Thursday Reads: Gray Lady Down and Other News
Posted: May 15, 2014 Filed under: Journalism, Media, morning reads, Women's Rights | Tags: Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., Bill Keller, code words, Dean Baquet, Equal Pay for Equal Work, gender discrimination, Janine Gibson, Jill Abramson, Ken Auletta, pushy females, the NEW York Times, uppity women 59 Comments
Good Morning!!
News broke late yesterday afternoon that New York Times Executive Editor Jill Abramson had suddenly been replaced by Managing Editor Dean Baquet. Here’s the New York Times’ own report: Times Ousts Its Executive Editor, Elevating Second in Command.
Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., the publisher of the paper and the chairman of The New York Times Company, told a stunned newsroom that had been quickly assembled that he had made the decision because of “an issue with management in the newsroom.”
Ms. Abramson, 60, had been in the job only since September 2011. But people in the company briefed on the situation described serious tension in her relationship with Mr. Sulzberger, who was concerned about complaints from employees that she was polarizing and mercurial. She had also had clashes with Mr. Baquet.
In recent weeks, these people said, Mr. Baquet had become angered over a decision by Ms. Abramson to make a job offer to a senior editor from The Guardian, Janine Gibson, and install her alongside him in a co-managing editor position without consulting him. It escalated the conflict between them and rose to the attention of Mr. Sulzberger.
Ms. Abramson did not attend the afternoon meeting at which her dismissal was announced.
The Times won eight Pulitzer Prizes under Ms. Abramson, and she won praise for journalistic efforts both in print and on the web. She had previously served as the head of the Washington bureau, and before coming to The Times was an investigative reporter at The Wall Street Journal. She co-wrote, with Ms. [Jane ] Mayer [of the New Yorker], “Strange Justice,” a book about the confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas.
But as a leader of the newsroom, she was accused by some of divisiveness and criticized for several of her personnel choices, in particular the appointment of several major department heads who did not last long in their jobs.
With Mr. Sulzberger more closely monitoring her stewardship, tensions between Ms. Abramson and Mr. Baquet escalated. In one publicized incident, he angrily slammed his hand against a wall in the newsroom. He had been under consideration for the lead job when Ms. Abramson was selected and, according to people familiar with his thinking, he was growing frustrated working with her.
Let’s see . . . Abramson was “polarizing and mercurial,” “was accused by some of divisiveness,” and her male second in command didn’t like taking orders from her, have I got that right? Is it just me, or do those sound like code words?
Now let’s see what people who don’t work for Sulzberger are saying.
From Ken Auletta at The New Yorker: WHY JILL ABRAMSON WAS FIRED.
At the annual City University Journalism School dinner, on Monday, Dean Baquet, the managing editor of the New York Times, was seated with Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., the paper’s publisher. At the time, I did not give a moment’s thought to why Jill Abramson, the paper’s executive editor, was not at their table. Then, at 2:36 P.M. on Wednesday, an announcement from the Times hit my e-mail, saying that Baquet would replace Abramson, less than three years after she was appointed the first woman in the top job. Baquet will be the first African-American to lead the Times.
Fellow-journalists and others scrambled to find out what had happened. Sulzberger had fired Abramson, and he did not try to hide that. In a speech to the newsroom on Wednesday afternoon, he said, “I chose to appoint a new leader of our newsroom because I believe that new leadership will improve some aspects …” Abramson chose not to attend the announcement, and not to pretend that she had volunteered to step down.
Apparently, the real problem Sultzberg had with Abramson was that she was an uppity woman.
As with any such upheaval, there’s a history behind it. Several weeks ago, I’m told, Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs. “She confronted the top brass,” one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management’s narrative that she was “pushy,” a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect. Sulzberger is known to believe that the Times, as a financially beleaguered newspaper, needed to retreat on some of its generous pay and pension benefits; Abramson, who spent much of her career at the Wall Street Journal, had been at the Times for far fewer years than Keller, which accounted for some of the pension disparity. Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for the Times, said that Jill Abramson’s total compensation as executive editor “was directly comparable to Bill Keller’s”—though it was not actually the same. I was also told by another friend of Abramson’s that the pay gap with Keller was only closed after she complained. But, to women at an institution that was once sued by its female employees for discriminatory practices, the question brings up ugly memories. Whether Abramson was right or wrong, both sides were left unhappy. A third associate told me, “She found out that a former deputy managing editor”—a man—“made more money than she did” while she was managing editor. “She had a lawyer make polite inquiries about the pay and pension disparities, which set them off.”
The other issues Auletta mentions are similar to those described in the NYT article: she had problems with Baquet and those who worked under her sometimes complained she was “brusque” (as opposed to Mr. Personality, Bill Keller?). Again, it sounds to me as if Abraham’s biggest “problem” was her gender. Mr. Baquet sounds pretty “pushy” too, but for him that was acceptable, I guess. Josh Marshall at TPM points out that:
The Times article notes in passing that Abramson reached a settlement with the Times, which makes pretty clear that whatever might have happened with disparate pay or a connection between her pressing the matter and her firing there will not be a lawsuit.
Hmmm . . . Sounds like Sultzberger thought Abramson might have grounds to sue if he didn’t settle with her.
At Business Insider, Hunter Walker calls attention to the Times’ past problems with gender disparities in pay (also mentioned by Ken Auletta in The New Yorker piece linked above):
Auletta claimed other Times staffers were concerned about the pay disparity between Abramson and Keller. He said it brought up “ugly memories” of a 1974 lawsuit female employees made against the paper due to allegations of sex discrimination in hiring, pay, and promotion.
On Twitter, NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik subsequently confirmed Auletta’s report. Folkenflik also noted unspecified “figures at Times wonder what role gender ultimately played in (Abramson’s) ouster.”
Finally, Politico describes how the announcement impacted other New York Times employees: Invitation to a beheaading: How Times editors learned of Abramson’s ouster:
“Please come to a masthead/dept head meeting at 2:00 p.m. today in the page one conference room/3rd floor.”
That was the note top editors at The New York Times received this afternoon summoning them to an abrupt gathering in which publisher and Times Company chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. would inform them that executive editor Jill Abramson was being replaced in the No. 1 masthead spot by one of her deputies, managing editor Dean Baquet….
[T]he news…came as a shock to most of the assembled editors. There had been none of the drama or widespread discontent that led up to the famous firing of Howell Raines in 2003. In fact when they arrived in the room, their first inkling of what was about to transpire was the fact that Abramson was not present.
Sulzberger gave the same vague reasoning for the change that would be relayed in a company memo and at a full newsroom meeting shortly thereafter—that the decision had to do with Abramson’s newsroom management.
Not everyone was buying it. When Sulzberger said he was sure it doesn’t “come as a surprise to you,” video editor Bruce Headlam spoke up in Abramson’s defense, according to a person who was present. “It does come as a surprise to me,” the source recalls him saying.
Two other editors also voiced their concerns, sources with knowledge of the meeting told Capital. National editor Alison Mitchell suggested that Abramson’s firing wouldn’t sit well with a broad swath of female Timesjournalists who saw her as a role model. (Abramson became the Times‘ first female executive editor in 2011, after Bill Keller stepped down.) Assistant managing editor Susan Chira seconded that notion.
Read more at the link.
So . . . draw your own conclusions. My guess is we’ll be reading and hearing quite a bit more about the Times and its history of gender discrimination over the next few days.
In other news . . . links to some stories that interested me:
The Hill: US using drones to find kidnapped Nigerian girls.
Yahoo News: Missouri lawmakers pass 3-day abortion wait period.
TPM: Christie Predicts BridgeGate Will Have Zero Effect On His Political Future.
NPR: Election-Year Politics Dooms Energy Bill, Averts Pipeline Vote.
Politico: Snowden Is The Kind of Guy I Used to Recruit—in Russia (by former CIA director of operations Jack Devine).
io9: The Ultimate Proof That Keeping Orca Whales in Captivity is Monstrous.
Digg: Gone Girls — The Female Sociopath.
CNN: 9 wildfires spring up around San Diego, more than 9,000 acres burned.
CBS News: Turkey mining accident toll nears 300 as anger at PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan boils over.
NYT: Captain and 3 Officers Charged With Murder in Korean Ferry Sinking.
What else is happening? Please post your links on any topic in the comment thread.
peej
Carissa
ecocatwoman
mablue2
peggysue22
quixote
skydancingguestblogger
Mona (aka Wonk the Vote)
Sky Dancing 
Spoiler Warning:
Don’t read the article about female sociopaths unless you’ve already read Gone Girl or you don’t plan to. The entire premise of the book is revealed in the first paragraph of the article. I hate when writers do that.
You have been warned.
I read and enjoyed “Gone Girl” and our book club chose it as one of our selections last year.
Yes, there are such things as female sociopaths with all things being “equal”.
Great coverage of the Times situation and Jill Abramson. Glad you chose to lead with that since I’m sure we will be hearing more and more about the inner workings of that paper.
I liked Gone Girl too. I read it after you recommended it.
I read and thought it was very good.
Thanks for this post, BB, you’ve helped to sort things out about the Times for us. It seems as though strong women are getting clocked at every turn.
It may be time for Sultzberger to replace himself.
Good thought!
I’m sure he has his own little internal cheering section that’s singing “Ding-Dong” this morning. Maybe we’ll get a full blown expose out of this that will pull the rug out from under the prick.
I just finished reading the article in the NYT about Abramson’s firing and my feminist hackles were twitching over the descriptions of her as “mercurial” and “divisive” (there’s not a woman who has held a leadership role on this planet who hasn’t been called the same) and I came over here to find you were all over the story, bb. Thank you for the links to all of the other coverage about this. I want to swear now, but I’ll go back and read all of the links first.
One thing that jumped out at me was this quote…
He slams his hand against the wall in the office and she’s described as “mercurial”? WTF does that make him?
Yeah, that was really mature. He sounds “pushy” and “mercurial.” He got what he wanted too. Jerk.
That’s how it should have been written.
“Polarizing” is another good code word. That one has been endlessly applied to Hillary.
They’re already going to work on Hillary. Someone needs to shove a sock in Karl Rove’s mouth.
Who the hell even uses the word “mercurial”? Do they think we don’t know that’s fucking code for MOODY? MAD MEN!!!!
Y’all need to remember that if a woman is “mercurial” it can make a man’s balls fall off and his thingy disappear!!! 🙂
Yup! And that’s why we can’t have nice jobs. We get all uppity and start demanding equal compensation, hiring other women into leadership positions, and even dare to challenge men’s superiority. Must be the hormones. 😉
It has been my experience that few men, especially men in powerful positions, can deal with a powerful woman. It’s totally emasculating to them. That’s why there are so few women in positions of power. Sadly though wage disparity reaches across the spectrum of employment. From Senior Management to Store Clerks, men are paid more than women and the saddest aspect of it is that they expect to be paid more than women. I could write a book on what I’ve seen with my own eyes because i worked most of my career in Aerospace and Engineering, and honey let me tell ya, it’s man’s world.
At the same time, every single republican in the senate voted against equal pay for women.
Code words do seem to fly around in a room with mixed company of bigots and racists and sexists… example is Sterling showing as the tip if the iceberg except without the code words?
Sterling is a combination bigot, racist, sexist with a huge dash of privilege, arrogance and self-importance topped off with what sounds and looks like a guy who’s already taken a few giant steps down the path of dementia.
What is sad to me…is I see Sterling as most of the Republicans in Congress and the conservatives on the oxymoron called the Supreme Court.
CNN can’t seem to get enough, they are interviewing his friend, the pimp.
tpm: Rubio Slams Liberals’ ‘Hypocrisy’ On Abortion, Climate Change
This country really needs to stop electing morons!
Rubio is a putz who can’t finish a paragraph of pre-scripted speech without having to take a big gulp! At least Big Gulp Rubio kept his eyes on the camera
I’ve taken the NYT off my favorites list; they won’t even get my nine little clicks per month-as if I’d pay for mindless twaddle and real estate porn.
Sulzberger can kiss my mercurial*ass!
*I have Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Ditto to all that
Gay Marriages Now Off In Arkansas
Court seems to have muddied the legal water in Arkansas, for now.
The tide has turned, They can keep putting up these temporary barriers, but they can’t hold back the tide.
Like Climate Change deniers, they’re doing themselves no good at all.
I don’t think the right wingnuts will believe in climate change until they’re rowing to higher ground. Looking at maps of how rising sea levesl will affect the U.S. there’s going to be a lot of rowing going on.
Gay Marriage resumes in Arkansas:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/05/15/arkansas-same-sex-marriage/9134473/
That didn’t take long 🙂
The 9th Circuit of Appeals in SF, halts the same sex marriages (temporarily stay) in Idaho. Many were planning weddings in the morning. Instead they are going to have a party with cake and coffee, and music. I was going post “At Last”, will wait now.
Esquire: This is What Happens When You Challenge Gun Cultists
Lt Col Robert Bateman writing at Pierce’s blog.
Woman at the Top of the Masthead
The media called her “brusque” and “polarizing.” But to young women at the New York Times, Jill Abramson was everything.
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/05/jill_abramson_was_everything_to_young_women_at_the_new_york_times.html
Jordan Weissmann at Slate: The New York Times Just Fired One Successful Editor
From the Amanda Hess story Dak linked to:
These examples say a lot.
Indeed they do. Considering women are over half the population, encouraging reporting through the eyes of woman is a win-win. Too bad someone’s testosterone got in the way
Bob Cesca: This is How Edward Snowden Taught Glenn Greenwald to Hide From the NSA (video sent from Snowden to Greenwald before they met)
Huge oil spill in Los Angeles
10,000-gallon crude oil spill in Atwater Village looked ‘like a lake’
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-crude-oil-spill-atwater-village-revised-20140515-story.html
NYT: Workers Take to Streets to Calm Tense Ukrainian City
Sounds like a good thing to me.
I hope it works.
It would be great if it worked out. Best way forward I would think, at least for now.
For Delphyne:
OMG that’s just too cute!
Looks like a cross between a moth, a mouse, and maybe a hedgehog! Earth is a marvelous place.
I had forgotten those things. Asbestos, that great lung protectant.
Oh please, no!
The worst part about Hillary running is having all these Bill hangers-on coming out of the woodwork. Lanny Davis is the worst of the bunch.
So, we have one pregnant woman to be killed as an apostate in Sudan and this woman that was murdered in the streets because her neighbors in a small Brazilian town saw a rumor on facebook that she was a witch …
http://www.livescience.com/45545-facebook-post-leads-to-witch-hunt.html
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brazil-woman-lynched-death-over-facebook-black-magic-children-kidnap-rumour-1447731
Superstition is alive and malevolent. Especially if you happen to be female.
Last night, while watching this, my husband and I both fell out of our chairs This is what we are up against. When all was done and said, I took one long nice hot shower. I mean that made me feel dirty!
http://youtu.be/t0OU7AVFlEc
I was hoping to share Harley showing his patch on the his leather jacket that says “diddle diddle right down the middle”……….and that is who he is. HAHAHA.
Here it is, “Hey diddle diddle right up the middle”………..
http://youtu.be/OlZA4SBD6qM
What rock did these people crawl out from under?