Tuesday Morning Reads

Good Morning!!

The Villagers have returned from their two-week Easter vacation, so there’s a bit more news today than we have had recently.

First up, I want to call attention to an important series of articles the UK Guardian will be running all week on the “Battle for the Internet.” There will be a major story every day this week:

Over seven days

The Guardian is taking stock of the new battlegrounds for the internet. From states stifling dissent to the new cyberwar front line, we look at the challenges facing the dream of an open internet

Day 1: the new cold war
China may have the world’s most internet-savvy government but Beijing has been struggling to keep a lid on bold social networks, writes Tania Branigan

Day two: the militarisation of cyberspace
Internet attacks on sovereign targets are no longer a fear for the future, but a daily threat. We ask: will the next big war be fought online?

Day three: the new walled gardens
For many, the internet is now essentially Facebook. Others find much of their online experience is mediated by Apple or Amazon. Why are the walls going up around the web garden, and does it matter?

Day four: IP wars
Intellectual property, from copyrights to patents, have been an internet battlefield from the start. We look at what Sopa, Pipa and Acta really mean, and explain how this battle is not over. Plus, Clay Shirky will be discussing the issues in a live Q&A

Day five: ‘civilising’ the web
In the UK, the ancient law of defamation is increasingly looking obsolete in the Twitter era. Meanwhile, in France, President Sarkozy believes the state can tame the web

Day six: the open resistance
Meet the activists and entrepreneurs who are working to keep the internet open

Day seven: the end of privacy
Hundreds of websites know vast amounts about their users’ behaviour, personal lives and connections with each other. Find out who knows what about you, and what they use the information for

Be sure to check out this interview with one of Google’s founders: Web freedom faces greatest threat ever, warns Google’s Sergey Brin

Next up, lots of news coming out of Columbia, where President Obama participated in the Summit of the Americas. It didn’t go well. Reuters:

President Barack Obama sat patiently through diatribes, interruptions and even the occasional eye-ball roll at the weekend Summit of the Americas in an effort to win over Latin American leaders fed up with U.S. policies.

He failed.

The United States instead emerged from the summit in Colombia increasingly isolated as nearly 30 regional heads of state refused to sign a joint declaration in protest against the continued exclusion of communist-led Cuba from the event.

The rare show of unity highlights the steady decline of Washington’s influence in a region that has become less dependent on U.S. trade and investment thanks economic growth rates that are the envy of the developed world and new opportunities with China.

Obama also certified the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement which will take effect on May 15, despite Colombia’s continuing human rights violations including the murder of labor leaders. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka called the decision “deeply disappointing and troubling.

Leaders of national labor organizations in Colombia joined Trumka in opposing today’s announcement, saying:

[T]he underlying trade agreement perpetuates a destructive economic model that expands the rights and privileges of big business and multinational corporations at the expense of workers, consumers, and the environment. The agreement uses a model that has historically benefitted a small minority of business interests, while leaving workers, families, and communities behind.

In April 2011, the U.S. and Colombia agreed to an Action Plan on Labor Rights intended to “protect internationally recognized labor rights, prevent violence against labor leaders, and prosecute the perpetrators of such violence” in Colombia. Although the Action Plan includes some measures that Colombian unions and the AFL-CIO have been demanding for years, its scope was too limited: it resolved neither the grave violations of union freedoms or human rights.

Some two dozen Colombian trade union leaders were killed last year alone, and an AFL-CIO report released last fall found that the Action Plan, which was billed as a major step to ending violence against trade unionists and protecting the right of workers to come together in unions “has failed to achieve improvements on the ground for Colombia’s working families.”

And then there was the Secret Service scandal, which keeps on getting worse. The latest from the WaPo:

A probe into the alleged misconduct of nearly a dozen U.S. Secret Service agents has expanded to include more than five military personnel, Defense Department officials said Monday, as the scandal that erupted during President Obama’s trip to Colombia last week put high-level officials on the defensive.

A preliminary investigation by the Defense Department, which included a review of video from hotel security cameras, found that more military personnel than initially thought might have been involved with the Secret Service in the carousing at the center of the probe. Already, 11 Secret Service agents have been placed on leave amid allegations they entertained prostitutes, potentially one of the most serious lapses at the organization in years.

The charges are triggering scrutiny of the culture of the Secret Service — where married agents have been heard to joke during aircraft takeoff that their motto is “wheels up, rings off” — and raising new questions at both the agency and the Pentagon about institutional oversight at the highest levels of the president’s security apparatus.

There’s a lot more detail in that article. Ron Kessler, who used to work for the WaPo and now writes for NewsMax (is that a comedown or a horizontal move?) says the head of the Secret Service should be fired.

Ron Kessler, the author who broke the Secret Service prostitution story in the Washington Post over the weekend, has been making the morning talk-show rounds, saying the director of the agency should be fired after agents were alleged to have solicited local prostitutes ahead of President Obama’s trip to Colombia.

“This is the worst scandal in the history of the Secret Service,” Kessler said on NBC’s “Today” show on Monday. “The Secret Service, under Mark Sullivan, has gone from one debacle to another.”

The only scandal that comes close to this one, Kessler said on CNN, was in 2009, when Tareq and Michaele Salahi crashed the state dinner at the White House.

“It goes back to a culture of laxness in the Secret Service,” Kessler said. “Corner cutting. Just a lax attitude which contributes to this kind of thing.”

Funny, I would have thought that Secret Service agents getting drunk the night before the JFK assassination and then not doing much to protect him would have been the worst scandal, but what do I know?

Now that Congress is back in session, the Senate didn’t waste any time dumping the President’s proposed “Buffet Rule” that would have made millionaires pay something resembling a fair share of taxes.

By a near party-line 51-45 tally, senators voted to keep the bill alive but fell nine votes short of the 60 needed to continue debating the measure. The anti-climactic outcome was no surprise to anyone in a vote that was designed more to win over voters and embarrass senators in close races than to push legislation into law.

At the White House, Obama denounced the vote, saying Republicans chose “once again to protect tax breaks for the wealthiest few Americans at the expense of the middle class.” In a statement issued after the vote, he said he would keep pressing Congress to help the middle class.

Another victory on the road to serfdom.

And of course there’s the new media meme: because of a poorly worded remark by Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen, the Republican War on Women is over and the Democrats have declared a War on Motherhood.

Never mind that the War on Women is real–based on horrible Republican anti-abortion, anti-family planning, anti-Planned Parenthood policies that have been implemented in state legislatures around the country. Never mind that the “War on Motherhood” is based on hysterical pearl-clutching by cynical Romney campaign strategists. The media has swallowed the fairly tale bait hook, line, and sinker.

And so the horrendous insult to poor little Ann Romney was a prime topic on the Sunday news shows. Meet the Press’s idiot host David Gregory had a whole panel discussion on it. Naturally Charlie Pierce had a great writeup on that yesterday.

the panel, which included my man Chuck Todd and complete political failure Harold Ford, Jr., was talking about Hilary Rosen and hookers. Savannah Guthrie said that the Obama administration moved so quickly to distance themselves from Hilary Rosen, Warrior Queen Of All Liberals:

In some ways it had the equal and opposite effect. They worked so hard to disown Hilary Rosen that you almost felt, well, they must own her, they must be allied with her. It didn’t betray a lot of confidence about their position with women.

See that rock at your feet? Pick it up. Throw it as far as you can. Remember, though, the farther you throw it away, the closer it is to hitting you in the head. Savannah Guthrie, Theoretical Physicist. (Later, she talked about how the administration wanted to draw a line in the sand so that “six months from now,” if somebody said something about Michelle Obama etc. etc. Six months from now? Has Guthrie been on Tuvalu for three years?) My head was descending rapidly toward my desk when Harold Ford chimed in, and it accelerated downward faster than it ever has before. Harold liked very much what his nutty former colleague said about how stay-at-home moms are more attuned to the economy than they are the attempts by a bunch of white men to make sure there’s a little more mommin’ to be done while they stay at home. It’s truly hard to believe that, in a Democratic wave election, the people of Tennessee rejected this titan….

“I thought Michele Bachmann, whom I don’t often agree with, made some pretty valid points. This issue here is more powerful in some ways that the conversation about contraception… No one goes around talking about that. People go around talking about raising their kids. Wome are insulted if you say if they stay at home instead of working then something’s different about them.

It is important to remember that these people wouldn’t even be discussing a whopping 19-point gender gap if it weren’t for Republican attempts to control the unauthorized use of ladyparts, the Dildos Mandating Dildos legislation in the various states, and all that other stuff that Harold Ford, Jr. says women don’t talk about.

Sorry about the long quote, but I just had to use that whole section. It’s perfect!

Anyway, as everyone knows by now, the Romneys blew it bigtime by talking too loud at a $50,000-a-plate fund raiser in Palm Beach. They didn’t realize the press could hear them when they gloated about what a great “gift” Hilary Rosen had given them.

Mrs. Romney acknowledged Republicans’ deficit at present with female voters, and urged the women in attendance to talk to their friends, particularly about the economy. She also discussed the criticism she faced this week, and her pride in her role as a mother.

“It was my early birthday present for someone to be critical of me as a mother, and that was really a defining moment, and I loved it,” Mrs. Romney said.

Gov. Romney went further in engaging the so-called “war on moms” that followed in the media — upon which his campaign has been aggressively fundraising — calling it a “gift” that allowed his campaign to show contrast with Democrats in the general election’s first week.

Um…no one was critical of you as a mother, Ann.

But maybe it wasn’t such a “gift” after all, because women voters are apparently not as stupid as the Romneys think they are. According to a CNN poll taken two days after Rosen dropped her bomblet and the the Republicans took to the fainting couch, Obama still leads among women by 16 points and he is even ahead among men by 3 points.

But the Romneys still think they won something, and they’re using it to raise money with a new video in which Romney waxes as poetic as a robot can about his beloved wife Ann. For the brave souls among us, here’s the Romney campaign’s “Happy Birthday, Mom” video. Don’t watch it unless you have a strong stomach and normal blood sugar levels.

As an antidote, please read this NYT op-ed by Nancy Folbre, an economist from U. Mass. Amherst on the real meaning of the gender gap.

Those are my suggested reads for today. What are yours?


33 Comments on “Tuesday Morning Reads”

  1. ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

    Well, girlfriend, you’re cookin’ on all 4 burners this AM. I am, however, going to pass on the RomneysweetnessFest. I haven’t taken my blood sugar yet this morning. Personally, I am sick of the Democrats Hate Stay At Home Mommies meme. It makes me just want to SCREAM!

    I’m dubious about this from the Folbre Op-Ed:

    Recent research by the economists Andrew Oswald and Nattavudh Powdthavee on Britain and Germany yields an even more startling result: raising daughters seems to lead people to be more sympathetic to left-wing parties, while raising sons seems to have the opposite effect.

    I simply don’t think that a single factor can be accepted for any specific political direction or action. I don’t think that is ever the case – directions/actions are more nuanced, in my experience. One factor might trigger a crack in the door, but I don’t think everyone chooses to open that door. The Bachmann’s fostered only girls & that certainly didn’t make either of them more “liberal.”

    Regarding the SS & military “Hang-Over” moment in Columbia: both are misogynist outfits. Surprise – NOT! Since both groups, IMHO, tend to lean Republican, is it any wonder that they may be less vigilant in guarding a Democratic President?

    Love the photo you chose this morning. But you forgot this one, my personal favorite “book” saying: Books, cats, Life is Good. (couldn’t figure out how to insert the picture by Edward Gorey)

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      I read something yesterday about congresspeople who have daughters voting more in favor of women’s concerns. I’m not sure if it was in the Folbre article or somewhere else.

  2. thewizardofroz's avatar thewizardofroz says:

    Gallup has Obama vs. Romney neck and neck with independents currently breaking for Romney 45% to 39%.

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/153902/Romney-Obama-Tight-Race-Gallup-Daily-Tracking-Begins.aspx

    I’m an FDR Democrat. I’m not voting for either of them.

    Roz in NJ/NYC

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      Gallup and Pew polls always skew Republican, Gallup even more so. It’s pretty early for the head to head polls to mean much. But the gender gap and Hispanic gap aren’t likely to change much, and Romney’s likeability problem will only get worse as more people are exposed to his obnoxious, entitled personality.

      I’m a very far left liberal and a former Democrat, now independent. I probably won’t have to vote for Obama, but I will if I have to. Romney as President would be a disaster beyond imagining. It could even mean total economic collapse and full-on serfdom for the 99%. Just look at his disastrous economic record in Mass.

      Unfortunately, there are some Obama-haters who will vote for Romney because of 2008–despite the disaster he would bring to our country.

      • janey's avatar janey says:

        Oh, gosh, I hope not. Voting for Romney is practically suicidal for women. Next election and everything would be even more right wing and anti woman and they would be claiming we asked for it.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        I’m not voting Republican until they sweep whatever they’ve got now in office into the sewers.

      • thewizardofroz's avatar thewizardofroz says:

        Everyone has to decide for himself or herself what to do when faced with two really bad choices.

        From my point of view, voting for Obama would be to excuse the fact that he literally stole the nomination from Hillary Clinton and in doing so, stole MY vote. That is, for me, the worst thing a candidate can do. So, I will never forget or forgive.

        As for Romney being “suicidal for women,” to the best of my knowlege, he did not sign a health care bill in Mass. that included a Stupak Amendment or a Stupak executive order.
        .
        Anyone who thinks Obama cares a fig about women hasn’t been paying attention.

        Roz in NJ/NYC

        • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

          I don’t think the issue any more is about Obama caring a fig about women or about the 2008 election. The issue right now is that Romney and the Republicans want to reverse every civil rights advance made in this country. They are defunding planned parenthood, title X, demonizing head start, removing everything from their budget except war and tax giveaways, restricting access to abortion and forcing laws that let women die in childbirth, and basically are sending all the public resources into places where corporations can raid them for profits and gain. If you’re so upset about Obama that you’re going to let that all happen, then there is nothing I can say to you but look at the bigger picture. If you think that’s the kind of thing Hillary Clinton would want you doing, I think you’re sorely mistaken. I’d rather things be different, but we cannot live in 2008 or we risk everything. I’m an independent. I’m livid at the Democrats. But, the last two years have shown us exactly what the Republicans will do because every possible nightmare scenario has been played out some where by one of them. I’m not going to sell out my daughter’s future over a grudge match.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        When Romney has been your governor, like he was BB’s, then I might give a shit what you think about him. But what you think of Obama is your opinion, and you’re welcome to it, but it means nothing to me.

      • northwestrain's avatar northwestrain says:

        I’ve noticed that my female friends & family who have ONLY boy basically do not give a damnable about “women’s ” issues. It is as if the women turned into men with boons.

        I will never ever vote for another penis in the white house. 0bowma did the Stupak dance & is completely untrustworthy worthy. In my state I don’t have to vote for the current woman hating MCP — an even if my vote were critical — . . . .

        One of the major problems with Romney is that he just doesn’t like the 99%. Plus if people really understood the Mormon religion — well Mormon’s are women haters — unless women show submissiveness to males in all things. I’ve never seen so many submissive, repressed women as I have in Utah & Idaho. Somewhere there’s an article about the women in Utah being over medicated with anti depression etc drugs. Which would explain seeing so many zombie like women.

        The SS current scandal — not surprising. More MCP jerks who think with their docks. One guy who was too dammed cheap to pay — and the truth of slime ball behavior leaks out.

        The Patriarchy is to blame.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Secret Service officials bragged about being in Colombia to protect Obama–thus revealing their identities.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/exclusive-secret-service-bragged-about-protecting-obama-while-partying-at-colombian-brothel/

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      If they don’t fire the head of the Secret Service, it would be a big mistake. Sounds like the need to clear out a hornet’s nest there!

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      I remember the Secret Service leaking to the right wing press etc when Clinton was in office. They definitely need a huge house cleaning.

  4. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Another jaw dropper from Willard. Wow, this guy’s really pathetic. Voting for this guy is asking for the right wing shitstorm to hit you in the face.

    TPM: Romney Wows Tea Party With Promise To End Obama’s War On The Rich

  5. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    Defection …

    Georgia lawmaker quits ALEC, calls it ‘radical’ group with ‘dangerous agenda’

    A state senator from Georgia, Nan Orrock (D-Atlanta) has left the American Legislative Exchange Council, the controversial legislative organization better known as ALEC. In a statement to the citizens’ action group Better Georgia, Orrock denounced the group, calling it “radical,” “dangerous” and accused it of “impeding democracy.”

    “As a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council for several years, having joined ALEC with the primary goal of better understanding the corporate-dominated organization, I know first-hand that ALEC is not the innocuous organization it claims to be,” Orrock said.

  6. RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

    funny cat video …

  7. The Rock's avatar The Rock says:

    Great post, BB. That Trumka is deeply disturbed about the Columbian free trade agreement is going to make me sleep better tonite (snark). Very little to add except that the World Bank made a terrible choice in Kim.

    http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/16/news/economy/world-bank-president/index.htm

    My mom knows the lady that he was up against. There was an assasination attempt made on her a few years back when she was on her way to work. A gunman shot a hole through one of her head dresses missing her head by a few inches. She didnt miss a minute of work that day. They were trying to kill her for the reforms she was instituting in Nigeria. A sad day for the world.

    Hillary 2012

  8. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    The Secret Service is investigating Ted Nugent for threats against Obama made in speech to NRA. No one there objected, of course.

    http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/04/17/465855/secret-service-ted-nugent/?mobile=nc