Is ‘Purposefully Crisp’ the new metaphor for No Comment?
Posted: November 8, 2008 Filed under: Human Rights, president teleprompter jesus, U.S. Economy | Tags: again, Media bias, Obamanomics, the NEW York Times, Under the bus 3 CommentsAs always, I spend my morning cup of coffee with the NY Times, my favorite blogs, and links that others offer up like the latest on line issue of Newsweek. My end of the day reads include the WSJ and Market Watch and anything new that has popped up on The Economist. I read the NYT’s coverage of the Obama presser with more than passing interest. They lured me over with this description: “answers were purposefully crisp — and, at times, laced with humor”. I had to read through the first dog conversation and the Nancy Reagan gaffe and apology before getting to the supposed purpose of the entire event: What Will an Obama Administration do with the current economic situation? Let me just highlight a few more of those ‘purposefully crisp’ answers which appears to be the Times new metaphor for no comment.
- No NEW specifics, stagecraft
Mr. Obama, who stood a few feet in front of an array of economic advisers as well as Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Representative Rahm Emanuel, the new White House chief of staff, offered no new specifics about what he intended to do to curb the economic crisis. But the stagecraft of the news conference, held after a closed-door meeting of Mr. Obama’s economic advisers, was intended to show that he was hard at work in search of solutions.
- Little Guidance, Saying only, narrow window of room to adjust
Mr. Obama offered little guidance on how he wanted the Treasury Department to carry out the $700 billion government plan to stabilize the financial markets, saying only that he would review any decisions made by the Bush administration.He suggested that he intended to move ahead with his campaign pledge to take away tax cuts for upper-income Americans, but seemed to leave a narrow window of room to adjust his proposal.
- imprecise campaign pledges have caused some confusion
Mr. Obama’s imprecise campaign pledges have caused some confusion about when he would repeal the Bush tax cuts on Americans making more than $250,000 a year.
- left unclear
He left unclear whether a tax bill signed into law next year would make the repeal effective retroactively for all of 2009 as well as 2010.
- did not claify
Mr. Obama did not clarify his intentions Friday.
One thing was clear. President Elect Obama just loves those Possum Seals.
The session carried the trappings of an official event, with eight American flags lined against blue drapes, and a freshly made seal on the lectern: “The Office of the President Elect.”
The Office of the President Elect is still considering Larry Summers. Let me highlight from that article.
CHICAGO — Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence H. Summers, a member of the new economic advisory board that met with President-elect Barack Obama here on Friday, is also a leading candidate to be the next Treasury chief.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesFormer Treasury Secretary Lawrence H. Summers’s policies and his tenure as Harvard president have surfaced as issues.
Reaching back farther, other Web sites have resurrected a 1991 memorandum that Mr. Summers signed as an economist at the World Bank that suggested parts of Africa could be repositories for toxic waste.
Mr. Summers, 53, left the meeting on Friday with Mr. Obama without answering a question about the controversies, and Obama advisers declined to discuss them.
That prospect has critics of Mr. Summers, particularly on the Democratic Party’s left, reviving old controversies in hopes of dooming his chances. In the days since Mr. Obama was elected, liberal bloggers have sought to ignite an online opposition by recalling the rocky five years Mr. Summers spent as president of Harvard, where he angered many women and blacks before resigning in 2006.
If any of your Obot friends are suggesting you start celebrating with them, just remind them that there appears to still be a huge bus fleet around the country with a large entourage under the bus. If Prop 8, continual misogyny, FISA reversals, the Easter lecture to black men, or being told you need a committee to decide if you’re just having one of those third term abortions because you’re “blue” didn’t put you there, perhaps the latest set of okie dokes just did. Be sure to check for tire tracks on your back. That’s a purposefully crisp sign. Oh, and I’ve decided to let Former First Lady Nancy Reagan pick out our under the bus China.
Sky Dancing Women on the BBC
Posted: October 6, 2008 Filed under: Human Rights, Women's Rights | Tags: BBC radio, Sarah Palin quotes starbucks cup, Women supporting Women, World Conversation, World Have Your Say Comments Off on Sky Dancing Women on the BBCI was asked today to participate in a BBC radio discussion on women supporting each other. It was today at noon on World Have Your Say. It was an interesting experience. Lots of women from all over the world in many different positions. There was a judge from Pakistan, a health minister from Kenya, and a former MP from Canada. Two of us were academics. I felt like the trapped in the middle American in constrast to am Obamabot from San Francisco and a journalist that was channeling Phyliss Schafly like a good little Stepford Wife. Luckily, some of the Conflucians were blogging on the lunch time thread to buck me up and get me to speak up! Hard to get a word in edgewise but I tried! You can listen at the mp3 download. I don’t come in until 24 minutes into it (if you’re at all interested in that tidbit).
The treatment of Sarah Palin by the media and others basically brought up the subject. 
Here’s the links:
WHYS: Are women their own worst enemy?
Sarah Palin quotes from a Starbucks cup the words of Madeleine Albright, but why should women support each other? Are women themselves the biggest obstacle to gaining equality?
Duration: 50mins | File Size: 23MB
Here we go again …
Posted: September 25, 2008 Filed under: Human Rights, No Obama, Women's Rights | Tags: ageist, gay hating, No Obama, obama campaign, sexist 8 Comments
It’s true. On issue after issue, I pretty much disagree with Sarah Palin. I see nothing positive about hunting or fishing unless you have no other way to eat. I see killing things for fun as a completely immoral action. I do not consider a gestating protohuman to be ‘ensouled’ and the same as a walking talking human being or even a walking, eating moose. I’d rather see Nebraska, Kansas, and North Dakota be turned into fan farms than drill in ANWAR. I’d also rather see Arizona turned into a one big solar panel that do any more drilling off the Florida coast. I think the death penalty is something right out of the dark ages and has no place in a civilized country. I don’t care if gay people marry, they have every right to be as miserable and trapped in dead end relationships as straight folks. I’m definitely a libertarian on the civil rights issues. My position on anything like this–even those multiple wife holding Mormon men– is it’s not my business and it’s certainly not the government’s business. If you’re not hurting some one and it applies to a person capable of giving reasoned consent (exceptions for minors and the disabled), it shouldn’t be the subject of a law. I don’t even care if folks smoke marijuana or use heroin as long as they stay put where they are and don’t try to drive a car. I am pro-science and I think Christianity was invented by the Romans to control slaves. I think folks that believe in it are victim to the biggest on-going sham in history. That pretty much puts me very much at odds with about everything Sarah believes in. But you know what? She has a right to say it, believe in it, and run for vice president without being called every nasty, misogynistic, stereotypical, hateful thing you can call a woman. Senator Obama delivers lectures to us on racism and his campaign accuses every one of using subtle racist code words. However, he and the rest of his democratic cronies are more than happy to use not so subtle code words or ads against women and the elderly. Today’s example from the NY Times Op-Ed page.
I have to hand it to Palin, she may be onto something in her batty way: the election is very much about American exceptionalism.
Roger Cohen in Today’s New York Times
When I read “batty”, all I can think of his Archie Bunker calling Edith a ‘dingbat’. It’s the ultimate insult to any woman’s intellgence.
While I’m at it, I’d like to say that any of my gay and lesbian friends and their related activist groups need to start looking (without stars in their eyes) at a candidate that will announce a series of Values Forums and be seen in public over and over again with a homophobic, gay-baiting preacher. It is also time for Senator Obama to start having a conversation about hating on homosexuals with the black religious community. He is not holding them to the same standard of supporting civil rights that he expects of white people when it comes to the civil rights of black people. So it’s okay for Obama and this group to hate on gay folks AND it’s okay for Obama and his cronies to hate on women who hold socially conservative positions since racism is the only relevant evil in this race. Is that the deal here?
Also, Senator Obama and his nation of clueless cult members should be more respectful of their elders and stop using ageism in his commercials attacking Senator McCain. I think portraying the elderly as addled, unable to keep up with technology, and incapable of change is exactly what Obama keeps pulling on Senator McCain. Any one who spends time teaching at universities, as Senator Obama has, should know that the emeritus professor is the most respected position. Many, many professors continue teaching and researching way into their nineties. They may need some additional support from staff, but they continue to be vibrant contributers to their areas way past their retirements. If Senator Obama thinks that he doesn’t want to be judged on his “funny name” or the color of his skin, he needs to extend the same level of respect to older Americans. Not all folks with Hussein in their names are terrorists and not all senior citzens have alzheimer’s disease. The latest mailing I keep getting from the Obama supporters to get McCain to release his ‘real’ medical reports is a thinly veiled whisper campaign made to make folks take notice of McCain’s age. While there are hate groups out there to remind folks of Obama’s race, there are only Obama supporters out there bringing up McCain’s age and Senator Palin’s sex and fundamentalist beliefs. Like I said, I disagree on almost every social position possible with the Republican party, but I’ve never seen them say anything blantantly racist about Senator Obama. However, I see Obama and his supporters spew misogynistic, ageist, and gay-hating terms daily. I’ve also seen them play the race card at the drop of a hat. This should stop. It’s ugly and it’s un-American.
UPDATE TODAY: YET AGAIN …
From Fox New:
Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings on Wednesday warned two minority groups to beware of Sarah Palin because “anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks.”
Hastings, who is black and a Democrat, made the comment in Florida at a panel discussion hosted by the National Jewish Democratic Council.
source:
http://http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/25/congressman-warns-jews-blacks-to-beware-of-palin/
Pandering to the original Kool Aid Drinkers: a Prime Time Exercise in Iron Age Mythology
Posted: August 17, 2008 Filed under: Human Rights, No Obama | Tags: Founding Fathers and religion, Kool aid drinking, mccain, Obama, Values forum 7 CommentsI didn’t watch the values forum last night despite all the hype. I had a lot of reasons for this. One, I really get tired of watching Obama continually invent himself and his life story. Two, I really didn’t want to watch McCain in high pander mode speaking to the craziest part of the Republican base. Three, I have to say that I avoid this country’s original koolaid drinker’s–the hyper religious–because I have a low threshold for ignorance and intolerance. If you have issues with atheists, you better stop reading now, because I’m going into full attack mode on what continues to be used by the powerful to control the weak: religion.
Why don’t we have big media events surrounding the candidates discussing their commitment to science and reasoned thought? We could have conversations on constitutional issues or approaches to foreign relations and trade. Instead, we get conversations on personal screw ups and what role ignorance plays in your life. Since Sunday morning new shows are part of weekly ritual, I’m currently enduring clips and analysis about Obama’s high school drug use (yawn) and McCain’s first marriage (bigger yawn). Obama was once again his light weight best. (This seemed to me a repeat of an Oprah interview). McCain just pulled the list of cliches every Republican uses when dealing with the likes of Dr. Dobson and Pat Robertson. Yes, a fertilized egg = a walking, talking breathing, thinking human being. Yes, marriage = some sort’ve club that somebody’s imaginary friend only lets one woman and one man into. Yes, I have an imaginary friend that I speak to even though that kind of behavior is usually associated with mental illness but is considered mandatory when you call the imaginary friend “god”. They both had to cite their carefully worded confirmation lessons for the benefit of the Pharisees.
I can’t imagine Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, or James Madison doing this sort of thing or going any where near the likes of Warren and his sheeple. Warren and his ability to make a group of people pay him tons of money so they can feel better about themselves is only equal these days to Obama’s ability to do the same. These guys are snake oil salesmen, pure and simple.
If you read the letters between Adams and Jefferson, they actually spend a huge amount of ink making fun of the hyperreligious and trying to figure out ways to stop them from ruining the USA. Thomas Paine was an ardent atheist. The major framers of the Declaration were deists at best and were probably just quiet atheists. Jefferson actually rewrote a bible for the Unitarian Universalist church taking out everything he considered to be based on fantasy. This means his version is a very small pamphlet. He considered Jesus a fictional character– along the lines of King Arthur–possibly a real person but so steeped in stories by now, the real person has been long lost. Most of the founding fathers found religion to be a base on which to build moral frameworks and something not to be taken literally. Can you imagine what last night’s group of kool aid drinkers would’ve have done to these three or four men and first presidents that many consider most responsible for the founding of this country?
None of the major founders of the country considered themselves Christian at all because they were all learned men who were born during the Age of Reason. They had read exactly what and how the religion was invented in the 3rd century. The Nicean Council was charged with setting up some thing that would be a tool to manage slaves, children and women, and spread Romanism throughout the conquered lands. Most Christians aren’t even aware they celebrate their ‘sabbath’ on Sunday because Constantine, the Roman Emperor responsible for inventing Christianity as we know it, was a committed high priest of the Sun God for his entire life. Each Sunday, Christians gather to celebrate Constantine’s snark.
We’re now in the 21st century, it’s time we stop badgering candidates to adopt Iron Age superstitions to be considered acceptable presidents. Let’s ask them to be reasoned, intellectually honest, and true to the spirit of this country’s commitment to freedoms instead. Pastor Rick Warren and his ilk should be left to the realm of the National Enquirer and not the nation’s business. This is especially true in a country where the fastest growing belief systems are Buddhism and Islam. Every day, we become more religiously diverse. There are also a huge number of atheists out there –besides Buddhist who are atheistic by doctrine. The Presidency should be an office for the intellectually gifted, not the reason-impaired. Religion needs to be kept out of politics as was the original intent of the founders of the nation.
Some examples on the Founding Father’s Belief System
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and State.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Danbury Baptist Association, CT., Jan. 1, 1802
http://www.nobeliefs.com/jefferson.htm
Indeed, Mr. Jefferson, what could be invented to debase the ancient Christianism which Greeks, Romans, Hebrews and Christian factions, above all the Catholics, have not fraudulently imposed upon the public? Miracles after miracles have rolled down in torrents.
— John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, December 3, 1813, quoted from James A Haught, ed, 2000 Years of Disbelief
http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/adams.htm
The Boy Who Cried Wolf and other Bedtime stories
Posted: July 31, 2008 Filed under: Human Rights, No Obama | Tags: Obama, race baiting, race card, racism in the Obama campaign, White Liberal Racism 6 CommentsHow many times did your parents read the Boy who Cried Wolf to you? Perhaps you read it in grade school when you were learning about myths and fables. I think almost all societies have a children’s tale about a child that cries out about something foul just to get attention only later to not be taking seriously when the foul actually happens because he’s just said it too many times to be believable.
Has the Obama campaign overplayed the race card yet? Has he yelled race-baiter one too many times? What will this mean, not only to Obama and his aspirations, but how will this impact black people who have legitimate experiences with racism but now face a cynical nation that’s been played one too many times?
Those of us that watched the Hillary/Obama primary unfold were horrified the day the race card was played on Bill Clinton. He was talking about Obama’s ever evolving positions on the Iraq War, he labelled them a fairy tale, and bam! There it was, the race card. President Clinton was charged with calling Obama’s life story a fairy tale– a story line clearly out of context and fabricated. Like many fabrications, enough repetitions and they become legend. Over and over we saw this pattern, some off the cuff remark by Geraldine Ferraro about Obama’s qualifications and resume and there it was again, the race card.
Each time we’d see the Obama campaign run to the press, demand justice, create a stir, then the, candidate would come out in a few days and say, well, I think this was a big misunderstanding. Folks, how many times will this candidate cry wolf?
This time we see it at play against McCain. When McCain uses images of Brittany Spears and Paris Hilton to imply that Obama is a media phenomenon, some one in the Obama campaign implies that it’s just one of those ads showing black men wanting young white women. Scary black men!!! Young white women!!! There it is again, that race card.
Then, in three separate speeches in Missouri, Obama tells his audience that McCain will try to frighten them because Obama doesn’t look like the other presidents on the currency or his name is a little funny. There it is again, the race card.
First off, EVERY one knows that Ulysses is a household name. Didn’t you go to school with tons of boys named Ulysses? I know my daughters bring home guys with powdered white wigs like Washington’s all the time.
Second off, some one should tell Obama that he’s about as scary-looking as Steve Urkel.
Finally, there are some real racial injustices in the world and I’m afraid they are going to get lost because of all this. When folks starting talking about racism, I’m beginning to think that no one is going to listen any more. If Obama keeps playing the race card every time he faces criticism, I swear, this is going to prevent any true dialogue about racism.
I had thought that this tactic would go away after Obama had solidified African American votes during the primary. After all, it was a tactic that pulled the southern states out of the Clinton column. However, what is the strategy now? Portray McCain as a racist for the benefit of white liberals? Most of the latte liberals are in his column any way, what particular good does that do? How does this benefit any one at this point?
I teach seminars in economics. Part of what I do is to try to get my students to think critically about promises candidates make on the economy and what is and isn’t possible. I teach in New Orleans. I have many black students. I’m now completely self-conscious about discussing anything on the candidate’s economy policies now because I feel that any criticism of Obama’s positions or his judgment are going to be taken wrong. Believe me, if you sit in my class, I run EVERY politician up the flag pole. I’m an equal opportunity critic. This is the first time in over 20 years of teaching I feel constrained. I can’t discuss even the issues because any criticism surrounding Obama might be labeled racist and create a wall between me and the students I’m trying to serve. I feel like I’ve lost a tool from my tool box. This is impacting my ability to relate to people.
So, what do you think? How many times can Obama play the race card and his campaign label folks as race-baiters before it is no longer taken seriously? Am I the only one that worries about race relations because of this campaign tactic?
Update: This is so cute, I had to add it.









Recent Comments