Friday Reads: Journey Back to White Male Privilege

er717 Good Morning!

It’s amazing to me to read about the number of efforts afoot to try to disenfranchise so many different types of Americans. No where is this most apparent than the ongoing struggle to diminish the right to vote. It’s sad to watch the Supreme Court destroy much of the modern era’s momentum to expand the ability to participate in government.

It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which eviscerated the Voting Rights Act, is leading to a new era of voter suppression that parallels the pre-1960s era—this time affecting not just African-Americans but also Hispanic-Americans, women, and students, among others.

The reasoning employed by Chief Justice John Roberts in Shelby County—that Section 5 of the act was such a spectacular success that it is no longer necessary—was the equivalent of taking down speed cameras and traffic lights and removing speed limits from a dangerous intersection because they had combined to reduce accidents and traffic deaths.

In North Carolina, a post-Shelby County law not only includes one of the most restrictive and punitive vote-ID laws anywhere but also restricts early voting, eliminates same-day voting registration, ends pre-registration for 16- and 17-year-olds, and bans many provisional ballots. Whatever flimsy voter-fraud excuse exists for requiring voter ID disappears when it comes to these other obstacles to voting.

In Texas, the law could require voters to travel as much as 250 miles to obtain an acceptable voter ID—and it allows a concealed-weapon permit, but not a student ID, as proof of identity for voting. Moreover, the law and the regulations to implement it, we are now learning, will create huge impediments for women who have married or divorced and have voter IDs and driver’s licenses that reflect maiden or married names that do not exactly match. It raises similar problems for Mexican-Americans who use combinations of mothers’ and fathers’ names.

In a recent election on constitutional issues, a female Texas District Court judge, Sandra Watts, who has voted for 49 years in the state, was challenged in the same courthouse where she presides; to overcome the challenge, she will have to jump through hoops and possibly pay for a copy of her marriage license, an effective poll tax on women.

The Justice Department is challenging both laws, but through a much more cumbersome and rarely successful provision of the Voting Rights Act that is still in force. It cannot prevent these laws and others implemented by state and local jurisdictions, many of which will take effect below the radar and will not be challenged because of the expense and difficulty of litigation.

Cheer up!  We have a new generation of suffragettes!’

12-year-old Madison Madison Kimrey, founder of NC Youth Rocks, gave a rousing speech at a recent NAACP event, taking on Governor Pat McCrory, and the state’s recent highly restrictive Voter I.D. laws. Being 12, her particular concern was the elimination of the state’s pre-registration for 16 and 17-year-olds through schools and the state’s DMV that enables them to automatically be added to the voting rolls when they turn 18.

She completely nails Gov. McCrory, who refused to meet with her, calling her “ridiculous” and a “liberal prop.” Her response: “I am not a prop. I am part of a new generation of sufragettes.”

Gov. McCrory also said, according to Kimrey: “He had not read that part of the bill.”

In the words of Alicia Keyes: “This girl is on fire.”

Check the video out at the link.

The U.S. Senate is trying to move the Employment Non-Discrimination Act forward.  What will its fate be in the Neanderthal-ridden house?53488_pec_g1103

Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid is likely to file cloture in the coming hours on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, BuzzFeed has learned, which would set up a Monday evening vote on a motion to proceed to debate on the bill to ban LGBT discrimination in the workplace.

Reid is likely to file a cloture petition on the bill this evening, a Democratic leadership aide told BuzzFeed Thursday, which would set a vote on the motion to proceed on debate of ENDA for Monday evening.

If the motion to proceed, which requires 60 votes, is agreed to, the Senate would debate and eventually vote on the bill. The vote would be the first Senate vote on the legislation since 1996 and the first vote ever on the legislation with both sexual orientation and gender identity protections.

Advocates say that they have clear support from 59 senators, including all 55 Democrats in the Senate and four Republicans, with a handful of other Republican senators as potential yes votes.

Economist Brad DeLong thinks we are coming to a new “normal” in the U.S. and it doesn’t look very pretty.

The new normal is different, the new normal is not an employment-to-population ratio of 63%. It’s an employment to population ratio of 59%. Out of every 15 people who we would have expected to have a job in the America of 2007 doesn’t have a job in the America of today. There is no sign that this will change. We have now seen four years without appreciable recovery in the employment-to -population ratio to what we used to think of as normal. And labor-force participation rate is now falling much much faster than we can justify from the demography. In long-run historical perspective, we are back to a labor force share of the population that we had in the late 1970s, when American feminism was at most only half-completed. An awful lot of those who are unemployed are long-term unemployed. Employers look at them askance when they apply for jobs. An awful lot more of the employment shortfall is people who have simply dropped out of the labor force, and I don’t see what forces will push them to come back in. Thus we are likely to have a lot of slack in the American labor market–and a large shortfall of aggregate demand below potential supply–as far into the future as we can see.

If you are running a business, demand for your products will be low. But if you are ruining a business, it is also a fact that your margins are likely to be high. For businesses, these two effects more or less offset each other, and businesses wind up wight he operative cash flow they would have expected–and with lower borrowing costs because of low interest rates. This means the “new normal” is better for non-financial businesses than we thought we would see back in 2007. And the “new normal” is considerably worse for workers than the normal of 2007. On the labor side, it looks like jobs are going to be scarce for at least a decade to come. Few people will dare to ask for a raise. Few people will dare to quit.

Senate Republicans are just saying no to Obama appointees including several extremely qualified people.

In a rebuke to the White House, U.S. Senate Republicans blocked two of President Barack Obama’s nominations on the floor, reviving a threat from Democrats to change the rules for dealing with filibusters.

The Senate voted not to consider the nomination of Representative Mel Watt, a North Carolina Democrat, to lead the Federal Housing Finance Agency following resistance from Republicans over his qualifications.

That opposition led to a 56-42 vote — four votes short of the 60 needed — to move the nomination to a final debate and floor vote on Obama’s nominee to replace Edward J. DeMarco, who has been acting director since 2009.

Less than an hour later, Republicans blocked Washington lawyer Patricia Millett, the first of Obama’s three nominations to vacancies on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, considered the nation’s second most influential because it hears appeals of federal regulatory cases.

The vote on her nomination was 55-38. Three Republican senators voted “present.”

6a00d83451ccbc69e20120a6513add970b-400wiMeanwhile, the impact of more strict abortion controls meant to restrict women’s right to access the constitutional act of conscience is coming home to roost all over the country.

On their last night in Dallas, the ramen noodles and microwave popcorn were finished. The money for the motel had run out too. So on a hot August night Jessica and Erick Davis and their three young kids slept in the Mazda rented for the trip.

It had only been a few hours since Jessica’s abortion. Because the procedure needed to be performed later in her pregnancy, it stretched over three days.

“I cried until I could fall asleep,” she said.

Earlier that month, at home in Oklahoma City, the Davises were told that the boy she was carrying had a severe brain malformation known as holoprosencephaly. It is rare, though possible, for such a fetus to survive to birth, but doctors told them that he would not reach his first birthday. “He would never walk, lift his head,” Jessica, 23, recalled in an interview.

“I could let my son go on and suffer,” she said. Or she could accept a word she didn’t like – abortion – “and do the best thing for my baby.”

“It took everything we had so that our son would not suffer”

The Davises’ ordeal was always going to be painful. But the grim path that led them to a night in the car was determined, nearly every step of the way, by a state that has scrambled to be the most “pro-life” in the nation. There are no exceptions for families like the Davises.

Oklahomans brag that theirs has become the reddest state. Republicans hold super majorities in both chambers and every single seat in the U.S. Congress. Republican Mary Fallin is governor. Every single Oklahoma county rejected Barack Obama–twice. The changed political landscape allowed Oklahoma to become a staging ground for the anti-choice movement’s strategy to undermine Roe v. Wade, one seemingly narrow restriction at a time.

“We are the guinea pigs,” said Ryan Kiesel, a former state lawmaker who is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma.

Since the consolidation of Republican control in 2010, the state legislature has passed at least sixteen laws relating to abortion, often with “no” votes in the single digits. It’s no coincidence that two of the cases involving women’s health currently hurtling towards the Supreme Court originated in Oklahoma.

“It’s sickened me about the state of Oklahoma, period,” Erick told MSNBC of his family’s experience. “I don’t even want to be in this state.”

So, welcome to the rightward march of the U.S. into the realm of fascist nightmares.   Welcome to trying to get the world back to a place where white men get to decide everything.

What’s on you reading and blogging list today?


31 Comments on “Friday Reads: Journey Back to White Male Privilege”

  1. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    We are in bad shape and Obama and the Democrats should start really raising hell about it. They should push an agenda as hard as the Republicans do. Being mild and meek is not cutting it and we’re failing in place.

    To start Reid should use the nuclear option on the filibuster. Whether he does or not, McConnell will as soon as he gets power anyway.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      You’re right. If the Dems don’t get off their asses and fight back we are going to be ruled by an insane minority for years to come.

    • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

      You are spot on this morning……..the direction we are headed is so fucking wrong. This morning Reince Priebus (head of republican party), was on tv selling Americans a few facts, like 6 people signed up for ACA on the first day the program was set up. Then he starts in on how many millions and millions were lied to (you can keep your insurance), and got letters kicking them off the rolls. When questioned about the recent poll showing that republicans have 22% approval rating, he jumped that fence, and said that the democrats are now afraid to face those people who have been bumped from their beloved insurance plans.

      Tell you what I would like to see, the democrats stand with women and children, and elderly, and the disabled, and veterans, who as of today will have to seek other forms of food security, and a hell of bleak holiday season.. I want the poor who have to take on more pain, and unhealthy living, to get in the faces of Republicans, like Priebus, like Cruz, like Paul, and Marsha Blackburn, and let’s see how they face us when we come to knock on their doors. Of course it’s got to happen soon, most of them are ready to head home for their Pilgrim’s dinner.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        The hell of it is the Democrats are afraid and for no good reason that I can see except for sheer cowardice. If they can’t stand up, they should just go home.

  2. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Didn’t expect this good story in Politico. The only way forward is to politically kill these sorry bastards off in 2014!

    tbtp: The Obamacare sabotage campaign

    To the undisputed reasons for Obamacare’s rocky rollout — a balky website, muddied White House messaging and sudden sticker shock for individuals forced to buy more expensive health insurance — add a less acknowledged cause: calculated sabotage by Republicans at every step.

    That may sound like a left-wing conspiracy theory — and the Obama administration itself is so busy defending the indefensible early failings of its signature program that it has barely tried to make this case. But there is a strong factual basis for such a charge. …

  3. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    Good grief!
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/11/why-bill-kristol-left-fox-news-176467.html

    In 2011, the Fox News chief asked Kristol to take a negative stance toward a certain individual, effectively helping Ailes in his effort to give that person a bad reputation, the sources said. Kristol refused to get involved in Ailes’ personal arguments and, as a result, there was a “coolness” between the two going forward. Though the relationship remained cordial, Ailes felt he could no longer trust Kristol to be a team player.

    Kristol is a jerk but at least he has some integrity if this is true.

  4. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    48 million Americans see food stamp cuts due to congressional inaction http://ow.ly/qp7NU

  5. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    The Atlantic Wire ‏@TheAtlanticWire 1m
    WATCH LIVE: Press conference on LAX shooting http://bit.ly/19jgWXB

    LAX shooter is in custody and one TSA agent is dead. Others are in hospital. 20 something male american. Some kind of TSA “contractor”.

    More mass shootings in the USA … seems like it’s just a daily thing these days

  6. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    BB should get a kick out of this, the NYT agrees now.

    BI via Yahoo: It’s Now Clear That Edward Snowden’s Life Is Dictated By Russian Intelligence

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      Thanks. I read that last night. It’s pretty obvious, the FSB is running Snowden. Ugh.

  7. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Media sucks, especially Sharyl Atkisson at CBS (hack)…

    Consumer Reports: That Florida woman’s canceled Blue Cross policy? It’s junk insurance.

    She can get a real plan for only $165 a month

    Conisder the case of Diane Barrette, a 56-year-old woman from Winter Haven, Fla. Her story was featured in this CBS News report and endlessly echoed on the Internet. She was upset because Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida was canceling her $54-a-month “GoBlue plan 91” and offering to replace it with a $591-a-month “Blue Options Essential plan.”

    Sounds terrible—except that Barrette’s expiring policy is a textbook example of a junk plan that isn’t real health insurance at all. If she had ever tried to use it for anything more than an occasional doctor visit or inexpensive prescription, she would have ended up with tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of medical debt.

  8. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    another one for BB to look at:

    A study published in the scientific journal forum PLOS ONE found that the presence of firearms in white homes in the U.S. is associated with higher incidences of racism and stiffer resistance to gun control policies. According to a press release from the University of Manchester, the study was led by University of Manchester and Monash University professor of Behavioral Studies Dr. Kerry O’Brien.

    The study analyzed data from a large swath of white U.S. voters and was spurred by the vehemence of the gun control debate in this country in the wake of the school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in New Town, Connecticut. O’Brien and his team mainly hail from the U.K., New Zealand and Australia and were curious about U.S. attitudes toward gun ownership.

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/01/study-links-racism-gun-ownership-and-resistance-to-gun-laws/

  9. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Fuck CBS, they’re even worse than we think!!!

    Report: Benghazi witness was nowhere near diplomatic compound during terrorist attack

    A security subcontractor who gave his account to CBS “60 Minutes” of the events leading up to the fatal attack at Benghazi had previously told his employers he was nowhere near the diplomatic compound at the time, according to a Washington Post report.

    The Oct. 27 television report was based on a yearlong investigation by reporter Lara Logan and producer Max McCellan and featured an interview with a man identified by the pseudonym “Morgan Jones,” who was described as “a security officer who witnessed the attack.”

    A Fox News correspondent said the following day that the network had been working on a story with the same security officer, but those efforts ended when he asked for money in exchange for his participation.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) used the “60 Minutes” report to justify calling Monday for additional hearings into Benghazi and threatened to block Senate appointments until lawmakers had heard from all the surviving witnesses to the attack.

    However, Graham conceded Wednesday that witnesses have already been questioned by members of Congress, but their testimony hasn’t been publicly released because the investigations are still ongoing.

    David Brock, chairman of Media Matters, has called on CBS to retract its Benghazi report based on the security officer’s comments.

  10. minkoffminx's avatar JJ Lopez Minkoff says:

    This post and yesterdays was awesome Dak…just got to read them now. I have the cartoon post scheduled(the div codes may be a problem), my internet has been out for over a day now. It is working for the moment but I don’t think it will last long…already giving me the disconnect signals.