Lazy Saturday Reads
Posted: November 14, 2015 Filed under: morning reads, U.S. Politics | Tags: CBS Democratic debate, Paris attacks, terrorism 21 CommentsStop It. Chris Delias
Good Morning.
It’s a sad day today as the world processes the horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. It seems this is the “new normal.” We are in a world war against non-state terrorists who are willing to kill innocent people along with themselves in support of goals that I personally do not understand.
The AP, via The Boston Globe: At least 127 killed in Paris attacks.
PARIS (AP) — French President Francois Hollande vowed to attack the Islamic State group without mercy as the jihadist group admitted responsibility Saturday for orchestrating the deadliest attacks inflicted on France since World War II.
Hollande said at least 127 people died Friday night in shootings at Paris cafes, suicide bombings near France’s national stadium and a hostage-taking slaughter inside a concert hall.
Hollande, who declared three days of national mourning and raised the nation’s security to its highest level, called the carnage ‘‘an act of war that was prepared, organized, planned from abroad with internal help.’’
The Islamic State group’s claim of responsibility appeared in Arabic and French in an online statement circulated by IS supporters. It was not immediately possible to confirm the authenticity of the admission, which bore the group’s logo and resembled previous verified statements from the group.
As Hollande addressed the nation, French anti-terror police worked to identify potential accomplices to the attackers, who remained a mystery to the public: their nationalities, their motives, even their exact number.
Against Terrorism and War, Julia Olivari
There’s much more at the link. The Globe also published a gallery of photos from the Paris attacks. More links to check out:
Wall Street Journal video: France Tried to Bolster Security Before Attacks.
The New York Times: Paris Attacks Were an Act of War by ISIS, Hollande Says.
BBC News: Paris attacks: A new terrorism and fear stalks a city.
Euro News: Le Bataclan, famous Paris music venue, turns into ‘bloodbath.’
LA Times: Paris attacks: Islamic State claims responsibility; French president decries ‘act of war.’
The New York Times: Americans are among the injured in Paris.
Tonight’s Democratic Debate
There will be a Democratic debate tonight at 9PM, and we plan to post a live blog here before it begins. The debate is on CBS, and they have pay-only streaming. I can’t even get it on my Comcast live site. But Time Magazine is offering free live streaming: How to Watch the Democratic Debate Free Online.
Watching the second Democratic presidential debate on Saturday will be simple, with a free live-stream on TIME.com.
CBS News is hosting the debate along with local CBS affiliate KCCI-TV and the Des MoinesRegister. The debate will air on CBS and will also be live-streamed on TIME.com, in collaboration with CBS News. Check back here closer to the 9 p.m. E.T. start time to see the live stream.
Blood of Terror, Li Li Tan
According to Time, CBS and Twitter will also keep track of social discussions of the debate using the hashtag #DemDebate.
In the wake of the Paris attacks, CBS has decided to change the emphasis of the debate. The NYT reports:
DES MOINES — In the hours after the deadly attacks in Paris, CBS News significantly reworked its plans for the Democratic presidential debate it is hosting here on Saturday night to focus more on issues of terrorism, national security and foreign relations.
Steve Capus, the executive editor of CBS News and the executive producer of “CBS Evening News,” said in an interview late Friday that he was in the middle of a rehearsal for the debate when news broke about the slaughter in Paris.
The CBS News team immediately shifted gears and reformulated questions to make them more directly related to the attacks. Mr. Capus said it was important for the debate to go on because the world looks to the American president for leadership during international crises.
“American leadership is put to the test,” Mr. Capus said. “The entire world is looking to the White House. These people are vying to take over this office.”
“This is exactly what the president is going to have to face,” he added.
Mr. Capus said the news team had planned a different debate, but “there is no question that the emphasis changes dramatically.”
“It is the right time to ask all the related questions that come to mind,” he added. “We think we have a game plan to address a lot of the substantive and important topics.”
More stories on the upcoming debate:
Mumbai Terror painting, by Subodh Kerkar
Politico: With just three on stage, Democratic debate moderator plans to dive deep.
This Saturday’s second Democratic debate will be a much smaller affair than the first. With only three candidates on stage, CBS News plans to delve deep into the issues with each candidate and have taken advantage of the smaller pool by doing some intense research.
Moderator John Dickerson and his team met with each of the campaigns for more than an hour to discuss the major issues at play in the race, sources on the campaigns said, describing the pre-interview as “informational in nature.” Dickerson is not giving candidates previews of his questions for the debate….
A CBS News official said Dickerson’s outreach to the campaigns was the same type of research he conducts for his weekly show, “Face the Nation.” The official said Dickerson talked with three dozen people and organizations beyond the campaigns to “immerse himself” in the issues.
Alongside Dickerson will be CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes; Kevin Cooney, anchor for KCCI-TV, the local CBS affiliate; and Des Moines Register political columnist Kathie Obradovich.
“Our goal is to ask the candidates questions that help to illuminate for primary voters their differences on key issues — the way they would work to make life better for average Americans. So we’re going to be focusing, as we’ve always planned, on the issues that people care about,” Cordes said.
Terrorism No Comment, by Sebastian Placzek
This New York Times published a piece on Bernie Sanders’ debate prep that is really interesting. I guess he decided he needed to actually do some studying and practicing this time. Bernie Sanders’s Debate Strategy: Attack Hillary Clinton, if Asked. You’ll have to read it at the the link, because I can’t seem to copy and paste any of the text. I highly recommend this one.
One more must-read article from FiveThirtyEight: Hillary Clinton Is The Most Establishment-Approved Candidate On Record.
It’s become a running joke that I’m in the tank for Hillary Clinton. Whenever I’ve written anything that suggests Clinton has a very good chance of winning the Democratic presidential nomination, fans of the other Democratic candidates have let me hear it on email, Twitter and Reddit. I’ve written these pieces not because I’m rooting for Clinton or am in the pocket of “the corporations,”1 but because Clinton is in a strong position to win — a historically strong position.
On the eve of the second Democratic debate, taking place Saturday, here’s the latest evidence for that fact: Clinton has amassed a higher share of intra-party support before the Iowa caucuses than any presidential candidate2 since 1980, as far back as our data goes.
FiveThirtyEight tracks the endorsements of members of Congress and governors because they are highly correlated with the outcome of the primary. In the book “The Party Decides” — where the strong correlation between endorsements and primary outcome was clearly demonstrated — the authors point out that there are basically two types of primaries: Ones in which a single candidate wins the party over before Iowa (like in 2000 on both the Democratic and Republican sides) and ones in which most party actors stay on the sidelines until voting begins (like in 2008 on both sides). The former is very predictable; the latter is far more unpredictable and can produce a number of possible winners.
The 2016 Democratic contest is clearly in the more predictable camp (this year’s GOP race, of course, is not). Clinton already has 71 percent of all possible endorsement points3 on the Democratic side.
Go read the whole thing. You won’t regret it.
What stories are you following today? Please post your thoughts and comments below, and I hope you’ll come back tonight for the Democratic debate live blog.
peej
Carissa
bostonboomer
ecocatwoman
mablue2
peggysue22
quixote
skydancingguestblogger
Mona (aka Wonk the Vote)
Sky Dancing 
Horrifying video posted by Le Monde shows carnage outside of Paris theater.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/11/14/horrifying-video-shows-carnage-outside-paris-theater/75772032/
http://www.alternet.org/media/not-bigots-will-care-muslims-around-world-are-condemning-paris-attacks
Condemnation of attacks by Muslims around world.
I just read that CBS is going to stream the debate on its CBS News mobile apps and at the link below.
http://www.cbsnews.com/live/
They charge for their stream. Are they opening it up?
I’m sorry. I didn’t see your response until now. Yes, it’s free everywhere.
I just listened to someone describe the horror in France as the belief that most French Muslim citizens feel “disenfranchised” by the government who fail to “provide” jobs and economic equality to that population which is why they “pose a threat” to their fellow non Muslim citizens.
Possibly, but it could also be that they are led by the clerics within that religion that education and assimilation is to be avoided if they are to maintain a relationship with the Prophet Mohammad.
Makes sense to me since the theory of that religion is essentially to throw everyone back into the 6th century at any cost and that education itself is prohibited. Only studying the Koran counts as “education” and this is primarily aimed at the male population.
Unless and until the entire Muslim community begins to honor education itself – a threat to commonsense from their point of view – these “martyrs” will continue to grow.
We can look at our own massive involvement of sheltering corrupt governments and invading Arab countries in our quest for oil, oil, and more oil but until the “man/woman on the street” is allowed to expand their knowledge in a technical world these episodes will continue.
Feeling disenfranchised is not in any way an excuse for killing unarmed people. The U.S. may be disenfranchising all kinds of minority groups here in the U.S. – blacks, gays, illegal immigrants, for example, but if a mass attack occurs, it’s most of the time either Muslim extremists or white Christian males.
I hope to be around for the live blog. I’m in the midst of what has become my annual, November, nasty cold so I’m fading in and out.
That’s too bad, Pat. I feel like I’m coming down with a cold–I hope not, but I spent the last two weekends with my nephews and one has a cold.
I don’t know if I will be able to see it though I will try. However, beyond the access problem I have another-a full on neighborhood mariachi band at the end of the street. I’m not close to having the patience for that kind of noise and energy. My walls are vibrating.
Yey! The music stopped and the debate is on the local CBS station.
Opening statements. All mention Paris. Sanders turns it to voting rights. Clinton all other issues depend on us being secure and strong. O’Malley mumbled.
Clinton, you were part of Obama’s how different, Obama underestimated, We abided by the Bush agreement to leave, there was a vacuum there many reasons puts it upon Assad, and Iraq. We
Sanders, the greatest threat is still climate change. The invasion of Iraq has unraveled the region, so this is our fault. Clinton voted for it I didn’t.
Clinton, re the vote: I have said the invasion was a mistake, but we must remember that there were precursors to Iraq in the region that would have led to it. Sanders is not a fan of regime change anywhere. O’Malley we didn’t understand the secondary and third consequences of regime change. Clinton you can’t paint with a broad brush.
Clinton, must understand the complexity of the situation. Sanders, the local muslim nations must do more. clinton , unfair to place like Jordan who have taken on much. Turkey needs to get off the pot.
After plan in Libya? There was one, and fair elections were a result. Arc of instabilty.
O’Malley- is the world too complex for a governor? He slides.
Clinton-Whole government approach. but just because we have one, it could still b a long battle. Sanders jumps in about veterans.
its not helpful to call them varieties of muslim, the media will misuse the phrase. Call them jihadists and violent extremsists.
Nihilism
Sanders doesn’t agree. He thinks all radical islam is wrong.
O’Malley says the softness of language betrays the softness of approach.
Clinton- Aumf must have authority.
Sanders we spend billions on the military but only abut 10% on terrorism we need military reform. (the military is trying to get new nukes.)
O’Malley- US refugees to accept 65,000 we should have more.
Clinton thinks agreed 65,000 because originally it was only 10,000 we must look at the defense
However, the China sea and a Russian drone submarine are examples of why the defense must be broad.