Monday Reads: Imagine there’s no country …

good morning!

The Olympics closed last night with a beautiful tribute to John Lennon. He was truly a remarkable man.  Meanwhile, we have people with a twisted vision of the future–and little imagination–running f0r higher office here.

and no Social Security too ….

Meanwhile, we struggle to hold on to everything this country used to stand for.  Here’s a post that lets you know exactly why those nuns are on that bus are protesting the nasty Paul Ryan/Mitt Romney/Republican way to burn down the entire country. I’m just going to give you the bottom line on the social security proposal.  There’s more at the WAPO link.

Ryan’s Social Security privatization proposal,  the Social Security Personal Savings Guarantee and Prosperity Act of 2005, which he sponsored along with then-Sen. John Sununu (whose father has been a prominent Romney surrogate), would have allowed workers to funnel an average of 6.4 percent of their 12.4 percent payroll-tax contribution to a private account. Lower-income workers would be able to divert more of their wages, as the plan allows 10 percent of income up to $10,000 and 5 percent of income up to the payroll tax cap to be diverted. By default, the private account would be invested in a portfolio set by the Social Security Administration of 65 percent stocks and 35 percent bonds. Workers could choose an 80/20 stock-bond portfolio, or a 50-50 portfolio, but would not be able to pick individual stocks or bonds. At retirement, all participants in the plan would be required to buy an annuity.

The Social Security Administration concluded that the Ryan-Sununu plan would require huge increases in general budget revenue to make up the shortfall left in payroll tax revenue. Specifically, revenue would have to increase by 1.5 percent of GDP every year, an analysis by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities found, or about $225 billion at current GDP. That’s a big honking tax hike. What’s more, under the plan, investments in the stock and bond markets would skyrocket such that by 2050, every single stock or bond in the United States would be owned by a Social Security account. This would mean that the portfolio managers at the Social Security Administration would more or less control the entire means of production in the United States.

Funnily enough, Ryan also proposed a resolution in 1999 that passed the House (with only Ron Paul voting against) expressing the sense of the body that Social Security should be maintained without any changes to benefits for current retirees or increases taxes.

and Weather that we’ll die from …

Get used to the extreme weather and drought.

BY many measurements, this summer’s drought is one for the record books. But so was last year’s drought in the South Central states. And it has been only a decade since an extreme five-year drought hit the American West. Widespread annual droughts, once a rare calamity, have become more frequent and are set to become the “new normal.”

Until recently, many scientists spoke of climate change mainly as a “threat,” sometime in the future. But it is increasingly clear that we already live in the era of human-induced climate change, with a growing frequency of weather and climate extremes like heat waves, droughts, floods and fires.

Future precipitation trends, based on climate model projections for the coming fifth assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, indicate that droughts of this length and severity will be commonplace through the end of the century unless human-induced carbon emissions are significantly reduced. Indeed, assuming business as usual, each of the next 80 years in the American West is expected to see less rainfall than the average of the five years of the drought that hit the region from 2000 to 2004.

That extreme drought (which we have analyzed in a new study in the journal Nature-Geoscience) had profound consequences for carbon sequestration, agricultural productivity and water resources: plants, for example, took in only half the carbon dioxide they do normally, thanks to a drought-induced drop in photosynthesis.

a brotherhood of the few …

A few numbers crunched at The Atlantic shows that “Mitt Romney Would Pay 0.82 Percent in Taxes Under Paul Ryan’s Plan”.

Under Paul Ryan’s plan, Mitt Romney wouldn’t pay any taxes for the next ten years — or any of the years after that. Now, do I know that that’s true. Yes, I’m certain.
Well, maybe not quite nothing. In 2010 — the only year we have seen a full return from him — Romney would have paid an effective tax rate of around 0.82 percent under the Ryan plan, rather than the 13.9 percent he actually did. How would someone with more than $21 million in taxable income pay so little? Well, the vast majority of Romney’s income came from capital gains, interest, and dividends. And Ryan wants to eliminate all taxes on capital gains, interest and dividends.

Romney, of course, criticized this idea when Newt Gingrich proposed it back in January by pointing out that zeroing out taxes on savings and investment would mean zeroing out his own taxes.

Hey, they are still calling him Mitt the Twit in the UK.

Some Fun stuff to take your mind off Monday:

  • Weird Grave stuff of the day: A cache of severed right hands are found in a dig of Ancient Egypt.  Hey!  Every one needs a hobby!!

    A team of archaeologists excavating a palace in the ancient city of Avaris, in Egypt,  has made a gruesome discovery.The archaeologists have unearthed the skeletons of 16 human hands buried in four pits. Two of the pits, located in front of what is believed to be a throne room, hold one hand each. Two other pits, constructed at a slightly later time in an outer space of the palace, contain the 14 remaining hands.They are all right hands; there are no lefts.

Alright, that’s enough for me. What’s on your reading and blogging list today?


76 Comments on “Monday Reads: Imagine there’s no country …”

  1. I love this post Dak.

  2. Krugman: The Ryan Role – NYTimes.com

    Look, Ryan hasn’t “crunched the numbers”; he has just scribbled some stuff down, without checking at all to see if it makes sense. He asserts that he can cut taxes without net loss of revenue by closing unspecified loopholes; he asserts that he can cut discretionary spending to levels not seen since Calvin Coolidge, without saying how; he asserts that he can convert Medicare to a voucher system, with much lower spending that now projected, without even a hint of how this is supposed to work. This is just a fantasy, not a serious policy proposal.

    So why does Saletan believe otherwise? Has he crunched the numbers himself? Of course not. What he’s doing – and what the whole Beltway media crowd has done – is to slot Ryan into a role someone is supposed to be playing in their political play, that of the thoughtful, serious conservative wonk. In reality, Ryan is nothing like that; he’s a hard-core conservative, with a voting record as far right as Michelle Bachman’s, who has shown no competence at all on the numbers thing.

    What Ryan is good at is exploiting the willful gullibility of the Beltway media, using a soft-focus style to play into their desire to have a conservative wonk they can say nice things about. And apparently the trick still works.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Cheers for Krugman, He should get a gold medal for punditry.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        He’s an economist. The rest of the villagers have degrees in esoteric things like philosophy. How do you write about economic policy when you’ve never actually taken a economics course? It’s like trying to write for Popular Mechanics when you’ve never gone near a machine or writing for a computer magazine when you’re a Luddite!

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    The Villagers on the Morning Joe show are thrilled beyond belief about the Ryan pick for VP. They are calling him a “serious” person and talking about how “we” have to “tell the truth” to the American people–the “truth” being that any reduction of the deficit has to come from Medicare, etc. No mention of tax increases for the wealthy of course….

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      No mention of the fact that Ryan has had his name on only two bills that were passed either.

      • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

        I always like your comments BB……………..question is what 2 bills were passed.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        One bill was to name a post office after Les Aspin. The other one had to do with a tax on arrows or something like that.

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/12/paul-ryan-bills_n_1769816.html?ir=Politics

        I like your comments too!

      • Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

        Thanks again BB………..I see Les Aspin was sect. defense under Bill Clinton from Milwaukee.
        Ryan went straight from college to governmental staff aid………….did less than 1 year marketing under his dad’s company. I can’t understand why all complain, and complain about government, government workers, government all fucked up, and then think someone is qualified for the job as VP solely working in government. Why do they do that? Seems like these ae all the people who are also married to tax attorney………..as his wife is. Why is that? 13 years and only 2 bills, I mean to tell you that is a piss ass poor story.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Fannie,

        I learned from reading Charlie Pierce today that Ryan’s grandfather made his fortune building highways–you know those big government projects that Eisenhower paid for by taxing the rich at 75%?

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      The Villagers on Morning Joe are all millionaires. That is a feature, not a bug, of today’s media. We;re not going to hear any “truth” from them outside an imagined narrative.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Of course not. But it gives me a sense of what these freakazoids are thinking, since I watch almost no TV.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Right. It’s certainly not just MJ, it’s all the contemporary media. I’ve stayed away from TV for a long time because of that.

  4. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    It’s simply amazing that even along with the suggestion of gutting Social Security and the fact that Romney would thus reduce his tax revenues down to zero, there are still those out there unfazed by this and willing to vote for this ticket agains their own interests.

    It’s also astounding that millionaires who do not have to worry about where their next meal is coming from are those in charge of our future.

    Plutocracy, oligarchy, it’s all the same while the majority will be tasked with the burden of trying to live with these radical measures while nothing whatsover touches the “haves”.

  5. Pat Johnson's avatar Pat Johnson says:

    The Olympics closed last night with a tribute to John Lennon which got me thinking:

    Imagine we all had UHC.
    Imagine fewer kids went to bed hungry.
    Imagine women being treated equal.
    Imagine gays not having to “hide” who they are.
    Imagine the environment being maintained.
    Imagine all babies being wanted.
    Imagine school children pushing kids into higher education.
    Imagine that cost being minimal.
    Imagine a reduction in war materials.
    Imagine a nation dedicated to one man, one vote.
    Imagine elections being funded solely by the populace.
    Imagine the break up of “too big to fail” institutions.
    Imagine a solid effort to eliminate diseases.
    Imagine a nation where “lies” are not the staple of the day.
    Imagine countries working together on behalf of all.
    Imagine less dependency on fossil fuels.
    Imagine a nation less enamored of guns.
    Imagine a nation where science and education is acclaimed.

    Imagine.

    • Joanelle's avatar Joanelle says:

      Amen, Pat

    • HT's avatar HT says:

      Yes imagine, and once I thought it was possible. It all went wrong. Politicians did that and money men plutocrats did that. Yet a lot of people don’t see what is so obvious, and as you say, Pat, vote against their own interests. Sad, very sad.

  6. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Candy Crowley is going to moderate one of the presidential debates.

    Along with Bob Shieffer and Jim Lehrer–both ancient codgers and both Republicans.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Shieffer’s “investor” brother was one of the prime movers behind Dubya’s run for governor and his first major bundler for his presidential run. But he has no conflict of interest, of course, the prick.

  7. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    On the day Ryan is supposed to be campaigning on Obama’s welfare destruction in Iowa, The Des Moines Register editorial board kicks Rmoney in the crotch, hard. This could leave a scar.

    The Register editorial: Romney’s welfare talk misses reality

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      Power, reality and data based opinion in that. Too bad it’s Iowa so no one in the NY/DC bubble will pay attention.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      That’s a great editorial! I want to see Romney and Ryan try to live on $334 per month while working and somehow paying for food, transportation, and child care

    • Beata's avatar Beata says:

      I can’t read it either. Sounds good though. 🙂

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        That’s strange. It still opens for me. Here is part of it.

        Everyone agrees Americans collecting “cash welfare” should meet work requirements. And they do.

        A recent policy tweak to the program by President Barack Obama’s administration does not undermine that. Yet Mitt Romney can’t pass up this one. The presumptive Republican presidential nominee wants voters to conjure images in their minds of freeloading moms sitting on couches watching big screen televisions. And he wants voters to think the president is helping them do just that.

        Then there is reality.

        Only about 15,000 Iowans actually receive a meager monthly check from Uncle Sam. Collecting an average of $334 a month for less than two years probably is not covering utilities and school clothes, let alone putting anyone on Easy Street. Requirements are so stringent, the program that once served more than 14 million Americans now helps only about 4 million.

        ….

        Romney should also provide more details about how the cash welfare program should work. In Iowa, recipients not only have to be parents, they have to show they are working toward supporting themselves.

        “I actually believe we should have increasing levels of work requirements” for recipients, Romney told Fox News. He should define exactly how much more work he wants someone to do for $334 a month.

        The real issue, of course, is the one Romney isn’t talking about: People who get off welfare don’t escape poverty. They simply move from the despised category of “welfare recipient” to the comparatively saintly and much larger category of the “working poor” in this country.

        They also point out that lots of groups get money from the gov’t, and a lot more than welfare recipients–like oil companies, farmers, etc. Are they getting something for nothing? Should they work harder? Romney needs to explain exactly what he thinks these people should do for their $334 a month while at the same time the gov’t subsidizes corporations who use the money to enrich their CEOs.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Meanwhile, under Ryan’s plan, Romney won’t even pay any taxes to support government services, so he should STFU!

  8. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    A quite twitter feed…

  9. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Paul Krugman probably writing from a socialist summer camp:

    Romney/Ryan: The Real Target

    So whence comes the Ryan reputation? As I said in my last post, it’s because many commentators want to tell a story about US politics that makes them feel and look good — a story in which both parties are equally at fault in our national stalemate, and in which said commentators stand above the fray. This story requires that there be good, honest, technically savvy conservative politicians, so that you can point to these politicians and say how much you admire them, even if you disagree with some of their ideas; after all, unless you lavish praise on some conservatives, you don’t come across as nobly even-handed.

    The trouble, of course, is that it’s really really hard to find any actual conservative politicians who deserve that praise. Ryan, with his flaky numbers (and actually very hard-line stance on social issues), certainly doesn’t. But a large part of the commentariat decided early on that they were going to cast Ryan in the role of Serious Honest Conservative, and have been very unwilling to reconsider that casting call in the light of evidence.

    So that’s the constituency Romney is targeting: not a large segment of the electorate, but a few hundred at most editors, reporters, programmers, and pundits. His hope is that Ryan’s unjustified reputation for honest wonkery will transfer to the ticket as a whole.

    So, a memo to the news media: you have now become players in this campaign, not just reporters. Mitt Romney isn’t seeking a debate on the issues; on the contrary, he’s betting that your gullibility and vanity will let him avoid a debate on the issues, including the issue of his own fitness for the presidency. I guess we’ll see if it works.

  10. pdgrey's avatar pdgrey says:

    This just kills me that the media won’t report real facts like this,
    Per Capita, Real GDP Growth

    1950s 2.60%
    1960s 2.84%
    1970s 1.73%
    1980s 1.51%
    1990s 1.43%
    2000s 0.19%
    2010s 0.13%

    ++++

    Okay, the past decade has been flat when you look at per capita, inflation adjusted GDP growth.

    And these numbers look very much like Japan’s “lost decade”

    But here’s the thing: the top 10% of America’s wealth earners, despite the worst environment for asset prices since the 1930s (worse, actually) saw their share of the nation’s GDP GROW by 8%.

    There has been and remains an epic transfer of wealth from the poor and middle classes to the rich.

    Because if you can’t get rich from a growing economy, the only other way is to do it by taking wealth out of peoples’ pockets and redistributing it.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      That’s your Gusher up economics right there. Screw the country to make the rich richer.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      That’s the very real “class warfare” that’s been going on for close to 30 years or longer. The rich taking from everyone else in reverse Robin Hood fashion.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      I can’t help but wonder how much longer voters are going to sit back and let the people at the top of the economic pile piss on them while telling us it’s raining? You would think we would eventually get enough of it!

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        I’ve been wondering that for more than a decade now. Actually, I couldn’t believe people put up with Reaganomics.

    • janicen's avatar janicen says:

      Interesting. And when were unions the strongest? Mid 1950’s through the 1960’s.

  11. ANonOMouse's avatar ANonOMouse says:

    Excellent Post Dak, Thanks!

  12. pdgrey's avatar pdgrey says:

    Please read Charles Pierce today. Three of his last post are eye opening. It’s really to bad he does not get major press.
    http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/paul-ryan-family-wealth-11644997
    http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/paul-ryan-foreign-policy-11644918
    http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/paul-ryan-new-york-times-profile-11644919
    The second post brought me back to the “Shock Doctrine”. Naomi Klein’s documentary was great until she hailed Obama being elected as a “coming”. It would have been a wonderful educational film if edited.
    So Paul Ryan is a good Catholic.

  13. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Quote of the Day:

    “If in fact, you do make contact with Martians please let me know right away. Because I’ve got a lot of other things on my plate but I suspect that that will go to the top of the list.”

    — President Obama, quoted by CNN, in a phone call with members of NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover team.

  14. Peregrine's avatar Peregrine says:

    The nightmarish image I’m receiving as I think about that “shining city on the hill” is Athens after the (possible) winners, “austerity” Ryan and a congressional Republican majority, turn the US into Greece, post-2013.

    But, then, as I read more about Ryan’s budget and all the voters the Romney-Ryan ticket has alienated, and will alienate in time, I have to wonder who in their right-mind will vote for these twits, other than the die-hards.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      I’m still voting we send them to Mars as a part of the Curiosity’s mission. There’s lots of austerity up there.

    • HT's avatar HT says:

      Because the media that people who are not informed read are painting Ryan as the next best invention since sliced bread, those people will not look further than that. Even the media that informed people read is painting his as a policy “Wonk”. As Dakini and Krugman and other economists have indicated, he is anything but, however it’s a toss up. Personally I quite concerned. but I’m a person who keeps herself informed. How many others are as informed as the people on this blog?

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Too few I’m afraid but the job of the Obama campaign is to change that. I’ll be cheering them on in their efforts.

  15. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    It looks like the shootings in Texas may have been by a homeowner who was being evicted. The law enforcement officers were there already when the shooting started. They weren’t responding to calls from the neighborhood.

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/13/justice/texas-am-shooting/index.html

  16. peregrine's avatar peregrine says:

    Dak, could you cancel my comment at 3:38? I used the wrong name.

  17. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Helen Gurley Brown has died at age 90.

    • HT's avatar HT says:

      She had a good life, and she really did open the eyes of many women despite that stupid movie supposedly based on her best seller.. I have neither good not bad to say about the woman, other than she provided a high profile environment for other writers to finally break through in the gender issues. Every passing is a time for relection.

  18. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Paul Ryan may have used inside info to guide his stock trades. Brad DeLong says Ryan’s main problem is that he doesn’t know what he’s doing with his trades.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      Yglesias explains that trading on inside info by Congresspeople wasn’t illegal in 2008 when Ryan did it. Besides the trades were made before he got the info. So never mind, but DeLong still says Ryan is dumb.

  19. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Red Sox Legend Johnny Pesky has died. He was 92.

    Johnny Pesky, who during a six-decade-long association with the Red Sox as player, manager, broadcaster, coach, and executive became one of the most popular figures in the team’s history, died Monday. He was 92.

    A lifetime .307 hitter, Mr. Pesky recorded 200 or more hits in each of his first three seasons, leading the American League in that category all three years. He hit .331 in 1942, his rookie season, finishing second to Ted Williams in the batting title race and was third in most valuable player voting. An All-Star in 1946, he was a fine fielding shortstop, his primary position. He also played third base and second base.

    Like his close friend Ted Williams, Pesky gave up three years of his baseball career to fight in WWII.

  20. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Some attacks are just so damn stupid I have no idea what to say about them 🙂

    Boehner’s Office Says Obama Avoiding Personal Responsibility For Drought

    On its website and in an email Monday, House Speaker John Boehner’s office said President Obama needs to take personal responsibility for the drought ravaging the Midwest.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      What? He’s responsible for global warming and/or acts of gawd now? He’s asked them a bunch of times to extend the subsidy help!! wtf?

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Didn’t Congress decide to go home without dealing with the farm bill? How is it Obama’s fault? And now he’s supposed to control the weather?

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        The drought became a centerpiece of the presidential race Monday after Obama accused Paul Ryan of being part of the reason a needed farm bill hasn’t passed Congress. Meanwhile, the White House announced $170 million in federal assistance aimed at alleviating farmers’ suffering from the lack of rain.

        Boehner must have had a few too many before he put out that statement.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        He must have been really drunk when they decided to go there 😉

      • pdgrey's avatar pdgrey says:

        Well that should get Charles Pierce going.

    • HT's avatar HT says:

      Good grief,so now Obama is substituting for their God? Every last nerve, I swear they are getting on every last nerve with this kind of stupidity.

  21. pdgrey's avatar pdgrey says:

    Please be sure to click the link, Rich Kids of Instagram
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/13/alexa-dell-twitter_n_1772587.html

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Wow, ya know that’s kind of grotesque. Those kids will probably be useless.

      • pdgrey's avatar pdgrey says:

        Yea, but the baby boomers are so me, me, me generation. Sucking on the government teat. I’d like to stick my teat somewhere in the vincinity of “Cat food Simpson and Bowels” and every person who writes those damn baby boomer columns, while ignoring “we selfish a-holes boomers” keep having to “pay” more because of the crisis we created by being born in the same decade. They didn’t see that coming. Snark, Snark, Snark. Where is Monty Python when you need them?