the direction the country is headed.  As unpopular as Dubya is, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have managed to place Congress at even lower approval ratings.  This is despite two years of ascendency.

We have an unpopular congress and democratic leadership anointing Backtrack Obama and we have yet another example of the DNC putting up a very weak candidate.  We’re expected just to jump on that unity pony again and watch the country reject another Dukkakis, Mondale, second term Carter, and Kerry.  Have you noticed these are the very folks that are excited about Obama?

I’m reminded of the last letters between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.  Their relationship was embittered by Jefferson paying a pundit to tell nasty lies about Adams.  Abigail Adams never forgive Jefferson.  Adams, after 10 years of no contact between the two, re-opened communications.  What was their final correspondence ?  Basically, both men shared the fear that party politics would bring the fragile republic down.

Year after year we see a repeat of this pattern.  Pander to the base then turn around and pander to the middle.  The DNC has lost election after election with this strategy.  Hillary Clinton decided to break this pattern by not taking any positions in the primary that she would have to reverse in the fall.  The left is never a group to be pragmatic.  McCain’s never been fully accepted by the Republican base but the right never bolts from the party.  I doubt you’ll see any of them voting Barr (Liberatarian) in the fall.  Obama believes the Evangelical might be up for grabs, however, they tend to be more likely to just sit the fall election out than consider him acceptable.  This is not what the Obama campaign must think, however, as Backtrack Obama continues to take positions traditionally not supported by Democrats to try to pick up as many votes in the middle.  However, at what cost?  He is horrifying one democratic constituency after another.

If you see both candidates as unacceptable due to lack of firm stands on certain issues, what then is your voting criteria?  I’m going to extrapolate from the folks around me and say character.  Even though McCain is intemperate, his service to the country is long, well-known, and reliably documented.  Obama remains an enigma.  This is because of his many advisers come from the right wing Chicago school of Business, his pastors and friends come from the radical left, and his base support is from the DNC establishment with its role call of losers (let’s put Ted Kenndy in that pigeon hole along with the others listed above).  Also, he tells life story that are as much fiction as Forrest Gump.  His speeches these days are so tailored to the audience I feel as though I’m watching Woody Allen’s old movie Zelig.  Which costume and persona will Backtrack Obama finally adapt?

Who will corner and define this chameleon as we pull closer to being stuck with Hobson’s choice for a President who faces some really daunting challenges?


Free Speech Gulag: Can the DNC Cage 18 million Pumas?

The Denver Post has announced the plans for the DNC Free Speech Zone for the Denver Convention.

source:  http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_9744092?source=pop_section_news&_requestid=7600054

“The fence around the public demonstration zone outside the Democratic National Convention will be chicken wire or chain link, authorities revealed in U.S. District Court today.  That may allow protesters to be seen and heard by delegates going in and out of the Pepsi Center during the convention.

But the American Civil Liberties Union and several advocacy groups have filed an amended complaint to their lawsuit against the U.S. Secret Service and the city and county of Denver that says protesters and demonstrators may have their First Amendment rights violated by security restrictions.

The ACLU has said it wants to avoid the conditions that existed during the 2004 convention in Boston, where protesters were caged, infuriating First Amendment advocates.

The first phase of the lawsuit asked the court to compel the city and the Secret Service to disclose the information on protest restrictions.

During today’s hearing before Judge Marcia S. Krieger, the attorney for the groups, Steve Zansberg, said the city and the Secret Service had provided the information sought in Phase One.

The second phase of the lawsuit will address whether the restrictions are unconstitutional. Zansberg also represents The Denver Post on First Amendment issues, though the paper is not a party in this dispute.

The groups agreed to go to trial on those issues on July 29 and the judge will visit the site the night before to assess the restrictions.

Guess Pumas and folks that are planning to March on the DNC better be prepared to be caged.  Of course, I’m not sure how well Pumas do in cages.  Hopefully, this court challenge will stop further erosion of first amendment rights.   According to another article in the Post,  these are some changes being requested by the ACLU and 13 other groups.

An increase in the size and location of the public demonstration zone in Lot A of the Pepsi Center so that people in the zone can access delegates through sight and sound and an electrically-powered sound amplification system.

Change the parameters of the zone to accommodate more people marching to the Pepsi Center during the convention.

Stop searches of people or possessions where such searches are based on a person’s entry into the zone rather than “probable cause” or “reasonable suspicion.”

Allow for the distribution of leaflets and pamphlets to the delgates.

Allow for parades that pass by the Pepsi Center along the south side of Chopper Circle and the adjoining east side of Ninth Street during times when the delegates are present.

Allow alternative parades requested by Recreate 68 to the federal courthouse on Aug. 25 and by Escuela Tlatelolco to Sunken Gardens Park on Aug. 26.

Right now, protesters will be kept in an area where they will not be able to leaflet convention attendees.  They will not be allowed to parade when conventioneers are entering or leaving the Pepsi Convent Center.   They will at least be seen.  However, this effectively blocks any access protesters will have to their supposedly democratically elected representatives.

So much for Free Speech.

Happy Independence Day!


Send in the Greyhound fleet! NY Times Now UNDER THE BUS!!!

EXTRA!  WALL STREET JOURNAL SAYS:

Bush’s Third Term

July 2, 2008; Page A12

“We’re beginning to understand why Barack Obama keeps protesting so vigorously against the prospect of “George Bush’s third term.” Maybe he’s worried that someone will notice that he’s the candidate who’s running for it.

Most Presidential candidates adapt their message after they win their party nomination, but Mr. Obama isn’t merely “running to the center.” He’s fleeing from many of his primary positions so markedly and so rapidly that he’s embracing a sizable chunk of President Bush’s policy. Who would have thought that a Democrat would rehabilitate the much-maligned Bush agenda?

[Bush's Third Term]
Getty Images

Take the surveillance of foreign terrorists. Last October, while running with the Democratic pack, the Illinois Senator vowed to “support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies” that assisted in such eavesdropping after 9/11. As recently as February, still running as the liberal favorite against Hillary Clinton, he was one of 29 Democrats who voted against allowing a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee reform of surveillance rules even to come to the floor.

Two weeks ago, however, the House passed a bill that is essentially the same as that Senate version, and Mr. Obama now says he supports it. Apparently legal immunity for the telcos is vital for U.S. national security, just as Mr. Bush has claimed. Apparently, too, the legislation isn’t an attempt by Dick Cheney to gut the Constitution. Perhaps it is dawning on Mr. Obama that, if he does become President, he’ll be responsible for preventing any new terrorist attack. So now he’s happy to throw the New York Times under the bus.

Next up for Mr. Obama’s political blessing will be Mr. Bush’s Iraq policy. Only weeks ago, the Democrat was calling for an immediate and rapid U.S. withdrawal. When General David Petraeus first testified about the surge in September 2007, Mr. Obama was dismissive and skeptical. But with the surge having worked wonders in Iraq, this week Mr. Obama went out of his way to defend General Petraeus against MoveOn.org’s attacks in 2007 that he was “General Betray Us.” Perhaps he had a late epiphany.

Look for Mr. Obama to use his forthcoming visit to Iraq as an excuse to drop those withdrawal plans faster than he can say Jeremiah Wright “was not the person that I met 20 years ago.” The Senator will learn – as John McCain has been saying – that withdrawal would squander the gains from the surge, set back Iraqi political progress, and weaken America’s strategic position against Iran. Our guess is that he’ll spin this switcheroo as some kind of conditional commitment, saying he’ll stay in Iraq as long as Iraqis are making progress on political reconciliation, and so on. As things improve in Iraq, this would be Mr. Bush’s policy too.

Mr. Obama has also made ostentatious leaps toward Mr. Bush on domestic issues. While he once bid for labor support by pledging a unilateral rewrite of Nafta, the Democrat now says he favors free trade as long as it works for “everybody.” His economic aide, Austan Goolsbee, has been liberated from the five-month purdah he endured for telling Canadians that Mr. Obama’s protectionism was merely campaign rhetoric. Now that Mr. Obama is in a general election, he can’t scare the business community too much.

Back in the day, the first-term Senator also voted against the Supreme Court nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito. But last week he agreed with their majority opinion in the Heller gun rights case, and with their dissent against the liberal majority’s ruling to ban the death penalty for rape. Mr. Obama seems to appreciate that getting pegged as a cultural lefty is deadly for national Democrats – at least until November.

This week the great Democratic hope even endorsed spending more money on faith-based charities. Apparently, this core plank of Mr. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” is not the assault on church-state separation that the ACLU and liberals have long claimed. And yesterday, Mr. Obama’s campaign unveiled an ad asserting his support for welfare reform that “slashed the rolls by 80 percent.” Never mind that Mr. Obama has declared multiple times that he opposed the landmark 1996 welfare reform.

* * *

All of which prompts a couple of thoughts. The first is that Mr. Obama doesn’t seem to think American political sentiment has moved as far left as most of the media claim. Another is that the next President, whether Democrat or Republican, is going to embrace much of Mr. Bush’s foreign and antiterror policy whether he admits it or not. Think Eisenhower endorsing Truman’s Cold War architecture.

Most important is the matter of Mr. Obama’s political character – and how honest he is being about what he truly believes. His voting record in the Senate and in Illinois, as well as his primary positions, would make him the most liberal Presidential candidate since George McGovern in 1972. But he clearly doesn’t want voters to believe that in November. He’s still the Obama Americans don’t know.”

It’s getting surreal out there folks!!! Let’s just disinter Salvador Dali and let him explain it to us!!!

Source:  source:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121495450490321133.html


Help Hillary Say Bye Bye Barack for $20.08!!!

Remember Independence day is on Friday!  Help Hillary Go to Denver Debt-Free!  Just Say No Deal and all of us very Proud Pumas are Saying YES to this Action Memo and NO DEAL! to Selected and Not Elected Nominees.  I just sent in my $20.08… have you?  Please! Please! Please!  Click the pretty Hillary poster in the side bar !

Thank you for your generous contribution.  We are at a critical stage in the campaign, and our online supporters like you are making the difference.  The more people we reach, the more resources we will have to help Hillary win.  Send an email to your friends and family asking them to support our campaign by making a contribution at http://www.hillaryclinton.com/joinme

If you have any questions about your contribution please contact us at http://www.hillaryclinton.com/help/contact/

=============================================================
YOUR CONTRIBUTION RECEIPT:

DATE:      July  2, 2008  5:28 PM EDT
NAME:       Dakinikat!!!
ADDRESS:  9th Ward NEW ORLEANS!

AMOUNT:    $20.08

————————————————————-

=============================================================