Friday Reads

Good Morning!

b45c61b8d9b03b61212dc3786b170d81I really have never quite figured out why a lot of people can’t figure out the basic rule of being nice to other people. You learn the lesson of mean almost immediately in this country.  My dad would always come home from his business, cook dinner to relax, and watch the news.  He was particularly fond of Huntley and Brinkley. One of my earliest images of the evening news is of southern police turning hoses on black children and adults.  I can’t imagine that image ever leaving me.  You would think that this far after the civil rights movement, the women’s movement, Stonewall, and all the other movements we’ve had to just bring basic respect to each other’s lives that this country would be less hostile to others.  But no, we continue to see out and out bigotry and hatred of others daily.  This occurs on many levels.

So, it was a bit of a surprise to me to find Adam Sandler making a movie.  I thought we’d moved beyond his unfunny brand of humor.  He seems to have made a decent living making fun of others.  His new script included every trope and stereotype about Native Americans possible.  The Native American actors on the set walked off.  Good for them.

About a dozen Native American actors have walked off the set of an Adam Sandlerspoof western in protest at its depiction of Apache culture, including characters with names like Beaver’s Breath and No Bra.

The group quit on Wednesday after taking offence at jokes in the The Ridiculous Six, reportedly a satire of The Magnificient Seven which is to be Sandler’s first film for Netflix.

In addition to certain characters’ names, they complained about a female character squatting and urinating while smoking a peace pipe and the inappropriate positioning of feathers on a teepee, according to the Indian Country Today Media Network.

The film stars Sandler, Nick Nolte, Steve Buscemi, Dan Aykroyd, Jon Lovitz and Vanilla Ice. Sandler co-wrote it with his veteran collaborator, Tim Herlihy.

It is to be released via Netflix, the first of a four-movie deal with the streaming service, which has scored high repeat viewing figures with Sandler hits such as The Wedding Singer.

The mostly Navajo Native American actors were told The Ridiculous Six, which is being filmed in New Mexico, would be humorous but not racist, actor Loren Anthony told the Indian Country Today Media Network.

“So I agreed to it, but on Monday things started getting weird on the set. One thing that really offended a lot of people was that there was a female character called Beaver’s Breath. One character says: ‘Hey, Beaver’s Breath.’ And the Native woman says: ‘How did you know my name?’”

When the actors complained, the director said the disrespect was not intentional and the film is a comedy, said Anthony.

He also complained about alleged inaccuracies. “We were supposed to be Apache, but it was really stereotypical and we did not look Apache at all. We looked more like Comanche.”

Another Navajo actor, Allison Young, said producers rebuffed her protests. “They just told us: ‘If you guys are so sensitive, you should leave.’”

Young said she cried. “This is supposed to be a comedy that makes you laugh. A film like this should not make someone feel this way. Nothing has changed. We are still just Hollywood Indians.”

It also seems these days that many people are confusing giving all people access to benefits henceforth reserved for a privileged few as something to go all martyr about. The blacklash to this has moved beyondold-tv-set appalling to me.  At least in this case the protesters are identified with a white supremacy group and are being honest about the outrage of having to share their special little snowflake status with others.  Of course, Fox and Friends have taken up the cause of the “War on White People”.

The white freakout over college students grappling with “the problem of whiteness” has just found a new target.

The National Youth Front’s leader, Angelo John Gage, told TPM in a phone interview Thursday that he believes the bulletin board amounted to discrimination. He repeatedly took issue with the portrayal of white people and Christians as having “privilege.”

“State and federal law says you must keep the school discrimination-free. They’re not doing that,” Gage said. “The Civil Rights Act says you can’t have discrimination based on race, sex, gender — all that stuff. Here comes a board that discriminates against people for their race, sex, gender, religion. It’s the complete opposite.”

He defined privilege instead as something “handed to you.”

“‘Oh you’re black, here you go, here’s a scholarship.’ That’s a privilege,” Gage explained. “Or here’s a racial quota. ‘You’re not qualified but you’re black, so here’s the job’ — otherwise it’s racism.”

Gage said he first learned of the bulletin board when he came across an article on Campus Reform, a student news website backed by the Leadership Institute, which organizes conservative groups on campus. Fox News ran with Campus Reform’s story in a “Fox & Friends” segment, which Gage said he watched.

“Fox and Friends” host Elizabeth Hasselbeck spoke with an Appalachian State student earlier this month who said she was cyberbullied after she posted a photo of the bulletin board on Facebook. The photo was picked up by Campus Reform. The student, Laurel Litter, who is white, told Hasselbeck that the felt the bulletin board intimidated her and made her feel shameful about her heritage:

White people!  There are things in our heritage of which we should feel very ashamed!  Slavery?  Lynchings? Jim Crow Laws? I’m sure you can add to the list. I’ve gotten to the point where my rule of not dealing downloadwith mean people implies I mostly avoid white christians unless I know they’re not “that kind” of christian.  You know, the freaking mean, judgmental, hating on others kids demonstrated so illustriously by many of our elected officials. Here’s some more examples of our uncivilized and inhumane behavior. A very dear friend of mine was brutalized at university for being gay 40 years ago.  We’re not beyond that either.

CBS46 obtained exclusive video of what Carver School of Technology students described as a five-round fight with punches being thrown by about 20 students at one point, all because classmates hurled racial and homophobic slurs at two students.

Tim Jefferson, 16, said it all started as he and a friend left their last class to go home.

During the fight, Jefferson said one student even pulled out a screwdriver and jammed it in his face, right next to his eye. Jefferson said he has several injuries.

“My face, my eye, my lip, on my back, my spine right in the middle, the back of my neck and I got hit in the back of my head,” Jefferson said.

Jefferson’s mom, Sabrina Giles, said this is about the eighth time this year that her son and his friend were attacked because of their sexuality so she’s transferring him to another school.

Jefferson hoped to teach the bullies a lesson of their own.

“I’m going to press charges. I want some justice. If God willing, I’m going to get justice and I want the boys who did this to go to jail,” Jefferson said.

Atlanta police charged four students in the fight. Three juveniles will face state charges of affray. The other student, Jefferson’s friend, who said he was bullied, will face a charge of disorderly conduct.

The continued invention of christian persecution in this country reached a fervored pitch yesterday when my governor announced he’d fight big sodomy and big business for his right to humiliate the GLBT community with laws that allow bigots to exclude them and any one else they don’t like from a seat at the lunch counter if they scream “You’re persecuting me because of my religion”!  Oh, SCOTUS and the Hobby Lobby Decision!  Look wtf you’ve done!

Jindal’s op-ed is actually a follow-up of his previous support for Johnson’s bill. Asked for the governor’s stance on the bill by the New Orleans Times-Picayune, a Jindal spokesman said the governor definitely supports it.

“This is a common sense bill that provides necessary protections for individuals to prevent adverse treatment from the state based on religious beliefs regarding marriage,” the spokesman told the newspaper.

Pence, at first, seemed adamant in not giving in to any criticism or pressure, be it byDemocrats or national or local businesses, in changing the the religious freedom law he signed. Eventually though the pressure was too much and Pence called on lawmakers to clarify the law. Hutchinson seemed to see the writing on the wall and also sent the religious freedom bill back to his state legislature. Jindal’s op-ed is a move that the other governors didn’t take and a clear line in the sand that he wants things to go differently in his state.

images (4)This nonsense and grandstanding on the Op Ed page of the NYT came on the same day that national support for marriage equality has reached a big plurality. Fully sixty one percent of Americans believe it should be legal in every state in our country.

A week before a closely watched U.S. Supreme Court hearing on the issue, public support for gay marriage reached a new high in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, with 61 percent of Americans – more than six in 10 for the first time – saying gays and lesbians should be allowed to marry legally.

Identical or similar majorities favor gay marriage on two key issues before the court: Sixty-one percent oppose allowing individual states to prohibit same-sex marriages. And 62 percent support requiring states to recognize gay marriages performed legally in other states.

This puts the majority of the Republican party at odds with the majority of the country.  It also indicates that little Bobby Jindal will do anything to the state of Louisiana, its economy, its people, and its environment to attract a few whackado Iowa Republican caucus goers.   Poor Bobby!  Point to the place on the doll where the mean married gay people hurt you!  What?  You can’t point to your imagination?  How about pointing to your blatant political strategy based on hating on people.

When it comes to defending big business over the rights of the average citizen, Bobby Jindal is your guy. After the BP oil spill – which began five years ago this week, dumping hundreds of millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf – Bobby Jindal was frontandcenter, defending BP.

But now that he’s running for President – unannounced as of now – Jindal is working to shape his image as the defender of religious liberty and freedom, for Christians.

Literally, for Christians.

The New York Times this morning published what appears to be an un-fact checked op-ed by the Louisiana Governor, in which he specifically states his plan to fight “discrimination against Christian individuals and businesses.”

Not, say, “people of faith,” or, “those with deeply held religious beliefs,” but “Christian individuals and businesses.”

Hopefully Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the ACLU, the American Humanist Association, and other like-minded organizations are at their keyboards reminding the 43-year old Roman Catholic Republican about the First Amendment.

So why exactly is Jindal preparing to defend these Christians (and not Muslims, Jews, or people of unaffiliated faith – or of no faith at all)?

“I’m Holding Firm Against Gay Marriage” is the title of his Times op-ed.

“I plan in this legislative session to fight for passage of the Marriage and Conscience Act,” Jindal writes. When he made the same statement in front of the Louisiana legislature last week, it received not a single moment of applause. Even the bill’s author wasn’t clapping.

That bill is so anti-gay, so sweeping, it states that no one and no business or organization in Louisiana has to recognize the legal marriage of a same-sex couple.

Your employer doesn’t have to extend medical coverage to your spouse. The DMV could state your legal name, had you changed it after marrying a person of the same gender, is invalid (as happened in Florida), and hospitals might be able to deny visitation and medical decision rights from you or your husband or wife.

Louisiana already has a Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but Gov. Jindal is planning a run for president, and he needs to distinguish himself from the rest of the pack.

maxresdefaultSo, when is removing rights from people so other’s won’t feel put out and can do whatever they want to others based on their bigotry any where near to religious discrimination?  All you have to do is read the justification for slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and  Laws that once prevented people of different colors from marrying and you’ll read the same old tired bigoted arguments.    Notice that I haven’t even got to any conversation on immigration today and I’ve already filled the page up with examples of mean, bigoted hate-filled assholes.

Love one another.

What’s on your reading and blogging list today?


31 Comments on “Friday Reads”

  1. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Josh Marshall tweeted something about a “Straight Pride” day somewhere. I can only hope he was joking. If not, that would be the largest persecuted majority of them all and we’ve achieved, perhaps, peak wingnut.

  2. NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

    the basic rule of being nice to other people

    Yes.

    There are hundreds of actions Jindal could take to help people. Instead he’s screaming that other people’s personal happiness discriminates against Xian businesses. Or something like that; it’s hard to tell because he does not make sense.

    Bobby, read the part about “Do unto others.”

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Spesking of human kindness, it seems to be missing from the Battle Creek, MI Catholic schools. This is pathetic.

      WWMT: Young girl who battled cancer dismissed from school over attendance, academic performance

      • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

        Well, that’s just right “Christian” of them, isn’t it? Come on, how hard would it be to come up with an independent study plan with extra time allowed? “What Would Jesus Do?”

        Somehow I don’t think Jesus the liberal street preacher would kick a kid with cancer out of school.

        • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

          The complete opposite of the New Testament. Organized religions are not Christian in any way I would recognize.

      • ANonOMouse's avatar ANonOMouse says:

        Why am I not surprised that a catholic school dismisses a sick child? The catholic schools are all about MONEY. They probably have a non-Catholic on the waiting list and so the sick child got the boot. You know the catholic schools charge more tuition if you’re not catholic. I’ve seen this sort of dismissal with my own eyes. I’ve known people it happened to. The catholic church demands that catholic children receive catholic education, but they shut catholic kids out of the catholic schools to let non-Catholics in. Then if you’re a catholic parent you must send your child to religious education classes under what the church calls “penalty of sin” which is short for OR ELSE YOUR GOING TO HELL . So you must drag your children to special classes on the weekend, which isn’t free either, or you’re a doomed.

        If her parents had money and were likely to endow the school with a money gift, there’s no way they would have dismissed this child. You can take that to the bank.

        FTATHTRIO (figure that one out) 🙂

  3. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Guardian: Hillary Clinton rouses women’s summit with first big speech of presidential run

    Just so we don’t forget that good things can happen.

    • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

      Thanks – great article!

      “When women are held back our country is held back. When women get ahead everyone gets ahead.”

    • janicen's avatar janicen says:

      This is when she’s at her best.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      She talked about abortion. This is why we need a woman president.

      Clinton: ‘Deep-seated’ beliefs block abortion access

      “Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton argued. “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will.”

      “And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed,” Clinton added.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        She just doesn’t sound like the conservative all the progs claim she is:

        Having pledged to be the champion of everyday Americans, presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton came out swinging during a speech in New York on Thursday night in which she expanded her personal doctrine – “women’s rights are human rights” – to the plight of mothers, fast food workers, immigrants, retirees, students, gay and transgender people and victims of sexual abuse.

    • janicen's avatar janicen says:

      I’m looking all over the front page of the NYT online this morning to see the story on this. Nowhere to be found. Funny, there were at least 3 stories on the Schweizer book.

  4. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    Oh for the love of king cake baby jayzus!

    http://blogs.houstonpress.com/artattack/2015/04/the_apparently_immoral_shoulders_of_my_five-year-old_daughter.php

    Last Monday morning was a little colder than I expected, so I made sure that there was a warm change of clothes in my daughter’s backpack in case she wanted to change. She’d had her heart set on wearing her rainbow sun dress since the weather warmed up so I finally acquiesced and let her. Still it wasn’t too surprising to me to see her walk out of school that afternoon with her T-shirt on over the dress and her jeans on under it.
    “Did you get cold, sweetheart?” I asked her.

    “No,” she said a little crestfallen. “I had to change because spaghetti straps are against the rules.”

    I’m not surprised to see the dress code shaming come into my house. I have after all been sadly waiting for it since the ultrasound tech said, “It’s a girl.” I didn’t think, though that it would make an appearance when she was five years old.

    Five. You get me? She’s five. Cut her hair and put her next to a boy with no shirt on and she is fundamentally identical. I guess you could argue that a boy would not be allowed to wear a shirt with spaghetti straps either, but the day they sell anything like that in the boys section of a Target I will happily withdraw my objections.

    Have you ever stopped to think how weird a school dress code really is? I went and checked out the one for my daughter’s school district and it’s amazing in how hard it tries not to say what it actually means. There are literally no male-specific guidelines anywhere on that list. I mean prohibitions against exposing the chest or torso could hypothetically apply to boys except that they don’t. Not really. They don’t sell boys clothes that do that. There’s nothing that is marketed to boys that is in anyway comparable to a skirt or a sun dress. Essentially, a school dress code exists to prevent girls from displaying too much of their bodies because reasons.

    I didn’t pick up my daughter’s dress at My First Stripperwear. It’s not repurposed fetish gear from a store for very short people. It’s a dress from a mall chain store in her size. It covers everything but her shoulders and a small section of her upper chest and back. She’s worn it to church, and in the growing heat she was looking forward to wearing it a lot because it’s light and comfortable.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Do you realize how fundamentally creepy and perverted one has to be to write a dress code like that for little children? I’m afraid it may be like how the worst homophobes turn out to be people unsure of their own sexuality or closeted. It’s very unpleasant to think about.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        It certainly is. Are they protecting the 5-year-old boys from seeing a girl’s shoulders or the adult men? OK, that’s stomach-turning. But what other explanation is there than that see a little girl as a sexual object? Good grief.

        • ANonOMouse's avatar ANonOMouse says:

          It’s so sad that it makes me remember back to my catholic school days and all the crazy ass rules the nuns had for girls that never were forced onto the boys. We weren’t even allowed to cross our legs or sit with our legs apart in any way. We could cross our legs at our ankles and we had to sit with our knees together. We couldn’t put our elbows on the desk and we had to sit at our desk with our hands folded in our lap unless were doing school work. The boys on the other hand could sit however they damn well pleased. Although I didn’t realize it then I’m certain those special rules for girls came from the Bishop of the Diocese. And most people here should remember all of the crazy dress codes for women pre-1970’d. Skirts or dresses in public places, gloves, hats, scarves, blouses buttoned up or high neckline dresses. I haven’t had a skirt on in 20 years or longer. I spent so much time in skirts & dresses as a child and teen I became totally burned out on dresses.

          • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

            I’m so glad I only went to Catholic school for three years. But I still got indoctrinated with all that garbage. When we went to public school, we had to go to Catechism class on Saturdays. It was awful.

  5. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    Religious freedom laws suffer another blow — in public opinion

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/04/24/the-upshot-of-indiana-opposition-to-religious-freedom-laws-rises/

    The new poll shows just 41 percent think businesses should be able to refuse service to gay weddings, while 57 percent disagree.

  6. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    To me the funniest thing about Bobby Jindal’s bizarre op-ed was when he referred to “radical liberals.” By definition liberals are not radicals. Either Jindal is stupid or he wants people to think he is.

  7. ANonOMouse's avatar ANonOMouse says:

    “Oh, SCOTUS and the Hobby Lobby Decision! Look wtf you’ve done!”

    They were warned!!!!