Monday Reads

Good Morning!

I am exhausted and I’m not even in Colorado yet.  It’s a good thing I’m getting some limited exposure to the news these days because it’s full of things like this.  Here’s the five most offensive sexist and homophobic offerings by conservatives for the month from Sarah Seltzer at Alternet. I picked a few for you so this is a spew alert!

Rejecting Virginia judicial candidate because he’s gay, then saying “Sodomy is not a civil right.” In Virginia, members of the House of Delegates failed to confirm Tracy Thorne-Begland, an openly gay formal Navy officer raising children with his partner, as a judicial candidate.

His nomination had been seen as a given, with bipartisan support, until lobbying from “both the Family Foundation, a powerful conservative group that opposed his candidacy, and conservative lawmakers, who argued that his past indicated that he would press an activist agenda from the bench ” according to the New York Times.

Even worse? One of the leading opponents of the nomination, Bob Marshall, defended the decision after it got national heat:

Dr. Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks never took an oath of office that they broke. Sodomy is not a civil right. It’s not the same as the Civil Rights Movement.

Bills allows pharmacists to deny care to women they think “may” be having abortions.

Kansas Governor Sam Brownback expanded the state “conscience clauses” to allow religious employees at pharmacies and medical facilities to refuse service to women they think “may” be having an abortion. As Robin Marty writes, he’s “legally blessed a virtually open-ended number of situations in which ‘religious’ workers can refuse to assist women under the guise that they believe they ‘may be’ terminating a pregnancy.”

So one consequence is simply refusing to dispense contraception and emergency contraception pills, neither of which terminate pregnancies. But there are other implications, as Marty notes, including that, “The law could also allow refusal of even more medically necessary drugs simply because they may relate to abortions…” like drugs that stop bleeding, for instance.

There’s more evidence that arrests in Chicago for protestors cum terrorists were the result of Cops Gone Wild. Naturally, you have to rely on the foreign press to get the story. Are we getting repeats of 1968?

Deutsch, the attorney representing the suspects, said at the hearing that police had planted weapons at the scene of the arrests. “This is a way to stir up prejudice against a people who are exercising their First Amendment rights,” Deutsch said. “There were undercover police officers that ingratiated themselves with people who come from out of town.”

In a case earlier this month five self-described anarchists were charged with plotting to blow up a bridge near Cleveland after planting fake explosives underneath that federal agents had sold them.

Natalie Wahlberg, a member of the Occupy Chicago movement protesting against income inequality, said: “The charges are utterly ridiculous. CPD [Chicago police department] doesn’t know the difference between home beer-making supplies and Molotov cocktails.”

The National Lawyers Guild, a group of volunteer lawyers representing the protesters, said on Facebook that police “broke down doors with guns drawn and searched residences without a warrant or consent”.

I am a long standing Monty Python fan as well as a big fan of the art of animation.  That’s why I was thrilled to learn what Terry Gilliam’s been up to in this week’s The Economist. Here’s Gilliam discussing the difficulties of being non-formula in Hollywood.

To what extent does your reputation as a maverick contribute to the problems you experience?

Hollywood still sees me as someone who won’t be controlled as easily as a young guy straight out of making commercials. They don’t want some ageing hippie who still hasn’t learned to play the game after all these years. And that goes against me sometimes. But it’s not just me. Hollywood has been afraid to take risks for a long time now. All the studios want is a safe pair of hands.

Can you give an example of a studio choosing a “safe pair of hands” over you?

The first Harry Potter film. I was the perfect guy for that movie. They all knew it. J.K. Rowling wanted me to do it; David Heyman, the producer, wanted me to do it. But one guy from Warner’s overruled everyone and Chris Columbus got the gig. I was furious at the time but in hindsight, the level of studio interference on a project that size would have driven me insane.

What effect is Hollywood’s “safe” approach having on audiences?

The longer you keep churning out this production-line crap, the more audiences are going to like it—and need it. There’s an element of security provided by re-makes and re-hashes. We’re at the stage where audiences just want to know that everything will be the same. Maybe it’s because the world has become so diffused and unclear that people just want to go back to what they know over and over again. People need to reassure themselves that Spider-Man can still do the things he’s always done.

I’ve developed a fascination with brain injuries while listening to a NPR series on all the problems that Football players appear to develop midlife.  Then there’s the the huge number of brain trauma patients coming out of our military these days.  Here’s an interesting article at The Atlantic on how a blow to the head some times creates a genius.  Warning!  Do not try this at HOME!

For a long time, it was a mystery as to how horses galloped. Did all four hooves at some point leave the ground? Or was one hoof always planted? It wasn’t until the 1880s when a British photographer named Eadweard Muybridge settled the debate with a series of photographs of a horse in midstride. Muybridge took a great interest in capturing the minute details of bodies in motion. The images made him famous.

Muybridge could be obsessive — and eccentric, too. His erratic behavior was blamed on a head injury he’d sustained in a serious stagecoach accident that killed one passenger and wounded all the rest. Now, researchers believe that the crash, which gave Muybridge a permanent brain injury, may actually have been partially responsible for endowing him with his artistic brilliance.

Muybridge may have been what psychiatrists call an acquired savant, somebody with extraordinary talent but who wasn’t born with it and who didn’t learn the skills from someplace else later. In fact, Muybridge’s savant abilities had evidently been buried deep in the recesses of his mind the whole time, and the stagecoach incident had simply unlocked them.

So, that should give you a few interesting things to think about!  I’m headed to Colorado on Wednesday so I’ll be a little scarce this week.  What’s on  your blogging and reading list today?


15 Comments on “Monday Reads”

  1. Wow Dak, for being exhausted you sure wrote a great post. 😉

    As for the firebombs and protester arrest: Whose Firebombs? Inside the Alleged “Conspiracy”

    The Associated Press has the best report I’ve seen about the alleged firebombing conspiracy in Bridgeport, noting that defense lawyers say there were police infiltrators who stayed in the targeted apartments, and that they were the ones who brought the firebombs there.

    (The Sun Times reports that undercover officers were present when the alleged firebombs were made, presenting that fact as evidence for the veracity of the charges.)

    “Longtime observers of police tactics said the operation seemed similar to those conducted by authorities in other cities before similarly high-profile events,” according to the AP.

    AP cites the RNC 8 – eight young people involved in planning protests at the Republican National Convention in 2008 who were charged with conspiracy to commit terrorism under Minnesota’s PATRIOT Act. When it was finally resolved, five accepted plea deals for misdemeanor conspiracy to damage property – one got 91 days, the others no jail time – and charges were dropped against the other three.

    Kind of not such a big deal as the initial headlines would have indicated.

    Then there is this: Democrats Fumble Violence Against Women Act | TPMDC

    “The Senate’s passed a bill, but they haven’t sent it over because it has a blue slip problem,” said House Speaker John Boehner at a Thursday press conference. “Our bill’s over there. It’ll be up I think to the Senate to request a conference.”

    He’s referring to an obscure practice the House uses to kill Senate-originated legislation, if the measure raises revenue. The Constitution’s Origination Clause requires revenue raising bills to have their first reading in the House — not the Senate. A provision in the Senate’s VAWA bill generates revenue by imposing a fee for visas that go to immigrant victims of domestic abuse.

    Normally, the Senate can work around this requirement by amending Senate bills or by using House-passed revenue bills as vehicles for their own legislation. Senate Dems didn’t regard the visa fee as a revenue provision and have thus fallen into a trap. For all intents and purposes they don’t have a bill to bring to a conference committee with House Republicans. They can and may attempt to relegislate VAWA in a way that fulfills the origination requirements — but out of deference to Boehner, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell could significantly delay or completely block such an effort.

    Alternatively, as a top Senate Democratic aide pointed out, House Republicans could simply drop their blue-slip threat, as they did for recent transportation legislation. But Boehner’s not likely to agree to that unless Democrats give up something in return — and at the expense of key Democratic constituencies.

    “We’re eager to resolve our differences between the House and Senate on the issue of domestic violence,” Boehner said. “I think the bigger issue is whether Senator Schumer and his Democrat allies in the Senate want to come to an agreement on this bill, or whether they want to continue to attempt to use it as a political weapon in this year’s election cycle.”

  2. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Thomas Mann and Norm Ornstein are back in the WaPo with another good editorial. These guys used to be on TV a lot but I’ll bet we only see them on PBS and CSpan from now on, if even there.

    Want to end partisan politics? Here’s what won’t work — and what will

    At least half of political journalism now concerns one of the things they say won’t work.

    • ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

      They have been interviewed on NPR. I think I posted the link a couple of weeks ago. Not sure if this is the same one or not – http://www.npr.org/2012/04/30/151522725/even-worse-than-it-looks-extremism-in-congress

      I liked the interview, especially when they both blamed the problems with our politics on The Republicans. Warmed the cockles of my heart.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      I don’t think it is repairable at the moment unless the republican party implodes. They are a revolutionary force at the moment. It is theocratic fascism or bust for them. They don’t want our country to work if they can’t have it all their way.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Just read Charles Pierce on the Sunday gab fests and it momentarily sent me into a small rage. If I had to watch that junk, I’d have to buy a new TV every Monday morning. Jeez.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Oh and I agree that it’s not repairable with the republicans in their current state. Nothing to do about it but get them out of power.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    The Chicago Tribune covered the entrapment angle in detail. I’m glad the foreign press is covering the story, but I’ve read it in other U.S. sources also.

    I think at this point most people with working brains understand that all of these “terrorism” arrests are the result of either sting operations or out and out entrapment. This one is particularly transparent, IMO.

    This is exactly what happened during the Vietnam era, except that now law enforcement officials actually have federal laws that support what they are doing.

  4. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Sometime back I used to go and read the wingnuts just to see what they were up to but now it’s gotten so loony I can’t stand them anymore. Their phony race war is one reason among many.

    Buzzfeed: In Conservative Media, A “Race War” Rages

    • northwestrain's avatar northwestrain says:

      Meanwhile the WAR on women continues and it is real. Women are dying and will die because of the patriarchal structure of our third world country.

      I have a friend — she is a retired MD who has worked as a doctor in Africa, Central America and the Caribbean. She has many stories of women who were allowed to die by husbands and fathers when she could have saved the life of the woman. Very often the death was due to a botched abortion. (She was an 0B-GYN but also did GP).

      So now this same sort of crap is happening again in the US — the rights of the pharmacists, the employer, next door neighbor anyone except the womens health is considered.

      I’m predicting that things will get much much worse and many women will die — some sort of centralized collection and reporting of data on deaths needs to organized.

      Right now the only push back is to vote all misogynists out of office. But then there are far too many women who are also misogynists. This was how it was during the witch hunts of the dark ages. And then during the 1800s and into the 1900s — women died by the thousands — when the males took over doctoring from the wise women and midwives.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        Unfortunately, I believe that you are absolutely correct. Throw those bums out.

  5. NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

    The men in beanies have another tantrum about women deciding for themselves.

    Roman Catholic dioceses, schools and other groups sued the Obama administration Monday in eight states and the District of Columbia over a federal mandate that most employers provide workers free birth control as part of their health insurance. ….

    “We do not seek to impose our religious beliefs on others,” Jenkins said (sic). “We simply ask that the government not impose its values on the university when those values conflict with our religious teachings.”

    And I wish they wouldn’t say “free.” It’s paid for by the employees either through their premiums or by their lower salaries to cover higher benefits.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      “We do not seek to impose our religious beliefs on others,”

      What utter and complete bullshit from the clan of the red beanies!

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Cancel their tax deductions! We could use the money for better purposes.