VooDoo Politics
Posted: May 18, 2011 Filed under: 2012 presidential campaign | Tags: Mitch Daniels, Republicans, the return of the House of Bush 22 CommentsAccording to Politico, the GOP “elite” are looking to Mitch Daniels in 2012 to save the Republican party from itself. Excuse me while I laugh. Have you seen Mitch Daniels or actually heard him speak? He may be the most sane person on deck at the moment, but when you’ve spent decades dredging the voting pool for the dim-witted that will believe your made-up tales on things like extreme tax cuts and “clean” coal, you’ve got to figure that eventually one of them or maybe a half dozen of them will decide to run for national office. Remember, this is the man that’s helping the religious right defund Planned Parenthood in Indiana too. I remember when Planned Parenthood was the darling charity of the Republican elite like Babs Bush. This isn’t Nixon’s Republican party any more. It’s more like George Wallace’s.
Despairing Republican lobbyists say their colleagues don’t ask, “Who do you like?” but instead, “Who do we back?”
“It’s not that they’re up in arms,” said a central player in the GOP money machine. “It’s just that they’re depressed.”
And a huge swath of operatives, donors and strategists remain uncommitted, in the hope that the field is not yet set.
So instead of solidifying against the overwhelming force being amassed by Obama’s reelection campaign, the GOP is indulging in an embarrassingly public — and probably futile — search for a more compelling standard-bearer.
They’ve started a war against women so it only figures that two of the standard bearers are two women that don’t know anything about anything but cutsey hyperbole based on wishful thinking. Also, don’t forget what the southern strategy has bought them either. They’ve now developed code words for immigration and civil rights so they don’t sound so much like the Ku Klux Klan. You would think Mitt Romney would have a chance but he’s got two problems. Evangelical Christians think Mormons are a cult and he put the Lincoln Chaffee/Heritage Foundation’s Republican Health Plan into law in Massachusetts. He just can’t seem to get away from the fact that it looks very much like “Obamacare” because they’re basically one and the same. Oh, and look who at the other names coming up with Mitch Daniels.
Two of the nation’s best-known Republicans, in background interviews, predicted this week that Daniels would run, although wishful thinking seems to be at least part of the animating force behind the latest wave of pro-Daniels buzz.
One veteran of several Republican presidential campaigns said party strategists consider Obama beatable and are asking themselves, “How can we beat this guy?”
“People are worried we don’t have the right elements on the field,” the campaign veteran said.
So Republicans are conjuring up far-fetched — even fanciful — scenarios, including the possibility that Jeb Bush will change his mind in late fall if the field still looks weak.
George Will, the conservative columnist, and Bill Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, have openly fantasized about an entry by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). Ryan’s advisers say he is focused instead on his role as a central player in the grand fiscal debate unfolding in Washington.
While these elite Republicans have been amassing their personal fortunes in places like Washington DC and New York City, Grass Roots, Republican activists–like the insane Tea Party Organizers or the ever fanatical RTLers–have been swamping party structures with whackos for years. Any one that’s attended a county or state Republican convention will tell you that most of them are stacked with members from evangelical churches that were told who to vote for by their whack-a-d00 preachers. So, where do Republican elites get the idea that they can use these folks for votes without eventually tarnishing their free-wheeling business agenda with messy candidates? Did they really think they could just sit there and manipulate their dumb right wing activists with promises of another pablum President like Ronald Reagan? These folks are dying to bring down Roe v. Wade and shove the GLBT civil rights movement back into the national closet. They want true believers where it counts.
Gallup Polls shows there is no clear front runner since Huckabee expressed his preference for a life with cash in his wallet.
With Mike Huckabee out of the race for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination, three well-known politicians, Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, and Newt Gingrich, emerge as leaders in Republicans’ preferences. Republicans, however, have less intensely positive feelings about these three than they did about Huckabee. Two less well-known potential candidates, Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain, generate high levels of enthusiasm among Republicans who recognize them.
Each of these Republicans appear to have groupies, but not one of them has enough widespread appeal to break out of the pack. Newt Gingrich is as bombastic as ever. Herman Cain has basically come out of no where so he has no background in what it takes to fund raise, appeal to the shrieking masses, and figure out what he has to say to attract the core voting blocks.
I’d almost like to watch this circus except there is so much at stake right now that it would be nice to have a functional two party system. We have anything but that now.
Steve Benen of the Political Animal explains the nuts and bolts electioneering impact of a donor base made nervous by the current crop of presidential wannabes.
The Republicans’ malaise isn’t just fodder for pundits; it carries real-world consequences. Major donors, activists, and staffers, for example, are waiting on the sidelines, hoping that more compelling candidates will come along. Allen added, “[I]nstead of solidifying against the overwhelming force being amassed by Obama’s reelection campaign, the GOP is indulging in an embarrassingly public — and probably futile — search for a more compelling standard-bearer.”
Party officials are pleading with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R), who has foresworn the possibility. Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) is the subject of a new round of scuttlebutt, but as of yesterday, he’s not running. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) is apparently eyeing 2016. Sarah Palin hasn’t ruled out the race, but by all appearances, the party establishment would much prefer she stay out of it. (Allen said D.C. Republicans are “terrified” that she or a similar insurgent candidate, such as Bachmann, will make matters worse.)
And that leaves Daniels — the former Bush official largely responsible for creating a fiscally irresponsible snowball — to play the role of the rescuing hero. Some of this seems to be the result of affection for Daniels, and some is the result of panic-stricken Republicans surveying the current GOP field.
This puts the President clearly in the cat bird seat even with his polls returning to normal after the OBL kill bounce. It appears it was only a brief vacation from every one’s concern with the lousy economy. Color me unsurprised.
So, yes, the President got a bump and, yes, it was short lived. We suspect that in the end, the impact will be approximately a 3-5 percent bump in approval and corresponding drop in disapproval that puts him somewhere around 50-51 percent approval rating and 43-45 percent disapproval. In addition, perceptions of the President’s handling of foreign policy and Afghanistan have gone up considerably. All in all, a good few weeks for the President.
Unfortunately for the White House, the dominant issue in the country remains the state of the economy, and the news on that front is not nearly as good. Here is our take on the economic situation and the overall political climate leading up to the 2012 elections:
The country remains in a prolonged period of national pessimism that seems at this point to be intractable. The political impact of this cannot be overstated. Six-in-ten Americans think the country is off on the wrong track. According to the Real Clear Politics average of public polls, only 34 percent of voters think the country is going in the right direction.
Meanwhile, both of the political parties refuse to address the real elephant in the room with real solutions. The job market continues to be awful, the housing market is still slumping, and the costs of health care, college, gas and food are high. So, what’s the discussion? It’s all about dismantling medicare and arguing over the nuances of the federal debt ceiling. Way to go elected officials!
This has me all depressed. It’s never been more obvious that our two party system continues to bring to leadership people that are completely out of touch with the realities of the dwindling working and middle class. The dead cat bounce in Tea Party popularity as well as the electorate’s response to the populist Obama campaign message struck the chord. However, both turned out to be astroturf messages and as usual, there’s no place to go.
What’s a voter to do?
Late Night: Chinese put Gallagher’s Act to Shame
Posted: May 18, 2011 Filed under: just because | Tags: exploding chinese watermelons 7 Comments
I’m beginning to get pretty fussy about my food sources. This news item from The Guardian just made me even more so. The picture shows some pretty huge watermelons that look like they just went through a Gallagher show. What happened is much more perverse.
The flying pips, shattered shells and wet shrapnel still haunt farmer Liu Mingsuo after an effort to chemically boost his fruit crop went spectacularly wrong.
Fields of watermelons exploded when he and other agricultural workers in eastern China mistakenly applied forchlorfenuron, a growth accelerator. The incident has become a focus of a Chinese media drive to expose the lax farming practices, shortcuts and excessive use of fertiliser behind a rash of food safety scandals
So, this is a late night open thread because I just had to share this …
Meet PJ Crowley’s Replacement
Posted: May 17, 2011 Filed under: Foreign Affairs | Tags: P.J. Crowley, Victoria Nuland 25 CommentsFP/The Cable’s Josh Rogin reports:
The Cable has confirmed that career Foreign Service officer Victoria “Toria” Nuland will soon be named as the State Department’s top spokesperson, the latest in a string of promotions for senior career officers in Foggy Bottom.
Nuland’s job will somewhat different than her predecessor P.J. Crowley, who resigned after making off-message comments criticizing the Defense Department’s treatment of alleged WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning. Unlike Crowley, Nuland will not be dual-hatted as assistant secretary of State for Public Affairs. Former National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer will be officially named to that job soon, a State Department official confirmed.
Nuland is currently the Special Envoy for the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe. From her bio on the State Department website:
Ambassador Victoria Nuland was named Special Envoy for Conventional Armed Forces in Europe in February 2010. She previously served on the faculty of the National War College (2008-2009).
She was the 18th United States Permanent Representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) from 2005-2008. As NATO Ambassador, she focused heavily on strengthening Allied support for the ISAF mission in Afghanistan, on NATO-Russia issues, and on the Alliance’s global partnerships and continued enlargement.
A career Foreign Service Officer, Ambassador Nuland was Principal Deputy National Security Advisor to the Vice President from 2003-2005, and the U.S. Deputy Permanent Representative to NATO from 2000- 2003. From 1997-1999, she was Deputy Director for former Soviet Union affairs at the Department of State, with primary responsibility for U.S. policy towards Russia and the Caucasus countries. She has also spent two years at the Council on Foreign Relations as a “Next Generation” Fellow looking at the effects of anti-Americanism in 1999-2000, and as a State Department Fellow in 1996-1997, when she directed a CFR task force on “Russia, its Neighbors and an Expanding NATO.”
“Toria is very skilled and talented and will do very well here,” one denizen of the State Department’s “executive level” seventh floor said, noting that given Nuland’s ties to GOP circles – her husband is Brookings foreign policy scholar and Washington Post columnist Robert Kagan, and she previously served as an adviser to Cheney — “who better…to aggressively defend the Administration’s foreign policy?”
That paragraph struck me as very telling, especially since this is the person the Obama Administration is replacing PJ Crowley with.
Just as an aside, Robert Kagan and Bill Kristol were co-founders of the now defunct neocon think tank PNAC, which BTW has morphed into the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI). Nuland herself was one of Cheney’s top policy advisors.
I think the noises out of the seventh floor touting all this GOP cred is interesting given the clueless class and their recent and utterly baffling hope that Obama will have incentive to move left now that he’s captured Osama. See tristero’s reaction to OBL’s death:
If ever there was a time that Obama could be persuaded to pursue even a moderately liberal agenda – as opposed to a (roughly) centrist/right one – that time is now.
More on Nuland from the FP/Rogin link that I started out with:
During the first term of Bill Clinton‘s administration, she was chief of staff to Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott and then moved on to serve as deputy director for former Soviet Union affairs.
In an interview, Talbott, now president of the Brookings Institution, praised Nuland as a consummate professional who proved that Foreign Service officers could be trusted to put professionalism over politics.
Talbott says Nuland is dedicated to whatever Administration she works for. Being as dedicated to Bush and then to Obama as she was to Clinton is not something I really consider a selling point:
“Her appointment demonstrates that Secretary Clinton has, quite rightly, an extremely high estimation of the value and confidence in the Foreign Service,” Talbott said, “The more use that’s made of the foreign policy civil service and the Foreign Service, the better.”
He noted Nuland’s public role as the U.S. envoy to NATO as evidence she can handle the spotlight and highlighted her roles across several administrations as evidence of her apolitical nature.
“She has a high degree of self confidence and an absolute dedication to working for the administration she is working for, whatever administration that is,” Talbot said.
Perhaps Nuland is more of an independent career foreign servant than an ideological type, but this appointment, combined with the trumpeting of Nuland’s GOP ties to say “who better to aggressively defend the Administration’s foreign policy” strikes me as part of a pattern of the Administration playing to the the right-wing after “Obama killed Osama” was supposed to have given Obama the national security trump card and assorted Democrats and progressives spoke of it as if this would give Democrats/progressives the national security trump card.
As usual, I think the left made the mistake of confusing victories and trump cards for Obama as victories and trump cards for the left. I don’t know how they expected Obama to move to the left on anything, when it seemed plain as day to me that he had all the more incentive to move to the right on everything from national security and foreign policy to drill, baby, drill.
Any thoughts?









Recent Comments