Tuesday Reads

blancoynegroGood Morning!

It’s amazing what people will do to children and it’s amazing what kind of people think  assaulting children with belts is just okey dokey.   This is one of those stories that’s actually hard to believe.

A Dollar General employee arrested in Wrightsville last week for hitting a child with a belt has now been charged with aggravated assault and cruelty to children. The charges were upgraded from simple battery because store video showed the woman hitting the 8 year old at least 25 times.

After initially saying they were looking into the details of the case before acting, Dollar General told 11Alive News Monday afternoon the employee, Emilia Graciela Bell, had been fired. “We are deeply shocked and saddened by the reported incident at our store in Wrightsville, Georgia,” read the statement, “And have expressed our sincere apologies to the child’s family.”

Investigators have not yet released the video, but the boy’s family told WMAZ Macon over the weekend it was more severe than a spanking.

“It was more or less a beating than a spanking the way she was hitting him,” said Logan Ivey’s father Jody. “I don’t know how to explain it, and I don’t want to think about it.”

Eight-year-old Logan said it was very painful.

“I felt like I had five needles sticking in me; it really hurt, I was screaming ‘Momma,'” he said. “And I was crying real bad because she had actually hurt me…when she stopped whipping me my pants were actually a little bit warm.”

Wrightsville Police Chief Paul Sterling said Logan Ivey was running around in the store and got into a confrontation with 39-year-old store clerk. Bell told investigators the boy threw a cookie at her and that’s when she removed her belt, chased the boy down and spanked him behind the counter.

What’s even more interesting is that Eric Erickson seems to think it’s perfectly appropriate.  Any one with children or small animals should keep them far away from the Red State Zombie Sadist.

Fox News contributor Erick Erickson wrote that a Dollar General employee deserves “a medal” for reportedly responding to an eight-year-old child who threw a cookie at her by hitting the child with her belt dozens of times.

What is wrong with these people?b&n flapper

A 16 page memo has been obtained by NBC and outlines the Justice Department case for drone attacks.

A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the  September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes.

The secrecy surrounding such strikes is fast emerging as a central issue in this week’s hearing of White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan, a key architect of the drone campaign, to be CIA director.  Brennan was the first administration official to publicly acknowledge drone strikes in a speech last year, calling them “consistent with the inherent right of self-defense.” In a separate talk at the Northwestern University Law School in March, Attorney General Eric Holder specifically endorsed the constitutionality of targeted killings of Americans, saying they could be justified if government officials determine the target poses  “an imminent threat of violent attack.”

But the confidential Justice Department “white paper” introduces a more expansive definition of self-defense or imminent attack than described  by Brennan or Holder in their public speeches.  It refers, for example, to what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” than actual intelligence about any ongoing plot against the U.S. homeland.

You can watch Micheal Isikoff speak with Rachel Maddow on the white paper at the link above.

I’ve written a lot about some of the Nordic Countries–like Finland and Norway–that show strong economies while still maintaining strong social nets and a commitment to income equality.  The Economist this week has a special  on the countries and shows how they’ve carved a middle path between markets and government.

Denmark has one of the most liberal labour markets in Europe. It also allows parents to send children to private schools at public expense and make up the difference in cost with their own money. Finland is harnessing the skills of venture capitalists and angel investors to promote innovation and entrepreneurship. Oil-rich Norway is a partial exception to this pattern, but even there the government is preparing for its post-oil future. This is not to say that the Nordics are shredding their old model. They continue to pride themselves on the generosity of their welfare states. About 30% of their labour force works in the public sector, twice the average in the Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation, a rich-country think-tank. They continue to believe in combining open economies with public investment in human capital.

You can read more about these countries and their initiatives throughout the magazines pages.

b&y with peacockHillary Clinton may not be our SOS but she is still thinking about how to better the lives of people in the US and around the world.  Here’s one of her initiatives that partners Silicon Valley with the developing world.

One of those new initiatives, the Alliance for an Affordable Internet, barely got a mention in Clinton’s speech. But it merits attention. If successful, the project—a public-private partnership among the State Department, the World Wide Web Foundation, and tech companies such as Cisco Systems (CSCO), Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo (YHOO) and Intel (INTC)—could end up helping many people in poor countries get onto the Web. It could also cement long-term ties between the State Department and the companies—while opening new markets and reaching new customers for Silicon Valley. “We’re going to help the next billion people come online,” said Clinton, quickly announcing the project before going on to talk about clean cook stoves for women in the developing world.

Only a quarter of people in developing countries are online, compared to three-quarters of those in developed nations. If the U.S. is to play a role in changing that equation, credit will go in part to a State Department employee named Ann Mei Chang.

Chang, a 25-year veteran of Silicon Valley—most recently she was a senior engineering director at Google—joined the State Department in November 2011 to be an adviser on technology and women’s issues. Now she lives in Nairobi, Kenya, a city recently billed by Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt as Africa’s soon-to-be Silicon Valley. Chang has been spending her time studying Kenya’s technological success and teaming up diplomats with U.S. tech companies to figure out how other countries can follow its example.

Chang says that in most developing countries, an entry-level Internet connection costs the equivalent of the average person’s monthly income. One reason is high taxes. In many places, computers, mobile phones, modems, and other software are taxed as luxury goods. “It’s one of the few things they can tax,” says Chang. The effect is that fewer people can afford to log on. “That’s short-sighted,” she says.

Here’s some interesting political speculation on Janet Napolitano.  Would she run if Hillary chooses to stay retired?

So, what happens if Hillary Clinton doesn’t run in 2016?

It is hard to imagine the presidential field without a woman contender, and here’s one to keep your eye on: Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. Napolitano is quietly making it known that she is considering the race, and there is reason to take her seriously.

Before coming to Washington, Napolitano was a highly regarded and very popular governor in Arizona, a state not known as a hospitable one for Democrats. In 2005, Time Magazine named her one of the nation’s five best governors, noting: “Positioning herself as a no-nonsense, pro-business centrist, she has worked outside party lines since coming to office in January 2003 to re-energize a state that, under her predecessors, was marked by recession and scandal.”

While in Arizona, she was criticized for not being aggressive enough in dealing with the influx of illegal immigrants. But her more recent job gives her an opportunity to change that image. This week, for instance, finds her on a high-profile tour of the southwest border, where she will highlight the stepped-up resources that the Obama administration has been devoting to reducing the flow of illegal entrants to this country.

Still, running for the White House from the cabinet is not an easy thing to do. Not since then-Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover did it in 1928 has anyone successfully made the leap from the president’s cabinet to the Oval Office.

So, there’s a few things to get us started off today.  What’s on your reading and blogging list today?


62 Comments on “Tuesday Reads”

  1. ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

    The use of drones & the info in that memo is beyond disturbing. I’m pretty sure I linked to last week’s Moyers & Company, but if you missed it, here’s the link to the video about “Drones & Democracy”: http://billmoyers.com/segment/vicki-divoll-and-vincent-warren-on-drones-and-democracy/

    Interestingly, Vicki Divoli lists questions, if given the chance, some questions she would ask Brennan at his confirmation hearing. One that stood out for me is whether the policy allows the prez to order a drone strike on an American in America. I think this is seriously bone-chilling.

    On the climate change/environmental front, I’m convinced Obama is going to give the go ahead for the Keystone XL pipeline. With both Steven Chu & Lisa Jackson leaving their posts, and both being basically gagged during their tenure, I don’t think it bodes well at all. Then again, I’m generally pretty pessimistic.

    Great post kat. Hope I’ll have time this evening to follow more of the links. Duty calls & I’m off to work.

  2. janicen's avatar janicen says:

    In another installment of “Which State Has the Most Insane Governor”, Virginia’s Governor Bob McDonnell is proposing to eliminate the gas tax and make up the revenue lost for maintaining the state’s roads by raising the sales tax. Virginia has one of the lowest gas taxes in the country and has not raised it since 1986, but that’s not the problem, oh no. The problem is hybrid cars. See hybrid cars use less gas and that’s not fair to the people driving around in 4500 lb. gas guzzlers because then the hybrid car drivers end up paying fewer taxes than the gas guzzlers. Eliminating this unfairness and raising the sales tax will solve the problem according to Governor and Regent University Law graduate Bob McDonnell. On last night’s local news, they added the Governor’s idea that we could also level the playing field by imposing a $150 a year hybrid car tax.

    I have a headache from slapping my head.
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/01/10/prius_tax_virginia_governor_mcdonnell_wants_to_eliminate_gas_tax_impose.html

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Remember tax breaks for buying more efficient hybrid cars? There’s been talk here of imposing extra fees because they don’t use enough gas and pay enough taxes. I don’t think it’s so much ideological as legislators desperately trying to raise revenues without “raising taxes”. It’s still completely ridiculous though,

      • janicen's avatar janicen says:

        It’s Virginia. It’s ideological, I can promise you that!

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        With no income tax, the state sales tax rate here is 6.25% excluding food and medication. Raising it would probably be the end of a politician’s career.

      • janicen's avatar janicen says:

        Funny how it’s coming up in different states at the same time. Almost as if someone else was pulling the strings. Could the tax on hybrid cars have ALECs fingerprints on it?

      • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

        You can bet the oil companies (most of whom are part of ALEC) are behind this just like they were behind not increasing the CAFE standards, increasing mileage on cars.

    • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

      It’s happening here in Washington state too. Electric cars are charged an extra $100 fee per year starting this year.

      Shortsighted.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Some details on the rescue of Ethan from the bunker in Alabama.

    CBS News reporter John Miller, quoting unidentified sources, said the rescue team “created an opportunity to bring (Dykes) to that door to accept (a) delivery.”

    Dykes, who had been talking to negotiators via a long plastic pipe, had let officers small items like crayons, toys, and medicines, but had apparently been talked into opening the front door to accept a larger item, CBS reported.

    “Then they threw in the distraction devices, or what are commonly called by SWAT teams ‘flash bangs,'” CBS’ Miller said.”They made a blindingly bright light, and a huge, big noise that is very disorienting.”

    The 3 or 4 SWAT team members then killed Dykes and hustled Ethan out of the bunker. “This probably took seconds,” Miller said.

    Sheriff Olson said Dykes was armed when officers entered the bunker. He added the boy was threatened, but declined to elaborate. “That’s why we went inside — to save the child,” he said.

    ABC News, quoting unidentified sources, reported that the FBI had built a mock bunker nearby and used it to train agents in various rescue scenarios.

  4. Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

    Eric Erickson…………let him keep saying it, that is why they keep losing…………….it’s a republican thing, losers.

  5. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    This poor child will live with the trauma of this event for the rest of his life. More so because he has been identified as austistic. The family of the slain bus driver must also live with this senseless act by another disturbed person who felt the need to act out on his delusions.

    Enough cannot be said for the preparedness of the SWAT team who rescued this little boy.

    What must we look like to the rest of the world when these occurrences are as commonplace in our society on a daily basis?

    Another example of someone armed to the teeth seeking revenge against perceived slights that leads to these tragedies.

    This event will disappear quickly only to be replaced by another. Just a matter of time.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      He has mild aspergers and ADHD. He was described as laughing,etc., so I think he’s on the low end of the autism spectrum. I hope his family can afford some therapy for him or get some help to pay for it.

  6. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    A 2016 GOP PLAN TO RUN ON SCREWING THE POOR, ENRICHING THE RICH, AND LETTING THE ROADS CRUMBLE

    SteveM on what Republican governors are doing around the country and what it says about a White House run in 2016.

    • Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

      What’s the matter with Kansas?

      It’s all right there in this post.

      Could this message win in 2016? Why not? By declaring Obama a “failure” due in large part to their own obstructionism, some morons would view this as a “need for change”.

      Let’s stop with the “we love children” message. We don’t. We would rather propose starvation and withhold health services from the most vulnerable to prove a point.

      How any voter in their right mind would find the GOP agenda worthwhile is beyond me.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        What’s NOT the matter with Kansas? But then you could ask that same question about a lot of our redder states, including my own.

        The “we love children” message is out, now it’s all “we love money, beyotchz”.

        • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

          These are all states that have set up an economy that thrives on a growing underclass that is so wretched it will do anything. Jindal’s job creation program includes bringing in a chicken evisceration plant and another natural gas processing plant. You can only imagine what the health hazards and the work environment. Only really desperate and uneducated people want these kinds of jobs and the kinds of damage that brings to the local environment. We’ve already got that toxic sink hole to the south of us that’s causing problems and he’s just opened us up to more fracking. Their idea of quality jobs and economy is going back to the sharecropper model.

          • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

            Here’s another reason we’re seeing some of these tax plans:

            http://forgotston.com/2013/02/05/the-big-winners-under-jindal-tax-swap/

            Under Bobby Jindal’s tax swap the only guaranteed winners will be individuals who can’t even vote in Louisiana. Those are individuals who earn income from Louisiana, but don’t live here.

            Currently, those non-residents have to pay personal income taxes on income earned in Louisiana. The Jindal plan eliminates income taxes and replaced the revenues with higher state sales taxes.

            Many of these people never set foot in Louisiana. So, unless a non-resident taxpayer visits Louisiana (and makes purchases), their sales taxes won’t rise and their Louisiana income tax will be eliminated.

            Apparently, Bobby is trying to appeal to the voters in the other states for his national ambitions.

      • HT's avatar HT says:

        Too true Ralph, but they will never be honest enough to come out and say it outright. Better to snow voters by rhetoric and implement draconian policies that harm said voters while said voters cheer them on. Vis a vis children – these men (and by and large they are men) hate children – they could grow up and challenge them so must be contained. They love fetoe because fetoe are a vote getter from the very same people they are screwing. It’s a mad, mad, mad world and I for one would like to get off (sorry for the plagerism of two very funny broadway plays.)

  7. Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

    Laura Bassett at Huffington Post just wrote an article “New Hampshire’s Domestic Violence Bill Would Weaken Existing Laws”……………..(it just more of a go with White republican men)……State Rep. Dan Itse, R. has submitted to house committee HB 502/503…….which prevents law enforcement officers from arresting a domestic abuser unless the officer witnesses the abuse occurring or a victim files a formal criminal complaint with the court.
    In other words, the spouse that took the coconut knife to his wife and killed her, must have been witnessed by an officer, and she should rise from death, and file a complaint before she is acknowledged as being abused………………..wtf……………..this is all going hand in hand, with their vote against family leave act, and let’s hand out awards to those that beat kids, and kill women.

    • Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

      What better way to “attack” the problems of the nation than going after women, children, and seniors?

      Look for the words “domestic violence” to be reupholstered along with the definition of “rape”.

      Just some guy having a “bad day” who turned his attention from kicking the crap out of the family dog and gave his family a little bit of the same.

      Not long before he becomes the “victim” here.

  8. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    Is Chris Christie running for president in 2016? Hell yes he is!

    Judging from his appearance on the Dave Letterman Show you can take this to the bank.

    Why else would he submit himself to Dave who does a nightly routine mocking and ridiculing his weight and eating habits? Some of it bordering on plain meanness. Few shows go without at least one “dig” at Christie which also features videos of Chris stuffing his face.

    So yes, Chris is looking at 2016 convinced of his own superiority in outshouting anyone who dares to interrupt or ask questions.

    The hurricane revived his image of sorts and he is riding on the goodwill he mustered by standing next to Obama.

    My guess: a Christie/Clinton run off in 2016.

  9. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    The latest on Benghazi from the investigators. The headline doesn’t match the story but this is from McClatchy so it’s probably believable.

    Gen. Carter Ham: Members of al Qaida group among Benghazi attackers

    Determining what motivated the Benghazi attack is one issue that Ham and Libyan investigators are still struggling with.

    Ham and Ashour said they thought that anger over the killing of a top al Qaida official, Abu Yahya al Libi, by a U.S. drone strike in Pakistan was one factor. Al Qaida leader Ayman al Zawahiri had confirmed al Libi’s death in a video aired the day before the Benghazi attack.

    “There are some indications that was part of the motivation for some of those who participated in the attack. Whether it was the compelling reason or not, I think, is hard to say,” Ham said.

    At the same time, protests had broken out in Egypt hours before the assault over an inflammatory video produced by Egyptian exiles living in the United States that insulted the Prophet Muhammad. Ashour said that was the motivation for smaller groups that planned the attack on the consulate.

    “Each group used (the assault) for its own interests,” Ashour said. “One used it for the film and another used it for the leader that was killed. And there were other thieves who used it for the sake of stealing.”

    Note they still list that film as a partial cause so Huckleberry Closetcase and McGrumpypants should eat a big bag of salted dicks.

  10. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    I am not the sharpest pencil in the box but from where I sit though there may be dozens of factions in the mideast referring to themselves as one name or another the simple fact is that their objectives remain the same: kill, maim, harm.

    Whether it be Al Qaeda or another “brotherhood” organization they are all intent on taking out those who are perceived as occupiers or infidels.

    Whatever lable they choose to conduct their dirty deeds under their goals remain the same.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      I agree, there is nothing magic or sinister about the name. It’s the desire and strategy that’s the problem for the peaceful of the world.

  11. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Why do wingnuts feel free to opine about Michelle Obama’s posterior?

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      I would say it was racism but they used to complain about Hillary’s looks as first lady. So it must be just plain old sexism. A woman says or does something I don’t like so I’m gonna attack her looks because I’m too stupid to address the issue.

      • Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

        She is Mrs. Obama. That’s all that is required.

        Better to mock her than to seriously look at the downward slide that is the trajectory of the GOP.

        Can’t find anything good to say about the GOP? Turn your jibes against Michele. It plays well and draws enough idiots who agree.

        Some of these sites no longer promote arguments as much as they promote stupidity, hate, and an open bias with safety in numbers.

    • janicen's avatar janicen says:

      Oops! I just commented about that above. Sorry for the repetition.

  12. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Whatevah shall we do, Miz Scarlett? Huckleberry is indisposed.

    The Daily Vapors From Senator Graham

    Lindsey Graham, the man with the portable fainting couch, is worried once again, this time about Chuck Hagel and his “disturbing” performance before the McCarthyite crackpots on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and about the state of the world, which Lindsey finds dark and ominous, with bustling in all the hedgerows, and filled with low growling from the underbrush. To borrow a line from Lawrence Ferlinghetti, give us this day our daily dread, senator. …

    • prolixous's avatar prolixous says:

      Lady Lindsay was so fidgety during the Armed Services hearing, he was squirming and bouncing during his questioning, my only possible hypothesis was that his ben-wa balls were slipping.

  13. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    I am still reeling with a mouthful of distaste for last night’s HBO documentary regarding the Catholic Church and how far they have gone to protect pedophilia priests.

    Titled “Mea Maxima Culpa” it largely dealt with a group home for deaf children in Minneapolis from the 1950s through the early 80s that was governed by a pedophile priest, Lawrence Murphy who has since died.

    The documentary disclosed that the Vatican itself was very much aware of this man’s crimes but did nothing to protect the hundreds of children who came under his care. The saddest part was that these children were deaf and few of their parents knew how to “sign”. They really and truly had no voice to offer as this beast went from year to year choosing his victims from so many.

    As adults these deaf men came forward but were never actually heard. They were up against the statute of limitations along with law enforcement and religious superiors who bent over backwards to protect this unholy priest.

    Pope John Paul and the current Pope Benedict were fully aware of what was going on and chose to ignore it. The overall belief was that though pedophilia may have been considered a “sin” it was not criminal.

    The Catholic Church is no different than Penn State when it comes to exposing the evil doers. But the Church is still in the business of drawing moral boundaries for women which makes it even more hypocritical as an institution.

    Best to keep in mind that when we are forced to listen to the likes of Rick Santorum expound on subjects of morality and “what is right” he is upholding those same traditions that have no place in modernity.

  14. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    I don’t know how the state supreme court will rule, but this is clearly true. Funding across the state is so unequal it’s pathetic.

    Judge: School finance system unconstitutional

    By raising academic standards and cutting school funding at the same time, Texas lawmakers have rendered the state’s method of financing public schools unconstitutional, a judge ruled on Monday.

    “As the economists put it: There is no free lunch. We either want increased standards and are willing to pay the price, or we don’t,” state District Judge John Dietz said, ruling immediately from the bench at the close of a 12-week trial.

    • janicen's avatar janicen says:

      Good. I’d like to see the entire system of funding public schools in this country turned upside down.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Judge Dietz has been down this road before and been only partially overruled. It’s worse now than it was back then so the state supreme court may sustain this full verdict.

  15. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Talk about a system just ready made for corruption, this is one of them. Hope this makes people feel better about their own home states.

    Judge: Totals spent on pensions of former lawmaker-lobbyists remains secret

    Texas taxpayers cannot find out how much retired lawmakers as a group are collecting in retirement benefits from the state, an Austin judge ruled this morning.

    The reason: Lawmakers have passed laws to keep that information secret, even if the retirees are not identified individually.

    The decision by State District Judge Lora Livingston came in a lawsuit filed by the government-watchdog group Texans for Public Justice. The group is seeking to find out the total cost of retirement benefits being paid to 103 former lawmakers who are now lobbiysts.

    “The information is confidential,” Livingston said, citing a series of state laws passed over the past decade that have tightened the information on lawmakers’ pension benefits. Now, even aggregate information and cumulative information about how much is being spent cannot be made public.

  16. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    Salon.com ‏@Salon

    U.K. legalizes same-sex marriage: “It’s about making our society stronger.” http://slnm.us/lAF3k8n #LGBT

    Can’t wait to watch HRH sign this …

  17. Fredster's avatar Fredster says:

    Hey kat: Courtesy of Mr. Prolix up above but over at our place, go nominate La Voice and Bob Mann’s blogs:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/02/04/iso-the-best-state-based-political-blogs/

    Coincidentally that was the topic of my post today and no I didn’t know the Cillizza piece existed. 🙂