Friday Reads: Strange Things Afoot

Good Morning!

images (3)Well, it’s not the Ciricle K, but there’s a lot of odd things going on right now in the Landrieu / Cassidy race.  Yes. I’m going local again and it’s all for a lost or good cause and what looks like my last stand in Louisiana.  We’ve been Koch’d to death already.  I can’t take any more.

First, Cassidy has fled to the safety of John Boehner’s arms after being constantly questioned about what looks like payroll fraud at his part time job at LSU’s HSC.  Tiger Beat on the Potomac thinks he’s so far ahead in the race that he basically skipped out on appearances with Rick Santorum and Reince Preibus.  I think he doesn’t want to answer any more questions and look as lame as he appeared on the Monday Night debate.  Every time he opens his mouth, it’s basically yet another audition opportunity for a remake of Clueless.  I still couldn’t believe how completely unprepared he seemed for that one debate.

Here’s how lopsided Louisiana’s Senate runoff is: Bill Cassidy is so far ahead that he’s not in the state campaigning. Two days before the election.
While Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu hustles across the Bayou State ahead of Saturday’s runoff, the Republican congressman is in Washington this week, voting on legislation and debating how to keep the government from shutting down. His press operation appears to be nonexistent.

Cassidy is the overwhelming favorite to win this weekend, and he’s acted in the final weeks like a football team trying to run down the clock. He’s run a surprisingly low-profile campaign, trying to keep the race a referendum on the incumbent, who received just 42 percent of the vote in last month’s primary.

Cassidy skipped an appearance that he was supposed to make with former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) on Wednesday night in Shreveport, sending his wife, Laura, in his place. Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus is campaigning solo in the state Thursday.

Landrieu has an aggressive schedule with stops on Thursday in Grambling, Minden, Shreveport and Lake Charles. The last two days she was in Gretna, Hammond, Baton Rouge, New Roads, Vidalia and Monroe.

Cassidy told POLITICO off the House chamber during a round of votes Thursday afternoon that he will be in Lake Charles on Friday with Sen.-elect Joni Ernst (R-Iowa). Then he will drive across southern Louisiana and finish up in Jefferson Parish.

tumblr_ma1shxyB8N1qdj9xio1_r1_250Mary’s Obituary is already being written by District Insiders. 

Mary Landrieu is dead, and everyone knows it but Mary Landrieu.

The senior senator from Louisiana, a diminutive blond woman with a round, youthful face, is standing under a green canopy in the middle of an airfield. The canopy reads, “City of Hammond, Too Lovely to Litter.” There is frustration in her voice as she repeats, yet again, the message nobody seems to be hearing. “The national race is over,” she says. “This race is clearly now about what’s in Louisiana’s best interest.”

Landrieu’s death was foretold on November 4, when any remaining hope Democrats might have had that their candidates’ individual qualities could overcome voters’ hostility to the president was washed away in a national Republican wave of unexpected proportions. Though Landrieu was also on the ballot that day, thanks to Louisiana’s quirky election laws, it was only the first round—an all-parties primary featuring four Democrats, three Republicans, and a Libertarian. Landrieu got 42 percent of the vote; Bill Cassidy, a physician and Republican congressman, got 41 percent. Now the two of them are pitted head-to-head in a runoff election Saturday.

It is the last Senate contest of 2014 to be decided, a lingering loose end, a hangnail of an election that—now that Republicans have already won the Senate majority—will affect practically no one, except Mary Landrieu and her constituents.

Since the primary, Landrieu has undergone a series of humiliations. First, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee announced it would not spend any money supporting her in the runoff. Landrieu’s campaign was already practically broke, and in the weeks following the primary more than 90 percent of the television ads Louisiana voters saw were from Cassidy or groups supporting him.

Then, in a last-ditch attempt to demonstrate her clout in the Senate, Landrieu—who describes herself as “a strong supporter of the oil and gas industry”—persuaded Harry Reid, the outgoing Senate majority leader, to hold a vote on a bill to build the Keystone XL oil pipeline. She spent several days pleading with her Democratic colleagues to vote for it. On November 18, every Republican and 14 Democratic senators supported the bill. It fell short by a single vote. “FAIL MARY,” declared a Politico headline.

Now, no one gives Landrieu much of a chance. “She’s going to lose—it’s just a matter of how much,” Bernie Pinsonat, a pollster who works for both Republicans and Democrats, tells me. (Pinsonat began as a Democratic pollster, but that is no longer much of a viable occupation in this state.) Elliott Stonecipher, a Shreveport-based political analyst, adds: “She’ll have trouble doing better than the 42 percent she got in the primary, and it could be worse than that.” Many observers question Landrieu’s campaign strategy, from her muddled message to the way she has allocated her funds. But, says Bob Mann, a former Democratic staffer who now writes a newspaper column and teaches at Louisiana State University, “She could be the best swimmer in the world, and it wouldn’t matter. The tide is just too strong.”

Still, Landrieu must go through the motions. She must play out the string. “I am fighting hard until the end,” she announces in Hammond, surrounded by several local mayors and state legislators and a couple of dozen supporters. December in Louisiana: sunny and 80 degrees. Outside the canopy, a man and a woman with six platinum-blond children are waving a sign that says, “Babies are a blessing. Choose life.” They are handing out pro-Cassidy literature. On the other side of the canopy, a woman is holding a Sierra Club sign that says, “Keep the Frack Out of My Water.” (Landrieu is pro-fracking.)

Landrieu approaches a pair of grandmotherly women in Democratic Party T-shirts and puts her arm around one of them. They’ve been making phone calls on her behalf, and she wants to know if the word is getting out—are people starting to see that this race isn’t about the national parties, but about the local matters Landrieu wants it to be about? Has anything changed since the primary?

“I haven’t seen any change,” says Jeanne Voorhees, a 72-year-old with a cross necklace. Bernadette Powell, who is 68 and moved to this part of the state when she lost her New Orleans house in Hurricane Katrina, tells Landrieu she thinks she spent too much time in this week’s debate haranguing Cassidy about a late-breaking scandal involving his Louisiana State paycheck.

“Focus on your record! Your record is good!” Powell tells Landrieu.

“You would think people would be focused on that,” Landrieu says, shaking her head, “but it’s tough.”

Pimp and Rape Barn owner James O’Keefe–who frequently masquerades as a “journalist”–has been parading 10849775_10153801759957619_745472262863728417_naround Landrieu’s offices with a camera harassing people.  The New Orleans Twitterarti have been having a bit of fun with him.   How many folks will want to go down his rabbit hole?

O’Keefe and creepy friend Gavin McInnes have been stalking Mary and the rest of us for some time.   I mean really, he’s already on parole for breaking into her office.   Don’t we get some kind of notice when sexual predators are around?

After Nadia sent the rape barn email, she says James published a response on Project Veritas’ website, then deleted it. Nadia writes that it contained images of documents from James’ legal battle with Isabel Santa, the former Project Veritas member who warned CNN reporter Abbie Boudreau about James’ plan to trap and sexually humiliate her on a “love boat.” Apparently Project Veritas fired Isabel after the ordeal; her lawyer argued that this treatment could qualify as “wrongful termination, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, harassment, negligence, conspiracy and detrimental reliance,” and ended up with a $20,000 settlement. Nadia saved the documents and published them on her blog.

In the words of blogger Lamar White, “What if I told you that the guy who orchestrated Cassidy’s employment arrangement with LSU actually quit his job for two weeks in order to begin drawing his pension? And then he was rehired? What if his pension was $20,000 A MONTH? ”  Yes. Double Bill was mentored by a stellar double dipper.  I’m actually beginning to think the Cassidy candidacy was all about getting him to a place where he’d have to resign so Bobby Jindal could appoint Tony Perkins as a Senator.  Could any one find a worse candidate than this man?

In a real bizarre turn of events, Landrieu has been dissing Maria Cantwell  for being a greenie.

“If I don’t get back there as a senior member of the committee,” said Landrieu, “we’re gonna have a woman who I like very much, [but] I’m not sure Louisiana’s going to think very much of a senator from Washington state who’s all for windmills and alternative energy, and doesn’t support the oil and gas industry! That’s who’s gonna take my place as head of this committee.”

She was talking about Washington Senator Maria Cantwell, a third-term Democrat from a far less conservative state. At 9:39 Pacific time—minutes after Landrieu said this—subscribers to Cantwell’s donor list got an e-mail asking them to help out a friend.

Katrina-WaterIsRising-HelpWhile a conservative PAC has been dissing her as taking too much money from the oil and gas industry.  We’ve seen really lopsided numbers of ads the last week.

Groups backing Landrieu have aired just 100 television ads on her behalf since the Nov. 4 primary. Conservative organizations, meanwhile, have run about 6,000 commercials for Cassidy, according to the The Center for Public Integrity. The election is Saturday.

Anyway, I’m going to try to make some last ditch efforts for her tonight and tomorrow. I still can say one thing for sure.  I don’t want to be here for another big hurricane with Vitter and Cassidy being the major politicos around.  The state will be drowned for certain.

 One last nail in the coffin for me was announced by UNO where more faculty and programs are being cut.   What can I possibly say about a state that’s more willing to subsidize the salary of Tom Cruise than rebuild it’s one major public urban university?

I just don’t think I can take any more of this.  What’s on your reading and blogging list today?

 

 

 


62 Comments on “Friday Reads: Strange Things Afoot”

  1. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    I feel your pain, Dakinikat. On top of LA probably being stuck with Cassidy, it seems as if Mary Landrieu is been rapidly morphing into a Republican.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      It’s not doing her any good. The only thing the majority of white people are motivated by is hating Obama.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Just like here. The Dems talking about A bad campaign by Davis are fully aware that Ann Richards would have been beaten just as badly. They just need to have a circular firing squad and get rid of Battleground TX so they can grab more money for local consultants. Fortunately, Battleground TX isn’t going away.

    • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

      Speaking of morphing into a Republican! I don’t think Landrieu shouldn’t be holding up one of my Senators — Cantwell — “who’s all for windmills and alternative energy, and doesn’t support the oil and gas industry!” as an example of who not to be. Wind farms provide jobs and energy. They’re not the perfect answer, but if wind turbines break you don’t have oil spills.

      Percentage of Washington’s electricity provided by wind in 2013: 6.2 percent. State Rank: 14th in percent of wind generation.
      Equivalent number of homes Washington wind farms now power: over 645,000 average American homes.

      http://www.awea.org/Resources/state.aspx?ItemNumber=5179

  2. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    The Cleveland PD officer who shot and killed Tamir Rice had a troubling past (see Thursday post), but I didn’t know when I wrote it that his partner was, if anything, more unfit for duty than the shooter.

    Cleveland paid out $100,000 to woman involving excessive force lawsuit against officer in Tamir Rice shooting

    The settlement, reached in U.S. District Court in Cleveland, involved Cleveland Patrolman Frank Garmback and stemmed from a 2010 confrontation he had with Tamela Eaton while the officer and his partner were tracking a slaying suspect near West 112th and Clifton Boulevard, records show….

    On Aug. 7, 2010, Eaton, who was 39 at the time, returned to her home to find a car parked in front of her driveway on Clifton Boulevard. She called Cleveland police and to have a tow-truck sent. Eaton then got ready for bed.

    Unbeknownst to Eaton, Cleveland police had been sent to Eaton’s neighborhood to find a suspect in a slaying. Garmback and Guerra found a man and woman walking down the street. The officers quickly arrested the man, despite the woman’s loud protests, according to documents Bradley and Marein filed.

    Eaton came out of her home and believed that the officers were responding to her complaint of the car blocking her driveway. The lawsuit said Eaton did not want the person arrested for her complaint.

    The suit said Garmback initially argued with Eaton. It said Garmback then “rushed (Eaton) and placed her in a chokehold, tackled her to the ground, twisted her wrist and began hitting her body. Officer Guerra rushed over and proceeded to punch Tamela Eaton in the face multiple times.”

    The suit said “such reckless, wanton and willful excessive use of force proximately caused bodily injury to (Eaton).”

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Phoenix Police Kill Unarmed Black Man After Mistaking Pill Bottle for Gun

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/12/phoenix-police-kill-unarmed-black-man.html

  4. Delphyne49's avatar Delphyne49 says:

    Eric Garner’s cry — “I can’t breathe” — taps the zeitgeist of our age: a sense of suffocating helplessness in the face of injustice and unrelenting intrusion.

    Still, one wonders: why such a strong response, however well deserved? Why do so many of us identify so strongly with Garner? Few of us who are not young men of color have felt that particular fear of police. But place the phrase, “I can’t breathe,” in other contexts and see how it fits.

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/people-in-nature/201412/why-i-can-t-breathe-will-be-the-meme-the-decade

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      That’s an excellent article. I think all of us at some time have felt the “I can’t breathe” emotion. We really need to change our sick society in a lot of ways and corralling the police is a good start.

    • janicen's avatar janicen says:

      I’m still woozy from pain meds after having some oral surgery today, so forgive me if I don’t make sense, but I just heard on the news that the police are blaming Eric Garner for contributing to his death because he was overweight and in poor health.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Yes, and it’s not just cops.

      • minkoffminx's avatar JJ Lopez Minkoff says:

        Yeah, I heard that too. The racist here in Banjoville are saying it too…along with the fact that he shouldn’t have been selling non-taxed cigarettes. Because you know, if he wasn’t breaking the law he would be alive today.

  5. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    All of us locals have been discussing that Atlanta article and a Salon one too that basically says Southern Democrats are extinct now unless they are black Southern Democrats from Black Districts. John Breaux and others have been saying that they have to go ahead and be moderate and try to win, but I’m not sure if anything is retrievable with that strategy any more because all the Repubs did this election was say Democrat official = Obama = BAD. It’s like the promise of electing white Republicans who would continually tell them they were superior to black people is all they care about. Reminds me of the old LBJ quote.

    LBJ in 1960: “If you can convince the lowest white man that he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket.”

  6. Delphyne49's avatar Delphyne49 says:

    And now for something really important – the chocolate chip cookie and its history! 🙂 I know it’s O/T, but I found the article so interesting, well written, not depressing and thought I would share it since I can’t share the cookies in cyberspace.

    In recognition of the benefits that she has bestowed upon us by her brilliant creation, I propose that we finally give Ruth Graves Wakefield the credit she is due. She invented the chocolate chip cookie! Chocolate chips might not even exist without her ground-breaking work in cookie research and development. That is a sobering thought. Without chocolate chips to pave the way, there would be no butterscotch chips, no cinnamon chips, and no mint swirl mini kisses – nothing. Whole aisles in the baking section would be bare. Half of the cookie shelf would be empty, the other half filled with various Newtons. Billion dollar businesses would never have been born.

    Toll House Cookies ™ and chocolate chips are momentous achievements that have made immeasurable contributions to public welfare, culture, and job creation, yet amazingly enough, on Nestlé’s Toll House page they essentially make light of her amazing achievement by calling the cookie creation “an accident.” As if the most amazing breakthrough in cookie history just happened. As if their creator wasn’t inventive enough to think of chopping chocolate and adding to cookie dough on purpose. It’s pretty bad that even the company that has made millions from Wakefield’s invention essentially makes light of her achievement by just passing it off as an accident. As another great inventor/discoverer once said, “Chance favors the prepared mind.” Anyone else could have thought of it, but no one else did.

    Read more at http://the-toast.net/2014/12/05/toll-house-cookies-secret-history/#T0jGbdmGpGGiZAOO.99

  7. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Our system is fubar.

    gawker: Why Should Anyone “Respect” the Law?

    In the wake of the announcement that Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson would not be indicted for shooting and killing Mike Brown, protestors across the country took to the streets in mass acts of civil disobedience, and in some cases, property damage.

    And so, yesterday, following a New York grand jury’s failure to indict New York City police officer Daniel Pantaleo for choking 43-year-old Eric Garner to death in July, Governor Andrew Cuomo issued a statement. “[W]hile there will be people who disagree with today’s grand jury decision,” it read, “it is important that we respect the legal process and rule of law.”

    He did not explain why. …

  8. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Matt Taibbi with a great take on the overall problem.

    Rolling Stone: The Police in America Are Becoming Illegitimate

    Nobody’s willing to say it yet. But after Ferguson, and especially after the Eric Garner case that exploded in New York yesterday after yet another non-indictment following a minority death-in-custody, the police suddenly have a legitimacy problem in this country.

    Law-enforcement resources are now distributed so unevenly, and justice is being administered with such brazen inconsistency, that people everywhere are going to start questioning the basic political authority of law enforcement. And they’re mostly going to be right to do it, and when they do, it’s going to create problems that will make the post-Ferguson unrest seem minor. …

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      Wow. Those are pretty powerful and pretty great examples of why the guy should go back to being a liver specialist instead of bringing nationwide embarrassment to the state. You really that racist that you consider those ramblings a reason to vote for him? Hope you don’t ever have another natural disaster in your neck of the swamps because you’re never going to get any help from any where again. That guy couldn’t charm a mouse out of snake’s mouth let alone anything from Mitch McConnell like relief for anything. The only thing he’s going to be is a reliable vote for the richest of the rich in this country.

  9. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Remeber the guy who was recently accidentally shot in the dark hallway.

    NY Daily News: Rookie NYPD cop who shot unarmed black man texted union reps before radioing for help: report

    • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

      Not just an insecure, violence-loving, shoot 1st & ask questions later cop, but a real jerk on top of all his other slimy qualities. Really bad type for police work.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Reading that WaPo story which brought this on, it seems like a laundering of loads of anonymous frat bro quotes which doesn’t prove anything much. A faulty memory on the part of a gang rape survivor should not be a surprise, I assume it would be the norm.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      I haven’t read the stories yet, but I’m just about finished with the book by Liz Securro, who was gang raped at a rush party in 1984 in the same frat as the one in the RS story. Her experience was so similar to the one in the story RS is supposedly “apologizing” for. I’m just sick about this, and I don’t know if I can read the “apology” articles.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Supposedly RS has “new information,” but they don’t say what it is. Are we talking about tiny inconsistencies in the story of a person who was drugged and traumatized? Until I know what the “new information” is, I’m reserving judgment. Why should I take the word of the editor of RS or a bunch of fraternity guys?

        • janicen's avatar janicen says:

          The local news did some interviews at UVA. An anti-sexual assault group is holding a candlelight vigil in support of victims, including Jackie, so that women are not discouraged from reporting sexual assault in light of these recent developments.

          A couple of students said exactly what you referred to above, that any trauma expert will tell you that memories of trauma victims very often differ on small details as a result of what they experienced. This does not mean she wasn’t gang raped.

          So far, I’m not hearing anything about the University backing away from this.

          • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

            I haven’t read anything to make me question the larger allegation at all.

          • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

            I’m glad I’m not alone. The woman who wrote the book I just finished reading had a very similar experience to the one described by “Jackie.”

        • janicen's avatar janicen says:

          On the other hand, an NBC 12 reporter, Curt Autry, is gloating on his FB page about the fact that “the story is unraveling” just like he said it would.

          https://www.facebook.com/CurtAutryNBC12?fref=nf

          Goes to show you, Richmond is changing but it still has a long way to go.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        It really sounds like the old boy network is working overtime on this … the huffington post link is an interview that includes Amanda Marcotte …I got it from her

        • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

          I couldn’t watch it. Does Marcotte go along with the party line? If so, I’ll never read anything by her again.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        I have been looking for one simple undisputed fact which disproves the claim of the victim. There are a lot of questions and niggling, perhaps, errors but nothing dispositive that I have found. The WaPo story just takes the frat boys at their word that they are telling the truth.

        For instance, they publish as fact that no “frat party” was held on the day of the rape. Then at the bottom of the article they say no records of “frat parties” were kept for 2012. How the fuck is that not just a “he said” statement reported as truth?

        • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

          The WaPo story says that Jackie changed her story. At first it was 5 men, then later 7. She could have heard rumors about the number of perpetrators.

          In Liz Securro’s book she describes how she was given a “special drink” and became woozy and so uncoordinated she couldn’t walk well. She recalled being raped by a man who was prosecuted 20 years later and went to jail. He confessed.

          Once the police and prosecutor started investigating, they learned she had actually been raped by 3 men, and the one who confessed was the third. She had been raped twice while completely unconscious. Liz had always wondered, because she had heard rumors on campus of a “gang rape” that happened at the frat party, and knew they must be talking about her.

          They were unable to prosecute the other two perpetrators, but Liz did get some approximation of justice and felt proud of standing up for herself.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Rolling Stone may know something the WaPo didn’t publish. What a mess.

      • minkoffminx's avatar JJ Lopez Minkoff says:

        I can’t read them either BB, so if you do let us know more.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      This appears to be the totality of the Fraternities actual rebuttal to the Rolling Stone story.

      These are the details of the alleged victim’s account, as reported by Rolling Stone, that the fraternity specifically disputes:

      There was no Phi Kappa Psi brother listed as a lifeguard at the university’s Aquatic and Fitness Center in 2012;

      The fraternity did not hold a social event during the weekend of Sept. 28, 2012;

      The fraternity’s pledging activities take place in the spring and not the fall semester.

      To me that doesn’t dispute the victim’s allegiations except around the edges.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        The WaPo located the man that supposedly took Jackie to the frat party and he claims not to have ever dated her. He was not a member of Phi Kappa Psi. He did work with her at the swimming pool as a lifeguard.

        Perhaps this rape happened at a different house? It’s not surprising that Jackie’s memories would be confused, but Sabrina Erdeley should probably have tried to make sure that party had taken place at the Phi Psi house.

        The WaPo was incorrect in their claim that Jackie stated that the people who raped her were rushees of the frat. She said she didn’t know who most of them were.

  10. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      This is so pathetic. The Washington Post must have an unknown interest in this story cause their reporting is a fucking mess. Most people seem to taking them at face value though which is a big mistake!

  11. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Fuck me! It’s a new meme that the RS story was debunked, which is a complete lie!

  12. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Rolling Stone scapegoats rape victim, makes matters worse, by Alexandra Brodsky

    http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/rolling-stone-scapegoats-rape-victim-makes-matters-worse

  13. Rikke's avatar Sima says:

    That poor, poor girl (the UVA rape victim). Now she gets to be raped by the media, by the public… Yeesh. One of the ‘objections’ that I read is that if she was really bloody and hurt badly, her friends offered really bad advice (not to see a doctor/get help) and noone would do that. Oh yea? A friend 17-18 would be able to evaluate wounds? Would be able to separate their own feelings? Would be mature enough to know what was a ‘bad’ wound, and what needed a bandaid? Come on.