Lazy Caturday Reads: Cornell Gang Rape, Tennessee Botched Execution, and Trump’s Taxpayer-Funded Ads

Good Afternoon!!

Norma and Cats, by Treechild

There are some new developments in the Cornell gang rape story, which I devoted my post to on Wednesday. New York Governor Kathy Hochul has put Attorney General Letitia James in charge of the investigation and possible prosecution and called for changes in state rape laws. Hochul also criticized the handling of the case by Cornell and local district attorney Matthew Van Houten.

Adam Daly at amny: Cornell 7 case: Hochul backs closing NY consent-law gap as AG James takes over rape investigation.

Gov. Kathy Hochul on Friday called for changing New York’s sexual assault laws to address cases in which a person becomes too intoxicated to consent after voluntarily using drugs or alcohol, as Attorney General Letitia James formally took over the criminal investigation into an alleged 2024 sexual assault at Cornell University.

Hochul said the “Cornell 7” case had exposed what she described as a gap in state law and pledged to work with lawmakers on legislation addressing voluntary intoxication.

“If someone is too intoxicated to consent, it should not matter whether they chose to use drugs or alcohol,” Hochul said during an Oct. 2 press conference at her Manhattan office. “Voluntary intoxication is not a license for sexual assault or gang rape. Period.” [….]

That bill, S.10632/A.101, would expand New York’s sexual assault law in cases where a person becomes incapable of consenting after voluntarily consuming alcohol or drugs.

Under the proposal, prosecutors could establish a lack of consent based on a person’s level of impairment, while also having to show that the person accused of the assault knew or reasonably should have known the other person was unable to consent.

The measure passed the state Senate but remains in an Assembly committee. Bronx Assembly Member Jeffrey Dinowitz, one of the bill’s sponsors, joined Bronx District Attorney Darcel Clark and other advocates Thursday to push for its passage in response to the Cornell case.

The New York Times (gift link): Hochul Rebukes Prosecutor’s Handling of Cornell Case.

In direct and sometimes furious remarks, Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York on Friday questioned how Cornell University’s police department and the local district attorney handled sexual assault allegations made by a student who said she was raped at a fraternity house in 2024.

Ms. Hochul was speaking at a news conference in Manhattan on Friday morning, alongside the state attorney general, Letitia James, whom the governor has appointed to oversee the investigation into the allegations.

Yellow Cat, by Didier Lourenço

Ms. Hochul said she was concerned to learn that the student, identified as Jane Doe, had given an interview to the campus police about the episode that included an unequivocal statement that she had been raped. That language was missing in the condensed statement that was shared with the district attorney’s office in Tompkins County, N.Y., which decided not to file criminal charges.

“In what world would the police learn from the victim that she had literally been gang-raped” and not elevate those allegations to the district attorney, Ms. Hochul said.

A lawsuit filed by the student two weeks ago has reignited a national conversation about the persistent issue of sexual assault on college campuses. It has also plunged one of the country’s elite universities into crisis. Cornell’s campus newspaper, elected officials and celebrities have questioned how the case was initially handled by the district attorney and the university.

“When the Tompkins County district attorney announced that he was reopening the case, he pointed to Jane Doe’s statement that said it did not establish that a crime had occurred,” Ms. Hochul said. “But new reporting raises serious questions about the information his office relied upon when it made that decision.”

The district attorney, Matthew Van Houten, said in a statement after the news conference that he supported the appointment of Ms. James and that his office would cooperate fully with hers.

“It has become clear that we were not provided the full picture by the university,” he said. “The focus has been and should continue to be on the victims.”

You can use the gift link to read the rest if you’re interested.

More on the district attorney’s failure to take the case seriously from Michael Rothfeld and Hurubie Meko at The New York Times (gift link): D.A. in Cornell Rape Inquiry Declined to Review Additional Evidence.

The Tompkins County district attorney said recently that the evidence he reviewed in 2024 made it impossible for him to bring charges in the Cornell University rape inquiry.

But records obtained by The New York Times show that the same district attorney’s office declined to review any additional evidence gathered by the campus police department beyond a six-page statement signed by the former student, now known as Jane Doe.

Cat And His Man, by Lena Ru

The decision not to review the additional evidence has not been previously reported.

On Nov. 25, 2024, a Cornell police investigator, Jeffrey Northrop, spoke to a member of the district attorney’s staff, Jeff Huddle, about additional interviews the police had done, the records show.

Prosecutors did not express interest, saying they agreed that based on the woman’s statement, “criminal charges would not be pursued in this case,” Mr. Northrop wrote in a note documenting their call.

By that point, the police had conducted numerous interviews, reviewed chat messages, logged anonymous tips, reached out to lawyers for some of the accused men and spoken to at least two others, the records show.

You can use the gift link to read more.

Rebecca Solnit commented on the implications of Cornell rape case at The Guardian: We live in a rape-prone society. The horrific Cornell case reveals what that looks like.

Sometimes a story is so so appalling, it captures the public’s attention, including the attention of people who don’t focus on the issue otherwise. Such is the case with the alleged 2024 gang rape at Cornell University.

For feminists who focus on violence against women or anyone who has ever cared about campus rape, the claims made in Jane Doe’s civil lawsuit against the alleged perpetrators may be unusual in its severity – but we know the statistics that show that somewhere between 20% and 25% of women college students will be the victim of a sexual assault (no statistics tell us what percentage of men students will be rapists).

This makes the public outcry to punish seven male students miss the point, which is that there are tens of thousands of campus rape stories, few of which make the news.

We know that nearly every campus in the US has a plethora of rape victims and rapists. We also know how it often happens. The Johns Hopkins University “student well-being” blog summarizes a key aspect:

“The ‘Red Zone’ is a period of time that lasts from the start of the fall semester through Thanksgiving break when the majority of sexual assault occurs on college campuses … It’s a six-to-10-week time frame when many students are going to parties, gatherings, and other social events to celebrate their return to campus. Data shows that over 50% of sexual assaults that occur on college campuses occur during this time. New students can be especially vulnerable during this period, due to their unfamiliarity with the campus, new social experiences, and the resources available to survivors.”

We know that the Greek system that sets the rules for most sororities and fraternities does not permit alcohol at sororities, which makes fraternities the hosts of the alcohol-saturated parties, which sends young women into enemy territory, which is where they are sometimes manipulated to get them drunk and stranded and abused.

The Hopkins blog notes: “Alcohol is the tool that is most commonly used by perpetrators in cases of sexual assault … A person who is incapacitated by drugs or alcohol is not able to consent.” We know that fraternities often make the news for their excesses and abuses, including sometimes-harmful-to-fatal hazing of their own potential members.

We know the Cornell student newspaper editorial that brought this case to light declares that 15% of all students there have experienced “nonconsensual sexual contact” and a disproportionate fifth of those incidents took place at fraternities.

Painting by Serbian artist Vladimir Dunjić

Solnit notes that the Trump administration is making campus rapes even less likely to be punished.

The non-profit organization Human Rights Campaign reports that the Department of Education just rescinded a Biden-era Title IX rule: “Specifically, this move puts back in place rules for colleges and universities from the first Trump administration that suppress the voices of survivors of rape and sexual assault and make it easier for their perpetrators to get away with their actions.” It also affects LGBTQ+ students.

The Trump administration appears comfortable in the company of alleged perpetrators. Last year, it intervened on behalf of Andrew Tate, who is charged with several counts of rape, trafficking and assault against women. This past week, administration members selected Russell Brand, likewise awaiting trial on multiple charges of sexual assault, to co-moderate a panel at a Maha conference on 29 September, and then there’s Trump, who has been held liable for sex abuse, and the allegations against the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth. (All of the men deny wrongdoing.) [….]

Sexual assault arises in part through both the entitlement and the desire to abuse and dehumanize women, which is in part about definitions of both masculinity and femininity: masculinity in that domination, violation and degradation are seen as status-enhancing, femininity in the perception that women’s bodies are for men to use, women’s voices and rights to be ignored.

I’ve quoted too much, but there’s still more to read at The Guardian link.

Unsurprisingly, Trump sympathizes with the Cornell rapists. Ryan Prosser at Metro.UK: Trump says he feels ‘bad’ for Cornell 7 and calls investigator by ‘racist’ nickname.

Donald Trump used a racist nickname to refer to Cornell 7 investigator Letitia James as he admitted feeling ‘badly’ for the accused rapists.

Sick boy with a cat, by John Bowen (Welsh, 1914-2006)

The US president called the New York attorney general ‘Peekaboo’ James, branding her ‘corrupt’ after she was appointed to probe the case.

‘Why would the Governor of New York, Kathy Hochul, appoint a Corrupt Prosecutor, Letitia “Peekaboo” James, to represent the State in the highly controversial Cornell University rape case?’, he wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Trump had previously told the press he believed Cornell University was a ‘fine school’ that would do ‘what’s right’ in response to the allegations that seven of its fraternity members had drugged and gang-raped a female student for hours at a house party.

But he told reporters that he felt for the seven alleged rapists, insisting they ‘wouldn’t get a fair hearing’ with James in charge.

He said: ‘Letitia James is a corrupt person. She’s totally corrupt and I can’t imagine it. I feel badly for whoever she’s looking at because they won’t get a fair shake.’

Quiet, Piggy.

You’ve probably heard about the horrible failed execution in Tennessee.

Emily Cochrane at The New York Times (gift link): With Christa Pike Unconscious, Another Execution Attempt Is in Doubt.

Christa Pike was unconscious, intubated and on a ventilator in a Nashville hospital a day after surviving a botched execution attempt, her lawyers said in a court filing, raising questions about whether the state could legally try to execute her again.

As of Thursday evening, Ms. Pike, 50, was critically ill, they wrote in the Friday filing in Davidson County Chancery Court, and both of her arms were swollen, burned and blistered when she arrived at the hospital.

Her condition sets the stage for an unprecedented ethical and legal quagmire: A future attempt to execute Ms. Pike could hinge on whether she is determined to be capable of what the Supreme Court has described as a “rational understanding” of the reason she is to be put to death.

And although Gov. Bill Lee has paused executions for now, the front-runner to be elected governor next month, Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn, said that she would try again to execute Ms. Pike, who was convicted of the 1995 murder of a classmate….

Friday’s disclosure about Ms. Pike’s condition is the most detailed update since she survived two rounds of pentobarbital, the drug used as part of Tennessee’s lethal injection protocol, on Wednesday evening. But it also underscored the legal and medical complexities that lie ahead for Ms. Pike, her lawyers, the doctors and nurses treating her, and her loved ones.

“Hospital staff are working to save Ms. Pike’s life and to clear the pentobarbital from her system,” the lawyers wrote in an emergency court filing. In a separate statement, they said she was also receiving treatment for “significant injuries to both arms.”

In a statement, Luke Ihnen, who represents Ms. Pike through the Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, said that “we are working closely with those closest to Christa to respect her wishes, safeguard her privacy and protect her rights as a patient during this extraordinarily difficult time.”

In my opinion, the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment and should be abolished.

Sam Levin at The Guardian: Outgoing prison chief in Christa Pike case oversaw five ‘botched’ executions, lawyers say.

Tennessee’s prison chief is under fire and resigning after the failed execution of Christa Pike, which lawyers say was the fifth “botched” execution under his leadership across two states since 2022.

Willem den Ouden, Ferry with cat

Frank Strada, the commissioner of the Tennessee department of correction, has faced mounting questions about the state’s highly secretive death penalty protocols since Wednesday evening when Pike became the first death row prisoner in the US to to be injected with lethal drugs and survive.

Witnesses said Pike, 50, was heard choking and struggling an hour after receiving the first injection of pentobarbital, a sedative, and after a second dose failed to kill her she was hospitalized in critical condition.

The scrutiny on Strada comes as Pike’s failed execution has sparked international outrage, with lawyers and advocates calling for a national halt on executions in the US. Pike’s lawyers have called the process “cruel and torturous”, and one death penalty expert said it was the worst botched execution in modern history.

Bill Lee, Tennessee’s Republican governor, on Saturday announced that Strada would step down from his role this month, the Associated Press reported. Lee also suspended executions in the state until the end of the year and ordered an independent inquiry.

Read more at The Guardian link.

Trump’s taxpayer-paid ads are coming fast and furiously.

Betsy Klein at CNN: ‘God made Trump’ ad and at least 12 others are part of controversial taxpayer-funded ad campaign.

The Trump administration has created at least 13 campaign-style ads as part of its controversial taxpayer-funded, multi-million-dollar effort to promote President Donald Trump and his policies.

Yet-to-be-aired spots include a trio of ads highlighting the US military and operations in Iran and Venezuela, one called “God Made Trump” and another recapping the UFC fight he hosted at the White House. Republicans and Democrats alike have questioned the wisdom of spending so much taxpayer money on the ads, which the White House has defended as public service announcements.

CNN has obtained clips of 12 ads, which range from 15 seconds to three minutes long, including two that have already aired. They appear in a Dropbox account — which was shared with CNN — run by LMD, the agency that has been given the government contract for the ad buys. Each ends with “Paid for by the U.S. Government” at the bottom of the screen. Another ad that is not in the Dropbox account, “Final Battle,” has also aired in recent weeks.

The three ads that have already aired have appeared on TV networks including CBS, CNN, MS NOW, Fox News and Fox. It’s not clear if all of the ads will air on television or digital platforms.

Asked for comment, the White House on Friday afternoon pointed to a just-posted video compilation of the president criticizing CNN.

Henry Sturgis Drinker with cat, by Cecilia Beaux, 1898

While each of the ads has a different theme, many of them include imagery of the president and audio with positive reviews from news reports, which is likely to intensify criticism that the campaign is using taxpayer dollars to help Trump personally. They also include patriotic images — including the cap toss at a military graduation, fireworks over Mount Rushmore and military flyovers.

First lady Melania Trump, who has been a rare presence at the White House during the president’s second term, is featured in many of the ads. There are also images from Trump’s reciprocal tariff announcement, the border wall, his escalator presidential-campaign announcement and the tongue-in-cheek framed photograph of an auto pen signifying former President Joe Biden on Trump’s “Presidential Walk of Fame.”

CNN previously reported that Trump has personally driven the video ads, including helping select the imagery and videos used, according to a source familiar with the matter. Two Trump advisers familiar with the ads said that they were being created in-house by the White House video team — which is part of the communications team, responsible for the administration’s public messaging — though at least one of them was produced by a pro-Trump meme group.

Maggie Haberman, Hamed Aleaziz, Shane Goldmacher, and Jonathan Swan at The New York Times(gift link): Trump Directed Use of Taxpayer Money for Ads Praising His Presidency.

President Trump personally instructed his budget director to use taxpayer money for TV ads praising him and his presidency, setting in motion a $20 million contract that used funds from the Department of Homeland Security, according to people familiar with the matter.

The ads have run across cable and network television — on Fox News, CNN and MS Now, with football games on Fox and with national newscasts on CBS, ABC and NBC, including “Meet the Press,” which Mr. Trump is known to watch.

Lady in Pink Dress, by Barbara Perrine Chu

Mr. Trump was eager to see the laudatory ads on the air and told Russell T. Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, to come up with the money from within the government, the people said. Mark Paoletta, the budget office’s counsel, and Will Scharf, the White House counsel, both said it would be legal to use D.H.S. funds. The president and Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, both spoke with Markwayne Mullin, the homeland security secretary, about the ads.

On Sept. 20, U.S. Customs and Border Protection — which falls under D.H.S. — awarded the contract to LMD, a Maryland marketing firm, federal records show….

The taxpayer-funded ads have been criticized by Democrats and even some Republicans as a possible violation of federal laws against using taxpayer dollars for “publicity or propaganda purposes.” And they come as the president is also directing spending from his super PAC — MAGA Inc., which entered the fall with $400 million — for which he has been raising money since he won re-election in 2024.

It was not clear why taxpayer funds, and not money from the super PAC, were used for the spots.

The White House has called the ads public service announcements and said they are appropriate because there is no “call to action” to vote for any candidate. Some of his aides also noted that Mr. Trump is not running for office now, in an attempt to blunt criticism of the ads as violating federal laws about the use of public money.

When pressed by a reporter on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said: “If somebody said that that’s wrong, I’ll gladly pay the money.”

Yeah, right.

Those are the stories that interested me today. What do you think? What else is on your mind?